User talk:Usien
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Babel user information | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Users by language |
Zirkus Krone
Hallo Usien, stecke Deine Bilder vom Zirkus Krone doch bitte in Category:Circus Krone (statt Category:Circus). Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 10:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Žmuidzinavičius Museum
Hallo Usien, ich habe inzwischen das ganze Museum mit Category:Devils versehen. Für jedes einzelne Bild ist das nun nicht mehr notwendig, es reicht jeweils Category:Žmuidzinavičius Museum. -- Ies (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
danke--Usien (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Галерија на богатствата на Хорјуџи.JPG was uncategorized on 14 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Bega noaptea in Timisoara Podul Tineretii.JPG was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Muenchen alter sendlinger friedhof Schwanthaler.jpg was uncategorized on 21 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Feuerwehreinsatz in Puchheim an einer Autowerkstatt 005.JPG was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Ich habe das Bild nur bearbeitet, weil es technisch gesehen Fehler aufwies. Da ich nicht mal weiß was das Bild darstellt, und schon gar kein russisch lesen kann, kann ich es auch nicht in eine Kategorie einordnen. Du musst dich da an die Person wenden, die das Bild als erster hochgeladen hat. --Usien (talk) 12:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
hierfür. :) --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Elektrofahrzeug_der_Firma_Still.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stillgmbh (talk) 11:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Hallo!
Sag mal, warst du auf dem Oktoberfest? Nur dort kann man solche Aufnahmen machen. --High Contrast (talk) 11:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Stimmt, hier wird eben mal die andre Seite des Festes gezeigt. --Usien (talk) 14:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Erdinger_Weissbier_Schneeweisse_Weihnachtsbier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:25, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Hacker-Pschorr_Weihnachtsbier_Superior_Festbier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Kulmbacher_Brauerei_Moenchshof_Weihnachsbier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Weihnachtsbier_Festbier_Hofbraeu_Muenchen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Beer_bottles has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Löwenbräu usw.
Hallo Usien, stecke Bayrische Biere wie hier das Löwenbräu doch bitte gleich unter Category:Beers of Bavaria (statt Category:Beers of Germany). Übrigens: es ist schon eine äußerst seltsame Idee, einzelne Bilder von Bierflachen wegen Copivio löschen zu wollen. Wenn einzelne Bierflaschen, dann alle Bierflaschen, dann alle etikettierten oder bedruckten Flaschen, dann alle etikettierten oder bedruckten Lebensmittelverpackungen... -- Ies (talk) 12:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Categorie geändert. Danke für den Hinweis. --Usien (talk) 13:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Nachdem jetzt doch zumindest eine Datei gelöscht wurde, habe ich auf Commons:Forum verlinkt. --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Removing DR template
Please do not remove {{Delete}} templates before the discussion is closed as you did at Beer bottles. It may be that the discussion will be closed as a keep, for German bottles, at least, but it is a serious violation of our rules to simply remove the template before an Admin has made that decision. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Was kann ich dafür, wenn ein Admin so falsch liegt. Vielleicht sollten Admins bessere Kenntnisse über das Urheberrecht haben. --Usien (talk) 21:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- [Machine translation:]What I can if an Admin so incorrectly lies. Perhaps Admins should have better knowledge of the copyright [machine translation ends].
- Certainly you cannot expect any of us, Admin or not, to fully understand the details of copyright law in the 100+ countries which Commons follows? These bottles would clearly be a copyvio in almost all of those countries. The DR discussion is intended to determine whether German law is sufficiently different to allow them to remain. Your opinion matters, but it is not the only one that matters. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- I stopped the beer bottle project. It makes little fun and too much trouble.--Usien (talk) 16:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's a mistake -- please don't -- if it turns out that German law permits it, then it's a great gallery for those of us who envy the great variety of German beers. We need a German speaking expert to take a close look at the law. That will happen, although maybe not quickly. Don't take a DR as being opposed to the image or gallery -- or as a personal thing -- as an Admin, I can be very interested in the image or gallery, but I must obey the law, or, as in this case, suggest that others look at it closely and see what the law is. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Think! This gallery is very special demands on the photographer. After the photos you have to be drink all the beer. ;-) --Usien (talk) 18:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Send it to me -- I can do it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Think! This gallery is very special demands on the photographer. After the photos you have to be drink all the beer. ;-) --Usien (talk) 18:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's a mistake -- please don't -- if it turns out that German law permits it, then it's a great gallery for those of us who envy the great variety of German beers. We need a German speaking expert to take a close look at the law. That will happen, although maybe not quickly. Don't take a DR as being opposed to the image or gallery -- or as a personal thing -- as an Admin, I can be very interested in the image or gallery, but I must obey the law, or, as in this case, suggest that others look at it closely and see what the law is. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- I stopped the beer bottle project. It makes little fun and too much trouble.--Usien (talk) 16:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Certainly you cannot expect any of us, Admin or not, to fully understand the details of copyright law in the 100+ countries which Commons follows? These bottles would clearly be a copyvio in almost all of those countries. The DR discussion is intended to determine whether German law is sufficiently different to allow them to remain. Your opinion matters, but it is not the only one that matters. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hatte die Lizenz eingebunden, beim Hochladen gabs Probleme und dabei ging die Lizenz verloren, nun ist sie wieder drin. --Usien (talk) 17:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
too small version
Hello, thanks for improving File:Willem-Jan Holsboer in Heimatmuseum Davos.JPG. But you made it too small; a picture taken frontally (but with terrible reflections, therefore useless) has proportions Height-broadness 1:0,87. Can you broaden your version to that ratio? Thanks, --Havang(nl) (talk) 13:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- The image was previously unusable. Now it can be used in articles. I can not make more out of the picture. The basic version is not mine. --Usien (talk) 13:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Deine Nachbearbeitung hat die Bildproportionen komplett verzerrt. Betrachtet man das perspektivische Original, ist die Bildbreite grösser als dessen Höhe, mindestens aber quadratisch. Weshalb diese extreme Verzerrung? Der Porträtierte wirkt komplett unnatürlich. -- Хрюша ?? 13:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wie kan mann das fast quadratisch richtig form geben? --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Eine Idee liegt hier, aber ich kann das nicht entrauschen. Finale Runde für Usien ;0}. -- Хрюша ?? 14:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Danke, das ist die richtige Forme. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Noch ein Hinweis für künftige Fotos: Wenn du zur Vermeidung von Spiegelungen Aufnahmen leicht seitlich machst, wähle den Ausschnitt gross genug, dann muss man beim Entzerren den Rahmen nicht beschneiden. Und als Referenz für die Proportionen trotz Reflexen noch eine Frontalsicht. -- Хрюша ?? 15:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Jawohl;heute achte ich darauf, aber 2006 war ich noch nicht actif auf Wikipedia.--Havang(nl) (talk) 17:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Noch ein Hinweis für künftige Fotos: Wenn du zur Vermeidung von Spiegelungen Aufnahmen leicht seitlich machst, wähle den Ausschnitt gross genug, dann muss man beim Entzerren den Rahmen nicht beschneiden. Und als Referenz für die Proportionen trotz Reflexen noch eine Frontalsicht. -- Хрюша ?? 15:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Danke, das ist die richtige Forme. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Eine Idee liegt hier, aber ich kann das nicht entrauschen. Finale Runde für Usien ;0}. -- Хрюша ?? 14:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wie kan mann das fast quadratisch richtig form geben? --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Deine Nachbearbeitung hat die Bildproportionen komplett verzerrt. Betrachtet man das perspektivische Original, ist die Bildbreite grösser als dessen Höhe, mindestens aber quadratisch. Weshalb diese extreme Verzerrung? Der Porträtierte wirkt komplett unnatürlich. -- Хрюша ?? 13:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Tractor Belarus Schneeraumer Riga Flughafen.JPG
Hi! Would it be alright if you added an English description to File:Tractor Belarus Schneeraumer Riga Flughafen.JPG? I want then put it on a Translation request to Latvian, since this is at Riga Airport.
English translation added.--Usien (talk) 11:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :) WhisperToMe (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Eiskarte_Italien.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 22:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Sitzender Keiler Muenchen.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sitzender Keiler Muenchen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 20:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I make the picture. --Usien (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Litfaßsäule_Muenchen_Westendstrasse.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eingangskontrolle (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Fahndungsplakat_NSU.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.103.174 15:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Strip auf Peugeot two girls.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Tarahumara Mädchen.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tarahumara Mädchen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 18:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Soweit ich das verstanden habe, habe ich das nötige Eingefügt. Das Bild kommt aus Wikipedia Deutschland und ich habe es für Wikinews benötigt. --Usien (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Rechtschreibfehler in Straßenkategorien
Hallo Usien, Straße schreibt man immer noch mit ß und nicht ss, also auch Bodenehrstraße, Kidlerstraße usw. Bitte korrigieren. Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 06:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Vielleicht findest du gelegentlich mal Zeit, auf diesen Hinweis zu antworten? Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ich gehe davon aus, dass der englische Zeichensatz hier verwendet wird und der kennt kein "ß"--Usien (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Nein, man darf in Kategorien ß verwenden, schau einfach mal bei anderen Straßenkategorien nach: Category:Streets in Munich by district. Das Problem ist, dass man, wenn man nach Hansastraße sucht, Hansastrasse nicht findet. Außerdem: Da es in Deutschland sicher ein Dutzend Hansastraßen gibt, nennst du die Kategorie besser Hansastraße in Munich. Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 14:07, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Strip auf Peugeot two girls.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blue Fox xyz (talk) 10:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Bahnhof Pasing
Bedanke mich f. das Bild vom Bahnhof Pasing vom März 2012. Wie die den Vorplatz vollgepfercht haben, da hat's mich durchgeschüttelt. Liebe Grüße. OAlexander (talk) 11:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Super, finde es schon auch mal einen Dank zu hören. Ging mir übrigens genauso. --Usien Max (talk) 21:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Polizeibeamter
Hallo, ist denn gesichert, dass das momentane Seitenbild von de:Spezialeinsatzkommando (File:SEK_Mann_auf_dem_Dach_des_Hotels_Bayrischer_Hof_in_Munich.JPG) einen SEK-Beamten zeigt? Nach Ausrüstung und Verwendung würde ich nicht ausschließen wollen, dass das einfach nur einen frierenden Bereitschaftspolizisten zeigt. --Rudolph Buch (Diskussion) 16:21, 14. Aug. 2012 (CEST)
- Frag mal User:Usien--Sanandros 18:33, 14. Aug. 2012 (CEST)
- Somit getan :-) --Rudolph Buch (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Bild ist von mir gemacht und ich versichere, dass es einer ist. --Usien Max (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Somit getan :-) --Rudolph Buch (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jimi Blue Ochsenknecht 02 Oktoberfest 2012 mit Freundin.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jimi Blue Ochsenknecht 02 Oktoberfest 2012 mit Freundin.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 12:00, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Strip auf Peugeot two girls.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Baloo1000 (talk) 08:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I am trying to understand exacty which competition is this one, looking at http://www.alpenverein.de/Wettkampf/Klettern-Bouldern-Speedklettern/Termine-Ergebnisse/ for giving the category the right name. DAV Calendar doesn't show a competition in Munich in 22.07.2012. Could you give me some more information? a web site for example?. Thanks in advance. --Rotpunkt (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- I found this one: http://www.alpenverein.de/wettkampf/muenchner-kletter-stadtmeisterschaft_aid_11281.html However it seems a local/regional competition, instead using the name "10th Climbing Championships in Munich" seems a national competition. I will try to find the correct name. I have also moved the two images in Category:9th Climbing Championships in Munich to Category:European Youth Series Munich 2009 because in this case the name was wrong at all. Cya. --Rotpunkt (talk) 15:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi I have read more here (http://kletterszene.com/news/die-10-munchner-jubilaums-stadtmeisterschaft-findet-am-21-7-statt-ankundigung/). I don't speak german, however the translation for Stadtmeisterschaft could be "City championship" (is it right?). It's really a local competition, not listed on alpenverein.de calendar. Calling the categories "Climbing Championships in Munich" is a bit wrong for me, it seems a national/international competition. Could be something like: "Munich city championship - climbing". --Rotpunkt (talk) 00:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
[[1]] I dont know. Perhaps helps the link. I guess it's just an event in the amateurs can sign out among themselves who Climb best. --Usien Max (talk) 15:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- 10th Championships, the plural s is too much. What about Category:10th Munich Climbing Championship, 2012 ? --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Bernd Burgemeister Fernsehpreis 2012 Jurymitglied Andreas Schreitmüller.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andreperso (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Sommertollwood 201254 Idaho Michael Guppenberger an der Gitarre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Michael.Guppenberger (talk) 06:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Bernd Bürgermeister Fehrnsehpreis Produzentin Siegerfilm Gefährliche Patienten sind Uli Putz.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
62.245.250.185 06:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Die Bildbeschreibung ist wohl beim Upload verlorengegangen, bitte hinzufügen. --Denniss (talk) 11:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Bitte schau mal ob es jetzt geht. --Denniss (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
What kind of attribution do you require for using this picture? I'm considering using it in a schoolbook, at about 4 cm x 3 cm size on the printed page.
- Hello, its no problem.
attribution
- Image: CC-BY-SA Usien
OK, thanks. Zbrntt (talk) 12:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 007 Westfriedhof Munich Grab Rosen auf einem Grab.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Granny in Albania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gabriele Weishaeupl Oktoberfest-Chefin und Michael Harles Fernsehmoderator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Munich BMW Vierzylinder.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 030 Vesakh in Munich 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 007 Pferd beim Trinken an einem Kanal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hauskatze an einem Scheunenfenster in Grossarl.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:Aufhofener Weiher.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aufhofener Weiher.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ww2censor (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Heiligenfigur in der Kapelle im Hafen von Malinska mit Fuck Finger.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Mar(c). 22:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 22:01
- F...- Humor is when you laugh anyway --Usien Max (talk) 16:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Christian Pfeiffer 002 2014 Juli.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Speisekarte aus Kroatien Malinska.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 08:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Speisekarte aus Kroatien Malinska.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A.Savin 23:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roseceae Beet Rose Planeten on Blomen Zuechter Kordes 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hallo Usien, dieses Foto ist m.E. problematisch. Nach deutscher Rechtsprechung zum Recht am eigenen Bild liegt der Tatbestand "identifizierbar" bereits vor, wenn jemand, der die betreffende Person kennt, sie auf dem Bild identifizieren kann. Aufgrund des sichtbaren Schultertatoos dürfte das hier gegeben sein. Hinzu kommt, dass du die Person durch den gewählten Dateinamen als "betrunken" abgestempelt hast. Ich würde dir empfehlen, die Löschung zu beantragen, im Interesse der Frau und in deinem eigenen (Haftungsrisiko). --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
File:013 Kirche von Fushe Kuqe.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HH Hafen Kontainerbruecken Sonnenuntergang 2015-03-23 19-55-39 - 0045.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Menue Speisekarte Oktoberfest Schottenhammel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 10:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Augustiner Edelstoff.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Krd 13:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Abkuehlphase nach Saunagang.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 09:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Vomiting Erbrechen drunk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wild lebender Hund in Bosnien.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Striptease auf einem Peugeot zwei Pornostars.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fixpol (talk) 13:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Nutzungserlaubnis Foto
Hallo Usien,
ich arbeite für das "Museum Mensch und Natur" in München und habe eine kurze Frage bezüglich eines deiner Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Botanischer_Garten_Muenchen_Gew%C3%A4chsh%C3%A4user.JPG
Das "Museum Mensch und Natur" ist Teil der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns. Das Museum wird in den kommenden Jahren erweitert und wir arbeiten derzeit an einer Broschüre, die über den Umbau und das neue Konzept des Museums informieren soll. Die Broschüre wird nicht verkauft, sondern nur an mögliche Projektpartner und -unterstützer weitergegeben, sowie in PDF-Format auf der Website des Museums verfügbar sein.
Das oben erwähnte Foto wäre zur inhaltlichen Illustration des Projektes sehr gut geeignet und wir möchten hiermit gerne anfragen, ob wir das Bild in der Broschüre verwenden könnten. Natürlich würden wir die Quelle des Bildes mit einem entsprechenden Bildnachweis versehen.
Weitere Informationen zum Projekt finden Sie auf der Website www.namu-bayern.de. Ich würde mich sehr über eine Antwort an folgende Emailadresse freuen: braun@namu-bayern.de
Vielen Dank und beste Grüße, Verena Braun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verena Braun (talk • contribs) 21:37, 03 July 2016 (UTC)
- Klar kann das Foto verwendet werden. --Usien Max (talk) 20:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Bettlerin an einer Kirche, Begging women Muenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Coyote III (talk) 05:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Nachtrag: "nach einer 'Spende' mit dem Foto einverstanden": die Frauen, die dort an der Kirche sitzen, befinden sich in einer Zwangssituation. Sie sind bettelarm (!) und werden möglicherweise auch gezwungen, dort um Geld zu bitten. Da halte ich 'einverstanden' für etwas abenteuerlich. An genau der Stelle, die du fotografiert hast, war eine Frau gegen eine größere Spende meinerseits zu ganz anderem noch bereit.
- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Coyote III (talk) 08:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)