User talk:Croquant

Image:Baybayin O-U.PNG and other

Thank you for uploading files on Commons.

Please add author/source info. You could use {{GFDL-self}} for your own files for this purpose.

Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:Baybayin letters.

Please note that SVG is better format for such kind of images.

EugeneZelenko 16:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SVG editor

You could try Inkscape. --EugeneZelenko 16:50, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flux_compression_2.png

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore 16:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just forgot the licence; it's OK now. Croquant 18:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flux_compression_3.png

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore 17:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See previous message. Croquant 18:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Location_of_Guangzhou_within_Guangdong_(China).png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Location_of_Guangzhou_within_Guangdong_(China).png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Croquant 21:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MapofLhasa.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:MapofLhasa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fred J 14:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong images

The Hong Kong images look great. Are they done now? Badagnani 07:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coup de main

Bonjour Croquant. Un plaisir de vous recroiser (la dernière fois, c'était il y a un an sur le front JPPesque). Je vois que vous avez pas mal de liens rouges. Si vous avez des difficulté à comprendre ce qu'on reproche à vos images, ou à les rendre "conformes" à la politique de Commons, n'hésitez pas à faire appel à moi, j'ai élu domicile ici et je commence à bien en connaître les usages. Je vois par exemple que vous avez tenté d'effacer une image en blanchissant sa page de description au lieu de placer un bandeau {{Bad name}} dessus. Cordialement. — Xavier, 17:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Nos messages se sont croisés. La probabilité que deux images de si petite taille (473 octets), et représentant quelque chose de cohérent à l'œil, aient le même checksum SHA1 (160 bits) est plusieurs milliers de fois inférieure à vos chances de gagner au loto. La probabilité que Google m'affiche l'image de Ta lorsque je demande Wa est du même ordre de grandeur, tout comme celle qu'un utilisateur ait de surcroît placé un bandeau comme quoi Ta.svg pouvait désormais se substituer Wa.PNG. Je crois qu'il est infiniment plus probable que vous vous soyez trompé en écrasant Image:Baybayin Wa.PNG. :-) — Xavier, 18:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

La source de Image:Baybayin Wa.PNG, ce n'est pas Image:Baybayin_alpha.jpg plutôt que en:Image:Baybayin sample 02.jpg ? — Xavier, 18:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I reuse or modify your work?

Croquant,

Do you mind me copying your Guangdong map style for other maps of Chinese provinces? Can I copy the China country background element as well? Thanks! Mrfish33 09:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Candes St Martin - France.jpg, Image:La Loire - Beaugency - France.jpg

Bonjour Bapti,

Je viens de vérifier la licence sur le site de l'auteur : c'est une Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic, et c'était donc une erreur de ma part de les avoir importées. Tu peux les supprimer. Désolé. Croquant (talk) 18:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Croquant,

Désolé à mon tour de ne pas t'avoir laissé de message : j'ai signalé cette absence de permissions pour les images de ce site sans m'apercevoir que plusieurs contributeurs différents en avait importés sur Commons.

Je supprime les images en tout cas ^^

Bonne continuation--Bapti ✉ 10:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Cat

Salut,

Peut-être que j'arrive trop tard, mais un outil peut t'aider à travailler sur les catégories :)

Tu peux activer Hot Cat dans Préférences > Gadgets > Outils pour les catégories > Hot Cat. C'est très efficace !

Cordialement--Bapti ✉ 20:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Bapti,

Merci de ton conseil : ça peut en effet m'être utile. Ce qui est dommage, c'est qu'il ne crée pas lui-même les catégories manquantes (c'est ce qui me demande le plus de temps), mais on ne peut pas tout avoir... Croquant (talk) 06:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heureusement à vrai dire qu'il ne créé pas des catégories toute seules... car les catégories doivent être elles-même être catégorisées (donc une minimum de jugeotte humaine est nécessaire...) Mais le script permet la encore d'aller plus vite pour créer la catégorie proprement dite.--Bapti ✉ 20:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 52f6396e5e84d8091ea2f9844493c94d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Clermont-Ferrand station.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Clermont-Ferrand station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 14:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oerlikon in Paris.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Oerlikon in Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RER A à Nation.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:RER A à Nation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renommage d'images

Bonjour,

Tu fais maintenant partie des utilisateurs de confiance pour le renommage d'images.

Pour renommer une image, ajoutes-y le code {{rename|Nouveau nom.jpg|Motivation (facultative)}}, sans le préfixe "Image:". Attention, le nouveau nom ne peut pas comporter de barre oblique "/" sans quoi le robot plante. Attention à bien garder la même extension !
Le robot tourne environ une fois par semaine. Si le nouveau nom est valide (pas utilisé), et que personne n'a modifié l'image depuis, l'image sera ré-importée avec son nouveau nom par le robot, en préservant l'historique.
Une fois l'image ré-importée, va sur la page User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands et ajoutes le code {{universal replace|Ancien nom.jpg|Nouveau nom.jpg|reason=Image renamed}} à la fin, et un autre bot passera sur les différents wikis pour corriger les liens. Après quoi un admin supprimera l'ancienne image.

Note bien qu'il n'y a pas de règle de nommage sur Commons : autrement dit, tu ne dois pas renommer une image "parce que ça te plait mieux comme ça", mais uniquement pour corriger les erreurs manifestes : erreurs d'orthographe, nom trop générique comme "DSCN1234.JPG" ou incompréhensible comme "KR-00-n25.jpg", ou différence entre le nom et l'image (par exemple "Tour Eiffel" quand il s'agit de Notre Dame). Voir notamment Commons:Language policy#Name of files. Tu peux t'attaquer à Category:Media renaming requests needing confirmation et Category:Media renaming requests needing target pour commencer !

Et enfin, pour utiliser ça, on peut aussi être admin... donc n'hésites pas à demander les droits d'admin sur Commons ! Il suffit en gros de 200-300 contributions (images ou texte), de savoir où trouver les pages essentielles (Commons:Règles et recommandations et surtout COM:APL), et les modèles de suppression (Commons:Guide de suppression). C'est pas très compliqué, sans obligations, et ça simplifie le travail des autres admins ! Donc n'hésites pas :-)

Merci, le Korrigan →bla 22:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cirque_A.Zavatta.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Cirque_A.Zavatta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

D-Kuru (talk) 12:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images Efcuse

Salut Croquant, je vois que tu corriges toutes les catégorisations de mes images, c'est un travail énorme et je t'en remercie beaucoup, c'est super et très sympa. Il faut dire que j'ai toujours un peu de mal avec la catégorisation (comme tu peux voir !) ; pourrais-tu me dire où je peux trouver "l'organigramme" des catégories pour pouvoir faire un choix. Les systèmes automatiques ne sont pas - à mon sens - très ergonomiques. Merci encore pour tout, Efcuse (talk) 10:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, merci de ta réponse rapide. Bon, je crois que je fais comme toi, faudra simplement que je fasse un peu plus attention... Au grand plaisir de te retrouver à une prochaine occasion, Efcuse (talk) 15:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HivaOa Atuona 20061110.JPG

Bonjour Croquant,

Je te laisse ce message car cela fait deux fois que tu dé-catégorise l'image en question de la catégorie Category:Cities and villages in French Polynesia. C'est de ma faute, j'aurais dû t'écrire dès la première fois le pourquoi des deux catégories de cette photo, ça aurait évité ce chassé-croisé.
Hiva Oa n'est pas un village, c'est une île. On ne peut pas la catégoriser comme "Cities and villages in French Polynesia", ça reviendrait à catégoriser la Corse dans "Cities and villages in France". Atuona, en revanche, est bien un village de Polynésie (d'où la catégorie "Cities and villages in French Polynesia"), situé sur l'île de Hiva Oa (d'où la catégorie "Hiva Oa"). Comme cette photo montre une vue de Atuona, elle a bien sa place dans les deux catégories.
Pour la même raison, j'ai enlevé la catégorie "Hiva Oa" de la catégorie "Cities and villages in French Polynesia".

Sémhur (talk) 15:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ça me paraît bon. L'île faisant partie de la commune, la catégorie "Hiva Oa" peut faire partie de la catégorie "Hiva Oa (Commune)", ainsi que de "Marquesas Islands". Il est vrai que "Cities and villages" n'est pas la même chose que "Commune", mais il existe tellement d'entités territoriales administratives dans le monde que ça deviendrait vite ingérable si on devait les mettre toutes. Donc ce que tu as fait me semble le mieux, à savoir mettre la catégorie "Commune" dans "Cities and villages". Sémhur (talk) 18:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorisation (barbarisme commode)

Merci d'avoir ajouté des catégories à mes photos des alentours de Grenoble. Evpok (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vos photos faites à Sceaux

J'ai utilisé votre reportage au "Jardin des Félibres" de Sceaux pour construire une gallery dans l'article français "Félibrige" [1]. J'espère que cela vous plaira... merci. Siren-Com (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

remerciement

Merci pour avoir catégorisé mes photos.Crochet.david (talk) 20:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Croquant!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vierzon canal de Berry 2 001.jpg is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Costa Rica provinces, blank.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Plan et profil au naturel de la ville d'Orleans.jpg was uncategorized on 11 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adon château 2.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Adon château 1.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

File:CP Châteaurenard château.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

File:CP Châteaurenard canal.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

File:CP Châteaurenard avenue de la Gare.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Photos du Loiret

Bravo pour vos photos du Loiret! J'aime beaucoup celle du jardin de la mairie à Saint-Jean-de-Braye et celle de la place de République à Orléans (un des lieux que je préfère dans cette ville). J'ai ajouté 2 photos sur l'article de Saint Jean de Braye (c'est mon premier ajout d'illustration sur wikipedia!), j'ai également des photographies personnelles à intégrer à Commons puis à Wikipedia, pour Saint Jean de Braye et ailleurs... Mélanie Huguet (talk) 01:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, suite à ta proposition d'aide, je veux bien être éclairée sur le choix des licences. Si je comprends bien, les 2 licences que tu utilises permettent de réutiliser les images dans Wikipédia (qui donne le lien vers le site Commons avec les droits de l'image), autrement il faut ajouter la licence et la source, c'est bien cela? Au début, je pensais à la licence libre, mais apparemment cela permet une utilisation commerciale des photos (carte - postales...)? Merci d'avance!--Mélanie Huguet (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abbaye du Bec - Tour S Nicolas nuit.jpg

Merci beaucoup Croquant pour la "catégorisation", j'avais oublié je crois...

Bonne semaine, Efcuse (talk) 10:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Formes d'ondes

File:Formes d'ondes.png

Encore moi avec un "Au secours" !!

J'ai uploadé Formes d'ondes.png avec une phaute d'orthographe. Donc correction et... impossible de remplacer depuis vendredi, le système me dit qu'il n'y a pas d'extension (genre .jpg) à mon fichier... Tu es au courant de ce problème ? Y'a une astuce ?

Mille mercis, Efcuse (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remerciements

Merci Croquant d'avoir corrigé le code d'image de ma page sur Arbin. Je débute dans cette "usine à gaz". Michel Terrier (en Savoie dans le village d'Arbin).

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nanjing_China.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nanjing_China.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Samulili (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

categorie

coucou,

J'ai vu que tu étais passé sur une grande partie de mes images pour créer et mettre des catégories (ville du pas de calais). T'as du bien te faire suer. En tous cas bon boulot. Merci a+ Chatsam (talk) 21:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oui oui. Rien que pour le pas de calais il y a trois mois de travail et je suis sadique car je continue avec les Ardennes. Je ne dois pas être loin du millier. a+ Chatsam (talk) 19:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie "Château-Rocher"

Bonjour, je te remercie d'avoir classé les photos que j'avais oubliées de catégoriser. Cordialement, Matth97 (talk) 14:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Images Rivières des Pyrénées

Merci pour : Oussouet (près fontaine de labassère) 2009-05-23.png Pourrais-tu regarder :Adour_de_lesponne_(Chiroulet)_2009-05-09.png c'est pas catégorisé pareil... enfin, j'y comprends rien a ces catégories --Gfa(fr.wiki) (talk) 11:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crypte Saint André, Mortagne au Perche

Bonjour, Sauf erreur de ma part, il s'agit bien de deux choses différentes.... Je n'avais effectivement pas ajouté de catégories, mais celle là n'est à mon avis pas correcte. Cordialement --Sedme (talk)

French buildings

You are welcome! I am not an administrator on FR. Am I still allowed to upload fair use images? If so, how? Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories

Merci d'avoir ajouté la catégorie à mon image "File:Belgodere-Centre village.jpg". Mais comment se fait-il que les catégories que j'écris (ou choisis) lors de l'importation d'une image, n'apparaissent pas une fois celle-ci téléchargée ? Je dois chaque fois modifier l'image téléchargée en réinscrivant la (les) catégorie(s) pour les voir apparaitre. Merci de me répondre. PierreB (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallue river

pourriez-vous m'expliquer le pourquoi du revert dans la Category:Hallue river de la category:Rivers of France by name en date du 17 octobre 2009 ? --Philippe rogez (talk) 21:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Renommage de catégorie

Bonjour,

Tu as déplacé la catégorie Monument Historique vers Cultural heritage monuments in France aujourd'hui. Que je sache, on n'était pas arrivé à un consensus sur la page de discussion. Je ne suis pas d'accord avec cette dénomination qui ne décrit pas le contenu, j'ai déjà expliqué mes arguments contre cette « traduction » de l'intitulé qui n'en est pas une.

Cordialement, Coyau (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour ta réponse. La discussion durait depuis longtemps, et tout le monde a oublié le bandeau, même quand on l'a relancée dernièrement. Si les monuments historiques en photo t'intéressent, il y a le relativement nouveau Commons:Projet Monuments Historiques français. Cordialement, Coyau (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monument historique à Louresse-Rochemenier

Bonsoir Croquant. J'ai rectifié la notice Mérimée erronée que tu as saisie pour la Category:Église Sainte-Madeleine et Saint-Jean (Rochemenier). En effet, cette catégorie concerne l'église de Rochemenier (Mérimée PA00109160 et IA00033304), construite après la ruine de l'ancienne église du même nom au lieu-dit Varenne (PA00109161 et IA00033284). Fais attention si tu traites des catégories ou des photos dont tu n'es pas à l'origine et prends le temps de passer d'abord en revue la totalité des notices Mérimée de la commune avant de valider. Merci d'avance. Cordialement. --Père Igor (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orléans station Vélo+ place Louis XI.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Anglet / Angelu

Why did you make such a change when we were discussing it? You only waited two days for a reply. That's not polite. I ask you to leave it as it was, so as to continue talking about it.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your change being not acceptable, as I explained in the discussion page, there is no reason to wait. Croquant (talk) 18:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not acceptable? Why? Because you decided it?--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 18:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Names must be the shortest possible" is one of the rules for naming articles and categories. You did not follow this rule. Croquant (talk) 18:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK! Then you argued one rule in the talk page, you didn't wait for a reply, and now you say you followed another rule... that's not serious. Please leave it as it was, and we can continue talking in it's talk page.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 18:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Name must be the shortest possible"... Solution: There´s no shortest name that "Angelu", isn´t it? --Euskalduna 20:20, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Your action it's completely unacceptable. I know this place as Angelu, an not as Anglet (despite I know that both names are equally used). -Theklan (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Croquant, please, see the larger context at Category talk:Saint-Jean-Pied-de-Port, where Anglet / Angelu is mentioned also. --Havang(nl) (talk) 21:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Viaduc de la Maine (7).jpg

Bonjour, cette photo est bien libre de droit et l'auteur est averti et d'accord pour qu'elle soit publiée sur wikimédia (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Glabb) (cf photos structurae)

Pour la permission, il ne s'agit que des conditions structurae, recopiées mais exécutées. --Glabb (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sinon, merci pour avoir catégorisé les photos du Viaduc de la Romme, je me charge de recatégoriser toutes les photos que j'ai mis sur commons (des heures de boulot en perspective ...)--Glabb (talk) 19:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocage

Salut,

En effet, je me suis un peu emmêlé dans les dates. J'ai débloqué cet utilisateur mais, suite à ce message de LPLT, je pense qu'il y a du ménage à faire dans ses contribs. Cdlt, Pymouss Let’s talk - 13:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai commencé à supprimer ses chargements pour motif de copyvio, mais, comme je ne dispose pas trop de temps en ce moment (et d'une connexion pas fameuse), je n'aurais rien contre un coup de main :) Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Hello. I just wanted to inform you that I have given you Autopatrolled rights. This does not affect your editing, but makes it easier for users watching Special:RecentChanges to find unhelpful edits. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:La_station_art_nouveau_de_la_porte_Dauphine_(Hector_Guimard).jpg

File:La_station_art_nouveau_de_la_porte_Dauphine_(Hector_Guimard).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hektor (talk) 13:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sceaux_Félibres_Paul_Mariéton_2.jpg

File:Sceaux_Félibres_Paul_Mariéton_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 12:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sceaux_Félibres_Paul_Mariéton_1.jpg

File:Sceaux_Félibres_Paul_Mariéton_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 12:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Œuvres du studio Harcourt

Salut Croquant,

Je te félicite de ta vigilance concernant les photos versées par User:Studio Harcourt et je pense en effet qu'il faut être très prudent quand il s'agit des photos d'un tel studio. Cependant, à l’examen des données EXIF des photos téléversées, je pense que nous avons de bonnes raisons de penser que c'est bien ledit studio qui a téléversé ces images et qu'en tout cas, on ne se trouve pas en présence de photos piratées sur Internet. Dans ces cas, l’abondance de messages automatiques avec des bandeaux rouges ne peut manquer de braquer cet utilisateur et on risque de se voir privé de ces précieux clichés.

La bonne procédure à suivre est celle utilisée par Túrelio : placer un message personnalisé en page de discussion et inviter l'utilisateur à s'authentifier via OTRS. Évidemment, c'est un plus de laisser un message en français. Vu qu'il est clair qu'une invitation à envoyer un courriel par OTRS a été faite, il est, à mon avis, superflu de mettre un message comme {{No permission since}} et plutôt privilégier {{OTRS pending}}. Il serait vraiment dommage que, à cause de « snipers », on soit privés de clichés de qualité de personnalités contemporaines, non ?

Bien à toi,

Pymouss Let’s talk - 15:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis entièrement d'accord avec l'explication de Pymouss, et j'ai supprimé la série d'avertissements sur la pdd de Studio Harcourt. --Gribeco (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je les ais contactés directement par leur site officiel (en leur conseillant d'envoyer une déclaration de consentement à OTRS), et voici la réponse que j'ai rapidement obtenu :

Ces photos sont bien des photographies Harcourt dont nous autorisons la publication sous licence libre. La définition ne permet pas la reproduction à grande échelle de ses images...

Merci de votre vigilance.

Donc voilà, c'est tout bon. Okki (talk) 16:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merci d'avoir terminé proprement ce que j'avais commencé un peu trop brutalement ; bien doser les actions est toujours difficile... Croquant (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie-mère

Bonjour Croquant. Tu as affublé la Category:Cities and villages in Dordogne de l'appellation catégorie-mère, ce qui est faux puisqu'il existe de nombreux autres de catégories au-dessus d'elle. Père Igor (talk) 19:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Au temps pour moi ! Père Igor (talk) 10:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Croquant. Ce n'est pas bien grave, mais, pour mon info, qu'as-tu compris de la différence entre MetaCat et categorize ? Peut-être la 1ère affiche un panneau "Avertissement" pour le cas de catégories surpeuplées, enjoignant les contributeurs à faire le ménage ? Merci d'avance. Cdlt, Jack ma (talk) 05:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories

Bonjour Croquant, sache que je suis d'accord avec toi a propos des catégories pour les communes française. Je les avaient tous créés pour l'Indre mais petite a petit celles qui étaient vide ont étés supprimées, conclusion maintenant il n'y a plus qu'a les recrées comme la commune du Magny. Cordialement --Parisdreux (d) 08:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barack Obama speaks at Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial 2009-06-06.JPG

moved from User talk:Common Good#File:Barack Obama speaks at Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial 2009-06-06.JPG -- Common Good (talk) 19:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barack Obama speaks at Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial 2009-06-06.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

---Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 01:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allainville-en-Beauce église Saint-Laurent 1.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:19, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Category:L'Île-d'Yeu

Bonjour Croquant,

J'ai vu que tu avais déplacé toutes les photographies et catégories présentes dans la Category:Île d'Yeu vers la Category:L'Île-d'Yeu. Peut-être à la suite de cette discussion sur le bistrot. Merci pour ton action, cependant, comme les autres catégories d'îles françaises sont sous la forme « Île de ... » (voir Category:Islands of France), je pense qu'il vaudrait mieux faire l'inverse, puis faire une redirection de L'Île... vers Île....

Sémhur (talk) 17:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I struggle to see the point of these tags. It's either acceptable here or not (and since practically all man-made structures are not acceptable - what's the point?). There are tags for non-copyright restrictions like personality rights, sure, but they don't intersect with subject. The loophole of "main subject or not so main subject" is too shaky to justify keeping when everything else says don't.

It seems that this template was not deleted yet simply because it's practically unused (just one screen of "what links here"). NVO (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nuclear power plant Golfech

Hallo Croquant, you have moved Category:Nuclear power plant Golfech. Fine - but could you please mention the move in the edit summary of the "category redirect" insertion and in the summary of the creation of the new category? Would make it more clear. Thanks! Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:24, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Croquant (talk) 07:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot two words to write: "next time". :-) And it is enough to just mention it in the edit summary/edit comment/history entry. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coasts of Maine

Maine has only one coast. People refer to it as "the Maine Coast", or, less often, "the Coast of Maine". I have never seen the plural used in either case.

I would appreciate it, therefore, if you would create the new category Category:Maine Coast or, less desirable, Category:Coast of Maine. Thank you. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello James,

Thank you for your advice. You are absolutely right: "Maine Coast" if much more frequently used than "Coasts of Maine". In the recent days, I created several categories with this same form, used in previously existing ones: Category:Coasts of California or Category:Coasts of Massachusetts for instance, so I think the best solution is to ask for a bot renaming of all the US Coasts categories, and related changes in subcats and images. As I am not accustomed to this procedure here, I let you do it. Croquant (talk) 05:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC) (preceding comment moved from User talk:Jameslwoodward)[reply]

Sorry, but I am not a bot person either, but I do know that this is nowhere near a large enough job to write a bot for the purpose. I suggest you clean this up the same way you did it in the first place -- using HotCat and or AWB. That won't take too long.

Also, as you see, I moved your comment from my talk page to yours. Almost all of the experienced Commons users expect to have both sides of a conversation on the talk page where it began. This makes it more readable for third parties and keeps a better record of it. I will keep your talk page on my watchlist, at least for a week or two, so I will see your responses. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:07, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I'll do this job "by hand", because, as I explained in my previous answer, I created several categories the same way, and there are hundreds of subcats and images to fix. Sorry. Croquant (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm -- your mess, your cleanup, I think. The combination of Hotcat and AWB would make it quick -- maybe thirty minutes. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As there are many other interesting things in the life, I'll do nothing at all. Bye. Croquant (talk) 06:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since this sort of refusal to clean up one's own mistakes happens very rarely on Commons, I have asked for the advice of my colleagues. You may wish to comment in your own defense at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Croquant. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Thanks a lot."

I hope and think you meant this in the sense of "Thank you very much", but I suggest you be careful with it. In idiomatic American English, it is usually used ironically, as in "No thanks to you for doing something I didn't like".

It's easy to tell the difference in conversation, but in writing I'd use "Thanks", "Thanks much", "Many thanks", or, more formally, "Thank you very much".

If you're going to do much of this sort of category work, I suggest you look at AWB, which I mentioned above. While Cat-A-Lot will do all the images in a category very rapidly, you need AWB to change the subcats and galleries, also very rapidly -- AWB will, among many other things, do a search and replace of any text in a list of files. The list can be any list you construct, but you can also tell it to change "oldthing" to "newthing" in all files in a category which you give it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my bad American English: I meant "thank you very much", really. I am in trouble with AWB, as I didn't find any executable version for Windows, and I don't have room enough in my computer disk to load a C++ compiler, without cleaning a lot of files. So, I'll do it when I have time enough. However, thanks for the advice. Croquant (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, your English is very much better than my French.

I don't understand your comment about AWB -- it is written for Windows -- I have run it on Win2K and XP with no problems, straight out of the download, for both WP:EN and Commons. As it happens, I installed it on a new machine today, with a download from here. You need to be authorized to use it on some projects, including separate authorizations on Commons, WP:EN, and WP:FR.

Commons requires 200 edits before you can be authorized -- I see that you are a long long way past that, so I can authorize Commons for you if you wish. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your link is precisely the one I was looking for and couldn't find. I had no problem to install it on my computer, so I'd appreciate being authorized by you to use it on Commons. Thanks ... very much. Croquant (talk) 07:09, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done It's got some real quirks (unusual behaviors), so if you have any questions, drop a note on my talk page. In particular, its default settings do a number of "cleanup" things that may surprise you, so you may wish to uncheck them. If you look at each result carefully before you click on "save" you'll see what I mean. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll use it carefully. Croquant (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tux2.png

File:Tux2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PL Przemek ^DYSKUSJA 06:14, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merci pour ...

Je passe juste pour te remercier du travaille de categorisation et de classement que tu fait. je te trouve regulierement dans ma liste de suivi. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 16:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C'est bon, j'arrive au bout pour cette fournée. Bon courage pour la création des blasons. Croquant (talk) 16:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour le modèle MH Citadelle du Quesnoy. Et la même demande pour Category:Citadelle de Maubeuge. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monuments historiques

Bonjour, merci pour avoir mis parfois le modèle Monument historique. Peut-être pourras-tu suivre fr:Utilisateur:Havang(nl)/Liste concernant les communes de l'Avesnois, pour les quelles je télecharge des photo's puis les importe dans le wiki-fr. Je marque ce qui est fait avec +. Il y a dans presque chaque commune des photo's de monuments, mais je ne suis jamais sûr si c'est "inscrit", "classé" ou "rapporté". J'utilise "repertorié" ou "relevé", s'il s'agit aussi de sources locales. Peux-tu contrôler wiki-fr et ajouter les modèles sur commons, tu t'y connais mieux que moi. Amicalement. --Havang(nl) (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noté. Je passerai ta liste en revue de temps en temps. Croquant (talk) 05:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Surpenant, de voir que j'ai fotographié une chapelle à Ramousies, prétendue disparue...Merci. Il y a d'ailleurs d'autres MH dans cette Category:Oratories in Nord. NB: en dehors des MH: je réfléchis sur la façon d'organiser (après la fin de mes uploads) les categories des édicules réligieux en Nord: chapels, oratories, calvaries, (wayside) crosses, Lourdes Grottoes. La distinction est parfois minime. Chaque suggestion est la bienvenue. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci ... La Grave

Merci pour avoir catégorisé mes photos de La Grave. Cordialement, --Gerdami (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Town hall of Ludres

Bonjour ! Merci de l'avoir signalé, je pensais naïvement que l'hôtel de ville était bien plus vieux que ça :( J'ai proposé la catégorie à la suppression, est-ce que je dois aussi proposer chacun des fichiers à la suppression ? Léna (talk) 12:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai pas l'expérience d'une telle situation ; je pense que oui, mais je ne sais pas s'il est possible de faire une demande de suppression globale pour toutes les images, plutôt que d'en faire une pour chacune. Croquant (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coal mines

I was following user:Alain meier's uncategorized uploads and created Category:Coal mines in Lorraine (in line with what he suggested). Then I realized that you have already placed a bunch of his photos, also from Lorraine, into Category:Coal mines in France. What would you suggest - move Lorraine-related photos to "in Lorraine" or merge back to "in France" or ? NVO (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest: move to this new category. I'll do it. Croquant (talk) 06:18, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wires_array.jpg

File:Wires_array.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bomazi (talk) 12:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Croquant,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added arrows, check it out. Yarl ✉ 18:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Église_Saint-Bruno_des_Chartreux

Category:Église_Saint-Bruno_des_Chartreux has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sammyday (talk) 16:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

mass deletion

Please consider mass deletion while nominating several similar files for deletion. Thanks --Razghandi (talk) 11:39, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Merci pour rajouter toutes les catégories que j'oublie / que l'UploadWizard enlève :D

Léna (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image de qualité

Bonjour, une de tes photos a été proposée en image de qualité. La revue peut t’intéresser :), en tout cas bonne soirée. PierreSelim (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Châteauroux église Saint-André 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crop is tight, but good quality overall --PierreSelim 17:56, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Petit patrimoine

J'ai l'autorisation du webmaster du site petit patrimoine de réutiliser sur wikipédia ses images à condition de marquer la provenance de l'image.CordialementNortmannus (talk) 12:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

stake

coucou,

j'ai besoin d'aide pour une traduction de categorie de meuble d'héraldique : "pieu" c'est "stake" donc pour pieu en heraldique ce serait "stake in heraldry". oui non ? merci de ton aide. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Patrolling

Hi Croquant,

Thanks for your contributions. Would you like to have the "patroller" right ? I see you've been reverting bad edits, it would help if you could patrol those edits so that they are no longer listed in the "unpatrolled edits" queue and save time for COM:ANON. Thanks and let me know what you think or request on COM:RFR. –Krinkle^talk 17:58, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller !

Hi Croquant !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. -- RE rillke questions? 19:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C'est Gég. Comme tu peux le voir dans l'historique, j'étais intervenu croyant que tu avais modifié un de mes textes . Or il n'en est rien . Je te demande de bien vouloir m'en excuser . Il semblerait que l'erreur vienne de moi depuis septembre 2011 où, pressé, j'avais mis lagon à la place d'atoll. Je te présente mes excuses.Gég 21:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Gég

Defaultsort

Bonjour Croquant. Je m'interroge sur des modifs de ce genre. Quelle utilité a un DEFAULTSORT puisqu'il n'y a qu'une catégorie et que la clé de tri mentionnée sur cette même ligne est faite pour ça ? Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 08:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Le fait qu'il n'y ait qu'une catégorie pour l'instant ne préjuge pas de l'avenir : d'autres catégories peuvent être ajoutées, comme par exemple le canton. Dans ce cas, la personne qui l'ajoute oublie très souvent de préciser la clé qui va bien (je l'ai constaté plusieurs fois) ; la meilleure solution est donc de mettre systématiquement DEFAULTSORT, ce qui évite ce problème. Croquant (talk) 08:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, merci pour ta réponse. Jack ma (talk) 11:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo

Bonjour Croquant,
On ne se connait pas mais je te vois beaucoup dans ma liste de suivi et je peux donc juger du formidable travail que tu effectues dans l'ombre ; je considère que l'on ne se dit pas assez sur le projets WP/Commons quand les choses sont bien faites, ce qui est d'autant plus vrai quand les tâches effectuées n'ont pas une énorme visibilité (ce qui ne contredit pas leur énorme utilité). Donc, voilà, je t'adresse un grand bravo. Merci !
Et à une prochaine, j'espère. --Agamitsudo (talk) 07:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category definition: French commune‎

Bonjour, j'ai enlevé les catégories de maintenance "coordinates missing". J'avais ajouté ça en créant le modèle mais en fait ce n'est pas très utile. Les coordonnées manquent dans pratiquement toutes les pages, ça n'aurait pas grand sens de créer une centaine de catégories de maintenance (une par département) et d'y mettre 36 000 pages. Et puis on peut facilement arriver au même résultat en utilisant catscan. Par ailleurs, on pourrait les importer par bot de Wikipedia, mais je ne pense pas que ce soit une priorité~, surtout qu'il serait beaucoup plus intéressant d'avoir des polygones comme ça que juste un point. --Zolo (talk) 09:34, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bailleul is a commune

Hello Croquant, thank you for categorizing my uploads. Bailleul is a commune as you thought. I also think Tour l'Anglais in Aunou-le-Faucon is a national monument. A sign was at the gate but I failed to note the distinction. The tower is a rare and famous 100 years war monument as it was the scene for a book(the Last Duel by Eric Jager) and a possible movie. The tower is currently being restored.

For your general information most of the upcoming images will be for communes around Argentan here in the Orne. I'm a volunteer teacher helping high school students write Simple English articles and these photos are to illustrate their submissions. - Your English is excellent Mlane (talk) 19:30, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Localities of cities and villages in France

Bonjour Croquant. Je ne comprends pas le nom de la Category:Localities of cities and villages in France que tu as créée. Elle ne se rattache à aucune catégorie autre que Category:Cities and villages in France, et surtout son nom ne veut rien dire. Une catégorie n'appartenant qu'à une catégorie doit porter le nom de cette dernière. C'est clairement "Cities and villages in France". De plus, "Localities of cities and villages" n'existe dans aucun autre pays. En toute cohérence, si ce nom est justifié, il faudrait créer Category:Localities of cities and villages. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Jack ma pour ta remarque. Je vais essayer de t'expliquer ma démarche, qui n'est qu'un pis-aller qui est loin de me satisfaire ; aussi, si tu as de meilleures idées, elles sont les bienvenues.

Suite à un désaccord avec un contributeur (LimoWreck) sur la catégorisation de villages ou de quartiers dans le département du Nord, où il tenait à classer dans Cities and villages in Nord (discussion) des quartiers ou des villages ne constituant pas des communes par eux-mêmes, il s'avère que le nom de ces catégories prête à confusion : à l'heure actuelle, leur usage correspond à une catégorisation par commune, alors que, de par leur nom, elles devraient regrouper les agglomérations, quelle que soit leur nature (villes, villages, hameaux), indépendamment de tout découpage administratif ; d'où conflit entre les deux approches. Il faudrait donc trouver comment gérer simultanément ces deux types de catégorisation, ce que l'état actuel ne permet pas, sauf erreur de ma part. Pour l'instant, je ne vois que deux solutions :

soit on crée un ensemble de catégories pour le découpage administratif en communes (Municipalities ou Communes), qui remplace l'ensemble des catégories actuelles mal nommées, ces dernières pouvant ensuite être utilisées pour tous les types de villages et de villes ;
soit on crée une catégorisation générique supplémentaire, sans toucher à l'utilisation actuelle des catégories Cities and villages ;

C'est cette deuxième approche que j'ai préférée, car elle peut être mise en œuvre sans se lancer dans une discussion générale sur le changement d'usage des catégories existantes. Malheureusement, je n'ai pas trouvé de catégorie générique pour les groupes d'habitations ; il y a bien des catégories quarters of, mais elles ne couvrent qu'une partie des cas. C'est ce qui m'a amené à cette initiative qui, comme je le disais plus haut, est loin de me satisfaire. À vrai dire, j'avais dans l'idée que des remarques ne manqueraient pas de se faire jour, et que de meilleures idées pourraient émerger. Alors, si tu as des idées, n'hésite pas.

Cordialement, Croquant (talk) 07:01, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour tes explications; en effet ce n'est pas simple. J'adopte aussi ton choix en ce qui concerne les communes françaises (ne pas toucher à Cities and villages). J'avais été confronté plus ou moins à ce problème, et j'avais créé Category:Villages in France (voir son bandeau), qui naturellement, fait partie de Category:Cities and villages in France. Peut-être cette catégorie peut être élargie à "Localities", ou plutôt (en ce qui concerne le nom), à une sous-catégorie de Category:Populated places. En tout cas, cette discussion est très liée à la relativement récente Category talk:Cities and villages, qui va dans le sens d'un titre plus spécifique à la France pour les communes. A suivre, donc... Jack ma (talk) 07:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using one of your pictures in a textbook

I will be using your picture of the salon d'honneur at the Hôtel de la Marine (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Hôtel_de_la_Marine_JP2010_salon_d%27honneur.jpg) in a textbook. This being text, no hyperlinks, I wondered if you would like it to be credited in any way other than Wikimedia:Croquant --such as adding a real name, location, URL, whatever. I can also be contacted at thechabon a t hot mail d o t t com.

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olly - Corbion

I try to add the most specific local category (commune, departement) to the pictures. I could not determine to wich commune the place is, as this is not close to a local village. Besides: Not al the departments railways are stricly within the departement.Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know the commune, just leave it as it is; one day or another, somebody who knows the place will add it. Croquant (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:DARHT experiment.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DARHT experiment.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:DARHT experiment.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cities and villages par département

Bonjour, je vois que vous manquez encore plus au moins la moitié des communes en France. Nous les avons quasiment systématiquement généres en Belgique, et du coup, les images tombent plus facilement en place. Au contraire, si ces catégories sont crées une par une par toute sortes de personnes, il y a pas mal d'erreurs. A considerer il me semble, surtout vous pourriez déjà les populer avec vos OpenStreetMaps. --Foroa (talk) 08:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, en effet, c'était mon intention. Croquant (talk) 08:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:DARHT aerial view.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DARHT aerial view.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:DARHT aerial view.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Est-ce un MH?

Merci pour tes corrections et ajouts interwiki des cats. Question: est-ce un Monument Historique: File: Le Coudoulou à Avèze, vieux pont et bief-barrage.JPG ?--Havang(nl) (talk) 13:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'en ai pas l'impression, car il n'apparaît pas dans la liste des monuments historiques, aussi bien sur Wikipédia (Liste des monuments historiques du Gard) que dans la liste des MH d'Avèze dans la base Mérimée. Pour plus de sûreté, tu pourrais poser la question sur la page de discussion du projet Monuments historiques de la Wikipédia francophone, qui est très actif. Croquant (talk) 13:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avignon TGV Station.jpg

File:Avignon TGV Station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

124.149.151.113 15:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MH's Berry-au-Bac

Bonjour, il n'y a qu'un MH de Berry-au-Bac sur la fr:Liste des Monuments historiques de l'Aisne mais il y a une grand nombre sur Mérimée Berry-au-Bac; est-ce que tu peux aller voir les images à la Category:Berry-au-Bac si j'ai bien mis les donnees MH et fais-moi-savoir ce qui est à faire différemment. --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La liste dont tu donnes le lien correspond à l'inventaire général du patrimoine culturel, qui comprend beaucoup plus que les monuments inscrits ou classés, ce qui peut expliquer la différence. Je jette quand même un œil pour m'assurer qu'il n'y a bien qu'un seul MH à Berry-au-Bac. Croquant (talk) 12:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Après vérification, il n'y en a qu'un seul. Pour tous les autres qui ont une fiche Mérimée, il faut bien, comme tu l'as fait pour la catégorie Monument aux morts des chars d'assaut, placer un bandeau Mérimée, mais en revanche il ne faut pas mettre la catégorie Monuments historiques, qui est réservée à ceux inscrits ou classés (si j'ai bien compris le principe). Croquant (talk) 12:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attention : tu as créé 3 catégories avec Cities and villages in Ain au lieu de Cities and villages in Aisne ; j'ai corrigé. Croquant (talk) 12:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour tout. Ain-Aisne, sorry. Je vais controler les categories MH des autres images de mes contributions du 13-14 juillet. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hôtel du Châtelet JP2011 façade cour.jpg

J'espère que tu ne m'en voudras pas, je me suis permis de redresser les perspectives sur ta photo. Si cela te dérange, tu peux revert ma version (ou je peux spliter l'historique). --PierreSelim (talk) 09:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

En général, je n'aime pas trop redresser les perspectives, car je trouve le résultat peu naturel ; je le fais bien de temps en temps lorsque la perspective est vraiment très forte, en en laissant généralement une légère, pour ne pas trop choquer ; mais mes goûts ne sont pas nécessairement ceux de tout le monde. Je vais revenir à la version d'origine, mais je n'ai rien contre le fait que tu uploades la photo corrigée sous un autre nom. Cordialement. Croquant (talk) 10:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok merci pour les explications (je m'en doutais un peu en fait). --PierreSelim (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

interwikis

J'ai crée les categories de toutes les communes du parc naturel des Ardennes, créé en decdembre 2011. Je m'excuse de t'avair laissé un part du travail, notamment les interwikis, sinon j'avance trop lentement avec mon travail de l'upload des photos et de l'illustrations des communes, voir fr:Projet:Illustration des communes françaises. Un grand merci.--Havang(nl) (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de problème, c'est un travail collaboratif et chacun y met sa pierre. Croquant (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Fusion microcapsule.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fusion microcapsule.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Kam Solusar (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cité Metro Stop.jpg

File:Cité Metro Stop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Remi Mathis (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WHICH station?

hello;

i'm just sorting through images & wasw wondering if you could tell me which train station in beijing this is? File:Outside Beijing Train Station.jpg

also; which direction it's facing (i.e.; towards the station, or away from it?), identify the buildings, etc...

what is visible in the photograph doesn't seem to be any part of THE Category:Beijing Railway Station, but i'm not clear if this is a view outside that station, or a different location entirely?

thank-you for your time & assistance :)

Lx 121 (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have no particular knowledge of this train station. I only uploaded it from Fliker, and I do not know more than what is in the original file. Croquant (talk) 05:19, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Panneaux routiers

Bonjour Croquant. Je suis en train de passer en revue tous les contenus avec la licence {{PD-JORF}}. Beaucoup de fichiers représentent des panneaux de signalisation routière et spécifient « ce logo est un panneau routier français, et à ce titre dans le domaine public ». Malheureusement le lien qui sert de référence est mort, et je ne trouve pas de référence à ce sujet sur le nouveau site. Tu as ajouté cette justification à un certain nombre de fichiers ; est-ce que par hasard tu te rappellerais de l'argumentation ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:12, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Jastrow. Je crois que cela provenait d'un site officiel, mais je ne me souviens plus lequel (peut-être la Prévention routière ?). Je n'ai malheureusement rien trouvé en faisant une recherche rapide Google ; il faudrait y consacrer plus de temps, mais là je suis assez pris et je ne peux pas m'en occuper. Si j'ai la chance de retrouver l'info, je t'en ferai part. Croquant (talk) 04:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, merci ! Le but n'est pas de virer ces images, qui sont probablement PD-ineligible par ailleurs, mais mettre un bandeau « PD parce que ça a été publié dans le JORF » fait un peu bizarre pour des panneaux routiers. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orléans rue Royale 3.JPG

File:Orléans rue Royale 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bob247 (talk) 23:19, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sceaux Félibres Maurice-Louis Faure 1.jpg

File:Sceaux Félibres Maurice-Louis Faure 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bob247 (talk) 02:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sceaux Félibres Maurice-Louis Faure 2.jpg

File:Sceaux Félibres Maurice-Louis Faure 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bob247 (talk) 02:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sceaux Félibres Sextius Michel 1.jpg

File:Sceaux Félibres Sextius Michel 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bob247 (talk) 02:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sceaux Félibres Sextius Michel 2.jpg

File:Sceaux Félibres Sextius Michel 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bob247 (talk) 02:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Category:Media_needing_categories_as_of_2_April_2012

Category:Media_needing_categories_as_of_2_April_2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Hindustanilanguage (talk) 18:08, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Combino Amsterdam.jpg

File:Combino Amsterdam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liamdavies (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gauchin-le-Gal vs Gauchin-Légal

Hello, bonjour, fr:Gauchin-le-Gal redirects now to fr:Gauchin-Légal; but in commons Category:Gauchin-Légal redirects to Category:Gauchin-le-Gal. Should the redirect direction in commons be inverted? --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Croquant (talk) 17:59, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Noia 64 apps xeyes.png

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 22:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:PF Filippov.jpeg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PF Filippov.jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:PF Filippov.jpeg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 09:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:DPFfig2 .jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:DPFfig2 .jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:DPFfig2 .jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:DPFfig1 .jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:DPFfig1 .jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:DPFfig1 .jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chevrolet - Suburban - 1975 (M.A.R.C.).jpg=Not 1975

I don't know if you can read English, but I feel obligated to inform you that the Chevrolet Suburban that you have titled as File:Chevrolet - Suburban - 1975 (M.A.R.C.).jpg is not from the 1970's at all. The oldest this could possibly be is from 1981. Therefore, either you or I should rename it. ----DanTD (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Croquant (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Because after I posted this message, I saw three more. General Motors light-duty trucks were redesigned in 1981, and this includes the Suburban, GMC Jimmy and Chevrolet Blazer. ----DanTD (talk) 04:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manifestation agriculteurs 27 avril 2010 Paris 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is good, but can you better work in the verticals on the left? --Tuxyso 05:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thank Tuxyso.--Paris 16 13:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
QI now. --Tuxyso 06:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Saint-Alban-d'Hurtières

Saint-Alban-d'Hurtières has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Floflo (talk) 13:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meyssiès

Meyssiès has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mont-Dore (nom officiel)

Bonjour Croquant. Tu as redirigé la category:Mont-Dore (Puy-de-Dôme) vers category:Le Mont-Dore (Puy-de-Dôme), alors que le nom officiel de la commune ne comporte pas d'article. J'envisage donc un retour à la situation antérieure. Père Igor (talk) 20:17, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de problème. A l'époque, je pense que j'avais renommé en fonction du titre de l'article de Wikipédia, et je n'avais pas vu que ce n'était pas le bon. Comme je n'ai pas le temps de corriger moi-même, je te laisse faire ; il faudrait aussi vérifier les liens interwiki, qui sont peut-être mauvais également. Croquant (talk) 04:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai fait le transfert. Père Igor (talk) 10:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skyburial.JPG

File:Skyburial.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Underlying lk (talk) 18:24, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Aurangabad - Ajanta Caves (3).JPG

And also:

File:Aurangabad - Ajanta Caves (4).JPG

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 19:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marne la Vallée TGV Station.jpg

File:Marne la Vallée TGV Station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris-ad7.jpg

File:Paris-ad7.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello. I would love to use some of your map images from Gansu and Qinghai provinces for an upcoming publication. How can I contact you directly regarding permissions? Joshbbird (talk) 04:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joshbbird. All these maps are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. As you can see in the "Licensing" section of the images, you may publish them freely, provided that you attribute the work as indicated in the "Use this file" notices (links just above the image).

If you have specific needs, or any other question, please feel free to email me, using the link "Email this user" in the left toolbar. --Croquant (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of Ganu Province

Hello, I would love to use some of your maps of China's Gansu Province in my upcoming book. How do I contact you to confirm permission? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshbbird (talk • contribs) 00:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orléans rue Louis Roguet 1.jpg

File:Orléans rue Louis Roguet 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Juste un merci général

Bonjour Croquant, merci de prendre la courte peine un peu chiante de noter les coordonnées de vos photos. Ce qui m'épargne la bcp plus chiante et loooonnngue peine de rechercher sur carte IGN doublée vue aérienne où se trouve telle *** *** *** (* X¹⁰ avec X>1) maison avec 2 cheminées placées comme ci et 3 vasistas placés comme ça avec un buisson d'à peu près tel volume placé là-bas et le tout formant tels angles avec ce truc-ci et ce bidule-là. Etc. Ya pas mieux comme bouffe-temps. Sur la petite trentaine de pics que je viens de tripoter cet aprèm, les 4 vôtres sont les seules à avoir été pré-localisées donc directement utilisables. pfiuuu. MERCI. (comment on fait pour écrire ça plus gros ? L'intention y est.) Pueblopassingby (talk) 17:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vous avez eu de la chance de tomber sur des photos géolocalisées, car je crains de ne l'avoir fait que pour une partie d'entre elles. En tout cas, bon courage pour cette tâche bien utile, mais fastidieuse.Croquant (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]