Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2024-05
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
.jpg){kind=link}
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files uploaded by Charivnanatusya
The batch of files uploaded by Charivnanatusya was deleted as unused personal photos (see also the deletion request's talk page) for context). However, the photos likely have encyclopedic / illustrative value as depicting Ukrainian folklore; they were submitted to the international Wiki Loves Folklore. The author clearly intended for the photos to depict folklore and Ukrainian traditions rather than use Wikimedia Commons as a storage for personal photos, as she herself wrote on her talk page in response to the notification about the deletion request (in Ukrainian). --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (talk) 05:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- @AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) and Yann: I have to agree with the nominations and then Yann's actions. These were poems in English, without attribution, and what seems unrelated images, and these look like personal images rather than clear folklore. If the contributor knows English then send them here, If they do not know English, then what are they contributing? I see neither encyclopaedic nor illustrative value in the [uploads. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I agree. It looks to me like a personal photo album with 193 images. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose restoration per above. Bedivere (talk) 20:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done: per discussion. Out of scope. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This photo was deleted without cause. It contributed to the article --DN27ND (talk) 06:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1969 picture scan claimed as own work, without permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This picture contributed to this article. Please undelete --DN27ND (talk) 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Newspaper scan claimed as own work, no permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This photo was released by the owner of the newspaper and contributed to the article. Please undelete --DN27ND (talk) 06:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Newspaper scan claimed as own work, no permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 08:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This photo was released by its owner and contributed to the article. Please undelete --DN27ND (talk) 06:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Newspaper scan claimed as own work, no permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 09:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This photo was released by its owner and contributed to the article. Please undelete. --DN27ND (talk) 06:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1969 picture scan claimed as own work, no permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 09:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please kindly undelete the photo, since it was provided by the person herself alongside with her agreement to publish it. The copyright belongs to Liliya Podkopayeva, as she personally confirmed that it was a private photoshoot for which she had paid, therefore the copyright was transferred from the author to the owner. We have sent an email, ticket 2024042210009148
I'm forwarding the info here: The photograph in question, depicting me, was taken during a paid photoshoot, for which I hold the copyright now, because I paid for it and the copyright was granted to me. Initially, it was shared on my private Instagram account. Subsequently, it has garnered attention from various media outlets, as evidenced by its appearance in the following publication: https://stars.clutch.net.ua/75376-zatmila-pervuyu-ledi-ukrainy-liliya-podkopaeva-opublikovala-foto-s-elenoy-zelenskoy-obe-v-chernyh-kostyumah-foto I would like to propose its inclusion on Wikipedia as an alternative to the current image. As a gymnastics champion, it would be more representative to showcase a photograph featuring myself with my medals, rather than one in a dancing dress. I am amenable to the dissemination of this photograph and would be grateful for its incorporation into the Wikipedia entry. Thank you in advance.
That was signed and sent bu Liliya herself. Please restore the file, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naruighich (talk • contribs) 14:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC) (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Oppose Per the response at Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard#Liliya Podkopayeva ticket # 2024042210009273. The estimated processing time for VRT tickets in English is 7 days. Thuresson (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
@Thuresson exactly. and they have passed.
Not done: The file will be undeleted if and when the permission is validated. No need for further action from the uploader. --Yann (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Undelete this file plz
Not done: Repeated abuse of COM:WEBHOST, see Special:Undelete/File:Shahroz_ahmed.jpg. --Yann (talk) 10:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The photograph in question is my own work. I have sent a release to allow anyone to use the work. I kindly ask for you undelete this media file.
--Lina.elza (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Not deleted, and this was never deleted. --Yann (talk) 14:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
public domain image in Paraguay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrovjrv (talk • contribs) 22:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Info Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pedro Cayetano J Vera. Thuresson (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why is this public domain? Did the photographer die 70 years ago? Bedivere (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done No response. Ankry (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
public domain image in Paraguay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrovjrv (talk • contribs) 23:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pedro Cayetano J Vera. Thuresson (talk) 03:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pedrovjrv: How can a 2022 photo be public domain in Paraguay? Thuresson (talk) 22:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done No response. Ankry (talk) 01:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please do hot delete File:윤운영-배우2.jpg. Because I recieved this photo file from the owner who is the actor, 윤운영. And I mended the photo with Photoshop by myself. 윤운영, the actor who is the owner of this photo already said that anyone can use this file. If my saying is not true, I will take the resposibility for the any result.
Thanks a lot. I love Wiki and everyone here.
--K-wiki-editor (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Same image as above request. --Yann (talk) 15:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files of Sainte Marie de la Tourette
Both photos were taken of my group of graduate students (FH Cologne, architectural department), as incidental images, on which almost nothing is shown of the monastery. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 17:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The roof's architecture is a main subject in the first, and the building is the subject of the second. Abzeronow (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- First picture: the main motive is the group of my students and the "roofs architecture" consists of the concrete walls (students standing) and of the steps (students sitting), both of which can`t be seen and can´t be visoned as bridge-construction between the church and the housing part of the former monastery. The cube in the foreground is the top of a banal staircase exit, and in the back one can see only the last part of the chimney. All elements are mere functional as one can see on this pic: https://www.german-architects.com/images/Projects/03/90/19/33a05007fe63472b8314379afd0d6855/33a05007fe63472b8314379afd0d6855.8945f03a.jpg (church is on the right of the slot between buildings, housing on the left) and not the "architectural roofgarden" which is typical for Corbusier`s "Unité s`habitation"-buildlings i.e. in Marseille: https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/march-2014/living-laboratory-richard-pare-on-le-corbusier-and-konstantin-melnikov/ (first picture). Please undelete under: CC BY-SA 4.0 Legal Code, Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
- Second picture I agree that there is too much to be seen of the whole building. should be deleted. Thanks Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 05:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann: Yes, we could keep the first picture after cropping the building, but the quality is poor, so what is the educational use of this picture without the building? Yann (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yann: My intention was to visualize in the article the "pilgrimage" of architectural students. But without the banal rest of the building, this would make no sense, thanks though. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 06:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Peter Christian Riemann: Yes, we could keep the first picture after cropping the building, but the quality is poor, so what is the educational use of this picture without the building? Yann (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done: This can be considered as withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 05:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hi there!
I am wondering to know, why my uploaded file was deleted, since I mentioned references.
Reference: https://reform.ee/euroopa-parlamendi-valimised-2024/yoko-alender
Person on the picture gave a permission for publishing as well as every picture on reform.ee is for free use all across the globe.
Maybe I wrote Authors rights form incorrect, but I will wait for your answer and will stay on that this picture IS NOT violate the authors rights.
Thank you in advice, Roccki69 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roccki69 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- @Roccki69: I don't see any kind of explicit free license there. Estonia is a signatory of the Berne Convention and all photographs are automatically considered copyrighted unless explicitly said otherwise. Abzeronow (talk) 20:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Roccki69: "Free use" is not a free license; see COM:L for minimal requirements. Also, any license has to be granted in a written form. Ankry (talk) 01:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done: per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:Dixie - Unofficial anthem of the Confederate States.ogg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: I have found out that this rendition of Dixie was written and conducted by Richard Bales. It was released in an album called The Confederacy in 1958. The file was deleted due to it not being known weather it violated copyright or not, since Richard Bales passed away in 1998 this version of Dixie might be in public domain. https://archive.org/details/lp_the-confederacy_richard-bales_0/page/n6/mode/1up https://archive.org/details/lp_the-confederacy_richard-bales_1/disc1/02.05.+Dixie's+Land+With+Quckstep+And+Interlude%3A+Year+Of+Jubilo.mp3 Andrew Adams fan (talk) 03:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1958 sound recording is protected until 2068. Also even if the life of the author figured into this, 1998 is not 70 years ago. Abzeronow (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done as per Abzeronow. Ankry (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hello,
The picture that has been uploaded can be used for Wikipedia, but I have indicated the wrong copyright type in the uploading process. Is it possible to undelete it?
Have a nice day, Pieter PieterDS (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Unless there is an explicitly free license at the source, we'd need VRT permission from the photographer to host it here. Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- @PieterDS: Which license is correct in your opinion and where has it been granted? Ankry (talk) 01:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Copyright information at the source doesn't indicate any free license. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The image was captured by my one of the friend and I have acquired full permission and rights to use it as my own work and upload it to Thirumali's page. Please remove the copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rydex64 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Rydex64: Then please ask your friend to confirm the permission for a free license via COM:VRT. The file will be undeleted when the permission is validated. Yann (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely. Thank you, will ask him to do so. Rydex64 (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done waiting for VRT action. Ankry (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
It isn't a copyright violation. I linked the YouTube video source, which is under a Creative Commons license, as can be read in the description. I specifically put in the license which the image was under, both in English and in Brazilian Portuguese. Pato ilógico (talk) 01:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Support CC-BY-3.0 at youtube.com. Thuresson (talk) 04:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)- Could we expedite the image undeletion? The Wikipedia page is currently without an image due to this issue. Thanks! Pato ilógico (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I usually wait for 24 hours after the request, or after the last comment. Yann (talk) 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Done: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 05:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:윤운영배우1.jpg I directly recieved this photo from 윤운영. 윤운영 is the man of the photo. There is no reason you should delete this file. Please do not delete this photo file.
--K-wiki-editor (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You said you are the owner of this file, which is wrong. The copyright holder is usually the photographer, not the subject. So we need a formal written permission for a free license from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. The file will be undeleted if and when the permission is validated. Yann (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 5 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
