Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/28
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![1.113 File:Recueil."Tu m'as sauvé la vie" de Sacha Guitry - btv1b10527207z (17 of 82).jpg](#File:Recueil."Tu_m'as_sauvé_la_vie"_de_Sacha_Guitry_-_btv1b10527207z_(17_of_82).jpg){kind=link}
_b_0765.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
November 28
This file was initially tagged by Intervex as no permission (No permission since) Montanabw (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- As I already informed you on your talk page (User_talk:Montanabw#File_tagging_File:Flag_of_the_Blackfeet_Nation.jpg), first nations can and do copyright their flags. This flag is above Threshold of Originality by the standards of US copyright law (for example, the Peoria Tribe logo is a registered copyright with the US copyright office). Given this flag was created in 1980 [1] and is above TOO, the default assumption to make is that it is copyrighted. I flagged it as no permission because I could find no evidence that the Blackfeet have released their flag with a free license. Best, Intervex (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Question works that are edicts of government, local or foreign, are public domain in the US per § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices. Is a first nations tribe considred a government? I would argue it is, therefore this is PD. Dmartin969 (talk) 03:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- The article you linked to applies to "Edicts of government, such as judicial opinions, administrative rulings, legislative enactments, public ordinances, and similar official legal documents are not copyrightable for reasons of public policy. This applies to such works whether they are Federal, State, or local as well as to those of foreign governments." and the actual Copyright Law you link to says "The doctrine is based on the principle “that no one can own the law.". As I understand it, this applies to *textual* laws, bylaws, judicial rulings, etc. I don't see why this would apply to flags.
- Dozens of first nations living within what is now the US have registered their flags with the US copyright office (e.g. Shawnee, Lumbee, Nez Percé, Pamunkey), Rosebud Sioux). Intervex (talk) 20:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Native American tribes in the United States that are federally recognized, which is true of the Blackfeet Nation, are dependent sovereign nations in the USA. Hence this is the official flag of a government/nation. I am troubled that while American state and local flags seeem to be fine, regardless ofmcopyright, you are singling out Native people. Compare Flags_of_Native_Americans_of_the_United_States where it appears several flags are being questioned, to Flags of counties and municipalities in the United States where there appears to be no dispute. This is a sovereignty issue--I would presume many entities with a flag will copyrught the design for any number of reasons, yet it is still an official symbol... do we eliminate all copyrighted flags from commons? That seems a ridiculous outcome! Montanabw (talk) 06:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Copyrighted flags should not be on Commons. The scope of Commons is clearly defined as freely licensed media only (See: Commons:Project scope, also COM:CARES). I think the municipalities *should* be checked for copyright violations. I have been actively checking the copyright status of the Indigenous flags because I realized so many of them are copyright violations. In response to your talk page comment: I am not singling this one flag out - I have been systematically going through all of the Indigenous flags on Commons that are affected by US and Canadian copyright law. I don't have the bandwidth to also be checking municipal flags but others really should, because it is unambiguous Commons policy that copyright violations should be removed. Which is why hundreds of copyright violating municipal flags have already been deleted from Commons. Intervex (talk) 07:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is also same why we had to transfer the municipal flags to the Wikipedias. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 13:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Copyrighted flags should not be on Commons. The scope of Commons is clearly defined as freely licensed media only (See: Commons:Project scope, also COM:CARES). I think the municipalities *should* be checked for copyright violations. I have been actively checking the copyright status of the Indigenous flags because I realized so many of them are copyright violations. In response to your talk page comment: I am not singling this one flag out - I have been systematically going through all of the Indigenous flags on Commons that are affected by US and Canadian copyright law. I don't have the bandwidth to also be checking municipal flags but others really should, because it is unambiguous Commons policy that copyright violations should be removed. Which is why hundreds of copyright violating municipal flags have already been deleted from Commons. Intervex (talk) 07:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Native American tribes in the United States that are federally recognized, which is true of the Blackfeet Nation, are dependent sovereign nations in the USA. Hence this is the official flag of a government/nation. I am troubled that while American state and local flags seeem to be fine, regardless ofmcopyright, you are singling out Native people. Compare Flags_of_Native_Americans_of_the_United_States where it appears several flags are being questioned, to Flags of counties and municipalities in the United States where there appears to be no dispute. This is a sovereignty issue--I would presume many entities with a flag will copyrught the design for any number of reasons, yet it is still an official symbol... do we eliminate all copyrighted flags from commons? That seems a ridiculous outcome! Montanabw (talk) 06:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
unofficial, and unused Strenatos (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- and yes i made the file Strenatos (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete Unused, fictitious, and uploader request. Dmartin969 (talk) 03:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; OOS personal fiction. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Collage of low resolution, watermarked images, while beautiful, are unused. Not certain whether original images are on Commons Bastique ☎ let's talk! 00:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Collage of low resolution, watermarked images, while beautiful, are unused. Not certain whether original images are on Commons Bastique ☎ let's talk! 00:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a turtle happily swimming along in a plastic bag. (Plastic pollution is a real problem for sea turtles, but this image doesn't represent it in an accurate manner.) Omphalographer (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete with no COM:EDUSE. Belbury (talk) 11:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete self promotion Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
- File:Logo GYT.png
- File:Transparent GYT Logo.png
- File:Guarded Youth Transportation Logo.png
- File:GYT Logo.png
- File:Guarded Youth LLC.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete self promotion Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Intervex as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
This should be discussed since multiple Wikipedias use it. Abzeronow (talk) 01:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Right, so I can't find a source for this flag being freely licensed. The sourcing I've found about the seal in the middle of the flag is that it was created in 1957 [2] and its author died in 2019 [3]. If anybody can find evidence of a free license that'd be welcome, as I haven't had any luck. I'm unfortunately getting the sense this flag will have to be transferred to Wikipedia with a nonfree use justification. Intervex (talk) 01:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Works published in the United States in 1957 needed to be published with a copyright notice and renewed in 1984 or 1985 to still be in copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 01:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I have had no success trying to track down when the flag was made, only when the seal used in the flag was made. I do not know if the seal was published with a copyright notice. Intervex (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- If this is deleted, we could reupload it to the English Wikipedia. Deal? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 20:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I have had no success trying to track down when the flag was made, only when the seal used in the flag was made. I do not know if the seal was published with a copyright notice. Intervex (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Works published in the United States in 1957 needed to be published with a copyright notice and renewed in 1984 or 1985 to still be in copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 01:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Keep License changed to PD-EdictGov. Dmartin969 (talk) 03:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- A flag is not an edict of government, and in the US, non-federal government works such as those from the Osage Nation can be copyrighted. As said above, it can be public domain for other reasons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Assuming the copyright *of the seal* was not renewed, am I correct that the *seal* would be {{PD-US-not renewed}}? Based on this assumption, my understanding is the *flag* would be below TOO as its only complex visual element is the seal (so {{PD-inelegible}} or similar). But: How can we be sure the seal was not renewed? I have searched the US copyright office database for Osage and renewals and did not see anything, but my understanding is that a lack of a record in their online system does not mean a lack of copyright. Intervex (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This village pump discussion about the Navajo flag gave me a sense that "published with notice" was pretty strict in the US. User Carl Lindberg writes: "even a copyright notice on a book's dust cover was not sufficient to cover the book, since it was removable.". A seal seems easier to have kept under copyright than a flag, so I'm still not 100% sure keep is the right move. But I think without clear evidence the seal was kept under copyright, it's fair for us to assume it went into PD, and hence the flag is also PD. Intervex (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Assuming the copyright *of the seal* was not renewed, am I correct that the *seal* would be {{PD-US-not renewed}}? Based on this assumption, my understanding is the *flag* would be below TOO as its only complex visual element is the seal (so {{PD-inelegible}} or similar). But: How can we be sure the seal was not renewed? I have searched the US copyright office database for Osage and renewals and did not see anything, but my understanding is that a lack of a record in their online system does not mean a lack of copyright. Intervex (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- A flag is not an edict of government, and in the US, non-federal government works such as those from the Osage Nation can be copyrighted. As said above, it can be public domain for other reasons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment To consolidate discussion, I think File:Osage seal.png should also be discussed here, because the Osage flag's copyright status depends on the copyright status of the seal. Intervex (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Early 20th century postcard by Louis Émile Choque of Epernay. Choque was born in 1856 but I cannot find a death date and him living to 100 is not implausible. Would need to narrow down publication date to determine if we can keep this. Abzeronow (talk) 01:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
1955 painting by Richard F. Lack (1928-2009), an American. More information about the provenance of this painting needed to determine if public domain or copyrighted until 2080. Abzeronow (talk) 01:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality non-photographic jpg of an US Army emblem. Is this worth keeping? Abzeronow (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Detegehuqa (talk · contribs)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep (since blocked); no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 07:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguel Rodrigues Araújo (talk · contribs)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 07:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
- File:Melistechnology-baseline2.png
- File:Melistechnology-baseline.png
- File:Melistechnology2.png
- File:Melistechnology.png
- File:Melistechnology-logo2.png
- File:Melisplatform.png
- File:Melisplatform-marketing.png
- File:Melisplatform-core.png
- File:Melisplatform-cms.png
- File:Melisplatform-commerce.png
- File:Melis.jpg
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 07:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdulmuqtaddirkhan (talk · contribs)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
_LIMITED.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rodrigo Sahd (talk · contribs)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
- File:Logo.LEADSales-assessment-área-comercial-teste-perfil-vendedor.jpg
- File:Logo.SalesX-Contratação-vendedores-representantes.jpg
- File:Logo.Foursales-recrutamento-seleção-área-comercial.jpg
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete self promotion Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
"Hans Peter" is 2 individual given names, not a compound one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjart (talk • contribs) 13:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, compound names exist. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, This is not normally considered a "compound name", but rather 2 individual names, which is why the category is empty. A "compound name" would look like "Hans-Peter", not "Hans Peter".--Hjart (talk) 07:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Tending towards Delete (or redirect to Category:Hans-Peter (given name)). In German, "Peter", in this way of writing the name, would be considered a "zweiter Vorname" (literally "second given name", or in English: "middle name"). It's not a compound name if it doesn't have a hyphen. Nakonana (talk) 18:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, sculptor Oscar Han died in 1976
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Muzeul Taranului Roman; B-II-m-A-18985 (Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcas, Director fondator al muzeului 1906-1948) (2).JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Muzeul Taranului Roman; B-II-m-A-18985 (Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcas, Director fondator al muzeului 1906-1948).JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Muzeul Taranului Roman; B-II-m-A-18985; (Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcas)(1).JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Muzeul Taranului Roman; B-II-m-A-18985; (Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcas)(2).JPG
- File:RO B Muzeul Taranului Roman (2).JPG
_(2).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(1).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(2).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, sculptor Oscar Han died in 1976
- File:Al Vlahuta.jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Parcul Cismigiu (Aleea Rondului Roman - statuia lui Al. Vlahuta); (2) B-II-a-A-19655.JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Parcul Cismigiu (Aleea Rondului Roman - statuia lui Al. Vlahuta); B-II-a-A-19655.JPG
- File:Rotonda Scriitorilor - Alexandru Vlahuta.jpg
- File:VlahutaCismigiu.JPG
;_(2)_B-II-a-A-19655.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;_B-II-a-A-19655.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, sculptor Oscar Han died in 1976
- File:Bustul lui Mihai Eminescu din Constanța.jpg
- File:Bustul lui Mihai Eminescu, Constanta.jpg
- File:Lui Mihai Eminescu, 1932, Oscar Han, Constanța, Romania.jpg
- File:Statuia lui Mihai Eminescu .jpg
- File:Statuia lui Mihai Eminescu Faleza Cazino.jpg
- File:Statuia lui Mihai Eminescu- 1932.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, sculptor Oscar Han died in 1976
- File:Manastirea Putna - Bustul lui Mihai Eminescu.jpg
- File:Mănăstirea-Putna (23).jpg
- File:Romania Putna Monastery Statue Mihai Eminescu Back.jpg
- File:Romania Putna Monastery Statue Mihai Eminescu Front1.jpg
- File:Romania Putna Monastery Statue Mihai Eminescu Front2.jpg
- File:Romania Putna Monastery Statue Mihai Eminescu Front3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 1939 by Oscar Han (1891–1976). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2047.
- File:20140702 Bucureşti 58.jpg
- File:20140702 Bucureşti 59.jpg
- File:20140816 București 196.jpg
- File:Biserica Sf .Gheorghe e la statua di Brancoveanu.JPG
- File:Biserica Sf.Gh (3).jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe Nou) (Statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu din fata Bisericii) (2) B-II-m-A-18225.JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe Nou) (Statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu din fata Bisericii) B-II-m-A-18225.JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Biserica SFANTUL GHEORGHE cel NOU si statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu. (B-II-m-A-18225) statuia (B-III-m-A-19965).jpg
- File:Constantin Brancoveanu statuie.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Statuia_lui_Constantin_Brancoveanu_din_fata_Bisericii)_(2)_B-II-m-A-18225.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Statuia_lui_Constantin_Brancoveanu_din_fata_Bisericii)_B-II-m-A-18225.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_statuia_(B-III-m-A-19965).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 1939 by Oscar Han (1891–1976). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2047.
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe, cu statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu (2), B-II-m-A-18225.JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe, cu statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu (3), B-II-m-A-18225.JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania, Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe, cu statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu (5), B-II-m-A-18225.JPG
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. BISERICA SFANTUL GHEORGHE NOU Bucuresti. Statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu (4).jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe Nou cu Statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu in fata.jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Biserica Sfantul Gheorghe Nou. Statuia lui Constantin Brancoveanu.JPG
,_B-II-m-A-18225.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_B-II-m-A-18225.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_B-II-m-A-18225.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 1934 by Oscar Han (1891–1976). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2047.
- File:Ansamblul statuar al Victoriei de la Tișița (1917), plan apropiat.JPG
- File:Ansamblul statuar al Victoriei de la Tișița (1917), vedere sud - est.JPG
- File:Ansamblul statuar al Victoriei de la Tișița (1917).JPG
- File:Marasesti Monument.jpg
- File:Statuia Victoriei - vedere laturală.JPG
- File:Statuia Victoriei de la Tișița, plan apropiat - „Pe aici nu se trece!” (1917).JPG
,_plan_apropiat.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_vedere_sud_-_est.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel 我对删除这些图像没有意见，凡是有条件的，我都会自己画一张取代它（CAD、SKP、Adobe AI、PS这些我也都会用），即使删掉了，我也还会用该文件名再次上传。--猫猫的日记本 (talk) 15:07, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
{{FoP-China}} didn't apply to indoor artworks in 2015. 沈澄心✉ 03:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Unsure This depends entirely on whether the amendment to Chinese copyright law applies to derivative works created prior to the amendment's entry into force. I don't see any indication either way at COM:FOP China, which I suppose might counsel a delete on COM:PRP grounds. Still, the legal issue with FOP shouldn't be the state of the law when the derivative work was created, but what the current state of the law is. As such I am unsure.- Delete per JWilz12345. There is insufficient compliance with the requirements for FOP in China. We needn't reach the issue of retroactive application of the new Chinese FOP standards. To the extent it matters, it's worth noting that this image is pretty blurry at maximum zoom, to the point that much of the text is unreadable. I think this should be taken as an additional factor counseling deletion. 69.174.144.79 13:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- See my reply to JWilz12345 below. Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 14:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per renewed COM:FOP China which included indoor works. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, no attribution to artists. While COM:FOP China now covers indoor works and the graphic work there is inside a museum (which is normally publicly-accessible premises), Chinese FOP requires attribution. Who were the artists of the graphic work? The law seems silent on copyrighted anonymous works in public places. Already-deleted images of similar cases were recently denied restoration notwithstanding broader Chinese FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I found out the artist is named Wang Qingrui. His name was actually shown on the far right of the photo, though the resolution was awful. Two additional sources are available to verify his authorship, including a newspaper interview[1] and a blogpost written by his studio.[2] Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 14:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- ↑ 苏日娜. "故土牵情 有一种情愫叫方言". 北方新报. Archived from the original on 2021-12-26.
- ↑ 王清锐. 难活、麻求烦，呼市方言漫画全集. 清锐出品.
Kept: Keep per User:Lovewhatyoudo - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Nominate again. {{FoP-China}} didn't include indoor works before 2021. 沈澄心✉ 02:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep per previous outcome, no new argument made here. While I disagree with the previous outcome, I don't believe it is so obviously wrong that a new DR is appropriate. 69.174.144.79 23:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- Leaning towards Keep this time. Notwithstanding the issue of retroactivity (which must be sent to COM:VP/C or Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/China), there is already proper attribution to the author who created the 2D graphic works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep No new argument since the original nomination in 2021 Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per {{PD-ancient-script}}? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- {{Vote speedy}} criteria F1, derivative of copyrighted adverts.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmartin969 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Probable deletion, but absolutely not a speedy. This is a pretty big panorama, so a de minimis argument can be made. I doubt it mainly because of the Mazda ad, and also probably the "souvenirs" sign and Girls ad, but I'd like to know which photos of Times Square would be kept if nominated for deletion. Is it possible to take a photo that shows lots of ads that is considered de minimis for any one ad? Because that's what Times Square is and has been for a long time. Do all photos of Times Square have to be uploaded locally to Wikipedias and Wikivoyages that allow fair use? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- You may have a point with the fact that the focus isn't on any one particular ad. Speedy withdrawn, but still learning towards Delete. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Me too, as I said. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- You may have a point with the fact that the focus isn't on any one particular ad. Speedy withdrawn, but still learning towards
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Com:GRAFFITI. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Junipherbavi (talk · contribs)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sourabhnetleaf123 (talk · contribs)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashwina Bramhe (talk · contribs)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work. Doing a reverse image search, this image appears on several websites and social media posts (although I do not know Japanese). The distortion suggests it is likely a picture taken of a computer screen. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 04:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- この画像は、私、生麦ビール本人が地下鉄博物館に行き、デジタルカメラで撮影した物を、タブレットに直接撮影した物を撮り、Wikipediaコモンズに載せたものです。決して他のサイトから転用した画像では無いので、どうか削除しないよう、お願い致します。 生麦ビール (talk) 22:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 04:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
- Weak delete OK photo with usable elements, but we have other photos of this lake and the fountain in it. It would be fine to keep the photo, but it's not objectionable to delete it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There are also the files "Софіївський парк (Умань) 17" through "Софіївський парк (Умань) 48" by the same uploader (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sasha Grygoriak). Category:People in Sofiyivsky Park has a lot of photos of this guy visiting this park. It's really more a case of Commons being used as a web host. Nakonana (talk) 18:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Statue was unveiled in 2019. The sculptor is Alexander Bourganov (b. 1935), who appears to be still alive. Source: press release by the Sheremetyevo International Airport where the sculpture is located. Nakonana (talk) 18:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sasha Grygoriak (talk · contribs)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 47.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 48.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 43.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 44.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 42.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 35.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 32.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 30.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 28.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 27.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 25.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 24.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 20.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 19.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 17.jpg
- File:Софіївський парк (Умань) 09.jpg
_47.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_48.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_43.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_44.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_42.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_35.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_32.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_30.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_28.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_27.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_25.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_24.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_20.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_19.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_17.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mitte27 (talk) 04:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like lots of photos of this one guy. Not needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, sculptor Parsla Zalkalne died in 1993 A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, sculptor Marta Lange died in 1985 A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, sculptor Marta Lange died in 1985 A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
The monument was completed in 1971 by Valdis Albergs (1922–1984). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2055 A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
The monument was completed in 1971 by Valdis Albergs (1922–1984). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2055 A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I wasn't aware of lack of freedom of panorama in Latvia. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The source of this file points to another file hosted on the French Wikipedia, with a clearly different license. This is obvious license laundering. Taichi (talk) 05:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep wordmark, ineligible for copyright. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. I'm guessing it should be easy to find another source? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep this logo it's a only text ,below too (google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 08:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:look (1990) AbchyZa22 (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I see. This is the logo minus the parallel stripes that might be a problem per COM:TOO France. That source can be used for this logo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:Yes but,this is a text logo. (only text is not copyrighted) (google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 08:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I already agreed with that above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- The file uploaded in French Wikipedia included the text as Modèle:Marque déposée (non-free logo). The fact that it uses as a source a non-free file uploaded on the French Wikipedia does not help much. Taichi (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- What fr.wikipedia thought about COM:TOO France isn't really relevant to our decision. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: The use of this source will be a topic of discussion in the future, I advocate changing the source and avoiding this double interpretation in the future, since your answer above seems to sound like an imposition, rather than a correction. Taichi (talk) 16:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I already supported adding a different source near the beginning of this thread. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: The use of this source will be a topic of discussion in the future, I advocate changing the source and avoiding this double interpretation in the future, since your answer above seems to sound like an imposition, rather than a correction. Taichi (talk) 16:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- What fr.wikipedia thought about COM:TOO France isn't really relevant to our decision. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- The file uploaded in French Wikipedia included the text as Modèle:Marque déposée (non-free logo). The fact that it uses as a source a non-free file uploaded on the French Wikipedia does not help much. Taichi (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I already agreed with that above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:Yes but,this is a text logo. (only text is not copyrighted) (google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 08:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I see. This is the logo minus the parallel stripes that might be a problem per COM:TOO France. That source can be used for this logo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:look (1990) AbchyZa22 (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep fix the license, keep the image. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 07:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Seems simple text, even for rather high TOO France. Current license seems correct/appropriate. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Useful if this were an 1840 photo, not a 2014 photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Extremely poor quality. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete nothing's visible. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree above comments. Ratekreel (talk) 21:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GreyViper17 (talk · contribs)
Out of scope: unused logos of various fictitious political parties and movements (only ever used in an enwiki sandbox).
- File:Pniflag.png
- File:Title Page 20241101 212945 0000.png
- File:Pnilogo.png
- File:Pni logo.jpg
- File:Flag of greater indonesia by comrademaxwell dcl37hn-pre.jpg
- File:Flag of greater indonesia by comrademaxwell dcl37hn-pre-removebg-preview (1).png
- File:National party logo2.jpg
- File:National party logo.jpg
- File:Logo Partai Nasional.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 04:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as out-of-scope, with no foreseeable educational use. Only "maybe" is File:Flag of greater indonesia by comrademaxwell dcl37hn-pre-removebg-preview (1).png, as it is a version of the Garuda Pancasila, but it has no clear source or author provided ("awdawdawdawdawdawd"?). ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 09:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Those two are likely copyvios as well - the filenames indicate that they were downloaded from DeviantArt. Omphalographer (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GreyViper17 (talk · contribs)
Out of scope: additional fictitious flags, emblems, etc.
- File:PPNIPoster(2).png
- File:PPNIFlag(6).png
- File:P.P.N.IFlag(3).png
- File:P.P.N.IFlag(2).png
- File:PPNILogo(5).png
- File:PPNILogo(4).png
- File:PPNILogo(3).png
- File:PPNI Poster.png
- File:PPNIFlag(5).png
- File:P.P.N.IFlag.png
- File:PPNILogo(2).png
- File:GNBLogo(2).png
- File:GNBLogo.png
- File:GNBFlag.png
- File:PPNIFlag(4).png
- File:PPNIFlag(3).png
- File:PPNIFlag(2).png
- File:BCMLogo.png
- File:BCMFlag.png
- File:PPNIFlag.png
- File:PPNILogo.png
- File:Pniflag1511.png
- File:Pniflag43(2).png
- File:Pniflag43.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GreyViper17 (talk · contribs)
Out of scope: minor variants of images previously nominated for deletion.
- File:PosterPPNI.png
- File:PPNILogo(8).png
- File:GNBLogo(6).png
- File:GNBFlag(3).png
- File:GNBLogo(5).png
- File:GNBFlag(2).png
- File:GNBLogo(4).png
- File:GNBLogo(3).png
- File:PPNIFlag(8).png
- File:PPNIPoster.png
- File:PPNIFlag(7).png
- File:P.P.N.IFlag(6).png
- File:P.P.N.IFlag(4).png
- File:P.P.N.IFlag(5).png
- File:PPNILogo(7).png
- File:PPNILogo(6).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 02:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GreyViper17 (talk · contribs)
Out of scope: additional fictitious flags, logos, etc. similar to those previously deleted.
- File:GNBLogo.png
- File:PRP Logo (3).png
- File:PRP Logo (2).png
- File:PRP Logo.png
- File:PRPLogo(8).png
- File:PRPLogo(7).png
- File:PRPFlag(4).png
- File:PRPLogo(6).png
- File:PRPFlag(3).png
- File:PRPLogo(5).png
- File:PRPFlag(2).png
- File:PRPLogo(4).png
- File:PRPLogo(3).png
- File:PRPTestFlag.png
- File:PRPLogo(2).png
- File:PRPFlag.png
- File:P (2).png
- File:PRPLogo.png
- File:P (1).png
- File:PPNItestLogo.png
- File:PPNIFlag(10).png
- File:PPNIFlag(9).png
- File:PPNILogo(9).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 18:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:26, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal flags and flag variants.
- File:A Flag Made By Haraf (3) Unión Española.png
- File:A Flag Made By Haraf. (2) China Union Flag.png
- File:A Flag Made By Haraf 1.jpg
_Uni%C3%B3n_Espa%C3%B1ola.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_China_Union_Flag.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 05:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:19, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ultra-close crop of face not used/necessary CzarJobKhaya (talk) 06:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This media file may have been used in the past or currently outside of the Wikimedia Foundation projects anywhere on the web or as a part the content of publications or physical goods. This person is currently in the news and subject to broad commentary and discussion. This photo is certainlinly within scope per COM:SCOPE "from an educational point of view, for the sake of variety and availability of choice."
- Also, @CzarJobKhaya per COM:NPOV: - (quotation)
- "Media files"
- "Commons is not Wikipedia, and files uploaded here do not necessarily need to comply with the Neutral point of view and No original research requirements imposed by many of the Wikipedia sites. Commons acts amongst other things as a common media file resource for all Wikimedia projects, and we stand apart from the rules that may be imposed locally by each of those individual projects."
- "It is not the role of Commons to adjudicate on subject-matter disputes nor to force local projects to use one version of a file in preference to another. Provided that a file falls within Commons scope, and can be legally hosted, we make it available. Whether and under what conditions it is actually used is a matter for the local communities of the individual projects to decide."
- "Images having particular national, political or religious significance including flags, emblems and maps can arouse strong passions, but Commons is not the place to decide which of various competing versions is the correct or official version. If you feel strongly that a map, emblem, flag or other file hosted here is "wrong" in some way, please try to persuade your local wiki community to make use of the version you prefer instead." -- Ooligan (talk) 07:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Media files"
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not used anywhere, as the file creator I request a speedy delete Stanloona2020 (talk) 07:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:12, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama for 2D character in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Not used anywhere, as the file creator I request a speedy delete Stanloona2020 (talk) 07:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:12, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama for 2D character in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, not ok for 2D works and works temporarily displayed in public places. Iming 彼女の愛は、甘くて痛い。 04:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Unused file, as file creator requesting a speedy delete Stanloona2020 (talk) 07:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:12, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no Freedom of Panorama for 2D character in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama for 2D character in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama for 2D character in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama for 2D poster in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 07:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 07:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
This is a photoshopped image - the real observatory doesn't have this density of antennas. Look at any mapping software or Caltech's website. It is also clear from the image that the same antenna has been duplicated 6 times Blervis (talk) 07:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oops nevermind - can I delete this? Blervis (talk) 07:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- The OVRO array had 6 antennas for many years, and that's what the image shows. I know. I used the array. I was there many times. It is not a photoshopped image. There were six antennas of identical design. Anyone who knows anything at all about radio interferometers would know that they are often composed of identical elements PopePompus (talk) 10:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per uploader's answer. Density is a perspective effect of using a tele lens. Herbert Ortner (talk) 12:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since) Krd 07:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
This was uploaded by a user with no other contributions and was linked on only one medical article. It is clearly just someone's medical fetish and, due to it's poor quality, serves no purpose other than to arouse the author. Starfishprime1989 (talk) 07:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Absolutely no COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 13:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
It seems that the source of the flag is not reliable, causing historical obfuscation and even fake news. Muhamad Izzul Fiqih (talk) 07:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I recommend we keep it but rename it to "Fictional Jambi Sultanate flag" Syazwi Irfan (talk) 10:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- It can be considered, but further discussion is needed. Muhamad Izzul Fiqih (talk) 03:14, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not all images for example are realistically useful for an educational purpose (Moreover, this flagged file has no history in Jambi). An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia.... COM:NOTUSED Muhamad Izzul Fiqih (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- The point of com:inuse is for Commons not to spend time arguing about, let alone overruling the editorial decisions of Wikipedias. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please give me a reference that this flag represents the Jambi Sultanate. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should use the same file which has a reliable source. Just discuss, thank you. Muhamad Izzul Fiqih (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- You ignored my remarks. Did you fail to understand that I don't believe we should consider that question on Commons? Have you read COM:INUSE? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please give me a reference that this flag represents the Jambi Sultanate. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should use the same file which has a reliable source. Just discuss, thank you. Muhamad Izzul Fiqih (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- The point of com:inuse is for Commons not to spend time arguing about, let alone overruling the editorial decisions of Wikipedias. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- This file does not appear to currently be in use. Omphalographer (talk) 02:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- You're right. So therefore, there's no longer a problem with deleting it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not all images for example are realistically useful for an educational purpose (Moreover, this flagged file has no history in Jambi). An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia.... COM:NOTUSED Muhamad Izzul Fiqih (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruano Marina (talk · contribs)
User with bad history, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Alfonso Salmerón Salmerón (005).jpg
- File:Alfonso Salmerón Salmerón (004).jpg
- File:Alfonso Salmerón Salmerón (006).jpg
- File:Alfonso Salmerón Salmerón (002).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 07:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not own works. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Likely copyright violation - file is used heavily on social media and near-identical file is at https://fineartamerica.com/featured/returning-home-sudeep-nair.html Redtree21 (talk) 07:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, the subject died in 1969 so the creator of the monument is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Quite borderline, it is not clear if the license is valid. Yann (talk) 07:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the texture is complex and IMO surpasses the US TOO. Perhaps a simpler version could be recreated. Bedivere (talk) 13:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment tbf isn't it likely this is AI-generated like the other DOGE images? --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 16:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so. It does resemble some similar images (based on a Google search image) but this one's texture is what is problematic, not the design itself. Bedivere (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I would bet that it is indeed AI-generated (both on appearance and how much Musk uses AI-generated images on social media for DOGE and beyond), but we can't definitively claim that without confirmation, and it shouldn't be a factor in this discussion unless it's confirmed. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 11:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- The texture is as basic as can be. Not relevant as qualifier for copyright. BarntToust (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The image is made of simple shapes and qualifies under {{PD-textlogo}}. The texture, in my opinion, is no more complex than File:Arkansas map by Sean Pecor.png, a confirmed-by-court case simple shape PD image, as both images have a "3d"-style shape/design and a not-smooth surface. P.S., including what Nintendofan885 stated above, given the other A.I.-generated images associated with DOGE, there is a high-chance this was also A.I.-generated. There is no proof of that, however, I feel like that also strengthens the PD-textlogo / simple-shape PD case for this photograph. WeatherWriter (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per User:WeatherWriter. I don't understand the deletion argument, keeping in mind the following, at COM:TOO US: the US Copyright Office does not consider text effects to be sufficiently unique to render a logo copyrightable, stating that "the mere use of text effects (including chalk, popup papercraft, neon, beer glass, spooky-fog, and weathered-and-worn), while potentially separable, is de minimis and not sufficient to support a registration". Are those who propose deletion figuring that because this is not text, a much more minor effect will make this copyrightable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per User:WeatherWriter and User:Nintendofan885; I would think of it as AI based on the dollar sign having inconsistency throughout its design. Sharport (talk) 2:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep – seems like it may be just far enough under the threshold of originality in my opinion. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- @WeatherWriter‘s court case and AI statement also has me leaning towards keep. AI images themselves are automatically PD, although they can contain copyright infringing stuff, so care must be taken in that regard. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- And plus, if this does become the DOGE logo; it would unambiguously become PD. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Because we’re talking about the logo of a presumably soon-to-be federal government agency. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- And plus, if this does become the DOGE logo; it would unambiguously become PD. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- @WeatherWriter‘s court case and AI statement also has me leaning towards keep. AI images themselves are automatically PD, although they can contain copyright infringing stuff, so care must be taken in that regard. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as a simple texture isn't creatively inclined whatsoever, and the discussion of {hell, probably} being AI is another conversation entirely. BarntToust (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Quite a consensus. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused logo of questionable notability, presumably uploaded for a deleted promotional article, possibly out of the project scope. Nutshinou Talk! 08:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Estonia, sculptor Ülo Õun died in 1988 A1Cafel (talk) 08:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Copyright holder Paavo Lehtonen". VRT permission from Paavo Lehtonen needed. MKFI (talk) 08:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Advertisement, out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Random AI-generated image, unlikely to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not useful. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. It appears to be self-promotional and outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 01:06, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Because it is necessary Anzarfayaz0 (talk) 08:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete this please Anzarfayaz0 (talk) 06:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete this please because it is important Anzarfayaz0 (talk) 06:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
obvious unfree photo from the internet + commons is not a hosting service Quenhitran (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 07:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 08:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: personal photo. Ratekreel (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 07:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Nice portrait. Yann (talk) 08:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Yann. Excellent 3D separation, nice lighting and background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete good quality photo, but unused not useful. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think that photos by the UK Department for International Development that were taken in the context of a UNICEF program can really be considered "personal" photos, even if they are "just" a portrait of a person. We also don't seem to have a Category:Young men of South Africa like we have for other countries. This photo would fit in that category. So, we really don't have nearly enough photos of young South African men to go around Commons and delete them as "personal photos". That deletion rationale would probably rather work for photos in Category:Young men of the United States, because we likely have plenty photos there, and therefore can afford to be picky about what we want to keep and what can be deleted because it's not distinct enough from all the other photos in that category. Nakonana (talk) 20:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Really low quality (out of focus face), and also out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Portraits are in scope, or at least they can be, as I'm sure you'd agree. You're arguing that it's out of scope because you believe it's not high quality, which I feel is a redundant or circular argument. "Not useful because of its poor quality" would be a reasonable argument, regardless of my opinion on this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per comment from user Nakonana. --Wdwd (talk) 12:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo by Studio Verhassel from Belgium published in 1949. The protection for pseudoanonymous works is 70 yeas ppa, so it is currently in the public domain in its country of origin. However, it was not in 1996 at URAA time (notice that protection changed from 50 to 70 years in 1994). Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following PCP we cannot keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 09:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Reproduction of a recent painting. The painter, Dimitris Alexandros Fatouros, died in 2020. The copyright duration in Greece is 70 years after the death of the creator, thus it should be undeleted in 2091. C messier (talk) 09:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Possible hoax image: Article where the image is used is nominated for deletion as a possible hoax. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete Hoax.
Huwiki talks:
https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Kocsmafal_(egy%C3%A9b)#Hoaxbokor_felder%C3%ADt%C3%A9se
https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:T%C3%B6rl%C3%A9sre_javasolt_lapok/Detre_fia_J%C3%A1nos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hörgő (talk • contribs) 23:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Hörgő (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed to be used as a hoax, but it is a detail of a 15th century book illumination, so I'm going to keep it. --Achim55 (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Kept: and renamed to File:Lovers in Conversation (detail).webp. --Achim55 (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
There is no Freedom of Panorama for 2D character in the United States of America. 茅野ふたば (talk) 09:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
unnötige Weiterleitung GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
unnötige Weiterleitung GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
unnötige Weiterleitung GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
unnötige Weiterleitung GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Indonesia. 茅野ふたば (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Copyrighted graphics now blurred. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
unnötige Weiterleitung GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Indonesia. 茅野ふたば (talk) 09:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded the blurred version, so Delete the original upload and Keep the blurred one –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 10:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
unnötige Weiterleitung GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
_b_0765.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
URV - ich habe leider erst nach dem Hochladen erfahren, dass der Künstler erst 1959 verstorben ist. Jenne1504 (talk) 10:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
_b_0765.jpg){kind=link}
- @Jenne1504: Was weiß man denn über diesen Künstler H. Hooff? In AKL und Wikidata habe ich nichts gefunden. --Rosenzweig τ 10:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Ich habe u.a. Das hier gefunden, die Signatur passt. [4], nach „Hooff, Ernst Hans“ googlen bringt weitere Ergebnisse. —Jenne1504 (talk) 23:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Siehe jetzt Ernst Hans Hooff. --Rosenzweig τ 02:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig Wow, beeindruckend. Aber ändert ja nichts daran, dass der Upload vorübergehend weg muss… -Jenne1504 (talk) 11:19, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Siehe jetzt Ernst Hans Hooff. --Rosenzweig τ 02:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Ich habe u.a. Das hier gefunden, die Signatur passt. [4], nach „Hooff, Ernst Hans“ googlen bringt weitere Ergebnisse. —Jenne1504 (talk) 23:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
_b_0765.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Cropped version of a portrait used in an FBI wanted poster. Original image is a non-federal work by Paul Hampartsoumian - REX/Shutterstock from the Daily Mail Hariboneagle927 (talk) 10:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Likely copyright violation - no evidence that Sofinance has released this material under CC0 or another free license/violation probable des droits d'auteur - manque d'évidence que Sofinance a publié ce materiel sous CC0 ou une autre licence libre. Redtree21 (talk) 10:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Too blurred to be of any use. Malcolma (talk) 10:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete blurry. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
non respect du droit d'auteur - appartient à les pictogrammes.com Editions Milmo Isabelle-ANDI (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No sufficient VRT permission; see ticket:2017062610009347. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
non respect des droits d'auteurs - propriété des editions milmo les pictogrammes.com Isabelle-ANDI (talk) 11:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: not a copyvio; see ticket:2017062610009347. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
non respect des droits d'auteur - propriété des éditions milmo les pictogrammes.com Isabelle-ANDI (talk) 11:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Deletion not requested by Ed. Milmo. See ticket:2017062610009347. Ruthven (msg) 12:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: small resolution image, uploader has a history of copyvios. MKFI (talk) 11:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: no realistic educational value. Very poor quality image. Headlock0225 (talk) 11:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: no realistic educational value. Very porr quality image. Headlock0225 (talk) 11:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Image of non-significant figure with no apparent purpose for upload, likely out-of-scope. Redtree21 (talk) 11:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
random image of dewy grass, uploader added large watermark. Out of scope. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unusual watermark and blurry. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Image of non-significant figure with no apparent purpose for upload, likely out-of-scope. Redtree21 (talk) 11:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Film poster, unlikely to be own work or freely licensed. Redtree21 (talk) 11:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yuval Y § Chat § 12:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a test, duplicating File:Nuvola Algerian flag.svg (Algeria vs Algerian in title) CMD (talk) 11:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
