Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg){kind=link}
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_-_stained_glass,_butterfly.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Play8boy21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted posters
- File:Color Rush Season 2 poster.jpg
- File:Light on Me 2021 s1 Poster.png
- File:My Sweet Dear Official Poster.jpg
- File:Behind Cut Poster.jpg
- File:Cherry Blossoms After Winter Official Poster.jpg
- File:To My Star Official Poster.jpg
- File:You Make Me Dance Official Poster.jpg
- File:The Tasty Florida Official Poster.jpg
- File:Tinted with You Official Poster.jpg
BriefEdits (talk) 03:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete please Play8boy21 (talk) 04:10, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
out of project scope LutzBruno (talk) 04:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam attack - gone. --Herby talk thyme 15:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps (Satellite) copyvio Enyavar (talk) 02:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 03:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 03:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Blurred image and copyright holder in Metadata
The photo looks like own work, and the receipt itself is probably uncopyrightable. However, is this in COM:SCOPE? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Beggars belief really - looks like vandalism too. It is simply speedy. Herby talk thyme 12:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS, troll/prank, also considering profane insult by uploader in image description. (24 hour warning block given to uploader.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
my request as uploader and copyright owner Syzyszune (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment Uploaded in March 2020; in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
my request as uploader and copyright owner Syzyszune (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Why? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep (I would have closed this if an admin had not already participated) No new deletion rationale; file remains in use. Brianjd (talk) 12:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
I as the uploader and the copyright owner of this image want to delete it. Syzyszune (talk) 09:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept, deletion request just closed as kept, and no new reason for deletion offered. (@Syzyszune: repeated requests for deletion without explanation of *why* it should be deleted are unlikely to do anything other than annoy other users.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I as the copyright owner of this image want to remove the image. Because in the picture I used the wrong Kawi script. Syzyszune (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image is still in use. Can someone with familiarity with Kawi script take a look at this? @Syzyszune: What is the problem, and why didn't you mention it in your previous deletion requests? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Rosenzweig τ 18:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
In writing this character, there is a typo and it is not in accordance with the writing of the Kawi script Inayubhagya (talk) 06:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This is the 5th time this reason has been given to delete a file in use. Could you fix or replace the image? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Agree with Ikan Kekek - @Inayubhagya: SO FIX IT. If you made a mistake, please make a corrected version and upload that over this. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek @Infrogmation I don't intend to fix it. I hope you can understand what request I mean is to delete this image file. Inayubhagya (talk) 03:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Someone has to fix it. It won't be deleted, because it's in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 08:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I, as the uploader and owner of this file, would like to remove it from Wikimedia Commons Inayubhagya (talk) 10:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep Uploaded in 2020, much too late for a courtesy deletion. Also in use. This is now the sixth nomination in 18 months without a proper and convincing rationale why this file should be deleted. Please stop it. --Rosenzweig τ 10:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- There are incorrect characters in the file. Because when I wrote the script there was a typo and it didn't match the Kawi script. Inayubhagya (talk) 22:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- So why not fix it - make a new corrected version and upload it over the current version? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- There are incorrect characters in the file. Because when I wrote the script there was a typo and it didn't match the Kawi script. Inayubhagya (talk) 22:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Mu mesti berhenti dengan perlakuan ini. Bosan-lah! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Inayubhagya Just fix it and upload a new version. I !vote Keep per above. Tryvix1509 (talk) 12:58, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Tryvix1509 I don't plan to build or upload a new version. But I asked for this image file to be deleted. Inayubhagya (talk) 03:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per previous DR's. Just create a corrected version and overwrite this file by clicking "Upload a new version of this file". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Clear violation of copyright. The original logo is taken from Sword Art Online, a light novel series. Milky·Defer 11:10, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Clear violation of copyright, original logo taken from Sword Art Online. Milky·Defer 11:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
File page without file. Leonel Sohns 13:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 1st galleon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Film posters; unlikely to be own work. Similar/closely related uploads of the same user have been found at https://www.atasov-film-travel.com/.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Giacomo Alessandroni What's up! 17:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Apologize me, this is another building, not the St. Paulus Church. I'll reupload it after deletetion with correct attribution. --Giacomo Alessandroni What's up! 18:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of Fernandes Arquitetos http://fernandes.arq.br/projetos/estacao-santa-marina-metro-de-sp-linha-6-laranja/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of Luiz Esteves Arquitetura http://www.luizesteves.arq.br/Portf%C3%B3lio_Luiz_Esteves_Arquitetura.pdf https://www.galeriadaarquitetura.com.br/projeto/luiz-esteves-arquitetura_/linha-2-verde-do-metro-de-sao-paulo/3229 Sorocabano 32 (talk) 22:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of Fernandes Arquitetos http://fernandes.arq.br/projetos/estacao-nova-manchester-metro-de-sp-linha-2-verde/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of http://www.metro.sp.gov.br/sua-viagem/linha-1-azul/estacao-jabaquara.aspx Sorocabano 32 (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Self promotions Pierre cb (talk) 14:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ezarate at 17:46, 27 December 2021 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Raza kashyap --Krdbot 20:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
exact duplicate of File:James Webb Space Telescope Prelaunch (NHQ202112250001).jpg vip (talk) 14:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Wdwd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
exact duplicate of File:James Webb Space Telescope Prelaunch (NHQ202112250003).jpg vip (talk) 14:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Wdwd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per Com:Packaging - not ineligible image - Fma12 (talk) 14:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
exact duplicate of File:James Webb Space Telescope Launch (NHQ202112250005).jpg vip (talk) 15:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Wdwd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
exact duplicate of File:James Webb Space Telescope Launch (NHQ202112250006).jpg vip (talk) 15:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Wdwd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Have better version File:Flag of Talysh-Mugan Autonomous Republic (the talysh national flag).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Have better version File:Flag of Talysh-Mugan Autonomous Republic (the talysh national flag).jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 22:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Fictional micronation parliamant Enyavar (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:58, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: fictional micronation flag Enyavar (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:58, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
private picture XRay 💬 16:03, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete COM:WEBHOST A09090091 (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)- Delete uploaded by a promotional account, could likely be speedied under COM:F10. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
private picture XRay 💬 16:03, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:WEBHOST A09090091 (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete uploaded by a promotional account, could likely be speedied under COM:F10. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
private picture XRay 💬 16:03, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:WEBHOST A09090091 (talk) 18:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete uploaded by a promotional account, could likely be speedied under COM:F10. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
would like to delete it Zwm2s (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 14:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept. Deletion request withdrawn by nominator. "Proof of compatible license provided."agr (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Originally requested speedy deletion by Melmann as copyright violation for following reason: Picture taken by upper stage of Ariane 5 owned by Arianespace and operated on behalf of European Space Agency and is thus unlikely to be owned by NASA and threrefore unlikely to be in public domain. Substantially similar to previously deleted File:JWST Separation Dec 25 2021.webp.
I've opened this deletion request as the uploader Differenxe has appealed to speedy deletion for following reason: Reply: I disagree about the speedy deletion tag. The image was uploaded to https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasas-webb-telescope-launches-to-see-first-galaxies-distant-worlds and therefore appears to be in public domain. Stylez995 (talk) 23:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
If we are willing to grant that the image is owned by ESA, then they explicitly state that their images cannot be used for commercial uses, which is incompatible with Commons. They do state that they license some images under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO, but this has to be expressly stated. I see no such statement on the source page provided.
If the image is owned by Ariancespace, they state explicitly that all right are reserved in regards to photos.- Comment The photo has also been published on NASA’s Webb telescope Flickr account at https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasawebbtelescope/51775886252/ , with credits to "Arianespace, ESA, NASA, CSA, CNES" and a CC-by license. -- Ariadacapo (talk) 20:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Proof of compatible license provided. Melmann (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files by various authors, no proof of CC license. VTRS needed.
Gumruch (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Apparently an old meme. Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of user:Jerzykluger97 Image has obvious fake mustache added as post processing. Trolling or similar which falls outside of scope. Grayfell (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete as out of scope. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 14:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of user:Jerzykluger97, this photo of a fringe social media figure has an obvious fake mustach added. Only possible purpose of image is for trolling, so falls outside of scope Grayfell (talk) 01:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, hoax. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
This image does not represent Storm Arwen of November 26, 2021. It is only an area of clouds in the North Atlantic Pierre cb (talk) 01:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not helpful/educational. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Author info leads to Imageshack which is paywalled or members only. Doubt this is freely licensed or even the right guy, and I do NOT want Wikipedia to be accidentally claiming some random Bob Shmoe is a horse fucker. Dronebogus (talk) 02:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced, possibly misleading map. At worst this might be some kind of zoophile sex tourism guide, or abused as such. Dronebogus (talk) 02:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment In use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment This map is poorly sourced and this is a big issue. But in any case a map that shows the differences of legality regarding zoophilia could be very useful for a lot of educational reasons, this is a topic that has also been covered in scientific literature: here's for example a research that shows (also with a map) the differences regarding legality of zoophilia in USA. --Digressivo (talk) 06:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. Use {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Image is artist concept art by the artchitects (https://www.facebook.com/AHEADCONCEPT/photos/10159770483186095), seemingly no permission ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 03:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Nonsensical "map" with rules about a custom-made sign. Unused, creater is indef-blocked. Enyavar (talk) 03:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Nonsensical "map" with rules about a custom-made sign. Unused, creater is indef-blocked. Enyavar (talk) 03:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Lakshmana and the monkey king Sugriva are conversing in a palanquin carried by four monkeys to offer allegiance to Rama..jpg Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not an exact duplicate considering the border. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation? Found this photo also on http://teleghraph.net/?tag=%D9%81%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B4%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%81 JopkeB (talk) 04:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg){kind=link}
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation? Found this file also on https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/1_%2828%29_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg JopkeB (talk) 04:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Found online published in 2015. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Sara mohmad abd elrahman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation? These files are also on other websites (https://bestsale.2021outletstores.ru/category?name=%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87%20%D9%81%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86%20%D8%A7%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%B1%20%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%B7%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D9%82, https://www.alkhaleej.ae/%D9%85%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%82/%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AD-%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%8A%D8%BA%D9%86%D9%8A-%D8%B9%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%A9 and https://www.entyhelwa.com/2018/02/Sarah-Abdelrahman_69.html), and they depict the same person as the uploader, so hard to believe she made them herself.
- File:1 (3) sara abd elrahman mohmad.jpg
- File:1 (9) sara abd elrahman mohmad.jpg
- File:1 (30) sara abd el rahman mohmad.jpg
_sara_abd_elrahman_mohmad.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sara_abd_elrahman_mohmad.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sara_abd_el_rahman_mohmad.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JopkeB (talk) 05:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Galarza Creador (talk) 05:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The demography has changed, this place doesnt look same anymore 2409:4054:87:5446:599F:1CD2:C4C:90C9 05:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
I would like to see proof that Scribia4178 really made this cover him/herself. Otherwise it is copyright violation. JopkeB (talk) 05:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The picture is a screenshot, no metadata Kadıköylü (talk) 07:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, cropped from unknown source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Image not clear PrfctSam (talk) 07:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep In use, clarity should not be the reason for deltion. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 01:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per C1K98V. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG used to mark a building. Better use en:Template:Site plan or alike. Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep That's no valid reason to delete an entire image! If you feel there's some technical fault with it, upload an amended version you feel is better suited. Asav | Talk 11:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Not valid delete-reason. Vasmar1 | Marius Vassnes (talk) 12:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As stated above. Ulflarsen (talk) 21:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As stated above.--Trygve W Nodeland (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As stated above.--Znuddel (talk) 19:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Understand the need for a pristine image, but Mal:Site plan Mal:Overlay Mal:Annotated image is not found and not working on no.wikipedia.org. A working solution for overlay is needed first. --Andrez1 (talk) 15:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason to delete. --Johannes Østby (talk) 07:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. But File:Maschius Trondheimsprospekt m seteritak.jpg should be used instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
This is my own work and I dont want it to be here Anhelina Starkova (talk) 10:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The author is unknown, so we are not sure the author died 70 years ago. The postcard is not very old, many people from this time, is alive.Template was probalby used as an excuse to add photos on Commons. German photo from the 1930s, so not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. {{PD-anon-70-EU}} is not applicable for pre-1995 German works. Mmedstereast (talk) 10:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The author is unknown, so we are not sure the author died 70 years ago. The postcard is not very old, many people from this time, is alive.Template was probalby used as an excuse to add photos on Commons. German photo from the 1930s, so not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. {{PD-anon-70-EU}} is not applicable for pre-1995 German works. Mmedstereast (talk) 10:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Request by another Android app user who couldn't resist. 191.126.161.44 02:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. They didn't use Android. --Achim55 (talk) 08:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Esta ficha fue borrada dos veces anteriormente. "We have the goal of an educational image collection." De veras? 191.126.41.174 11:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviio: Text and display from the website of Free the Narrative where there is no indication of Creative Commons https://www.freethenarrative.com/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyviio: Text and display from the website of Free the Narrative where there is no indication of Creative Commons https://www.freethenarrative.com/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Commons is not a private file repository. Di (they-them) (talk) 13:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
useless picture with a huge ass watermark right at the centre... absolutely shitty pictures... must be deleted and the uploader should be blocked for his self promotion 2003:F2:670A:8800:EDB1:405D:DCAF:8452 13:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: the uploader tried to take over a page on en.wiki with self promotion (diff of my removal), and eventually realized that it was harder for patrollers to get rid of images than text. I went through and cropped out some of the big bold text on images, but much of it is still watermarked and of marginal quality. - Featous (talk) 15:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
useless picture with a huge ass watermark right at the centre... absolutely shitty pictures... must be deleted and the uploader should be blocked for his self promotion 2003:F2:670A:8800:EDB1:405D:DCAF:8452 13:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: the uploader tried to take over a page on en.wiki with self promotion (diff of my removal), and eventually realized that it was harder for patrollers to get rid of images than text. I went through and cropped out some of the big bold text on images, but much of it is still watermarked and of marginal quality. - Featous (talk) 15:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted work with no permission. Might even contain private information. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland#Not protected: Ministry of Culture and National Heritage - © Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego - no dedicated copyright page 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Most photos from this uploader are attributed to Jarosław Barański (eg. File:Hanna Gill-Piątek Joanna Mucha.jpg), some to Tomasz Kaczor (eg. File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at Senat RP.jpg) and one to Piotr Lipka (File:Leepeck - koncert w Warszawie (2021).jpg), however all of them contain own work tag. Since it's impossible to deduce which of them are really own work in such case, permission is needed to host these files on Commons.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Leepeck - koncert w Warszawie (2021).jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek with flowers.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek - UE-PL conference.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek UE-PL.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at Senat RP.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek in polish parlament.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at Sejm RP.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at Polish Parliament.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek and Paulina Hennig-Kloska.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at brifing.jpg
- File:Polish MEP briefing.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at conference.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek and polish politicians.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek during parliament work.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at parliament briefing.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at manifestation.jpg
- File:Press briefing Polska 2050 party.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek tv interwiev.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek Polska 2050.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek at press briefing.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek during interview.jpg
- File:Polska 2050.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek Szymon Hołownia Michał Kobosko.jpg
- File:Hanna Gill-Piątek Joanna Mucha.jpg
- File:Szymon Hołownia and Hanna Gill-Piątek at Sejm RP.jpg
~Cybularny Speak? 15:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rickyponting05 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo and diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thethinh 1610 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
_c%E1%BB%9D_th%E1%BB%A7_l%C4%A9nh.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thích Thách Thức (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Buichinhhung (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Phoebe Doan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, it definitely should be deleted. It's just a cropped screenshot of a case of Wikidata vandalism visible on the Polish Wikipedia that I used once in 2020. --MemicznyJanusz (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:US secret service rounding up German spies 1915 by Robert Moore Brinkerhoff.jpg Thats Just Great (talk) 17:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian, just trying to promote himself. Osama Eid (talk) 17:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian, just trying to promote himself. Osama Eid (talk) 17:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
"Taken on location"; uploader appears to be depicted looking at the username. Unlikely to be own work, no permission from photographer. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
This image has a bug and I've uploaded another, correct version (Transmed Transport Logo.svg) so this version can be deleted. Welkend (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
unused self-advertisement Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, nothing to see. Joschi71 (talk) 18:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate - uploaded from geograph, not sure why it did not find the original and notify me. Anyway, newer version is far better quality and I have replaced the single file use with the better version. Hopefully this is the correct procedure even tho this one is older. Crowsus (talk) 19:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- For reference, this is the replacement version: File:Last day of the old Renfrew ferry (geograph 531786).jpg --bjh21 (talk) 12:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: This is not a duplicate. While they're both the same photo, File:Last day of the old Renfrew ferry - geograph.org.uk - 531786.jpg is cropped rather tighter than File:Last day of the old Renfrew ferry (geograph 531786).jpg. This is correctly marked on Geograph, and is why Geograph Update Bot hadn't already overwritten the picture with the higher-resolution version. --bjh21 (talk) 12:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Not enough substantial difference to keep the low res version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 19:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Provide link for direct copyvio. A09090091 (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Provide link for direct copyvio.--A09090091 (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Provide link for direct copyvio.--A09090091 (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Provide link for direct copyvio.--A09090091 (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Multiple instances found on web, watermark is questionable. A09090091 (talk) 18:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Multiple online instances found. A09090091 (talk) 18:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Provide link for direct copyvio.--A09090091 (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Provide link for direct copyvio.--A09090091 (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Provide link for direct copyvio.--A09090091 (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Provide link for direct copyvio.--A09090091 (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Unless an actual link is provided. A09090091 (talk) 18:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete https://yandex.ru/maps/org/departament_po_sportu_i_molodezhnoy_politike_administratsii_goroda_tyumeni/1843375051/gallery/?ll=65.536053%2C57.150338&photos%5Bbusiness%5D=1843375051&photos%5Bid%5D=urn%3Ayandex%3Asprav%3Aphoto%3AY31IgvThLY-a17-UsNP7ih_Qao4W0NyTf&z=17 A09090091 (talk) 18:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete https://gorod-t.info/culture/obrazovanie/378/ A09090091 (talk) 18:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Unless an actual link is provided. A09090091 (talk) 18:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. By own admission, it is not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement. A source: Yandex 95.31.191.213 20:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete http://safe-rgs.ru/641-podaruevskaya-a-nyne-semakova.html A09090091 (talk) 18:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Jelican9 (talk) 21:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Screenshot. A09090091 (talk) 18:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
erreur d'image Lau80 (talk) 21:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
erreur d'image Lau80 (talk) 21:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused COA. No real value if it is incorrect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
I think that this advertising materials are copyrighted. Discostu (talk) 22:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete 2 instances found on web. A09090091 (talk) 18:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian, and there is a conflict of interest Osama Eid (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright-Vermerk auf dem Bild und der Herkunftsseite 87.154.170.101 22:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of Companhia do Metropolitano de São Paulo (CMSP) https://www.metrocptm.com.br/estacao-chacara-klabin-da-linha-5-inicia-operacao-comercial-das-portas-de-plataforma/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 22:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian, trying to promote oneself only. Osama Eid (talk) 23:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The picture is a screenshot, no metadata Kadıköylü (talk) 07:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a copyvio per https://onlyalperend.tumblr.com/post/662595762602082304/via-drburak-altun-bug%C3%BCn-g%C3%BCnlerden . — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Túrelio, hello. Could you close this ? Kind regards. Kadıköylü (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Deleted: Done by Túrelio (Copyright violation: https://onlyalperend.tumblr.com/post/662595762602082304/via-drburak-altun-bug%C3%BCn-g%C3%BCnlerden), thanks! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wikimedia oversighter icons
[edit]The source of the yellow person icon on a green background must be identified. If determined to be non-free, it can be replaced with the icon in File:Wikiversity Overshight.svg.
- File:Commons Oversighter.png
- File:Meta-wiki Oversight.svg
- File:Wikibooks Oversighter.png
- File:Wikidata Oversighter.png
- File:Wikinews Oversighter.png
- File:Wiktionary Oversight-2000px.png
- File:Wiktionary Oversight.svg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Source file should be File:Fairytale kdmconfig2.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:58, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept as the icon has been identified and is freely licensed. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Lezgi_people.png Sharval (talk) 01:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Lezgi people.png -- Geagea (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
This is not Lezgi people flag. This is flag of organization "SADVAL" in 1990-1995 years. ALDKL (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Lezgi people.png -- Geagea (talk) 20:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
This is no flag of Lezgi people. Ordinem (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 18:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Have better version File:Lezgin flag.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better version File:Lezgin flag.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE A09090091 (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091, it is only used in File:Lezgin flag.png, which is the exactly the same of this file. If it use not useless, then we can upload lots of duplicates and just use them in one version of it. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Dr.Wiki54: Your "better version" is not better but worser (look at the quality of file) and it was uploaded later than Lezgin flag sadval. A09090091 (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091 it is not mine, but never mind. Yeap i agree here that i made a mistake by saying "better one". But why we should upload lots of duplicates and do not delete them. I agrre with your commemt that you wrote in other request. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Dr.Wiki54: Your "better version" is not better but worser (look at the quality of file) and it was uploaded later than Lezgin flag sadval. A09090091 (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091, it is only used in File:Lezgin flag.png, which is the exactly the same of this file. If it use not useless, then we can upload lots of duplicates and just use them in one version of it. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. Jeez the dude had a really hard life and died at age 20, at least respect his copyright. Dronebogus (talk) 03:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mmedstereast as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo scanned from Ebay Polarlys (talk) 19:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Copying postcards from an auction site is an abuse, even many photos are watermarked to avoid being copied. Additionally, inserting a template {{PD-Poland}} is frivolous because, photos was taken before independence of Poland and comes from the auction site, not the Polish publication. --Mmedstereast (talk) 22:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- A rubber stamp "Foto Kopp, 0734" is shown on the back of the photo. Therefore, I conclude that the copyright belongs to the photographer Kopp and not to the eBay salesman who just scanned the photo. I think, the copyright has lapsed and the old photo is now public domain. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The photographer probably was someone named Kopp from Falkenburg in Pomerania, but everything else, including the assumption that this photo is in the public domain, is only speculation. I can be rather sure that the photo dates from no later than 1946, because the town was given another (Polish) name then. So the file can be restored with {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2067, unless someone has another convincing clue giving the photo an earlier time of creation. --Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Image not entered PD in USA due to COM:URAA 182.239.87.44 18:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this image is not eligible for copyright restoration, the Associated Press avoided the URAA restoration in the US. GreenPollock (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Question How exactly did they manage to "avoid" a federal law? --Rosenzweig τ 19:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm not given enough information here to be able to determine the copyright status of this photograph. The photo is said to be from ca. 1930 and that a signed print was given to the headmaster of an American school in Paris Philip attended at the time. So it's probably French in origin. There is no photographer named, but does that really mean that the author is anonymous as claimed by the template {{Anonymous-EU}} that is used? Without more context, you can't really say that, so I'll delete the file per the precautionary principle. Plus, even if it were anonymous, it would have been still copyrighted on the URAA date. --Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
it's my own and I want to delete it Starsunboy (talk) 21:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
+What is yours and you want to delete? The penis or the file? I think none of them is worth to keep. Delete.
Deleted: SD G7. --GPSLeo (talk) 09:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Dear Martin SG.,
- First of all, I am new ans this is my very first article, so I am glad to get informatons, if something went wrong. I have uploaded further pictures too. Now I am not sure, why these pictures are not discussed.
- All the pictures I will use in this article are made by my brother. We both are the sons of Peter Mayer, so there is no copyright issue.
- Best Regards
- Florian LA SAD (talk) 09:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Lieber Florian, Danke für die Beiträge und die Nachfrage. Es geht um den urheberrechtlichen Schutz der abgebildeten Kunstwerke, der ja bis 70 Jahre nach dem Tod ihres Urhebers greift. Da Ihr aber wohl die Rechtsnachfolger und -inhaber seid, ist eine gültige Freigabe für die gemeinfreie Publikation hier wohl zu erlangen resp. durch Euch zu erteilen, siehe Commons:VRT/de. Beste Grüße, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, insufficient permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright holder Clemens Mayer - which was revealed as the brother of the uploader in the previous DR. Needs COM:VRT.
- File:Wackersdorf-IP.jpg
- File:Kebbelvilla.jpg
- File:Vogelwächter.jpg
- File:Sonnemond.jpg
- File:Burgweinting 2.jpg
- File:Peter Portrait.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Archivo duplicado. Pedro H. Vega (talk) 01:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Bharatpurcha Vedha Pooja Ramesh Kadam (talk) 09:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- What is the reason for deletion? It seems that you have uploaded the better version. Thanks for the same. However the previous file also can be kept here. I request the admins to guide on this matter.--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 07:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ce fichier est non comforme à la réalité 2A01:E0A:5C9:6A00:D578:E28:B85:2D1B 15:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, fictional, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by AlfenMeister (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploads marked as "own work", most likely from space companies and/or space agencies, certainly not "own work".
- File:Comet Interceptor probe.png
- File:GOES-T.png
- File:X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission.png
- File:ARIEL Telescope probe.png
- File:Euclid space telescope.png
- File:Time-Resolved Observations of Precipitation structure and storm Intensity with a Constellation of Smallsats.png
- File:BioSentinel Probe.png
- File:VERITAS.png
- File:PLATO.png
- File:NEO Surveyor probe.png
- File:Lunar Trailblazer.png
- File:Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem.png
- File:IXPE.png
- File:Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe pictures.png
- File:Euclid telescope.png
- File:NEA Scout.png
- File:JPSS-2.png
- File:Luna 25.png
- File:TROPICS.png
- File:CAPSTONE.png
- File:Near-Earth Asteroid Scout.png
- File:LunIR.png
- File:OMOTENASHI.png
- File:Lunar IceCube.png
- File:EQUULEUS.png
- File:BioSentinel.png
- File:Ei CubeSat for Solar Particles.png
- File:GOES-T-image-1.jpg
- File:Solar Orbiter.png
- File:Inmarsat-6 -scaled.webp
Polarlys (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unless the original file can be clearly determined to be freely licensed. I'll go through these tomorrow when I have time and mark which are acceptable, and clean them up. Either way, this is a classic example of how not to contribute. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Info: I removed them from en.wp, sometimes in favor of images that were removed.. --Polarlys (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: File:VERITAS.png contains the same spacecraft illustration shown in File:Veritas20150930.jpg, which has a public domain provenance in NASA (here). I can't figure out where the spacecraft illustration originated (I don't have much free time to dig at the moment), but it seems likely that either VERITAS.png is also from NASA and therefore something we can keep, or the spacecraft image originated elsewhere, which means Veritas20150930.jpg should also be deleted. Tisnec (talk) 04:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- I had time to do a little more digging today. I couldn't find a copy of just the spacecraft image from NASA, but I opened up the image and noticed something interesting: The edges are fuzzy. The original uploader hasn't responded to the notice for deletion, but here's what I think happened. This image - and possibly the others, only some of which I've checked - are edited copies of NASA imagery. (To support this argument, look at this image. The struts have an eroded quality they wouldn't have if this were the original render.) NASA stuff is generally PD, and PD stuff can be edited and redistributed on the editor's terms. If that's what happened here - and I stress the "if" - then this is exactly what the uploader says it is: Their own work. They still should have made that chain of provenance clear, to avoid exactly this situation, but if my theory is right then we can keep these images, they just need to be retagged. The uploader was notified yesterday, so I won't ping them again just yet, but I'm hoping they can clear this up. Tisnec (talk) 22:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. Uploader has not responded to calls for clarification. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/incategory:"Charging Bull"
[edit]These three images show a copy of w:en:Charging Bull, which is notoriously copyrighted and cannot be enjoyed freely (sources: [1], [2], and [3]) since there is no panorama exception in the United States. While this copy is situated in Belgium which has freedom of panorama, Belgian FOP only covers works permanently situated outdoors. I suspect this Charging Bull copy (likely recent) is indoors, and was also only exhibited temporarily (for Génération 80 Experience, whose categories include "Category:Temporary exhibitions in Belgium").
- File:Generation 80 Experience 20190108 12.jpg
- File:Generation 80 Experience 20190108 13.jpg
- File:Generation 80 Experience 20190108 14.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since), which is correct as given. However, the subject died in 1933. Would it be possible for uploader to tell us the actual creator of the photograph which looks like a studio photograph and the real date of the picture? Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Is this supposed to be Edmond Gros? Is it not PD-EU-no author disclosure? If the family received a copy from the anonymous photographer in 1923 it was published. "Published" for copyright purposes means a copy has been distributed to the public, not necessary appearing in a magazine or newspaper). --RAN (talk) 04:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. As the photographer is unknown it is not clear if the image is in public domain. It is also not known if and when the image was first published. Therefore the photo must be deleted. Per community decision of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template the photo can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was made, which will be not later than 1922+121=2043.. --Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:TOO Australia John123521 (talk) 07:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Saints Peter and Paul Roman Catholic Church (Sandusky, Ohio) - stained glass, butterfly.JPG
[edit]_-_stained_glass,_butterfly.JPG){kind=link}
_-_stained_glass,_butterfly.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no Freedom of Panorama in the United States for Stained Glasses. 116.206.12.51 10:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Info: The church was built in 1866. --Achim55 (talk) 10:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Based on the age of the church, it seems fair to assume that the stained glass is of similar age absent conflicting information. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO UK. Minoraxtalk 00:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
This IS NOT the onlyfans logo , is this , (Padlock on O)This file is only text. (Gotham lite & Marguerite fonts) .--EEIM (talk) 00:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ah. Initially thought that the word "Fans" is handwritten. I shall withdraw this nomination. --Minoraxtalk
- @Minorax: Seems like it's only text. Feel free to return and remove nomination, if nothing more is added in the discussion.--Paracel63 (talk) 08:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Below treshold, text only logo (not the real logo). --Elly (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Current logo is above COM:TOO UK --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
¿Delete OF and....keep OnlyFans?--EEIM (talk) 03:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- The overwritten file was moved to File:OnlyFans text (2).svg. I have updated the link here. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Beyond COM:TOO UK. The design of "OF" is complex. --SCP-2000 16:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Originally tagged for missing permission by Afifa Afrin. The rationale though is PD-textlogo which does not require a permission because there is no copyright at all. As the copyright law of Bangladesh was modelled after UK law, the threshold of originality may be quite low though. De728631 (talk) 19:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Can't tell whether the event depicted in the video was either public or private. Apparently, looks like one of family occasions. Furthermore, originally uploaded by WMF-banned user Meganesia and then transferred to Commons. Also, the song performed in the video may or may not be copyrighted. George Ho (talk) 21:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this film and the music. --Ellywa (talk) 20:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright by w:Viktor Zhirmunsky (one of the authors, see [4]). This book was published in 1934: see [5], pp. 46—47 2A02:2168:A01:45E9:0:0:0:1 21:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Copyright holder died in 1971, see en:Viktor Zhirmunsky. The image will be in PD 71 years after this year and can be undeleted in 2042. Can be undeleted earlier if permission for publication with a free licence is obtained from the heirs per VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 20:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright by w:Leonid Sabaneyev (one of the authors, see [6]). This book was published in 1929: see [7], pp. 46—47 2A02:2168:A01:45E9:0:0:0:1 22:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Copyright holder died in 1968, see en: Leonid Sabaneyev. The book will be in PD 71 years after this year and can be undeleted in 2039. Can be undeleted earlier if permission for publication with a free licence is obtained from the heirs per VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 20:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
This file shows a flag of the ethnic group, which lives in different countries of the same region. But it hasn't any references. So I think it's original work and must be deleted. Wertuose (talk) 09:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept, file is in use and thus within project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 20:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
This is not flag of the Lezgian people. Sharval (talk) 00:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Commons does not editorialize on files that are in use in Wikipedias.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the previous party. Хаджимурад (talk) 06:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The flag is in use by other Wikimedia projects (several Wikipedia articles) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this flag should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any flag at all. After stop being in use, you can request again deletion from commons.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This file is in use therefore is project scope. You can still consider using the template {{Factual accuracy}} but only after discussion in the file talk page. -- Geagea (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
This is not Lezgi people flag. This is flag of organization "SADVAL" in 1990-1995 years. ALDKL (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Because:
- The flag is in use by other Wikimedia projects (several Wikipedia articles) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this flag should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any flag at all. After stop being in use, you can request again deletion from commons.
- If name or description are wrong, this is not a reason to delete. It is just a reason to gather consensus to fix them.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This file is in use therefore is project scope. You can still consider using the template {{Factual accuracy}} but only after discussion in the file talk page. -- Geagea (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Have better version File:Lezgin flag.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 22:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
@A09090091, it is only used in File:Lezgin flag.png, which is the exactly the same of this file. If it use not useless, then we can upload lots of duplicates and just use them in one version of it. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This file has been here since 2006. The so-called "better version" (which I can't see any difference in) has only been here since 2012, so the comparison is irrelevant. It shouldn't be deleted so that older versions of pages that used it will still be legible.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Dr.Wiki54: Prosfilaes was faster than me. I don't see a difference; older files should be kept and their newer duplicates deleted. A09090091 (talk) 11:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091@Prosfilaes ok, i am not against the version which was written by @A09090091. But in that case one should move all pages into oldest one. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, history merge IMHO is not needed. Their difference is 1 px on y axis and that is too small of a difference for human eye. The best thing would be a SVG version of flag, not another small resolution JPG file. A09090091 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091 ok, i asked for a help to move all of them. Now all of File:Lezgin flag.png have been moved into File:Flag of the Lezgi people.svg. I think there is no need for "png" versions. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, history merge IMHO is not needed. Their difference is 1 px on y axis and that is too small of a difference for human eye. The best thing would be a SVG version of flag, not another small resolution JPG file. A09090091 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091@Prosfilaes ok, i am not against the version which was written by @A09090091. But in that case one should move all pages into oldest one. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: kept the older flag, deleted the newer file:Lezgin flag.png per COM:REDUNDANT and made redirect to avoid red links on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)