Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hercules 1998 Intertitle.png
Is this really okay for {{PD-textlogo}}? While the text would be okay per se, what about the fairly elaborate background? Decltype (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: The background is in shades of beige, with no distinguishable shape or form, such background isn't elaborate or eligible for any type of copyright. Xeworlebi (t•c) 12:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Xeworlebi, the shades of the background is nothing that copyright can be claimed for. -- Neozoon (talk) 22:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
This image is licensed claiming it "only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text". This is inaccurate, as the background image and possibly the beveling should easily meet the threshold of originality. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Same deletion rationale as above. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept. I'm closing this early. Unless there are new issues raised, we all have better things to do than debate the same image twice in five weeks. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
I must concur with previous DRs, this is not in any way PD-SIMPLE or PD-TEXTLOGO. The background is undeniably complex - if it were without text, we'd easily accept it was copyrighted. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Very complex. I think the previous DRs resulting in the file being kept won't change it. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 18:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- And it is also possible a court could rule this to be copyrightable because of the 3D letters and the background, and thus I think we need to delete the image per COM:PRP. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?)
Delete As per my 2010 nomination, adding that it would be prudent to err on the side of caution in cases where reasonable doubt exists that an image meets {{PD-textlogo}}. decltype
(talk) 11:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Maybe we've all become more precautionary in the last couple of years, but I agree that this shows artistry beyond the TOO. --99of9 (talk) 07:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)