Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scat-01.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very dirty pictures Dealtsamsi (talk) 21:55, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a reason for deletion, though I do agree, it is a very dirty picture. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Scat-01.jpg

I am the copyright holder of this picture to stop the distribution of the photo. Dealtsamsi (talk) 05:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Scat-01.jpg

To stop the distribution of the photo. Siryusis (talk) 11:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept -mattbuck (Talk) 15:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Comment Help I have previously raised concerns about the specific type of behaviour which appears to be happening here. People upload the photo and then leave, there is no identifiable information which links them to the photo, and they seem to have forgotten about their account. The style of their uploads is different from one another, for example we can look at how date field is presented, sometimes it's with '/' as the delimiter, sometimes it's '-', sometimes it's written out. Many times we have a rather good grasp of English language shown in the description field. Then all of the sudden they come back and start making demands to remove the image, without engaging in any discussion, but always stating their demand grammatically incorrectly. I honestly believe that we may be dealing with somebody who is just picking the passwords of the nudity/sexually explicit uploader profiles. I once again request that this is investigated by somebody who has access to logs or somesuch and report on the finding. This isn't the first time this has happened, but the pattern is too similar to be ignored. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 14:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked Herby to weigh in on this pattern. We might want to move the discussion elsewhere. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Herby says no, perhaps if you gather some more evidence we can do something about it. Anyway, I've closed this discussion, upload protected the image and semiprotected the image page, so should be OK for now. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Info according to the block of both accounts it seems that user:Siryusis and user:Dealtsamsi are the same. Also note that Dealtsamsi uploaded probably a copyvio: File:Jigsaw Squirting Dildo-0.jpg --Saibo (Δ) 15:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted uploaded to [1] in 2007 --Denniss (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]