Commons:Deletion requests/File:X Corp. logo.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
logo appears to be sourced from an unofficial linkedin page Jurta (talk) 16:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Why do you say it's unofficial? Epicamused (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- anyone could've made that page and set the profile picture as that logo, regardless if its official or not. until there's official confirmation of its legitimacy, or if an official logo is announced at all, i advise against using this as a source Jurta (talk) 17:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- can you prove that it's unofficial? Epicamused (talk) 07:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Entire page is written in Spanish, "Headquarters" field has a grammatical error (space before comma), logo is an edit of the SpaceX logo despite both companies having nothing to do with each other apart from being owned by Elon Musk, to name a few. Jurta (talk) 08:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- can you prove that it's unofficial? Epicamused (talk) 07:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- anyone could've made that page and set the profile picture as that logo, regardless if its official or not. until there's official confirmation of its legitimacy, or if an official logo is announced at all, i advise against using this as a source Jurta (talk) 17:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep No policy-related rationale for deletion is put forth. Commons doesn't care whether it's final or official, it just has to be in scope and be freely licensed. This isn't Wikipedia. File:SpaceX logo black.svg is below TOO, so I don't see why this wouldn't be too. 25stargeneral (talk) 04:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete I'm almost certain this is unofficial. Why would the page not be in English? Why would there be errors on the page? Anyone could make this. Even if it is real, it says it's for X Holdings Corp., which the Wikidata page that this logo keeps being added to, and the associated Wikipedia article, are not about. Wikipedia doesn't even have a page on X Holdings Corp. Strugglehouse (talk) 13:48, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Strugglehouse: What reason for deletion are you citing? You do not mention one of the ones listed at Commons:Deletion policy. 25stargeneral (talk) 22:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- @25stargeneral: Probably a copyright violation as there's no proof of who made it and where it originally came from. Definitely out of scope as it's almost certainly fan made and is not useful for educational purposes. See COM:EDUSE and Commons:Project scope/Summary#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Strugglehouse (talk) 23:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's well below TOO. File:SpaceX logo black.svg is and uses the same stylized x. Scope is interpreted fairly broadly, if there's any chance at all it's associated with the company then it is of value to us. We are not Wikipedia and content on Commons does not need to be factually verified. Just label it as unconfirmed in the file desc. 25stargeneral (talk) 23:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Just because it can be included, doesn't mean it should be included. It may be okay in terms of copyright law, but it's not useful as it doesn't "provid[e] knowledge", and is "Self-created artwork".
- I don't believe it should be included, but, if it is, then it should definitely not be added to Wikidata or Wikipedia, as those most certainly do need to be factually verified. Strugglehouse (talk) 10:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- I believe that if it weren't official that page would have already been shut down for false information or something, also because I'm pretty sure it's a crime to impersonate someone else.
- Also I don't see any problems using Spanish or in any case it could just be a transcription error (same thing for the spelling error, it can happen, I've seen several times grammatical errors in official websites). Epicamused (talk) 18:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sure it would get deleted if it was reported a number of times, but LinkedIn aren't going to check every single page. Think of it as any other social media - how many impersonators there are on Twitter, Instagram, etc.. They can't check everything. Strugglehouse (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's well below TOO. File:SpaceX logo black.svg is and uses the same stylized x. Scope is interpreted fairly broadly, if there's any chance at all it's associated with the company then it is of value to us. We are not Wikipedia and content on Commons does not need to be factually verified. Just label it as unconfirmed in the file desc. 25stargeneral (talk) 23:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- @25stargeneral: Probably a copyright violation as there's no proof of who made it and where it originally came from. Definitely out of scope as it's almost certainly fan made and is not useful for educational purposes. See COM:EDUSE and Commons:Project scope/Summary#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Strugglehouse (talk) 23:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Strugglehouse: What reason for deletion are you citing? You do not mention one of the ones listed at Commons:Deletion policy. 25stargeneral (talk) 22:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It is just a majority unclean logo which I have never even seen once! Even the twitter HQ never showed that logo, it showed File:X logo 2023.svg, it just looks like some fan boy made something out of the Space X logo design, I have honestly never even seen this design once! SnowieLuna1212 (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, in use. --Yann (talk) 21:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
