Commons:Deletion requests/Image:View of TV Hill in Kabul.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serious problems with copyright status. Looking at the edit history, the original license terms were "Wikipedia only". Further, the uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder, so he can't change the license terms. --Carnildo 11:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Question why do Carnildo say "the uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder"? User Prong is the only uploader of this picture and he can change the license. He seems to be a newbie (see his contribution) and he probably did not know details of licensing, repairing it later. Julo 15:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the edit history. The original image description was "Released for free public use on Wikipedia or its associated sites. Not authorized for duplication anywhere else or for any commercial purposes. View looking south. Original source: Wikipedia User:Thewalrus". The image is the same as en:Image:Kabul 2006 december tvhill.jpg, which was indeed uploaded by en:User:Thewalrus. The image on Enwiki has two license statements: "Wikipedia-only, no commercial use" and GFDL, and the uploader has not indicated which one is correct. --Carnildo 07:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Incompatible/incorrect licence. LX (talk, contribs) 06:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, as in Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Central Kabul 2006.jpg Julo 15:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC) I've changed opinion. But I would prefer to wait for the answer of User:Thewalrus Julo 22:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Dubious licence change by user who was not original supplier of the image. --MichaelMaggs 07:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]