User talk:IdLoveOne~commonswiki

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, IdLoveOne!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, IdLoveOne~commonswiki!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

• Image:IdeaShel.jpg was uncategorized on 16 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:VP-prop.jpg was uncategorized on 17 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:VPC-prop.jpg was uncategorized on 17 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:VPCold-prop.jpg was uncategorized on 17 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:VPColdALT-prop.jpg was uncategorized on 18 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:VPColdALT2-prop.jpg was uncategorized on 18 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:VPCold2-prop.jpg was uncategorized on 18 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:VPC2-prop.jpg was uncategorized on 18 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Actinostola2.jpg was uncategorized on 4 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sturnus vulgaris -California-8.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sturnus vulgaris -California-8.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Avocado with cross section.jpg

Hi, There is a slightly improved version of the image you supported. Could you please take some time to revisit the nomination? Thanks -- Muhammad 17:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chalice Pizino MBA Lyon L689.jpg

I'm sorry, but the picture does not meet my expectations. Try Commons:Valued images. Albertus teolog (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sommarnöje (1886), akvarell av Anders Zorn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sommarnöje (1886), akvarell av Anders Zorn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ecotourism Svalbard.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ecotourism Svalbard.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Hi idloveone I noticed you are giving lots of feedback on the featured pick candidates page. Could you give me feedback about my bee picture? Thanks, Thomas888b (talk)

Sure, I guess this one? =) --IdLoveOne (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Thats it :-) Thomas888b (talk)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Image of an African Songye Power Figure in the collection of the Indianapolis Museum of Art (2005.21).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Image of an African Songye Power Figure in the collection of the Indianapolis Museum of Art (2005.21).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sidewalk in Pacifica was destroyed by erosion.jpg

Hello IdLoveOne, Thank you for voting on my nomination. I added an alternative. Could you please take a look, when you have a time? Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:44, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello

This is just to let you know in person that the post you made about me on FPC talk is not acceptable. Your allegation of hypocrisy is unsubstantiated and has the quality of a smear. You offer no backing and just make a diffuse comment about the 1000px minimum size requirement discussion on en.wp. This rings with the implication that I am a hypocrite especially in regard to that matter. By hypocrite I understand a person that holds other people to a different standard than himself. I always upload the highest possible resolution of my images to commons, and do not withhold them for commercial purposes as some other actors in that debate do. So I fail to see the hypocrisy there. Please consider this especially in light of the fact that I am editing under my real name, while you can hide behind a pseudonym. Furthermore your allegations about admins punishing dissenting users painting commons as a totalitarian regime are distasteful and an offense to the many people who donate their hard work to the project. Not cool! --Dschwen (talk) 01:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

My first name's Michael, now we're even. --IdLoveOne (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Why would you think that?? --Dschwen (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Holodiscus discolor

File:Holodiscus discolor 3007.JPG was promoted just now. It is my first featured picture. I was surprised that you nominated it and pleased that it was promoted. Congratulations to you as nominator. Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Sure, and thank you for sharing it. --IdLoveOne (talk) 14:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Holodiscus discolor 3007.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holodiscus discolor 3007.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Caricature gillray plumpudding.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caricature gillray plumpudding.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gear-kegelzahnrad.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gear-kegelzahnrad.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for supporting my featured picture candidate Pieris rapae .JPG I'm accustomed to close-shooting and close-cropping my arthropod images, as they are used in scientific publications primarily, and not as "artwork" per se. More dead air to the top would reduce the size of the useful image. Was your suggestion prompted by past experience? Bruce Marlin (talk) 14:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh yes. Commons has a lot of animal lovers and most of them hate tight crops. Alvegaspar's "let the poor thing breath" is practically his tagline. I've seen many good nominations go down due to the crop being 'too tight,' although I agree with you personally about unnecessary space in an image, and Commons's scrutiny of insect images can be very severe. --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I'm a bit surprised many here do not understand this image is used in a taxobox; the purpose of a taxobox image is to show as many of the features of the organism in as clear a manner as possible. It's a picture of the butterfly, the subject of the article, not a picture of the flowers or a picture of the backyard the flowers are in. I'm a well-known professional photographer, and this is just another reason for me to avoid donating to Wikimedia Commons.Bruce Marlin (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Âne d'Ethiopie

It's done! cordialy--Citron (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, we'll see how it goes. --IdLoveOne (talk) 02:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turtle golfina escobilla oaxaca mexico claudio giovenzana 2010.jpg

Hi, you forgot to add another ~ and so you only left the date. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Âne d'Ethiopie.jpg (2nd attempt), that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Âne d'Ethiopie.jpg (2nd attempt) has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Yepee! But there isn't label on the page of description? --Citron (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Congrats, but it looks like FPCbot made a goof and put the featured template on the redirect page.. I'll fix it. --IdLoveOne (talk) 20:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pieris rapae ce1.jpg (2nd attempt), that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pieris rapae ce1.jpg (2nd attempt) has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: The crown pics

Thank you very much! --ESCJosep (talk) 13:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Raphia farinifera MHNT.BOT.2007.26.50.jpg

Thank you for your vote, but especially thank you for making the effort to understand thefruit reflects the light. The gray background diminished the effect of this reflection, the black background increased. I have not thought of using a white background, that'll have been better.  --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Quentin Massys 008.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quentin Massys 008.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified yellow circle in QIC

Hi IdLoveOne
First I would like to congratulate you for all your very interesting reviews an comments, and thank you very much for many supports on my own pictures.
About your question in QIC, you make me a great compliment when you tell it is hard to say what it is really ! It was the purpose of this photograph: make the reviewer asking this question: what is it ?
It is not a NASA picture of a very far star. It is only a glass lamp, as a lantern, a light fittment, as you can see above. I found the light interesting, and I wanted to see how could my camera react in this difficult condition.
Yes I blacked out the background, because it was uninteresting, badly dark, really ugly, and very noisy.
I didn't want any distraction on the main subject, which was this yellow-orange shade.
And I thought it was funny to nominate it in QICjust near the "mexican sun".
Anyway, many thanks again, and please enjoy a friendly "cheers" from Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh, that's all? Ok thanks. I thought it might be some kind of glitch. And ditto from the USA! =) -- IdLoveOne (talk) 22:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guildfordia yoka 7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 08:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum sanguineum fm1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gouache.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice! --Mbdortmund 11:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artichaut2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DOF does'nt cover the whole flower, but QI nevertheless imo. --Cayambe 08:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

French marigold

Hi IdLoveOne; On File:French marigold with raindrops.jpg, I assume you used an automatic white balance feature in an image processing application. Such software can only guess what gray should be, but in scenes with clouds, concrete, snow, etc., the result is often good. In this example, with its strongly colored subject, and no gray, the result is unlikely to be accurate. Sometimes you can do better if you can find something in the image, e.g., concrete, that is likely to be gray and manually identify it to the software. The levels tool in Photoshop has this capability, for example. If you want to be compulsive, you can photograph a calibration target every few frames, e.g., File:Color_target-A8R1_br.jpg.[1]

Please consider putting babelboxes on your userpage. They may help others communicate with you. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

I suppose I should put a babel and some info on my userpage. Yeah, for images like the marigold where the colors are very different due to the weather I'll often run it through white balance to hopefully get a look at what things look like under clearer conditions, but I wouldn't expect it to change a plant from green to blue. The shade but not the color. Still you're probably right because I've seen GIMP make mistakes. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

BTW the zorn painting I used different languages of recent users just to sort of pander to them, er, make it easier for them to know what the image is lol. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 08:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes, File:WhiteBalanceFAIL.jpg is a good example of a problem with automatic white balance. Blue is opposite yellow on the color wheel. White balance may have assumed that the yellow of the flower was excessive and added blue to compensate. Your image notes are welcoming. It is kind of you to wish Anders Zorn a happy birthday, too. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, and that panorama with all its issues is why I'm usually wary of panoramic images in FPC and QI. But what should be done about white balance and how do we determine the likelihood that it'll be wrong? -- IdLoveOne (talk) 17:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

The white balance looks fine to me. With no calibration card in the frame, there is no objective way to decide. Like most everything on FPC and QI, the reviewers decide, in the end. I don't have an opinion on the panorama. Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Autopatroller

You have the autopatroller user right (Special:Log/rights). Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll go learn precisely what that means. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 04:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Please see COM:PATROL. Sorry for not explaining. Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

That's ok, I'll get it. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Guildfordia yoka

Thank you for listing and letting me know. MerlinCharon (talk) 13:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Sure thing, I love your shell pics. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 07:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auslikon - Strandbad - Fulica atra 2010-10-20 16-35-08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Meteora Agios Triadas IMG 7632.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meteora Agios Triadas IMG 7632.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.

I just noticed your edits to my photograph pieris_rapae.jpg got into picture of the day. That's all they wanted is more dead air, black wasted space around the specimen? Bruce Marlin (talk) 23:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, or as they might call it "wing room" LOL, and you're welcome. Alchemist-HP thought it should've just been a basic shoot. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Salix caprea Male.jpg

I'm sorry, my English is also zero. I did not understand the question for Salix caprea Male.jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh, never mind that. Just poking fun at the C:FPC know-it-alls. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 18:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

To learn English, I will stay another hundred years on Commons, or maybe more ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JRE201 K2 Shiomi 20110306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

comment

I just follow yours request. But there is no room in formulare. Nothing new was done.Витольд Муратов (обс, вклад) 07:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Micael

Olá, aqui esta imagem original. voce poderia avaliar? obrigado Micael 106 (talk) 00:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Sun by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly of NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory - 20100801.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Sun by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly of NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory - 20100801.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

File:VP-prop.jpg

File:VP-prop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Extended content

File:VPC-prop.jpg   File:VPC-prop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC) File:VPC2-prop.jpg   File:VPC2-prop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC) File:VPCold-prop.jpg   File:VPCold-prop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC) File:VPColdALT-prop.jpg   File:VPColdALT-prop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2011 (UTC) File:VPCold2-prop.jpg   File:VPCold2-prop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2011 (UTC) File:VPColdALT2-prop.jpg   File:VPColdALT2-prop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 23:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Orbitalaltitudes.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Orbitalaltitudes.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Agnus Dei in Florence

Hi
Thank you for support in FPC page !
--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

• Sure. I've been really busy lately though. Sorry to only reply now. :( -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 17:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stained glass in Nysa cathedral.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stained glass in Nysa cathedral.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called IdLoveOne. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name IdLoveOne~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

21:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

03:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)