default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCIDArgMining@ACL 2016: Berlin, Germany
- Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining, hosted by the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ArgMining@ACL 2016, August 12, Berlin, Germany. The Association for Computer Linguistics 2016
- Aseel Addawood, Masooda N. Bashir
:
"What Is Your Evidence?" A Study of Controversial Topics on Social Media. - Emma Barker, Robert J. Gaizauskas:
Summarizing Multi-Party Argumentative Conversations in Reader Comment on News. - Maria Becker, Alexis Palmer, Anette Frank:
Argumentative texts and clause types. - Pavithra Rajendran, Danushka Bollegala, Simon Parsons:
Contextual stance classification of opinions: A step towards enthymeme reconstruction in online reviews. - Rory Duthie, John Lawrence, Katarzyna Budzynska, Chris Reed:
The CASS Technique for Evaluating the Performance of Argument Mining. - Jaromír Savelka, Kevin D. Ashley:
Extracting Case Law Sentences for Argumentation about the Meaning of Statutory Terms. - Angrosh Mandya, Advaith Siddharthan, Adam Z. Wyner:
Scrutable Feature Sets for Stance Classification. - Beata Beigman Klebanov, Christian Stab, Jill Burstein, Yi Song, Binod Gyawali, Iryna Gurevych:
Argumentation: Content, Structure, and Relationship with Essay Quality. - Yuta Koreeda, Toshihiko Yanase, Kohsuke Yanai, Misa Sato, Yoshiki Niwa:
Neural Attention Model for Classification of Sentences that Support Promoting/Suppressing Relationship. - Elena Musi, Debanjan Ghosh, Smaranda Muresan:
Towards Feasible Guidelines for the Annotation of Argument Schemes. - Georgios Petasis, Vangelis Karkaletsis:
Identifying Argument Components through TextRank. - Andreas Peldszus, Manfred Stede:
Rhetorical structure and argumentation structure in monologue text. - Christian Stab, Iryna Gurevych:
Recognizing the Absence of Opposing Arguments in Persuasive Essays. - Orith Toledo-Ronen, Roy Bar-Haim, Noam Slonim:
Expert Stance Graphs for Computational Argumentation. - Filip Boltuzic, Jan Snajder:
Fill the Gap! Analyzing Implicit Premises between Claims from Online Debates. - Charlie Egan, Advaith Siddharthan, Adam Z. Wyner:
Summarising the points made in online political debates. - Matthias Liebeck, Katharina Esau, Stefan Conrad:
What to Do with an Airport? Mining Arguments in the German Online Participation Project Tempelhofer Feld. - Maria Skeppstedt, Magnus Sahlgren, Carita Paradis, Andreas Kerren:
Unshared task: (Dis)agreement in online debates. - Chantal van Son, Tommaso Caselli, Antske Fokkens, Isa Maks, Roser Morante, Lora Aroyo, Piek Vossen:
Unshared Task at the 3rd Workshop on Argument Mining: Perspective Based Local Agreement and Disagreement in Online Debate. - Zhongyu Wei, Yandi Xia, Chen Li, Yang Liu, Zachary Stallbohm, Yi Li, Yang Jin:
A Preliminary Study of Disputation Behavior in Online Debating Forum.
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2025-02-09 14:45 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
