Broad near-infrared spectroscopy calibrations can predict the nutritional value of >100 forage species within the Australian feedbase
Hayley C. Norman A E , Elizabeth Hulm A , Alan W. Humphries B , Steve J. Hughes C and Philip E. Vercoe DA CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.
B SARDI Livestock Feed & Forage, GPO Box 397, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
C SARDI, Australian Pastures Genebank, GPO Box 397, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
D School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Animal Production Science 60(8) 1111-1122 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19310
Submitted: 28 May 2019 Accepted: 23 October 2019 Published: 7 April 2020
Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Context: Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) is a tool that permits rapid and inexpensive prediction of the nutritional characteristics of forages consumed by ruminants.
Aim: Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of developing a NIRS calibration to predict the nutritional value of the majority of grasses, legumes and forbs that are utilised for sheep and cattle production in southern Australia.
Methods: More than 100 annual and perennial forage species were grown in replicated plots at two locations over a period of 3 years. Biomass was sampled every 3–6 weeks, dried, ground and scanned with a desktop NIRS machine (n = 4385). One-quarter of these samples were subjected to laboratory analysis for calibration development or validation.
Key results: Despite the large variation in the taxonomy and maturity of the plants when sampled, we successfully developed broad calibrations that predicted key nutritional traits. We achieved excellent predictions for crude protein, with a ratio of standard error of performance : standard deviation (RPD) of 5.3, and standard error of cross validation (SECV) of 1.06%. Predictions of neutral detergent fibre were also excellent (RPD 4.3, SECV. 3.5%). For pepsin–cellulase DM digestibility and acid detergent fibre, predictions were very good (RPD 3.7, SECV 2.6% and RPD 3.9, SECV 2.1%). Predictions for organic matter were less reliable (RPD 2.2). We achieved very promising predictions of methane production during batch culture fermentation (RPD 3.1, SECV 3.5 mL/gDM). Predictions of ammonia and total volatile fatty acid concentrations in the post-fermentation substrate were poor.
Conclusions: We found that the broad calibrations predicted the nutritional traits of annual grasses, annual legumes and forb species with greater accuracy than perennial grasses or legumes. This could be associated with the accuracy of the wet chemistry methods. As a general rule, separating taxonomically similar species into groups before the development of calibrations, did not lead to more accurate predictions.
Implications: If more spatial and temporal diversity can be built in without a large reduction in accuracy, these broad NIRS calibrations represent a valuable tool for Australian researchers, feed testing agents and livestock producers, as they encompass nearly all of the species that appear in monocultures or mixed swards.
Additional keywords: feeding value, feed testing, fibre, pasture quality, proximate analysis, ruminant.
References
Abrams SM, Shenk JS, Westerhaus MO, Barton FE (1987) Determination of forage quality by nearinfrared reflectance spectroscopy: Efficiency of broad based calibration equations. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 806–803.AFIA (2007) ‘Laboratory methods manual. Publication no 63/001.’ (Australian Fodder Industry Association: Melbourne)
Andueza D, Picard F, Jestin M, Andrieu J, Baumont R (2011) NIRS prediction of the feed value of temperate forages: efficacy of four calibration strategies. Animal 5, 1002–1013.
| NIRS prediction of the feed value of temperate forages: efficacy of four calibration strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22440096PubMed |
Brogna N, Pacchioli MT, Immovilli A, Ruozzi F, Ward R, Formigoni A (2009) The use of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) in the prediction of chemical composition and in vitro neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility of Italian alfalfa hay. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, 271–273.
| The use of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) in the prediction of chemical composition and in vitro neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility of Italian alfalfa hay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burns GA, Gilliland TJ, Grogan D, Watson S, O’Kiely P (2013) Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme. The Journal of Agricultural Science 151, 331–346.
| Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke PC, Flinn P, McGowan AA (1982) Low-cost pepsin-cellulase assays for prediction of digestibility of herbage. Grass and Forage Science 37, 147–150.
| Low-cost pepsin-cellulase assays for prediction of digestibility of herbage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coates DB (2002) An empirical approach to the question ‘Is NIRS only as good as the laboratory reference values?’. Spectroscopy Europe 14, 24–26.
De Boever JG, Cottyn BL, De Brabander DM, Vanacker JV, Boucque CH (1996) Prediction of the feeding value of grass silages by chemical parameters, in vitro digestibility and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60, 103–115.
| Prediction of the feeding value of grass silages by chemical parameters, in vitro digestibility and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Deaville ER, Flinn PC (2000) Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy: an alternative approach for the estimation of forage quality and voluntary intake. In ‘Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition’. (Eds DI Givens, E Owen, RFE Axford, HM Ohmed) pp. 301–320. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)
Deaville ER, Humphries DJ, Givens DI (2009) Whole crop cereals 2. Prediction of apparent digestibility and energy values from in vitro digestion techniques and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and chemical composition by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology 149, 114–124.
| Whole crop cereals 2. Prediction of apparent digestibility and energy values from in vitro digestion techniques and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and chemical composition by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dryden GM (2003) Near infrared spectroscopy: applications in deer nutrition. Report: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Available at: www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/DEE/w03-007.pdf [Verified July 2003]
Durmic Z, Hutton P, Revell DK, Emms J, Hughes S, Vercoe PE (2010) In vitro fermentative traits of Australia woody perennial plant species that may be considered as potential sources of feed for grazing ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 160, 98–109.
| In vitro fermentative traits of Australia woody perennial plant species that may be considered as potential sources of feed for grazing ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Faichney GJ, White GA (1983) ‘Methods for the analysis of feeds eaten by ruminants.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne)
Flinn PC, Edwards NJ, Oldham CM, McNeill DM (1996) Near infrared analysis of the fodder shrub tagasaste (Chamaecytisus proliferus) for nutritive value and anti‐nutritive factors. In AMC Davies, P Williams (Eds.), ‘Near Infrared Spectroscopy: The Future Waves’. pp. 576–580. (NIR Publications: Chichester, UK)
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1997) ‘Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some Applications).’ Agriculture Handbook No. 379. (USDA-ARS: Washington, DC)
Halgerson JL, Sheaffer GC, Martin NP, Peterson PR, Wes SJ (2004) Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy prediction of leaf and mineral concentrations in alfalfa. Agronomy Journal 96, 344–351.
| Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy prediction of leaf and mineral concentrations in alfalfa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hetta M, Mussadiq Z, Wallsten J, Halling M, Swensson C, Geladhi P (2017) Prediction of nutritive values, morphology and agronomic characteristics in forage maize using two applications of NIRS spectrometry. Soil and Plant Science 67, 326–333.
Hsu H, Mathison GW, McNeil A, Tsai C, Recinos-Diaz G, Okine E, McKenzie RH, Wright S (2000) Determination of feed quality for barley hay and silage by near infrared spectroscopy. In ‘Near Infrared spectroscopy: Proceedings 9th International Conference’ (Eds AMC Davis, R Giangiacomo) pp. 643–649. (NIR Publications: Chichester, UK)
Landau S, Glasser T, Dvash L (2006) Monitoring nutrition in small ruminants with the aid of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) technology: a review. Small Ruminant Research 61, 1–11.
| Monitoring nutrition in small ruminants with the aid of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) technology: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lobos I, Gou P, Saldana R, Alfaro M (2013) Evaluation of potential NIRS to predict pastures nutritive value. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 13, 463–468.
McRoberts KC, Cherney DJR (2014) Low-infrastructure filter bag technique for neutral detergent fiber analysis of forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 187, 77–85.
| Low-infrastructure filter bag technique for neutral detergent fiber analysis of forages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murray I (1993) Forage analysis by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. In ‘Sward management handbook’. (Eds A Davies, RD Baker, SA Grant, AS Laidlaw) pp. 285–312. (British Grassland Society: Reading, UK)
Myer R, Blount A, Coleman S, Carter J (2011) Forage nutritional quality evaluation of bahiagrass selections during autumn in Florida. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42, 167–172.
| Forage nutritional quality evaluation of bahiagrass selections during autumn in Florida.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Norman HC, Masters DG (2010) Predicting the nutritive value of saltbushes (Atriplex spp) with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. In ‘Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Soil and Groundwater Salinization in Arid Regions’, 11–14 January 2010, Muscat, Oman. (Eds M Ahmed, SAl-Rawahy) pp. 51–57. (SQU Press: Muscat, Oman)
Olsoy PJGriggs TCUlappa ACGehlken KShipley LAShewmaker GEForbey JS (2016 )
Parrini S, Acciaioli A, Crovetti A, Bozzi R (2018) Use of FT-NIRS for the determination of chemical components and nutritional value of natural pasture. Italian Journal of Animal Science 17, 87–91.
| Use of FT-NIRS for the determination of chemical components and nutritional value of natural pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Raju CS, Ward AJ, Nielsn L, Moller HB (2011) Comparison of near infra-red spectroscopy, neutral detergent fibre assay and in-vitro organic matter digestibility assay for rapid determination of biochemical methane potential of meadow grasses. Bioresource Technology 102, 7835–7839.
| Comparison of near infra-red spectroscopy, neutral detergent fibre assay and in-vitro organic matter digestibility assay for rapid determination of biochemical methane potential of meadow grasses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21708461PubMed |
Rothman JM, Chapman CA, Hansen JL, Cherney DJR, Pell AN (2009) Rapid assessment of the nutritional value of foods eaten by mountain gorillas: applying near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to primatology. International Journal of Primatology 30, 729–742.
| Rapid assessment of the nutritional value of foods eaten by mountain gorillas: applying near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to primatology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shenk JS, Westerhaus MO (1993) Near infrared reflectance analysis with single and multiproduct calibrations. Crop Science 33, 582–584.
| Near infrared reflectance analysis with single and multiproduct calibrations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stubbs TL, Kennedy AC, Fortuna AM (2010) Using NIRS to predict fiber and nutrient content of dryland cereal cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58, 398–403.
| Using NIRS to predict fiber and nutrient content of dryland cereal cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19961223PubMed |
Sweeney RA, Rexroad PR (1987) Comparison of LECO FP-228 “nitrogen determinator” with AOAC copper catalyst Kjeldahl method for crude protein. Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists 70, 1028–1030.
Triolo JM, Ward AJ, Pederson L, Lokke MM, Qu H, Sommer SG (2014) Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) for rapid determination of biochemical methane potential of plant biomass. Applied Energy 116, 52–57.
| Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) for rapid determination of biochemical methane potential of plant biomass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams P (2014) Tutorial: the RPD statistic: a tutorial note. NIR News 25, 22–26.
| Tutorial: the RPD statistic: a tutorial note.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Windham WR, Mertens DR, Barton FE (1989) Supplement 1. Protocol for NIRS calibration: sample selection and equation development and validation. In ‘Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality’. (Eds GC Marten, SJ Shenk, FE Barton) pp. 96–103. USDA Agriculture Handbook No 643 (U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington DC, WA).
