loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Author: Alessio Caccamo

Affiliation: Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy

Keyword(s): Data Visualization, Usability, Graphicacy, SUS Questionnaire, Information Design.

Abstract: The study presented here examines the accessibility of information conveyed through the language of infographics, analyzing the usability by users in the fruition of information content of five Data Visualization artifacts, selected according to the degree of iconicity of representation by Anceschi. Specifically, the study compared the SUS evaluation by two groups [F=100 – M=100] homogeneous in educational grade and age but distinguished in owning proven Visual Design competence or not. It is therefore investigated, whether basic soft skill, is sufficient to achieve an optimal level of accessibility or rather, whether Graphicacy competence is discriminated. Therefore, understanding whether infographic language could be considered ad a universal language or no. A three–variable correlation design was therefore constructed: two independent variables, the System Usability Scale (SUS) along with the degree of iconicity of the representation, and one dependent variable, namely the amount of information extracted from the infographic. The results show that in both Group A and B is evident a general difficulty in accessibility of information correlated to the degree of iconicity of the infographic representation. Specifically, in “non designer” group, no infographics achieved the minimum usability rating, which, on the other hand, in “designer” group, is achieved by the only two artifacts with a medium/low degree of iconicity. From the analysis of the data, Graphicacy – acquired within the educational curriculum of Designers – would appear to be a determinate element in the correct decoding of communicative artifacts. The contribution, through existing data and literature, leads, on the one hand, to confirm that Graphicacy has been found to be neglected in comparison to Literacy, Numeracy, and Articulacy and that the complexity and sophistication of infoaesthetic may be incomprehensible without timely data visualization literacy. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 3.135.206.240

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Caccamo, A. (2022). Data Visualization, Accessibility and Graphicacy: A Qualitative Study of Communicative Artifacts through SUS Questionnaire. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - WEBIST; ISBN 978-989-758-613-2; ISSN 2184-3252, SciTePress, pages 422-430. DOI: 10.5220/0011587700003318

@conference{webist22,
author={Alessio Caccamo.},
title={Data Visualization, Accessibility and Graphicacy: A Qualitative Study of Communicative Artifacts through SUS Questionnaire},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - WEBIST},
year={2022},
pages={422-430},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0011587700003318},
isbn={978-989-758-613-2},
issn={2184-3252},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - WEBIST
TI - Data Visualization, Accessibility and Graphicacy: A Qualitative Study of Communicative Artifacts through SUS Questionnaire
SN - 978-989-758-613-2
IS - 2184-3252
AU - Caccamo, A.
PY - 2022
SP - 422
EP - 430
DO - 10.5220/0011587700003318
PB - SciTePress