Upper Saxon German: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

21 October 2024

29 August 2024

16 August 2024

22 July 2024

10 May 2024

  • curprev 20:5120:51, 10 May 2024 Jackpaulryan talk contribs 11,758 bytes −146 Subgroups: One accent being "stronger" than another is confusing. Does "stronger" mean that there are fewer borrowings from the "standard" language? If so, "stronger" is not a good word for this as you could also say that people who speak the "standard" language have a "strong" accent relative to the certain rural Upper Saxon varieties. If "stronger" meant that it has stronger seeming sounds, then the note about the High German consonant shift should cover it. undo Tag: Visual edit

21 March 2024

19 December 2023

14 December 2023

5 December 2023

11 October 2023

24 September 2023

1 July 2023

27 March 2023

21 March 2023

18 October 2022

7 October 2022

5 April 2022

25 March 2022

11 March 2022

6 February 2022

15 January 2022

9 January 2022

28 September 2021

20 September 2021

  • curprev 17:3417:34, 20 September 2021 2003:de:3734:bf76:7197:5f06:ab3d:cb55 talk 11,801 bytes +33 "Das Sächsische als Dialekt ist heute weitgehend ausgestorben, als Regiolekt ist es immer noch lebendig ... Becker/Bergmann 1969 sprechen von obersächsischer Umgangssprache" - that doesn't mean that Upper Saxon is not a dialect but a regiolect, it means Upper Saxon is mostly extinct and a new regiolect has emerged undo

19 March 2021

8 March 2021

6 March 2021

5 March 2021

1 March 2021

6 February 2021

1 February 2021

10 January 2021

29 December 2020

17 June 2020

7 June 2020

22 November 2019

25 September 2019

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)