User talk:Aoba47/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

== Wipeout 2048 ==

 

:*I am sorry to hear that your previous nomination failed. I will provide some comments on your current FAC by the end of today if that is okay with you. [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 13:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

:*::No worries. I enjoyed reviewing the article. If you have any time, I would appreciate it if you could provide some commentary on my [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Faces_(Star_Trek:_Voyager)/archive1&redirect=no FAC]. Thank you in advance. [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 16:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

:*::::Thank you! I am pretty big fan of the show too, and it is one of my favorite episodes, especially prior to Season 4. [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 18:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

 

 

==Hannah Baker==

:*I will take a look through the section as soon as I can (probably sometime tomorrow if that is okay with you). Great job with the article so far. [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 21:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

::*{{ping|Numerounovedant}} Everything about the "Characterization" section seems rather solid. I would recommend thinking about the placement of the "Casting" section and also maybe better distinguishing the characterization for Baker in the novel and the characterization of Baker in the television show. I typically see the "Casting" section before the "Characterization" section as it is normally more of a chronological set-up since it would go from when the role was created, and then it was casted, followed by the actual view of the character itself. I would also recommend seeing if you could dig up more about the character in the novel and more on Asher's thought process/influences when creating the character. Hope you find this to be helpful, and I apologize for the delay in my response. Great work on it so far! [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 22:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

::::{{ping|Numerounovedant}} That makes sense to me as the character and the material itself primarily received attention through the television show. In that case, I would suggest moving up the "Casting" portion before the "Characterization" and renaming it something along the lines of "Character creation" so that way you can talk about both the creation of the character for the book and television show and move into the characterization of the actual character. This is just an idea, and it may not work, but I just wanted to give you some food for thought. I would also remind you to include negative reviews of the character and show as this particular character and the representation of her suicide has received a lot of negative attention as well as praise so you want to make sure you are being comprehensive and to avoid accusations of bias. I would also include information about how the ending of the series and for the character was almost going to be completely different. But, to more directly answer your question, I would assume that this article would be more centered on the television version of the character given the more intense commentary on it over the book, but I would say just make sure you make the differences between the book character and television character as clear and understandable to the reader as possible. I hope this helps in some way, and I apologize for my long responses :P lol. For the actual plot/storyline sections, you actually have to cite the individual episodes to the best of my understanding; the only television article that I believe is an exemption to that rule is soap opera-related ones given the format of soap operas. You have done great work on the article so far and it is very commendable for you to take on an article on a topic that is getting so much coverage (I know that I would be overwhelmed by it so keep up the good work and good luck with it). [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 13:40, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

:::::: Anytime; I am glad that I can help in any way and good luck with the article! [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 17:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

 

 

==Hey==

:*Thank you for your kind words, and I greatly enjoyed working with you and just wanted to add my two cents as I agree with both you and Syek88 and the way in which that FAC was handled as a whole. I think my current FAC is nearing completion, and will most likely be promoted within the next week (*fingers crossed*), but I will definitely keep you updated and ask for further help if necessary. Also, good luck with your current FAC. I will definitely go over to it sometime within the next to provide my comments on it. Hope you had a great weekend. [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 21:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

::: Happy birthday!! I would actually greatly appreciate it if you could provide further commentary on the FAC if possible. I understand if you do not have the time or energy to do so though. [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47#top|talk]]) 22:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)