Nomenclature codes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 2600:100A:B115:6443:A98F:D7B3:C4A1:87D8 (talk) to last version by Beland
 
(42 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{see also|International Code of Area Nomenclature|Phytosociology|l2=International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature}}
{{short description|Rulebooks of taxonomic nomenclature, in biology}}
{{see also|International Code of Area Nomenclature|Phytosociology|l2=International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature}}
'''Nomenclature codes''' or '''codes of nomenclature''' are the various rulebooks that govern biological [[Taxonomy (biology)|taxonomic]] [[nomenclature]], each in their own broad field of organisms. To an end-user who only deals with names of species, with some awareness that species are assignable to [[family (biology)|families]], it may not be noticeable that there is more than one code, but beyond this basic level these are rather different in the way they work.
{{Use DMY dates|date=November 2023}}
'''Nomenclature codes''' or '''codes of nomenclature''' are the various rulebooks that govern the naming of living organisms. Standardizing the scientific names of biological organisms allows researchers to discuss findings (including the discovery of new species).
 
As the study of biology became increasingly specialized, specific codes were adopted for different types of organism.
 
'''Nomenclature codes''' or '''codes of nomenclature''' are the various rulebooks that govern biological [[Taxonomy (biology)|taxonomic]] [[nomenclature]], each in their own broad field of organisms. To an end-user who only deals with names of species, with some awareness that species are assignable to [[Genus|genera]], [[family (biology)|families]], and other taxa of higher ranks, it may not be noticeable that there is more than one code, but beyond this basic level these are rather different in the way they work.
 
== Binomial Nomenclature ==
{{Main|Binomial Nomenclature}}
 
In [[Taxonomy (biology)|taxonomy]], '''binomial nomenclature''' ("two-term naming system"), also called '''binary nomenclature''', is a formal system of naming [[species]] of living things by giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which use [[Latin grammar|Latin grammatical forms]], although they can be based on words from other languages. Such a name is called a '''binomial name''' (which may be shortened to just "binomial"), a '''binomen''', '''{{not a typo|binominal|reason="Binomi'n'al", with an "n" before the "al", is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} name,''' or a '''scientific name'''; more informally it is also historically called a '''Latin name'''. In the ICZN, the system is also called '''{{not a typo|binominal|reason="Binomi'n'al", with an "n" before the "al", is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature''',<ref name="ICZN1999_Chap2Article5">{{Harvnb|International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature|1999|loc=[https://code.iczn.org/chapter-2-the-number-of-words-in-the-scientific-names-of-animals/article-5-principle-of-binominal-nomenclature/?frame=1 Chapter 2, Article 5. Principle of Binominal Nomenclature]}} ({{Cite web |url= https://code.iczn.org/chapter-2-the-number-of-words-in-the-scientific-names-of-animals/article-5-principle-of-binominal-nomenclature/ |title=Article 5. Principle of Binominal Nomenclature &#124; International Code of Zoological Nomenclature |access-date=29 March 2023 |archive-date=29 March 2023 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230329164629/https://code.iczn.org/chapter-2-the-number-of-words-in-the-scientific-names-of-animals/article-5-principle-of-binominal-nomenclature/ |url-status=live}})</ref> "binomi'N'al" with an "N" before the "al", which is {{em|not}} a typographic error,<!--Keep the text explaining that "binomiNal" is NOT a typo or redundant, and do not hide it inside a footnote. Even with the big {{not a typo}} template, people just keep removing "binomiNal", such as in [[Special:Diff/1011109157]], [[Special:Diff/1147038384]], and [[Special:Diff/1183771307]]. Note that italicizing and underscoring the "N" both failed to prevent the removals. They got removed as "typos", instead.--> meaning "two-name naming system".<ref name="ICZN1999_Glossary">{{Harvnb|International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature|1999|loc=[https://code.iczn.org/glossary/ Glossary – "binomen", "nomenclature, binominal"]}} ({{Cite web |url=https://code.iczn.org/glossary/ |title=Glossary &#124; International Code of Zoological Nomenclature |access-date=29 March 2023 |archive-date=6 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206072152/https://code.iczn.org/glossary/ |url-status=live}})</ref>
 
The first part of the name – the ''[[generic name (biology)|generic name]]'' – identifies the [[genus]] to which the species belongs, whereas the second part – the '''specific name''' or '''specific epithet''' – distinguishes the species within the genus. For example, modern humans belong to the genus ''[[Homo]]'' and within this genus to the species ''[[Homo sapiens]]''. ''[[Tyrannosaurus rex]]'' is likely the most widely known binomial.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Busby |first1=Arthur III |display-authors=etal |title=A Guide to Rocks and Fossils | page=103 | date=1997}}</ref>
 
The ''formal'' introduction of this system of naming species is credited to [[Carl Linnaeus]], effectively beginning with his work ''[[Species Plantarum]]'' in 1753.<ref name=Knapp>{{cite web |last=Knapp |first=Sandra |author-link=Sandra Knapp |title=What's in a name? A history of taxonomy: Linnaeus and the birth of modern taxonomy |publisher=[[Natural History Museum, London]] |work=NHM.ac.uk |url=http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/science-of-natural-history/taxonomy-systematics/history-taxonomy/session1/index.html |access-date=17 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141018181831/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/science-of-natural-history/taxonomy-systematics/history-taxonomy/session1/index.html |archive-date=18 October 2014}}</ref> But as early as 1622, [[Gaspard Bauhin]] introduced in his book ''Pinax theatri botanici'' (English, ''Illustrated exposition of plants'') containing many names of genera that were later adopted by Linnaeus.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Bauhin |first1=Gaspard |title=Pinax theatri botanici |url= http://edb.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/exhibit-e/b07/b07cont.html |publisher=Kyoto University Library |access-date=19 June 2016 |archive-date=17 October 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161017200341/http://edb.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/exhibit-e/b07/b07cont.html |url-status=live}}</ref>
The introduction of two-part names (binominal nomenclature) for species by [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]] was a welcome simplification because as our knowledge of biodiversity expanded, so did the length of the names, many of which had become unwieldy.<ref name="L23CRC">{{cite book |last1=Laurin |first1=Michel |title=The Advent of PhyloCode: The Continuing Evolution of Biological Nomenclature |date=3 August 2023 |publisher=CRC Press |doi=10.1201/9781003092827 |isbn=978-1-003-09282-7 |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781003092827/advent-phylocode-michel-laurin}}</ref>
 
==Codification of Scientific Names==
The successful introduction of two-part names for species by [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]] was the start for an ever-expanding system of nomenclature. With all naturalists worldwide adopting thisbinominal approach to thinking up namesnomenclature, there arose several schools of thought about the details. It became ever more apparent that a detailed body of rules was necessary to govern [[scientific names]]. From the mid-19th century onwards, there were several initiatives to arrive at worldwide-accepted sets of rules. Presently nomenclature codes govern the naming of:
* [[Algae]], [[Fungus|Fungi]] and [[Plant]]s &ndash; ''[[International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants]]'' (''ICN''), which in July 2011 replaced the ''[[International Code of Botanical Nomenclature]]'' (''ICBN'') and the earlier ''International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature''.
* [[Animal]]s &ndash; ''[[International Code of Zoological Nomenclature]]'' (''ICZN'').
* [[Bacterium|Bacteria]] and [[Archaea]] &ndash; ''[[International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes]]'' (''ICNP''), which in 2008 replaced the ''International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria'' (''ICNB'').
* [[CultivarBacterium|CultivatedBacteria]] plantsand [[Archaea]] described from sequence data &ndash; ''[[International Code of Nomenclature forof Prokaryotes Described from CultivatedSequence PlantsData]]'' (''ICNCPSeqCode'').
* [[PlantCultivar|Cultivated associationplants]]s &ndash; ''[[International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants]]'' (ICPN)''ICNCP'').
* [[Plant association]]s &ndash; ''[[International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature]] (ICPN).''
* [[Virus]]es &ndash; [[International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses|''The International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature'']] (ICVCN); ''see also [[virus classification]].''
 
== Differences between codes ==
 
=== Starting point ===
The starting point, that is the time from which these codes are in effect (usually retroactively), varies from group to group, and sometimes from rank to rank.<ref>{{cite journal | author last= Nicolson |first=Dan | year date= 1991 | title = A history of botanical nomenclature | url = https://archive.org/details/cbarchive_53278_ahistoryofbotanicalnomenclatur1991 | journal = Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden | volume = 78 | issue = 1 | pages = 33–56 | doi = 10.2307/2399589 | jstor = 2399589 }}</ref> In [[botany]] and [[mycology]], the starting point is often 1 May 1753 ([[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]], ''[[Species plantarum]]''),. inIn [[zoology]], 1758{{clarify|date=Decemberit 2016}}is 1 January 1758 (Linnaeus, [[10th edition of Systema Naturae|''Systema Naturae'', 10th Edition]]). On the other hand, [[bacteriology]] started anew, making a clean sweep in 1980 (Skerman et al., "Approved Lists of Bacterial Names"), although maintaining the original authors and dates of publication.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Skerman |first1=V. B. D. |last2=McGowan |first2=V. |last3=Sneath |first3=P. H. A. |date=1980 |title=Approved lists of bacterial names |journal=Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. |volume=30 |pages=225–420 |doi=10.1099/00207713-30-1-225 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
''Systema Naturae'', 10th Edition]]). On the other hand, [[bacteriology]] started anew, making a clean sweep in 1980 (Skerman et al., "Approved Lists of Bacterial Names"), although maintaining the original authors and dates of publication.<ref>{{cite journal | author = Skerman V. B. D., McGowan V., Sneath P. H. A. | year = 1980 | title = Approved lists of bacterial names | journal = Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. | volume = 30 | pages = 225–420 | doi= 10.1099/00207713-30-1-225| doi-access = free }}</ref>
 
Exceptions in botany:<ref>{{cite journal | author last= Chitwood |first=B. G. | year date= 1958 | title = The designation of official names for higher taxa of invertebrates | url = https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12219511#page/292/mode/1up | journal = Bull. Zool. Nomencl. | volume = 15 | pages = 860–895 | doi = 10.5962/bhl.part.19410 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | author last= Silva |first=P. C. | year date= 1958 | title = Later starting points in algae | url = http://www.iapt-taxon.org/historic/Congress/IBC_1959/Prop058.pdf | journal = Taxon | volume = 7 | issue =7 7| pages = 181–184 | doi = 10.2307/1216399 | jstor = 1216399 }}</ref><ref>{{harv|Turland et al. 2018|loc=Article 13|ref=Turland}}</ref>
* [[Spermatophyta]] and [[Pteridophyta]], suprageneric names: 4 August 1789 ([[Antoine Laurent de Jussieu|Jussieu]], ''Genera plantarum'');
* [[Musci]] (except Sphagnaceae): 1 January 1801 ([[Johann Hedwig|Hedwig]], ''Species muscorum'');
Line 23 ⟶ 39:
* ([[Fungi]]:) [[Microsporidia]] are governed by the ''ICZN'' (treated as animals), and see below for ''fossil'' fungi;<ref>{{harv|Turland at al. 2018|loc=Article F.1.1|ref=Turland}}</ref>
* ([[Algae]]:)
** [[Nostocaceae]] homocysteae: 1 January 1892 (Gomont, "''Monographie des Oscillariées''");
** Nostocaceae heterocysteae: 1 January 1886 ([[Jean-Baptiste Édouard Bornet|Bornet]] & [[Charles Flahault|Flahault]], "''Révision des Nostocacées hétérocystées''");
** [[Desmidiaceae]]: 1 January 1848 ([[John Ralfs|Ralfs]], ''British Desmidieae'');
** [[Oedogoniales|Oedogoniaceae]]: 1 January 1900 ([[Karl Engelbrecht Hirn|Hirn]], "''Monographie und Iconographie der Oedogoniaceen''");
* [[Fossil plant|''Fossil'' plants]], algae ([[diatom]]s excepted) and fungi: 31 December 1820 ([[Kaspar Maria von Sternberg|Sternberg]], ''Flora der Vorwelt'').
 
Line 32 ⟶ 48:
* [[Spider]]s: 1757{{clarify|date=December 2016}} ([[Carl Alexander Clerck|Clerck]], ''[[Aranei Svecici]]'').
 
=== Workings ===
There are also differences in the way codes work. For example, the ''ICN'' (the code for algae, fungi and plants) forbids [[tautonym]]s, while the ''ICZN'', (the animal code) allows them.
 
=== Terminology ===
These codes differ in terminology, and there is a long-term project to "harmonize" this. For instance, the ''ICN'' uses "valid" in "valid publication of a name" (= the act of publishing a formal name), with "establishing a name" as the ''ICZN'' equivalent. The ''ICZN'' uses "valid" in "valid name" (= "correct name"), with "correct name" as the ''ICN'' equivalent. Harmonization is making very limited progress.
 
=== Types ===
There are differences in respect of what kinds of [[Biological type|type]]s are used. The bacteriological code prefers living type cultures, but allows other kinds. There has been ongoing debate regarding which kind of type is more useful in a case like [[cyanobacteria]].<ref name="oren">
{{cite journal |first=Aharon |last=Oren |date=2004 |title=A proposal for further integration of the cyanobacteria under the Bacteriological Code |journal=International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology |volume=54 |issue=Pt. 5 |pages=1895–1902 |doi=10.1099/ijs.0.03008-0 |pmid=15388760 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
{{cite journal
|author=Ahoren Oren
|year=2004
|title=A proposal for further integration of the cyanobacteria under the Bacteriological Code
|journal=Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
|volume=54
|issue=Pt 5
|pages=1895–1902
|doi=10.1099/ijs.0.03008-0
|pmid=15388760
|doi-access=free
}}</ref>
 
==Other codes==
===BioCode===
A more radical approach was made in 1997 when the [[International Union of Biological Sciences|IUBS]]/[[International Union of Microbiological Societies|IUMS]] International Committee on Bionomenclature (ICB) presented the long debated ''Draft BioCode'', proposed to replace all existing ''Codes'' with an harmonization of them.<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.bgbm.org/IAPT/biocode/default.htm | title=Draft ''BioCode'' | yeardate=1997}}</ref><ref>{{cite conference | title=Chapter 2. The BioCode: Integrated biological Nomenclature for the 21st Century? | book-title=Proceedings of a Mini-Symposium on Biological Nomenclature in the 21st Century | authorfirst=John |last=McNeill | date=4 November 1996-11-04 |url= http://www.plantsystematics.org/reveal/pbio/nomcl/mcne.html}}</ref> The originally planned implementation date for the BioCode draft was January 1, 2000, but agreement to replace the existing ''Codes'' was not reached.
 
In 2011, a revised ''BioCode'' was proposed that, instead of replacing the existing ''Codes'', would provide a unified context for them, referring to them when necessary.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.bgbm.org/biodivinf/docs/biocode2011/biocode2.html |title=The Draft BioCode (2011) |publisher=International Committee on Bionomenclature (ICB)}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | author last1= Greuter |first1=W., |last2=Garrity |first2=G., |last3=Hawksworth |first3=D. L., |last4=Jahn |first4=R., |last5=Kirk |first5=P. M., |last6=Knapp |first6=S., |last7=McNeill |first7=J., |last8=Michel |first8=E., |last9=Patterson |first9=D. J., |last10=Pyle |first10=R., |last11=Tindall |first11=B. J. | year date= 2011 | title = Draft BioCode (2011): Principles and rules regulating the naming of organisms. | journal = Taxon | volume = 60 | pages = 201–212 | doi = 10.1002/tax.601019 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | author last= Hawksworth |first=D. L. | year date= 2011 | title = Introducing the Draft BioCode (2011) | url = http://iczn.org/content/introducing-draft-biocode-2011 | journal = Taxon | volume = 60 | issue =1 1| pages = 199–200 | doi = 10.1002/tax.601018 }}</ref> Changes in the existing codes are slowly being made in the proposed directions.<ref name="BioCode intro">DL Hawksworth (2011) BioCode 2011. Introduction. http://www.bionomenclature.net/biocode2011.html</ref><ref name="BioCode prolo">Werner Greuter (2011) BioCode 2011. Explanatory prologue. http://www.bionomenclature.net/biocode2011.html</ref> However, participants of the last serious discussion of the draft BioCode concluded that it would probably not be implemented in their lifetimes.<ref name="Oren19">{{cite book |last1=Oren |first1=Aharon |title=in Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria |date=2019 |publisher=Wiley |isbn=978-1-118-96060-8 |page=1-12 |edition=1 |doi=10.1002/9781118960608.bm00004.pub2 |s2cid=240836383 |url=https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608.bm00004.pub2}}</ref>
 
===PhyloCode===
{{main|PhyloCode}}
Many authors encountered problems in using the Linnean system in phylogenetic classification.<ref name="de Queiroz y Gauthier 1990">{{Cite journal |last1=de Queiroz |first1=K. |last2=Gauthier |first2=J. |date=December 1990 |title=Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon Names |url=http://vertebrates.si.edu/herps/herps_pdfs/deQueiroz_pdfs/1990deQ_GauSZ.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171113112849/http://vertebrates.si.edu/herps/herps_pdfs/deQueiroz_pdfs/1990deQ_GauSZ.pdf |archive-date=13 November 2017 |journal=Systematic Zoology |volume=39 |issue=4 |pages=307–322 |doi=10.2307/2992353|jstor=2992353 }}</ref> In fact, early proponents of rank-based nomenclature, such as Alphonse de Candolle and the authors of the 1886 version of the American Ornithologists' Union code of nomenclature already envisioned that in the future, rank-based nomenclature would have to be abandoned.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Laurin |first1=Michel |title=The PhyloCode : The logical outcome of millennia of evolution of biological nomenclature? |journal=Zoologica Scripta |date=23 July 2023 |volume=52 |issue=6 |pages=543–555 |doi=10.1111/zsc.12625 |s2cid=260224728 |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12625 |issn=0300-3256}}</ref><ref name="L23CRC">{{cite book |last1=Laurin |first1=Michel |title=The Advent of PhyloCode: The Continuing Evolution of Biological Nomenclature |date=3 August 2023 |publisher=CRC Press |doi=10.1201/9781003092827 |isbn=978-1-003-09282-7 |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781003092827/advent-phylocode-michel-laurin}}</ref> Another ''Code'' that was developed since 1998 is the ''[[PhyloCode]]'', which now regulates names defined under [[phylogenetic nomenclature]] instead of the traditional [[Linnaean nomenclature]]. This new approach requires using phylogenetic definitions that refer to "specifiers", analogous to "type" under rank-based nomenclature. Such definitions delimit taxa under a given phylogeny, and this kind of nomenclature does not require use of absolute ranks. The ''Code'' took effect in 2020, with the publication of [https://www.routledge.com/Phylonyms-A-Companion-to-the-PhyloCode/Queiroz-Cantino-Gauthier/p/book/9781138332935 Phylonyms], a monograph that includes a list of the first names established under that code.
Some authors encountered problems in using the Linnean system in phylogenetic classification.<ref name="de Queiroz y Gauthier 1990">de Queiroz, K.; Gauthier, J. (1990). Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon Names. ''Syst. Zool.'' (39): 307–322. doi:10.2307/2992353 http://vertebrates.si.edu/herps/herps_pdfs/deQueiroz_pdfs/1990deQ_GauSZ.pdf.</ref> Another ''Code'' in development since 1998 is the ''[[PhyloCode]]'', which would regulate what their creators called [[phylogenetic nomenclature]] instead of the traditional [[Linnaean nomenclature]] (that is, it requires phylogenetic definitions as a "type" attached to every name, and does not contain mandatory ranks). The ''Code'' and the accompanying volume (meant to serve as a list of not-suppressed names and a new starting point, like the 1980s ''Approved Lists of Bacterial Names''<ref>VBD Skerman, Vicki McGowan, and PHA Sneath, 1989. ''Approved Lists of Bacterial Names, Amended edition''. Washington (DC): ASM Press</ref> functions relative to the ''Bacteriological Code'', much like ''[[Systema naturae]]'' functions relative to the ''Zoological Code''), is however still in the draft stage, and it is uncertain when, or even if, the code will see any form of implementation.
 
==Ambiregnal protists==
Some [[protist]]s, sometimes called '''ambiregnal protists''', have been considered to be both [[protozoa]] and [[algae]], or [[protozoa]] and [[fungi]], and names for these have been published under either or both of the ''ICZN'' and the ''ICN''.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Corliss |first=J. O. |date=1995 |title=The ambiregnal protists and the codes of nomenclature: A brief review of the problem and of proposed solutions |journal=Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature |volume=52 |pages=11–17 |url= http://biostor.org/reference/2636 |doi=10.5962/bhl.part.6717 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{harv|McNeill et al. 2012|loc=Preamble: 8|ref=McNeill}}</ref> The resulting double language throughout protist classification schemes resulted in confusion.<ref>Adl, S. M. et al. Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists. ''Systematic Biology'', p. 684-689, 2007, [https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20110331223739/http://myweb.dal.ca/jmarchib/2007.Adl.Syst.biol.pdf].</ref><ref>Elbrächter, M. et al. Establishing an Agenda for Calcareous Dinoflagellates Research (Thoracosphaeraceae, Dinophyceae) including a nomenclatural synopsis of generic names. ''Taxon'' 57, p. 1289–1303, 2008, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/27756780?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents]</ref><ref name="auto">{{harv|Lahr et al. 2012|ref=Lahr}}</ref>
| last = Corliss
| first = J O
| year = 1995
| title = The ambiregnal protists and the codes of nomenclature: a brief review of the problem and of proposed solutions
| journal = Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
| volume = 52
| pages = 11–17
| url = http://biostor.org/reference/2636
| doi = 10.5962/bhl.part.6717
| doi-access = free
}}</ref><ref>{{harv|McNeill et al. 2012|loc=Preamble: 8|ref=McNeill}}</ref> The resulting double language throughout protist classification schemes resulted in confusion.<ref>Adl, S. M. et al. Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists. ''Systematic Biology'', p. 684-689, 2007, [https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20110331223739/http://myweb.dal.ca/jmarchib/2007.Adl.Syst.biol.pdf].</ref><ref>Elbrächter, M. et al. Establishing an Agenda for Calcareous Dinoflagellates Research (Thoracosphaeraceae, Dinophyceae) including a nomenclatural synopsis of generic names. ''Taxon'' 57, p. 1289–1303, 2008, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/27756780?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents]</ref><ref name="auto">{{harv|Lahr et al. 2012|ref=Lahr}}</ref>
 
Groups claimed by both [[protozoologist]]s and [[phycologist]]s include [[euglenid]]s, [[dinoflagellate]]s, [[cryptomonad]]s, [[haptophyte]]s, [[glaucophyte]]s, many [[heterokont]]s (e.g., [[chrysophyte]]s, [[raphidophyte]]s, [[silicoflagellate]]s, some [[xanthophyte]]s, [[proteromonad]]s), some monadoid [[green algae]] ([[Volvocales|volvocaleans]] and [[prasinophyte]]s), [[choanoflagellate]]s, [[bicosoecid]]s, [[ebriid]]s and [[chlorarachniophyte]]s.
Line 84 ⟶ 78:
 
==Unregulated taxa==
The [[International Code of Zoological Nomenclature|zoological code]] does not regulate names of taxa lower than subspecies or higher than superfamily. There are many attempts to introduce some order on the nomenclature of these taxa,<ref>Dubois, A. (2006). Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale. ''Zoosystema'', 28 (1): 165‒258, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265399833_Proposed_Rules_for_the_incorporation_of_nomina_of_higher-ranked_zoological_taxa_in_the_International_Code_of_Zoological_Nomenclature._2._The_proposed_Rules_and_their_rationale].</ref><ref>Frost, D. R. et al. (2006). The Amphibian Tree of Life. ''Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History'' 297: 1–291, [http://www.uta.edu/biology/mexicoherps/Frost%20et%20al%202006.pdf],</ref> including the [[PhyloCode]], orthe alsoDuplostensional Nomenclatural System,<ref name="D15">{{cite journal |last1=Dubois |first1=Alain |title=The Duplostensional Nomenclatural System for higher zoological nomenclature |journal=Dumerilia |date=2015 |volume=5 |page=1–108}}</ref><ref name="Duetal21">{{cite journal |last1=Dubois |first1=Alain |last2=Ohler |first2=Annemarie |last3=Pyron |first3=R. Alexander |title=New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia) |journal=Megataxa |date=26 February 2021 |volume=5 |issue=1 |doi=10.11646/megataxa.5.1.1 |issn=2703-3090|doi-access=free }}</ref> and [[Circumscriptional name|circumscriptional nomenclature]].<ref>Klüge, N. J. (2010). Circumscriptional names of higher taxa in Hexapoda. Bionomina, 1, 15-55, [http://www.insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/dual-nom.htm].</ref><ref>{{cite journal | author last= Kluge, |first=N. J. | year date= 1999 | title = A system of alternative nomenclatures of supra-species taxa. Linnaean and post-Linnaean principles of systematics | journal = Entomological Review | volume = 79 | issue =2 2| pages = 133–147 }}</ref>
 
The [[botanical code]] is applied primarily to the ranks of familysuperfamily and below. There are some rules for names above the rank of familysuperfamily, but the [[principle of priority]] does not apply to them, and the [[Principle of Typification|principle of typification]] is optional. These names may be either automatically [[Type (biology)|typified name]]s or be [[Descriptive botanical name|descriptive name]]s.<ref>{{harv|McNeill et al. 2012|loc=Article 16|ref=McNeill}}</ref><ref>{{harv|Turland et al. 2018|loc=Article 16|ref=Turland}}</ref> In some circumstances, a taxon has two possible names (e.g., [[Chrysophyceae]] Pascher, 1914, ''nom. descrip.''; Hibberd, 1976, ''nom. typificatum''). Descriptive names are problematic, once that, if a taxon is split, it is not obvious which new group takes the existing name. Meanwhile, with typified names, the existing name is taken by the new group that still bears the type of this name. However, typified names present special problems for microorganisms.<ref name="auto"/>
 
==See also==
Line 103 ⟶ 97:
 
==Bibliography==
*{{citationcite journal |authorslast1=Lahr, |first1=Daniel JG,J. EnriqueG. |last2=Lara, and|first2=Enrique |last3=Mitchell |first3=Edward ADA. MitchellD. |title=Time to regulate microbial eukaryote nomenclature |journal=Biological Journal of the Linnean Society |volume=107 |issue=3 |yeardate=2012 |pages=469–476 |ref=Lahr |doi=10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01962.x|doi-access=free |ref=Lahr}}
*{{cite book |author1last1=McNeill, |first1=J. |author2last2=Barrie, |first2=F. R. |author3last3=Buck, |first3=W. R. |author4last4=Demoulin, |first4=V. |author5last5=Greuter, |first5=W. |author6last6=Hawksworth, |first6=D. L. |author7last7=Herendeen, |first7=P. S. |author8last8=Knapp, |first8=S. |author9last9=Marhold, |first9=K. |author10last10=Prado, |first10=J. |author11last11=Prud'homme Van Reine, |first11=W. F. |author12last12=Smith, |first12=G. F. |author13last13=Wiersema, |first13=J. H. |author14last14=Turland, |first14=N. J. |yeardate=2012 |volume=Regnum Vegetabile 154 |title=International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011 |publisher=A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG |isbn=978-3-87429-425-6 |url= http://www.iapt-taxon.org/melbourne/main.php?page=title |ref=McNeill}}
*{{cite book |author1last1=Turland, |first1=N. J. |author2last2=Wiersema, |first2=J. H. |author3last3=Barry, |first3=F. R. |author4last4=Greuter, |first4=W. |author5last5=Hawksworth, |first5=D. L. |author6last6=Herendeen, |first6=P. S. |author7last7=Knapp, |first7=S. |author8last8=Kusber, |first8=W. H. |author9last9=Li, |first9=D.-Z. |author10last10=Marhold, |first10=K. |author11last11=May, |first11=T. W. |author12last12=McNeill, |first12=J. |author13last13=Monro, |first13=A. M. |author14last14=Prado, |first14=J. |author15last15=Price, |first15=M. J. |author16last16=Smith, |first16=G. F. |yeardate=2018 |volume=Regnum Vegetabile 159 |title=International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017 |publisher=Koeltz Botanical Books |isbn=978-3-946583-16-5 |url= https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php |ref=Turland }}
 
==External links==
{{Commonscat|Nomenclature codes}}
* [http://ocean.si.edu/emvideo/modal/3083/750/484/field_video/brightcove/91420525001 Biocode in Action] at the Smithsonian Ocean Portal
* [http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php ''ICN'']: Shenzhen Code (2018)
* [httpshttp://webwww.archiveiapt-taxon.org/webnomen/20150801154338/http://icznmain.org/php ''ICZNICN'' ]: the "greenShenzhen book"Code (19992018)
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20150801154338/http://iczn.org/ ''ICZN'' ]: the "green book" (1999)
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20110613191625/http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/introduction.html List of Prokaryotic names] with Standing in Nomenclature (1997), by J.P. Euzéby
* [http://iczn.org/content/introducing-draft-biocode-2011 ''BioCode''] introduction (2011)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20071114093618/http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/index.html ''PhyloCode'']
 
[[Category:Nomenclature codes| ]]
[[Category:Biological nomenclature| *]]
[[Category:Virology]]