Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 2600:100A:B115:6443:A98F:D7B3:C4A1:87D8 (talk) to last version by Beland |
m →Codification of Scientific Names: punctuation |
||
(42 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{see also|International Code of Area Nomenclature|Phytosociology|l2=International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature}}▼
{{short description|Rulebooks of taxonomic nomenclature, in biology}}
▲{{see also|International Code of Area Nomenclature|Phytosociology|l2=International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature}}
'''Nomenclature codes''' or '''codes of nomenclature''' are the various rulebooks that govern biological [[Taxonomy (biology)|taxonomic]] [[nomenclature]], each in their own broad field of organisms. To an end-user who only deals with names of species, with some awareness that species are assignable to [[family (biology)|families]], it may not be noticeable that there is more than one code, but beyond this basic level these are rather different in the way they work.▼
{{Use DMY dates|date=November 2023}}
'''Nomenclature codes''' or '''codes of nomenclature''' are the various rulebooks that govern the naming of living organisms. Standardizing the scientific names of biological organisms allows researchers to discuss findings (including the discovery of new species).
As the study of biology became increasingly specialized, specific codes were adopted for different types of organism.
▲
== Binomial Nomenclature ==
{{Main|Binomial Nomenclature}}
In [[Taxonomy (biology)|taxonomy]], '''binomial nomenclature''' ("two-term naming system"), also called '''binary nomenclature''', is a formal system of naming [[species]] of living things by giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which use [[Latin grammar|Latin grammatical forms]], although they can be based on words from other languages. Such a name is called a '''binomial name''' (which may be shortened to just "binomial"), a '''binomen''', '''{{not a typo|binominal|reason="Binomi'n'al", with an "n" before the "al", is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} name,''' or a '''scientific name'''; more informally it is also historically called a '''Latin name'''. In the ICZN, the system is also called '''{{not a typo|binominal|reason="Binomi'n'al", with an "n" before the "al", is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature''',<ref name="ICZN1999_Chap2Article5">{{Harvnb|International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature|1999|loc=[https://code.iczn.org/chapter-2-the-number-of-words-in-the-scientific-names-of-animals/article-5-principle-of-binominal-nomenclature/?frame=1 Chapter 2, Article 5. Principle of Binominal Nomenclature]}} ({{Cite web |url= https://code.iczn.org/chapter-2-the-number-of-words-in-the-scientific-names-of-animals/article-5-principle-of-binominal-nomenclature/ |title=Article 5. Principle of Binominal Nomenclature | International Code of Zoological Nomenclature |access-date=29 March 2023 |archive-date=29 March 2023 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230329164629/https://code.iczn.org/chapter-2-the-number-of-words-in-the-scientific-names-of-animals/article-5-principle-of-binominal-nomenclature/ |url-status=live}})</ref> "binomi'N'al" with an "N" before the "al", which is {{em|not}} a typographic error,<!--Keep the text explaining that "binomiNal" is NOT a typo or redundant, and do not hide it inside a footnote. Even with the big {{not a typo}} template, people just keep removing "binomiNal", such as in [[Special:Diff/1011109157]], [[Special:Diff/1147038384]], and [[Special:Diff/1183771307]]. Note that italicizing and underscoring the "N" both failed to prevent the removals. They got removed as "typos", instead.--> meaning "two-name naming system".<ref name="ICZN1999_Glossary">{{Harvnb|International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature|1999|loc=[https://code.iczn.org/glossary/ Glossary – "binomen", "nomenclature, binominal"]}} ({{Cite web |url=https://code.iczn.org/glossary/ |title=Glossary | International Code of Zoological Nomenclature |access-date=29 March 2023 |archive-date=6 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206072152/https://code.iczn.org/glossary/ |url-status=live}})</ref>
The first part of the name – the ''[[generic name (biology)|generic name]]'' – identifies the [[genus]] to which the species belongs, whereas the second part – the '''specific name''' or '''specific epithet''' – distinguishes the species within the genus. For example, modern humans belong to the genus ''[[Homo]]'' and within this genus to the species ''[[Homo sapiens]]''. ''[[Tyrannosaurus rex]]'' is likely the most widely known binomial.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Busby |first1=Arthur III |display-authors=etal |title=A Guide to Rocks and Fossils | page=103 | date=1997}}</ref>
The ''formal'' introduction of this system of naming species is credited to [[Carl Linnaeus]], effectively beginning with his work ''[[Species Plantarum]]'' in 1753.<ref name=Knapp>{{cite web |last=Knapp |first=Sandra |author-link=Sandra Knapp |title=What's in a name? A history of taxonomy: Linnaeus and the birth of modern taxonomy |publisher=[[Natural History Museum, London]] |work=NHM.ac.uk |url=http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/science-of-natural-history/taxonomy-systematics/history-taxonomy/session1/index.html |access-date=17 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141018181831/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/science-of-natural-history/taxonomy-systematics/history-taxonomy/session1/index.html |archive-date=18 October 2014}}</ref> But as early as 1622, [[Gaspard Bauhin]] introduced in his book ''Pinax theatri botanici'' (English, ''Illustrated exposition of plants'') containing many names of genera that were later adopted by Linnaeus.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Bauhin |first1=Gaspard |title=Pinax theatri botanici |url= http://edb.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/exhibit-e/b07/b07cont.html |publisher=Kyoto University Library |access-date=19 June 2016 |archive-date=17 October 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161017200341/http://edb.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/exhibit-e/b07/b07cont.html |url-status=live}}</ref>
The introduction of two-part names (binominal nomenclature) for species by [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]] was a welcome simplification because as our knowledge of biodiversity expanded, so did the length of the names, many of which had become unwieldy.<ref name="L23CRC">{{cite book |last1=Laurin |first1=Michel |title=The Advent of PhyloCode: The Continuing Evolution of Biological Nomenclature |date=3 August 2023 |publisher=CRC Press |doi=10.1201/9781003092827 |isbn=978-1-003-09282-7 |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781003092827/advent-phylocode-michel-laurin}}</ref>
==Codification of Scientific Names==
* [[Algae]], [[Fungus|Fungi]] and [[Plant]]s – ''[[International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants]]'' (''ICN''), which in July 2011 replaced the ''[[International Code of Botanical Nomenclature]]'' (''ICBN'') and the earlier ''International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature''.
* [[Animal]]s – ''[[International Code of Zoological Nomenclature]]'' (''ICZN'').
* [[Bacterium|Bacteria]] and [[Archaea]] – ''[[International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes]]'' (''ICNP''), which in 2008 replaced the ''International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria'' (''ICNB'').
* [[
* [[
* [[Plant association]]s – ''[[International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature]] (ICPN).''
* [[Virus]]es – [[International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses|''The International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature'']] (ICVCN); ''see also [[virus classification]].'' ==
===
The starting point, that is the time from which these codes are in effect (usually retroactively), varies from group to group, and sometimes from rank to rank.<ref>{{cite journal |
Exceptions in botany:<ref>{{cite journal |
* [[Spermatophyta]] and [[Pteridophyta]], suprageneric names: 4 August 1789 ([[Antoine Laurent de Jussieu|Jussieu]], ''Genera plantarum'');
* [[Musci]] (except Sphagnaceae): 1 January 1801 ([[Johann Hedwig|Hedwig]], ''Species muscorum'');
Line 23 ⟶ 39:
* ([[Fungi]]:) [[Microsporidia]] are governed by the ''ICZN'' (treated as animals), and see below for ''fossil'' fungi;<ref>{{harv|Turland at al. 2018|loc=Article F.1.1|ref=Turland}}</ref>
* ([[Algae]]:)
** [[Nostocaceae]] homocysteae: 1 January 1892 (Gomont,
** Nostocaceae heterocysteae: 1 January 1886 ([[Jean-Baptiste Édouard Bornet|Bornet]] & [[Charles Flahault|Flahault]],
** [[Desmidiaceae]]: 1 January 1848 ([[John Ralfs|Ralfs]], ''British Desmidieae'');
** [[Oedogoniales|Oedogoniaceae]]: 1 January 1900 ([[Karl Engelbrecht Hirn|Hirn]],
* [[Fossil plant|''Fossil'' plants]], algae ([[diatom]]s excepted) and fungi: 31 December 1820 ([[Kaspar Maria von Sternberg|Sternberg]], ''Flora der Vorwelt'').
Line 32 ⟶ 48:
* [[Spider]]s: 1757{{clarify|date=December 2016}} ([[Carl Alexander Clerck|Clerck]], ''[[Aranei Svecici]]'').
===
There are also differences in the way codes work. For example, the ''ICN'' (the code for algae, fungi and plants) forbids [[tautonym]]s, while the ''ICZN'', (the animal code) allows them.
===
These codes differ in terminology, and there is a long-term project to "harmonize" this. For instance, the ''ICN'' uses "valid" in "valid publication of a name" (=
===
There are differences in respect of what kinds of [[Biological type|type]]s are used. The bacteriological code prefers living type cultures, but allows other kinds. There has been ongoing debate regarding which kind of type is more useful in a case like [[cyanobacteria]].<ref name="oren">
{{cite journal |first=Aharon |last=Oren |date=2004 |title=A proposal for further integration of the cyanobacteria under the Bacteriological Code |journal=International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology |volume=54 |issue=Pt. 5 |pages=1895–1902 |doi=10.1099/ijs.0.03008-0 |pmid=15388760 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
==Other codes==
===BioCode===
A more radical approach was made in 1997 when the [[International Union of Biological Sciences|IUBS]]/[[International Union of Microbiological Societies|IUMS]] International Committee on Bionomenclature (ICB) presented the long debated ''Draft BioCode'', proposed to replace all existing ''Codes'' with an harmonization of them.<ref>{{cite web |
In 2011, a revised ''BioCode'' was proposed that, instead of replacing the existing ''Codes'', would provide a unified context for them, referring to them when necessary.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.bgbm.org/biodivinf/docs/biocode2011/biocode2.html |title=The Draft BioCode (2011) |publisher=International Committee on Bionomenclature (ICB)}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |
===PhyloCode===
{{main|PhyloCode}}
Many authors encountered problems in using the Linnean system in phylogenetic classification.<ref name="de Queiroz y Gauthier 1990">{{Cite journal |last1=de Queiroz |first1=K. |last2=Gauthier |first2=J. |date=December 1990 |title=Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon Names |url=http://vertebrates.si.edu/herps/herps_pdfs/deQueiroz_pdfs/1990deQ_GauSZ.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171113112849/http://vertebrates.si.edu/herps/herps_pdfs/deQueiroz_pdfs/1990deQ_GauSZ.pdf |archive-date=13 November 2017 |journal=Systematic Zoology |volume=39 |issue=4 |pages=307–322 |doi=10.2307/2992353|jstor=2992353 }}</ref> In fact, early proponents of rank-based nomenclature, such as Alphonse de Candolle and the authors of the 1886 version of the American Ornithologists' Union code of nomenclature already envisioned that in the future, rank-based nomenclature would have to be abandoned.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Laurin |first1=Michel |title=The PhyloCode : The logical outcome of millennia of evolution of biological nomenclature? |journal=Zoologica Scripta |date=23 July 2023 |volume=52 |issue=6 |pages=543–555 |doi=10.1111/zsc.12625 |s2cid=260224728 |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12625 |issn=0300-3256}}</ref><ref name="L23CRC">{{cite book |last1=Laurin |first1=Michel |title=The Advent of PhyloCode: The Continuing Evolution of Biological Nomenclature |date=3 August 2023 |publisher=CRC Press |doi=10.1201/9781003092827 |isbn=978-1-003-09282-7 |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781003092827/advent-phylocode-michel-laurin}}</ref> Another ''Code'' that was developed since 1998 is the ''[[PhyloCode]]'', which now regulates names defined under [[phylogenetic nomenclature]] instead of the traditional [[Linnaean nomenclature]]. This new approach requires using phylogenetic definitions that refer to "specifiers", analogous to "type" under rank-based nomenclature. Such definitions delimit taxa under a given phylogeny, and this kind of nomenclature does not require use of absolute ranks. The ''Code'' took effect in 2020, with the publication of [https://www.routledge.com/Phylonyms-A-Companion-to-the-PhyloCode/Queiroz-Cantino-Gauthier/p/book/9781138332935 Phylonyms], a monograph that includes a list of the first names established under that code.
==Ambiregnal protists==
Some [[protist]]s, sometimes called '''ambiregnal protists''', have been considered to be both [[protozoa]] and [[algae]], or [[protozoa]] and [[fungi]], and names for these have been published under either or both of the ''ICZN'' and the ''ICN''.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Corliss |first=J. O. |date=1995 |title=The ambiregnal protists and the codes of nomenclature: A brief review of the problem and of proposed solutions |journal=Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature |volume=52 |pages=11–17 |url= http://biostor.org/reference/2636 |doi=10.5962/bhl.part.6717 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{harv|McNeill et al. 2012|loc=Preamble: 8|ref=McNeill}}</ref> The resulting double language throughout protist classification schemes resulted in confusion.<ref>Adl, S. M. et al. Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists. ''Systematic Biology'', p. 684-689, 2007, [https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20110331223739/http://myweb.dal.ca/jmarchib/2007.Adl.Syst.biol.pdf].</ref><ref>Elbrächter, M. et al. Establishing an Agenda for Calcareous Dinoflagellates Research (Thoracosphaeraceae, Dinophyceae) including a nomenclatural synopsis of generic names. ''Taxon'' 57, p. 1289–1303, 2008, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/27756780?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents]</ref><ref name="auto">{{harv|Lahr et al. 2012|ref=Lahr}}</ref>
Groups claimed by both [[protozoologist]]s and [[phycologist]]s include [[euglenid]]s, [[dinoflagellate]]s, [[cryptomonad]]s, [[haptophyte]]s, [[glaucophyte]]s, many [[heterokont]]s (e.g., [[chrysophyte]]s, [[raphidophyte]]s, [[silicoflagellate]]s, some [[xanthophyte]]s, [[proteromonad]]s), some monadoid [[green algae]] ([[Volvocales|volvocaleans]] and [[prasinophyte]]s), [[choanoflagellate]]s, [[bicosoecid]]s, [[ebriid]]s and [[chlorarachniophyte]]s.
Line 84 ⟶ 78:
==Unregulated taxa==
The [[International Code of Zoological Nomenclature|zoological code]] does not regulate names of taxa lower than subspecies or higher than superfamily. There are many attempts to introduce some order on the nomenclature of these taxa,<ref>Dubois, A. (2006). Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale. ''Zoosystema'', 28 (1): 165‒258, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265399833_Proposed_Rules_for_the_incorporation_of_nomina_of_higher-ranked_zoological_taxa_in_the_International_Code_of_Zoological_Nomenclature._2._The_proposed_Rules_and_their_rationale].</ref><ref>Frost, D. R. et al. (2006). The Amphibian Tree of Life. ''Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History'' 297: 1–291, [http://www.uta.edu/biology/mexicoherps/Frost%20et%20al%202006.pdf],</ref> including the [[PhyloCode]],
The [[botanical code]] is applied primarily to the ranks of
==See also==
Line 103 ⟶ 97:
==Bibliography==
*{{
*{{cite book |
*{{cite book |
==External links==
{{Commonscat|Nomenclature codes}}
*
*
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20150801154338/http://iczn.org/ ''ICZN'' ]: the "green book" (1999)
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20110613191625/http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/introduction.html List of Prokaryotic names] with Standing in Nomenclature (1997), by J.P. Euzéby *
*
[[Category:Nomenclature codes| ]]
[[Category:Biological nomenclature|
[[Category:Virology]]
|