Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
{{more footnotes|date=September 2014}}
{{use dmy dates|date=August 2023}}
'''Economism''', sometimes spelled '''economicism''',<ref>{{Cite web|last=Garber|first=Megan|date=2014-06-30|title=Why 'Efficiency' Is Inhumane|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/06/economicism-n-the-language-of-economics-infiltrating-the-language-of-everything-else/373722/|access-date=2020-12-20|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US}}</ref> <!--
Mike Cole, [[Bishop Grosseteste College]], Lincoln, United Kingdom</ref><ref>Young, R.M. (1998) [
▲Mike Cole, [[Bishop Grosseteste College]], Lincoln, United Kingdom</ref><ref>Young, R.M. (1998) [http://human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/pap104h.html https://web.archive.org/web/20180507121440/http://www.human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/pap104h.html ''Marxism and the History of Science''] The Human Nature Review. The defining feature of Marxist approaches to the [[history of science]] is that the history of scientific ideas, of research priorities, of concepts of nature and of the parameters of discoveries are all rooted in historical forces which are, in the last instance, socio-economic. [...] There are variations in how literally this is taken [...] There is a continuum of positions.</ref>
== In Marxist analysis ==
Line 16 ⟶ 11:
In his criticism of economism, Lenin's view was that the political figure of the worker could not necessarily be inferred from the worker's social position.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Russo |first=Alessandro |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1156439609 |title=Cultural Revolution and revolutionary culture |date=2020 |publisher=[[Duke University Press]] |isbn=978-1-4780-1218-4 |location=Durham |pages=180 |oclc=1156439609}}</ref> Under capitalism, the worker's labor power is [[Commodification|commodified]] and sold in exchange for wages.<ref name=":1" /> While negotiating the sale of labor power is necessary for survival under capitalism, Lenin argued that participating in that negotiation did not guarantee a worker's political existence and in fact obscured the underlying political stakes.<ref name=":1" />
Lenin used the term in his attacks on a trend in the early [[Russian Social Democratic Labour Party]] around the newspaper [[Rabochaya Mysl]].<ref>{{
===Cultural Revolution===
Line 51 ⟶ 46:
{{Economics}}
[[Category:Economic ideologies]]
[[Category:Political
[[Category:Political science terminology]]
[[Category:
|