Content deleted Content added
m rv, not needed, needs wider discussion first |
De Boni 2007 (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
(33 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 6:
| image = 2000 Summer Paralympics logo.svg
| image_size = 150
| host_city = [[Sydney
| motto = ''Performance, Power and Pride''
| nations = 120
Line 23:
{{2000 Summer Olympics}}
The '''2000 Summer Paralympic Games''' or the '''XI Summer Paralympics''' were held in [[Sydney]], New South Wales, Australia, between 18 and 29 October. The Sydney Paralympics was the last time that the Summer Paralympics were organized by two different Organizing Committees. In this edition, a record 3,801 athletes from 120 [[National Paralympic Committee]]s participated in 551 events in 18 sports, and until the [[2006 Commonwealth Games]] held in [[Melbourne]], it was the second largest sporting event ever until that date held in Australia and the Southern Hemisphere. Sydney was the eighth city to host the Olympics and the Paralympics on same venues at the same year, and the first since Barcelona 1992 that they were organized in complete conjunction with the Olympics. They were also the first Paralympic Games outside the Northern Hemisphere and also in Oceania.<ref name="Australian Bureau of Statistics">{{cite web|url=http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/featurearticlesbytitle/E7E546D49DCA1D97CA257298000CED32?OpenDocument|title=A look back at the Sydney Paralympics|publisher=Australian Bureau of Statistics|date=25 January 2002|access-date=22 August 2015}}</ref>
== Host city bid process ==
It was not mandatory that candidate cities host both the Olympic and Paralympic Games, but motivated by the events in the lead up to the 1996 Summer Paralympics, the [[International Olympic Committee]] (IOC) decided in 1993 that the newly created [[International Paralympic Committee]] (IPC) would become a stakeholder in the Olympic city selection process. This allowed the IPC the opportunity to gauge the intentions of candidate cities around hosting the Paralympics through the addition of specific topics in the questionnaires. This also allowed the IPC to establish its own selection commission alongside the IOC; however, the two functioned independent from one another. When it became public that 5 cities had finalised the process to host the 2000 Summer Olympics, the IPC evaluated each separately and sent the name of the
Sydney was chosen as host for the XI Summer Paralympics on 11 September 1993, 12 days before the city was also chosen by the IOC to host the 2000 Summer Olympics. The official announcement was delayed until 4 days after the IOC decision due to the IPC being an interested party in the Olympic selection process, therefore a different host could open the possibility of the IPC'S selection to interfere at the IOC process. If the results was different, the IPC had the opportunity to renegotiate with the Olympic host city. Given the separate processes, the Paralympic Bid Committee led had to wait until the end of 1993 to sign the host city contract, with clear conditions given to Sydney that negotiations with Manchester would be initiated if the Australian stakeholders proved that they really had the guarantees and conditions to given a true financial security to the games, and these were fulfilled following several rounds of negotiations between the Federal Government of Australia and the Government of the State of New South Wales.
Line 34:
This was the last time to date that the Paralympics host city was chosen in a process that was not linked to the Olympic Games. Starting with the [[2002 Winter Olympic Games]], the IOC demanded that host city applicants submitted their plans to host the Paralympic Games as a part of their Olympic proposals.
As it was selected as host at different moments, this was the last time in history that the Summer Olympics and Paralympics were organized by separate bodies, though administrative and financial decisions in all areas was jointly made, as the all common areas were the same.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sydney 2000 Paralympic Summer Games|publisher= Stock Mandeville Paralympic Heritage |date=April 2022 |url=https://www.paralympicheritage.org.uk/sydney-2000-paralympic-summer-games|access-date=27 April 2022 }}</ref><ref name="ref1">{{cite web|url=http://www.treasury.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/4245/bp2_6.pdf|title=Sydney 2000 Olympic and Paralympic Games|publisher=NSW Treasury|date=1999–2000|access-date=22 August 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160327105057/http://www.treasury.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/4245/bp2_6.pdf|archive-date=27 March 2016}}</ref>
==Background to the bid process==
Line 41:
=== History of the Paralympic Movement in Australia ===
Despite having a historical tradition in the Paralympics and having participated (and won gold medals) in the previous eight summer editions, Australia had traditionally looked down on Paralympic sport, to the point that during the 2000 Summer Olympics host city bid process. After won the Australian internal process, Sydney had showed little or no interest in hosting the Paralympics and had not submitted any proposal about hosting the event. The interest for the Paralympic Games only arose when there was the possibility of a defeat of the Olympic bid for two of its main rivals in the process: Manchester, in the Great Britain and Berlin, in the recently unified Germany. Even so, and being a traditional stakeholder in the International Paralympic Movement and with expressive results in all eight previous summer editions. It was normal that the accomplishments and performances of local athletes were little noticed or ignored. Not even expressive results, such as fifth place in the medal table at the 1992 Summer Paralympics held in Barcelona, drew attention in the same way that Paralympic sport was treated in other countries: some sectors of society treated the Paralympics as an event of "second class".
===The process to host the Paralympic Games===
Line 48:
For the 1960 and 1964 Games, Rome and Tokyo had accepted the direct invitation made by the International Stoke Mandeville Games Committee and hosted the Paralympics some weeks after the Olympic Games, but in different conditions.
Despite having given initial guarantees in 1964, in 1966, alleging increased costs and lack of infrastructure and a local responsibilities, Mexico City withdrew from host the [[1968 Summer Paralympics]] and in 1967, as part of Israel's celebrations for their 20th anniversary of independence, the Israeli government made
The [[1972 Summer Paralympics]] and the [[1976 Summer Paralympics]] were held in the same countries ([[West Germany]] and [[Canada]]), but in different cities ([[Heidelberg]] and [[Toronto]], respectively).
The Soviet Union rejected the hosting rights for the [[1980 Summer Paralympics]] out of hand, also issuing the infamous statement that "There are no people with disabilities in the USSR!" Following this, the [[Netherlands]] ([[Arnhem]]) immediately offered to host, which was accepted. After these problems, an attempt was made to approach [[Los Angeles]] so that the original concept of "one city, two events" could be resumed. But even with potential sympathy on the part of LAOCOG'84, formal relations did not exist between the Stoke Mandeville Committee and the IOC, nor even between the various American Federations of Sports for the Disableds. In the midst of conversations between Los Angeles and the Stoke Mandeville Committee, it became public that the chosen funding model intentionally overlooked the holding of the Paralympics, and upon learning of this, those responsible for wheelchair sports in the United States decided to request the holding of their event separately.<ref>{{cite web |title=Stoke Mandeville 1984 Paralympic Summer Games|publisher= Stoke Mandeville Paralympic Heritage |date= 2019|url=https://www.paralympicheritage.org.uk/stoke-mandeville-1984-paralympic-summer-games|access-date=16 August 2022}}</ref>
After this decision, the concept of the same hosting country (USA) was near to happen again, under an opt-out system in which wheelchair events would be at the [[University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign]], and the other types of disabilities were scheduled for [[New York City]]: at the last minute the Illinois University withdrew, and the games returned to [[Stoke Mandeville]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Stoke Mandeville 1984 Paralympic Summer Games|publisher= Stoke Mandeville Paralympic Heritage |date= 2019|url=https://www.paralympicheritage.org.uk/stoke-mandeville-1984-paralympic-summer-games|access-date=16 August 2022}}</ref>
This situation led the IOC to start talks with the 1988 hosts, [[Seoul]], and the 6 cities interested in hosting the 1992 Summer Olympics. In 1984,Seoul accepted the Games in a late stage but with a different Organizing Committee, who worked with alongside their Olympic counterparts. However, the SLOOC only accepted help in trivial matters such as logistical services and the training of volunteers, but the South Koreans held the Paralympics by removing some different elements (i.e. different venues and a specific Paralympic Village), as the Olympics had poor accessibility conditions, while all the apartments were sold on the guarantee that they would be delivered to their buyers the week after the Games ended.
Seoul would ultimately finance the Paralympics with the profits and
In April 1987, [[Barcelona]] accepted the host of the [[1992 Summer Paralympics]] jointly and with the same Organizing Committee, and in order to give improve the event's quality and secure its future, the COOB '92 decided to standardize the entire classification system for athletes, which would give them the chance to have the same experiences and opportunities during the Paralympics.
Contrary to what had happened previously, the Spanish city managed to finance the Paralympics with the extension of existing sponsorship quotas and signed new contracts with new sponsors specifically for the Paralympics. But this was not enough to raise more funds, given the fact that the initial budget could not cover the costs of preparation and initially it was proposed to use more public resources so that other expenses could be covered. Soon after the first denial of extra support by the Spanish government for the Paralympic Games, COOB'92 received support from the third sector, through a partnership proposed by the Spain's National Organization for the Blind (ONCE).
The city still managed to receive some additional public funds, and had the support of the [[ONCE Foundation]] who helped the Paralympic division of the COOB'92 to turn a joint venture with also helped to organize and also added funds of its own, buying a minority stake and also acting as a manager of personnel and resources to be applied. ONCE's proposal perfectly fit the needs of COOB '92. And it included the idea that the Paralympic division would become a joint venture between the two interested parties. Thus, with a big political power, ONCE was predisposed to help the Paralympic division to seek new financial resources to cover the missing amounts. for volunteers who would work in services for athletes with disabilities.
After the Games in Catalonia, ONCE and COOB '92 also helped to organize the Paralympic Games for the Mentally Disabled, which were held in Madrid following the closing ceremonies in Barcelona.<ref>{{cite web |title=Llibre Official dels IXns Jocs Paralímpics Barcelona 1992|publisher= COOB |date= 1993|url=http://lameva.barcelona.cat/25anysolimpica/sites/default/files/memoria_jj_paralimpics.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181124220059/http://lameva.barcelona.cat/25anysolimpica/sites/default/files/memoria_jj_paralimpics.pdf |archive-date=24 November 2018 |access-date=16 August 2022}}</ref>
Despite what had been agreed in 1989, in which Barcelona and Madrid would be the last Paralympics organized by the International Coordination Committee (ICC) and that from the Winter Games of 1994 onwards, the powers to organize the Paralympic Games would belong to the International Paralympic Committee (IPC). And despite the intentions of this institution to carry out the Paralympics and the Olympics jointly in the city, this ran the risk of not happening, as the Olympic Organizers "closed the doors" to the Paralympic Games "claiming that the financial potential of a niche event could lead to any risk of loss and huge net losses", and this led to a public outcry in the US and also led to actions by civil society and the third sector led by the [[Shepherd Center]],a world know rehabilitation centre. Due the lack of financial guarantees and other issues as the such as the non-involvement of local authorities. Due this situation, a Bid Committee led by the
===The impact of Barcelona and Atlanta at the bids for the 2000 Games===
Line 75 ⟶ 74:
*''See also'': [[1984 Summer Olympics]], [[1996 Summer Olympics]], [[1996 Summer Paralympics]].
If the joint management of the 1992 Games opened up new possibilities for the Paralympic Games, the confusion and discredit surrounding the 1996 Games could cause enormous damage to the image of the Paralympics.<ref>{{cite web |title=How Buckhead's Shepherd Center saved the Atlanta 1996 Paralympic Games|publisher= Reporter Newspapers |date=3 August 2019 |url=https://reporternewspapers.net/2019/08/03/how-buckheads-shepherd-center-saved-the-atlanta-1996-paralympic-games/|access-date=16 May 2022}}</ref><ref name="Atlanta History Center">{{cite web |title=The 10th Paralympic Games and Their Place in Disability History|publisher=Atlanta History Center |date=4 March 2021 |url=https://www.atlantahistorycenter.com/blog/the-10th-paralympic-games-and-their-place-in-disability-history/|access-date=16 May 2022 }}</ref> As the events in Atlanta they had no relation, and were planned to held with two separate Organizing Committees, functioning simultaneously and without any communication and inexistent relations. Even Nagano, which would host the [[1998 Winter Paralympics]], was further ahead than Atlanta and provided more security for the International Paralympic Committee, that despite having two separate organizations, the stakeholders were the same.<ref>{{cite web |title=Atlanta 1996 Paralympic Summer Games|publisher= Stoke Mandeville Paralympic Heritage |date= 2019|url=https://www.paralympicheritage.org.uk/atlanta-1996-paralympic-summer-games|access-date=23 May 2022}}</ref>
After the financial success of the [[1984 Summer Olympics]], "Olympic Fever" swept the United States and their bids became common in the following years.
[[Anchorage]], [[Alaska]] applied to host the 1992 and [[1994 Winter Olympics]] without success, and [[Salt Lake City]] also applied for the [[1998 Winter Olympics]], before the Utah capital "bought" the bidding process and won the rights to host the [[2002 Winter Olympics]] in 1995: three years later, the ensuing bribery scandal became public, leading to the biggest crisis in the history of the Olympic movement until the [[2020 Summer Olympics]] were postponed. Considered short-term bids, both Atlanta and Salt Lake City had used as a guide the financing model of the [[1984 Summer Olympics]], when no public funds were invested in the organization of the Games. Unlike Sydney, all the competition venues were ready and were mostly from private institutions. During the bid, all sponsors and interested parties financed all the necessary works.
By choosing this model, however, the Atlanta Olympic Bid Committee, caused the Paralympic Games to be "forgotten", as seen from the loss of funding and low market potential, closing the door to any kind of damage to the image of the AOCOG. However, when this situation was discovered, this led to a severe public outcry. As Salt Lake City was already in the bidding process for the 2002 Winter Olympics, the International Olympic Committee changed the process and signed a strategic partnership with the International Paralympic Committee in 1994, making the compromise to host the Paralympics under the same umbrella and Organizing Committee.<ref>{{cite web |title=Salt Lake City 2002 Paralympic Winter Games|publisher= Stoke Mandeville Paralympic Heritage |date= 2019|url=https://www.paralympicheritage.org.uk/salt-lake-city-2002-paralympic-winter-games|access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref>
===Two committees, too much confusion===
Line 137 ⟶ 135:
Under Australian law, the SOBC was constituted as a "specific purpose entity", which barred any change in its composition. The SOBC operated as a joint venture company with a 100% of its composition divided into three equal parts: 33.3% owned by the [[Australian Olympic Committee]], 33.3% owned by the [[Government of New South Wales]] and 33.3% owned by the [[Commonwealth of Australia]].
Under the current Australian legislation at the time, regardless of winning or losing the candidacy, at the end of the process it would have to be dissolved. Thus, these rules blocked any change in the composition, structure and functioning of the SOBC. As a result of this, the bid committee created by the APF had to do all the work alone.<ref name="Hartung-Rocket Fuel" />
After the announcement that of the five finalists, four satisfied the conditions to host the Paralympic Games ([[Beijing]], [[Berlin]], [[Manchester]] and [[Sydney]]) – technical infeasibility eliminated [[Istanbul]] – the IPC breathed a sigh of relief at that moment as three of these cities were proposing to "jointly organize the Olympic and Paralympic Games to save human and financial resources": the only bidding city that didn't propose this was Sydney.
After the decision was made by the IOC, Berlin was seen as favorites, as it was "considered the perfect proposal to celebrate the entry of the third millennium" as they wanted to celebrate the ten years of the [[German reunification]]
The [[Manchester bid for the 2000 Summer Olympics|Manchester's bid book]] was believed to be one of the most strong, but was harmed by recurring delays in the regeneration process and the ongoing works at the historic centre of the city, by criticism within Britain when its promotional videos and material featured videos and photos of the main tourist attractions
The first reactions in the UK were one of disbelief and embarrassment when the final presentation was taken in Monaco: many opinions in the editorials in national and local newspapers the following day concluded "Manchester is in a severe identity crisis", and even with Great Britain being the "spiritual home of Paralympic sport", Manchester's candidacy was being rejected by political force, along with several failures - the most glaring being their proposal to hold the Paralympic Games over 15 days, whereas the maximum allowed at the time was 12.
A review of the failed project in a smaller scale was submitted two years later to the [[Commonwealth Games Federation]] (CGF), and the city was eventually named as the host of the [[2002 Commonwealth Games]].
Along Berlin, the city was seen as a favourite due to the bid book stating "The Paralympic Games will be jointly financed with the Olympic Games and athletes will have the same opportunities and conditions offered to their Olympic counterparts".
Beijing had very weak arguments, similar to those of Milan (who withdrew in February 1993 due to a scandal involving overpricing for the project and involving environmental risks related to the [[Po River]]), though Beijing stated that "the city would accept the mission of organizing and hosting the Paralympic Games, and that the financing would be the same".
However,
With all these problems seeing the other candidates eliminated, only the APF candidacy remained, which also faced serious problems: despite being the only viable candidate,
During the first phase of feasibility studies, the Sydney 2000 Olympic Bid Committee (SOBC) had rejected the holding of the Paralympics, haunted by the perfect storm that was brewing in Atlanta. That made perfect sense,
Since from the beginning, the Organizing Committee of the 1996 Summer Olympics ignored any possibility of helping the organization of the Paralympic Games, the IPC had to consider a "plan B", which would be to hold the games in Great Britain or maintain them in Spain. However, the efforts of civil society in the city of Atlanta led to the main managers of the world know-[[Shepard Center]], to hold the project in a record three years' time. But unlike Seoul and Barcelona, there were financial and budget uncertainties which were only resolved at the last minute when large companies and multinationals based in the city bought the sponsorship when attempts to boycott and sabotage by Olympics and [[United States Olympic Committee]] sponsors become public through complaints made by the Paralympic organizers themselves.space.<ref>{{cite web |date=August 3, 2019 |title=How Buckhead's Shepherd Center saved the Atlanta 1996 Paralympic Games |url=https://reporternewspapers.net/2019/08/03/how-buckheads-shepherd-center-saved-the-atlanta-1996-paralympic-games/ |access-date=2022-05-16 |publisher=Reporter Newspapers}}</ref><ref name="Atlanta History Center">{{cite web |date=March 4, 2021 |title=The 10th Paralympic Games and Their Place in Disability History |url=https://www.atlantahistorycenter.com/blog/the-10th-paralympic-games-and-their-place-in-disability-history/ |access-date=2022-05-16 |publisher=Atlanta History Center}}</ref>
===The Sydney affair===
Sydney did not originally submit any documents regarding the holding of the Paralympic Games, which angered the [[Australian Paralympic Federation|Paralympics Australia]], as the funding for the Olympics was secured: it seemed there was no realistic prospect of any funding for the Paralympics.
Line 167:
This triggered a red light for the SOBC: the bid planning needed to be redone, and a chapter on the Paralympic Games was included at the last minute.
However, it was clear that the two events would be organized by two separate Organizing Committees. Immediately, the bid consultants advised the SOBC to reconsider its decision, and reluctantly they accepted this: it was claimed that the "rejection of the Paralympic Games could be considered a crucial weakness for Sydney" and that "important votes for the end could be lost".
Against its will, the SOBC approached the APF and tried to change its statute and the entire project to include the plans for the Paralympic Games, but the legislation in force in Australia at that time barred this structural change.
While the possibility of what was happening in Atlanta could repeat were real, the
===Third phase: the fight continues===
While the period of presentations was approaching, SPBC was structured. With a simpler and more modest structure than the other candidates as consequences of the lack of financial, organizational and structural support. As the final evaluations approached, the Sydney bidding committee for the 2000 Summer Paralympics was structured in a simpler and more modest way than the other bidders as a consequence of it being operating separately and also because there was not the structural, financial and organizational support of the Olympic Committee. Despite being there competing, Sydney's candidacy had more work than her competitors because of this lack of support. <ref name="Hartung-Rocket Fuel" />
===The APF's resilience===
Line 184 ⟶ 183:
In addition to these roles, they took on the duties and the matters of Sydney's bid for the 2000 Summer Paralympics. The APF also had the tasks of organizing its staff and interested parties, convincing sceptics about Australia's ability to host, organize and manage the Paralympic Games after the Olympics (hosted at a level of excellence never before seen), and show that a potential Paralympic edition on Australian soil could be a perfect opportunity to demonstrate that parathletes are part of Australian society, and that they have enormous potential to demonstrate their inclusion and diversity.<ref name="Hartung-Rocket Fuel" />
The APC's arguments had previously been used successfully when they convinced former Prime Minister [[Bob Hawke]] to sponsor the foundation of the APF: nobody imagined that Australia would consolidate itself in the Paralympic movement in the same way as in the Olympic movement, or even that this would be done in just
===Third phase: "We are on this"===
Line 193 ⟶ 192:
Taking advantage of this and the increasingly shorter deadline for sending the necessary documentation - this was to be delivered to the IPC by 21 March 1993.
The late Adrienne Smith, who was then working as the executive secretary of the APC, sat down at a table with several consultants of the SOBC: in just eight weeks, Smith and the SOBC drew up the bid project that would be handed over to the IPC executive board in a meeting scheduled for [[Lillehammer]],
At this meeting, the four candidate cities were aware of what their competitors were proposing to the IPC and, for the first time, face-to-face meetings between the members of these candidacy committees took place.
Line 227 ⟶ 226:
This selection was made eleven days before the 101st Session of the International Olympic Committee that was to be held in [[Monte Carlo]], Monaco. However, the signing of the city contract would have to wait, as this depended on the decision of the Olympic host: on 23 September, Sydney won the hosting rights in an upset, beating the favorite, Beijing, by just two votes. Thus, for the eighth time in history, the same city would host the Olympic and Paralympic Games in the same year: the SOBC had chosen 16 September – 1 October to hold the Olympic Games, while the APF chose 14–26 October to hold the Paralympic Games.<ref name="Hartung-Rocket Fuel" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gamesbids.com/eng/past.html |title=Past Olympic Host Cities List |website=GamesBids.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110124022022/http://www.gamesbids.com/eng/past.html |archive-date=24 January 2011 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="olympicbid">{{cite web|url=https://library.olympics.com/Default/doc/SYRACUSE/37644/sydney-2000-share-the-spirit-sydney-olympics-2000-bid-ltd|title=The Sydney 2000 Bid Book |year=1993 |publisher=SOBC|access-date=27 July 2022}}</ref>
After the win, Smith – now
Between these actions, Smith, Finneran, and members of SOBC also ensured in a letter to the IOC, IPC and Australian and New South Wales authorities that if Sydney won both bids, the Paralympic athletes would have the same treatment, conditions and support as their Olympic counterparts as happened in Barcelona, but in a better and innovative way. This was unprecedented
=== After the elections: first innovative proposal ===
Line 248 ⟶ 247:
==Administration==
However,during 1994,the authorities realized that both had several characteristics in common and motivated by incidents prior to the organization of the Atlanta Games, it was decided in the second half of that year to merge both organizations.in a movement mediated by the Australian government. This form was born in January 1995,
the Olympic Coordination Authority (OCA) was born. A body created by the city's three spheres of government to mediate relations between all parties involved. After the fusion, SPOC and SOCOG became two different public companies controlled by the Sydney local Government, receiving support by both State and Commonwealth Governments. Despite being legally different apart the same structure, the composition of the boards of directors of the two Committees was practically made up of the same people with the same functions with members appointed by New South Wales Premier, the Federal and State Ministers for the Olympics, the Federal Treasurer and the Federal and State Ministers for Sports and Recreation who conducted the joint planning.Within OCA, SOCOG and SPOC had the same administrative and legal duties and responsibilities related to the management, planning and execution of the Games.But SPOC responsabilities included almost all their relative marketing actions, the sale and distribution of tickets, the information systems and services, the disability classification, the converting Olympic venues to Paralympics, conducting the test events, facilitating drug testing, arranging broadcasting conditions, the housing for athletes, arranging all the ceremonies, transporting athletes and conducting and take the Paralympic Torch Relay.Along the IPC, the SPOC also had the responsibilities to regulated the use of Paralympic Games brand and images.
Even with this innovative organizational measure, there was a need for the IPC to intervene in small elements and moments,as the aaus such as the separation of theEven with the extensive experience of the people involved in the organization, the IPC realized that there were some specific needs, such as the creation of a specific sports and competitions department for the Paralympic Games.Thus, in 1997, the Spaniard Xavier Gonzalez was appointed to the portfolio, who had performed the same role in the two previous summer editions.The Gonzalez department supervised more than 3 thousand athletes in 21 competition venues including the supplementary and auxiliary places involving all sports management and competitions under your orientation.This subdivision was also responsible for finalizing the sporting program and make the final calendar.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sydney.olympic.org/media/review/1997/0206.htm |title=Paralympic Games Appointment |publisher=SOOCOG and SPOC |date=23 January 1997 |access-date=15 July 2022 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19971023082020/http://www.sydney.olympic.org/media/review/1997/0206.htm |archive-date=23 October 1997 }}</ref>
===Public Reception===
After an aggressive marketing campaign and an unprecedented and successful educational project.Huge crowds were drawn to the venues during the Games, namely some 340 000 basic education students.Public and Private Schools were provided with free day tickets for students and teachers to attend,as a conclusion for the schools education project which ran before the games.
To this happen,the Sydney Olympic Games Organising Committee (SOCOG) and the Sydney Paralympic Organising Committee (SPOC) held an administrative and organisational partnership to deliver three months of festivals including the Olympic,Paralympics and their relative events. This partnership alleviated transitional issues who happened during the Atlanta 1996 Games and led to the cross involvement between the committees at all events.<ref name="ref9">{{cite book |last=Brittain |first=Ian |date=2012 |title=From Stoke-Mandeville to Stratford: A History of the Summer Paralympic Games|publisher= Illinois: Common Ground LLC}}</ref>
==Transport and logistics operations==
Logistics management during the 1996 Summer Paralympic Games were a big disaster and were a key result of the lack of collaboration between the organizers, the city of Atlanta and the Georgia state government. As the provide services did not communicate with each other this led to huge traffic jams and other problems during competitions. In Atlanta, the majority of venues were outside the Olympic Ring and very far from the Paralympic Village. Since the bid projects, Sydney treated this issue in a different way, which practically transformed this issue into something much calmer and easier. As 20 of the 25 competition venues were all practically centralized in the same region neighboring the Paralympic Village, Paralympic athletes could reach them on foot or by their wheels. In this way the joint planning from the beginning ended the possibilities of different logistics for the two events, leading the reduction of these operations. However, the distances between the [[Homebush Bay]] precinct to the [[Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport]], the city Downtown and the most populated neighborhoods and their suburbs. Ended up leading to the expansion of the actions of the Sydney Olympic Transport and Roads Authority (SORTA), which also assumed the responsibilities of planning, managing and executing all logistics activities during the two events. SORTA was responsible for developing specific and differentiated actions for each one. Among this group was the hiring of 27 buses adapted to transport the blind and wheelchair athletes during the Paralympics in the daily routes between the airport and the Paralympic Village and also those competition and tourist and another sites further away from the Games epicenter. In addition to the roads management and the logistic operations during the Games, SORTA was also owned the responsibility to monitor, organize and prepare all transport routes that would take the public to watch the events. This involved cars, buses, the subway and surface trains, since most of the public arrived during the games using the [[Olympic Park railway line]] stations.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sydney.olympic.org/media/review/1997/0310.htm |title=Paralympic Games Appointment |publisher=SOOCOG and SPOC |date=23 January 1997 |access-date=15 July 2022 |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/19980122130000/http://www.sydney.olympic.org/media/review/1997/0310.htm |archive-date=22 January 1998 }}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Sydney 2000 Post-Paralympic Games Report|publisher=[[Sydney Paralympics Organizing Committee]]|year=2001|url=http://www.gamesinfo.com.au/postgames/pa/contents_para.htm|access-date=12 May 2023|archive-url=http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20040915162957/http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/13323/20020919-0000/www.gamesinfo.com.au/postgames/pa/contents_para.htm|archive-date=15 September 2004|url-status=live}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
==Political context==
[[File:201000 - Opening Ceremony Yothu Yindi perform 3 - 3b - 2000 Sydney opening ceremony photo.jpg|thumb|right|Yothu Yindi performs at the Sydney opening ceremony.]]
The Sydney 2000 Summer Paralympic was only the sixth time that the Summer Paralympics were hosted at the same city as the Olympic Games and the fifth time that they were organized by a different organizing committee. Contrary to what was expected, the 16 days of transition between the Games (2 to 18 October 2000) were very tense for the
==Controversies==
Line 275 ⟶ 278:
== Look of the Games ==
Despite all the approximation and development in common through the development of shared actions. The two events had different visual and corporate identities at the beginning, and this caused a differentiation of colour palettes, logos and other secondary characteristics.and led to the development of a specific department to look after the Paralympic Look of the Games. This group was responsible for providing a decoration, wayfinding and a common mark and identification program for some 20 competition venues, five major non-competition venues, the Sydney Olympic Park (SOP),and the turistic and common places in Sydney and Parramata. However, this group operated on an extremely smaller budget than its Olympic counterpart. This
▲and this caused a differentiation of colour palettes, logos and other secondary characteristics.and led to the development of a specific department to look after the Paralympic Look of the Games.This group was responsible for providing a decoration, wayfinding and a common mark and identification program for some 20 competition venues, five major non-competition venues,the Sydney Olympic Park (SOP),and the turistic and common places in Sydney and Parramata.However, this group operated on an extremely smaller budget than its Olympic counterpart.This leded in actions that led to the maximum reuse of several elements that were used during the Olympic Games.However, there was an audit to see which ones were in condition to be reused and were not discarded Thus, a huge amount of plaques and kits of parts were recovered or kept while those that were discarded were replaced by the Paralympic brand/identity along the specific graphics.Thus, those elements in which the "Sydney 2000" brand was used were maintained, with a view to maintaining the festive atmosphere experienced at the Olympic Games and also to demonstrate the similarity of the two events.The aim was to give the venues a fresh Paralympic identity, while maintaining the atmosphere of festivity and a similar level of presentation as the Olympic Games.<ref>{{cite web|title=Sydney 2000 Post-Paralympic Games Report|publisher=[[Sydney Paralympics Organizing Committee]]|year=2001|url=http://www.gamesinfo.com.au/postgames/pa/contents_para.htm|access-date=12 May 2023|archive-url=http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20040915162957/http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/13323/20020919-0000/www.gamesinfo.com.au/postgames/pa/contents_para.htm|archive-date=15 September 2004|url-status=live}}</ref>
=== Overlay Time ===
The situations experienced in Atlanta and Nagano regarding the visual identities of the Olympic and Paralympic Games in which they clashed and led to numerous problems and lawsuits and a lack of identification and differentiation by athletes, local communities and spectators. Due to these issues,for the first time a games overlay program was developed.<ref>{{cite web|title=Sydney 2000 Post-Paralympic Games Report|publisher=[[Sydney Paralympics Organizing Committee]]|year=2001|url=http://www.gamesinfo.com.au/postgames/pa/contents_para.htm|access-date=12 May 2023|archive-url=http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20040915162957/http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/13323/20020919-0000/www.gamesinfo.com.au/postgames/pa/contents_para.htm|archive-date=15 September 2004|url-status=live}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
Between 1997 and 1999 a specific and different visual identity for the Paralympics was developed, but due to internal administrative and financial issues at the Olympic Organizing Committee who that made the applications simpler and integrated them with the Paralympic Games. An example of this integration was the creation of 8 new specific paralympic sporting pictograms. Another integration in common was the use of the blue colour, the mark "Sydney 2000" and the graphics works called "fluid energy". However, with new elements now in eucalyptus green.
The solution for the changes of marks was simple due the low budget used. They covered with stickers in which the SOCOG and IOC brands were covered by the SPOC and IPC brands, lowering costs. Another plan was relocating that elements who were in using conditions to other areas. For this to happen, a list of priority locations was created, based on the profile of each sport and also on their maintenance costs. On average, each received AU$5,000, with the most expensive amount invested in the Olympic Stadium being AU$80,000. The original values were because of the reuse of most of the visual aspects of the Olympic Games, which were mostly made of recycled fabrics, as cardboards and another materials. Soon after adjustments and the final requirements made in the game areas and the common festive areas, made after the execution of the projects or else technical-operational requirements, they were handed over to the respective operational managers. Another change was that not a penny was spent on the readjustment of the 5 competition venues outside the Olympic Park. Because these were the last to be executed and received leftovers from the materials used for the Olympic Park. In addition, there was no need to prepare a specific project for them and only opted for changing the brands, just only covering the
===Logo===
The Sydney 2000 Summer Paralympics logo was developed by marketing agency FHA Image Design from Melbourne and went public on 18 October 1997, 3 years before the opening ceremony in a public event at the [[Homebush Bay]] precinct.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1772552|title=Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games |author=State Library of New South Wales |year=1998 |access-date=10 February 2023 |publisher= National Library of New South Wales}}</ref>
The Victorian agency was already involved with all the visual planning for both the Olympics and the Paralympics and unified several visual elements of the two events such as the pictograms, the street signals and the trademarks under the name of "Sydney 2000".The 2000 Summer Paralympic Games logo was a representative of a dynamic human form leaping triumphantly forward and 'breaking through' towards the games.<ref name="Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences">{{cite web |url=https://ma.as/503001 |title=Collection of posters for the Sydney Paralympic Games |author=Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences |access-date=10 February 2023 |publisher=Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences, Australia}}</ref>
The logo came to life with the design of the Paralympic torch and with the visual identity of the event that was focused on the energy dissipated by the paralympic athletes. It represents the energy dissipated by a paralympic athlete when "breaking a barrier" or a "wall of bricks, concrete or glass".This is also reflected in the Paralympic spirit, composed at the time by the motto of "body, mind and spirit".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ma.as/10770 |title=Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games torch with packaging |author=Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences |access-date=10 February 2023 |publisher=Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences, Australia}}</ref>
Another image that can be seen in it is the Paralympic torch that is in a handover position for the next carrier in inspiring views to the world and the future with the use of [[Futura (typeface)|Futura Typeface]] to write the games, host city's and year's names. The host's unique characteristics are seen in the fact that it also refers to the [[Sydney Opera House]] and [[Port Jackson|Sydney Harbour]] with its sea and the boats that are part of the most famous cityscape around the world, through the use of three graphic shapes who refer to this feature. The agency even developed unique tones of the 3 colours of the Paralympic flag to represent unique characteristics of the host country: the blue represented the two oceans that bathe Australia: the [[Indian Ocean]] and the [[Pacific Ocean]], the warm red of the [[Outback]] and a lush forest green which represent the [[Forests of Australia|Australia's endemic plants and animal species]]. The logo also embodies the host city vitality, Australia's spirit, and the achievements of a Paralympic athlete.<ref name="Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences"/>
===Tickets Design===
The comprehensive signage strategy, a design application specifically for the Paralympic Games, was fully connected to ticket design and layout and used a much simpler visual system, based on the Games logo, where the graphics were much larger.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sydney 2000 Post-Paralympic Games Report |publisher=[[Sydney Paralympics Organizing Committee]] |year=2001 |url=http://www.gamesinfo.com.au/postgames/pa/contents_para.htm |access-date=12 May 2023 |archive-url=http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20040915162957/http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/13323/20020919-0000/www.gamesinfo.com.au/postgames/pa/contents_para.htm |archive-date=15 September 2004 |url-status=live }}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
==Ceremonies==
[[File:151100 - Opening Ceremony Australian team - 3b - 2000 Sydney opening ceremony.jpg|thumb|right|The Australian team at the opening ceremony]]
The opening ceremony commenced on Wednesday 18 October at 8.00 pm with over 6000 performers and volunteers taking part.<ref name="ref9"
The Paralympic torch relay final
The closing ceremony took place as planned on the Sunday,29 October. The event started at 7:30 pm and was
▲The Paralympic torch relay final legs ended with [[Louise Sauvage]], who lit the cauldron.<ref name="ref9"/>
a party filled with fireworks, emotions and celebrations. After the last finals, all the athletes met for the last time to say goodbye to the Games. While Sydney was making history, the future of the Paralympic Games was uncertain until march of the next year. This situation happened because there were still no real guarantees and questions about the fact that the next Summer Games could be really in Greece or they will change of host country. These doubts were raised during a press conference held by the then president of the IPC, Canadian Robert Steadward, days before the opening ceremonies, as the host city contract and the delivery of several guarantees were open and uncertain. This situation led a new chapter in the midst of public disagreements between the IOC over the delays and bureaucracy in Greece that were putting the holding of the 2004 Summer Olympics at risk and which were also involving the Paralympic Games, which were seen as a second-class or unknown event in the country. As the situation was drastic and unprecedented, several changes to the ceremony protocol were made. The first of them was that the Greek anthem was not performed and any mention of Athens as the host of the next edition would not be made in the speeches or in any other reference. In addition, the traditional cultural presentation during the transfer of the Paralympic flag would be carried out. In fact, these doubts led to the positioning of other cities around the world that wanted to host the 2004 Summer Paralympic Games in Athens' place. even holding the Games in Sydney or going to Manchester or Barcelona.
==Calendar==
Line 669 ⟶ 674:
*[[Sydney International Archery Park]]: Archery
*[[Sydney Olympic Park Hockey Centre|State Hockey Centre]]: Football-7-side
*[[Sydney Showground (Olympic Park)|Sydney Showground Pavilions]]:ID Basketball, Goalball, Wheelchair Basketball (secondary venue), Judo,Wheelchair Rugby, Powerlifiting, Wheelchair Fencing, Sitting Volleyball and Standing Volleyball
*[[Sydney SuperDome]]: Wheelchair Basketball (main venue)
Line 692 ⟶ 697:
The flame was created from burning eucalyptus leaves in a special lighting ceremony at Parliament House, Canberra, on 5 October 2000, and involved 920 torchbearers in each capital of Australian state, each of whom carried the flame an average of 500 metres.<ref>{{cite web |title=Indigenous Flame created to start the Paralympic Torch Relay|url=https://www.sportcal.com/pressreleases/indigenous-flame-created-to-start-paralympic-relay/ |website=SportCal |publisher=SOCOG |access-date=21 September 2022}}</ref>
After visiting each capital city (except Sydney) by air and land in counterclockwise a way, the torch entered [[New South Wales]] (NSW) from [[Moss Vale]] through the [[Southern Highlands (New South Wales)|Southern Highlands]], [[Illawarra]], [[Campbelltown, New South Wales|Campbelltown]], [[Penrith, New South Wales|Penrith]], [[Windsor, New South Wales|Windsor]], [[Hunter Region|Hunter]] and [[Central Coast (New South Wales)|Central Coast]] areas before heading to Sydney Metropolitan Region.
Highlights included:
Line 738 ⟶ 743:
The Australian team had a number of notable gold medal-winning performances. Individual achievements included swimmer [[Siobhan Paton]]'s six gold medals in the 200m SM14 individual medley, and S14 100m freestyle, 50m butterfly, 50m backstroke, 200m freestyle, and 50m freestyle. She set nine world records in the process.
[[Tim Sullivan (athlete)|Tim Sullivan]] topped the track and field medal tally with five gold medals.
Other track medallists included [[Neil Fuller]] won two golds in the T44 200m, and 400m events, as well as one individual bronze medal in the T44 100m. Fuller later combined with [[Tim Matthews (athlete)|Tim Matthews]], [[Stephen Wilson (athlete)|Stephen Wilson]] and [[Heath Francis]] to win another two gold medals in the T45 4X100m relay and T46 4X400m relay. Heath Francis went on to win a total of three golds and one silver after also winning an individual gold and silver in the T46 400m and T46 200m events respectively. Other track medallists were [[Amy Winters]] with two golds in the T46 200m and 100m T46, and a bronze in the T46 400m. [[Greg Smith (Paralympian)|Greg Smith]] also won three gold medals in the 800m, 5,000m and 1,500m T52 events.
Line 802 ⟶ 807:
* {{FlagIPC|CHI|2000 Summer|4}}
* {{FlagIPC|CHN|2000 Summer|87}}
* [[File:Chinese Taipei Paralympic Flag (
* {{FlagIPC|COL|2000 Summer|3}}
* {{FlagIPC|CRC|2000 Summer|1}}
Line 955 ⟶ 960:
==External links==
{{commons category
*[http://www.paralympic.org/sydney-2000 "Participation Numbers: Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games"], [[International Paralympic Committee]]
Line 973 ⟶ 978:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Summer Paralympics}}
[[Category:2000 Summer Paralympics| ]]
[[Category:Summer Paralympic Games by year|2000]]
[[Category:2000 in Australian sport]]
[[Category:2000 in multi-sport events]]
|