Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
an album does not have eyes and cannot "see" anything
m HTTP->HTTPS link
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{essay|WP:HAMMER|WP:CRYSTALHAMMER|WP:HAMMERTIME|WP:STOPHAMMERTIME|WP:TPHL}}
{{nutshell|If you don't even know the name of an upcoming album, you probably don't know enough about it to write an article.}}
{{quotebox|align=left|qalign=center|width=100%|fontsize=12|title=[[User:TenPoundHammer|TenPoundHammer]]'s Law|quote=''If the name and track order of a future album are not yet known, the album is very likely to have its page [[WP:AFD|deleted]] from Wikipedia.''}}
[[File:ThorMårten Eskil Winge - Tor's Fight with the Giants - Google Art Project.jpg|thumb|right|If you do not want to feel the holy wrath of [[User:TenPoundHammer|the thunder god]], then do not title the article "[name of artist]'s [nth] studio album".]]
'''[[User:TenPoundHammer|TenPoundHammer]]'s Law''': If the name and track order of a future album are not yet known, the album is very likely to have its page [[WP:AFD|deleted]] from Wikipedia. Pages of this sort usually take the naming convention "[name of artist]'s [nth] studio album". There are occasional exceptions to this law, as sometimes a future album ''will'' contain enough verifiable information for a decent article even if the title is not known.<ref>For example, ''[[In Rainbows]]'' had a fully fledged article before its name was announced, because the page already contained sufficient sourced information for an article.</ref> But if all you can do is [[WP:CRYSTAL|look into a crystal ball]] or base your information off rumors posted to message boards, blogs or MySpace, then it's best ''not'' to create a page on the album until you've got something more to say. Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:There is no deadline|isn't going anywhere]]; it's not going to hurt you to wait.<ref>Also consider the fact that arguments like "''everybody'' knows it will be put out soon" or "this is going to be [name of artist]'s biggest album", or worst of all, "you just hate [name of artist], don't you?" don't hold water.</ref>
 
'''[[User:TenPoundHammer|TenPoundHammer]]'s Law''': If the name and track order of a future album are not yet known, the album is very likely to have its page [[WP:AFD|deleted]] from Wikipedia. Pages of this sort usually take the naming convention "[name of artist]'s [nth] studio album". There are occasional exceptions to this law, as sometimes a future album ''will'' contain enough verifiable information for a decent article even if the title is not known.<ref>For example, ''[[In Rainbows]]'' had a fully fledged article before its name was announced, because the page already contained sufficient sourced information for an article. Similarly, ''[[Chinese Democracy]]'' had sufficient content to warrant an article years before a track listing was finalized.</ref> But if all you can do is [[WP:CRYSTAL|look into a crystal ball]] or base your information off rumors posted to message boards, blogs, or MySpaceFacebook, then it's best ''not'' to create a page on the album until you've got something more to say. Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:There is no deadline|isn't going anywhere]]; it's not going to hurt you to wait.<ref>Also consider the fact that arguments like "''everybody'' knows it will be put out soon" or "this is going to be [name of artist]'s biggest album", or worst of all, "you just hate [name of artist], don't you?" don't hold water.</ref> And if that wasn't enough, exacerbating the issue even more is that if the article is [[WP:AfD|nominated for deletion]], performing [[WP:BEFORE|the relevant pre-checks for sources online]] is made extremely difficult by the fact that, ''by definition'', no genuine search term exists.
 
This also applies to discographies; please try to refrain from listing "TBD" in a list of the band's albums, unless of course the album is actually ''called'' "TBD".<ref> One of many examples [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deep_Purple&diff=prev&oldid=535548619 here]</ref> Again, it won't hurt you to wait.
 
==Other applications==
[[File:Claw-hammer.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Other media aside from music can also be susceptible to the hammer of [[WP:AfD]]]]
By extension, TenPoundHammer's law can also refer to any future subject for which a name is not yet known and no [[WP:V|verifiable information]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] yet exists.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii 2]] is the first deletion discussion to cite this essay beyond the scope of albums.</ref> This might include "future" [[video game]]s,<ref>In particular those which [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primeval: New Dawn|videohave gamesnot even started their funding campaign]],</ref> [[movies]], computer hardware, [[Video game console|consoles]], books, [[DVD-Video|DVD]]s, [[software]] and other types of media and products. It can even apply to a future band whose name and final members aren't known.,<ref>Yes, that actually happened; see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TenPoundHammer&diff=294248703&oldid=294215865 this comment]</ref> proposed constitutions,<ref>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next constitution of Zimbabwe]]</ref> or professional sports teams that do not know what league they will play in.<ref>See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Silverhawks]]</ref> It could also apply to speculation about potential or theoretical, but undiscovered, chemicals.<ref>See the discussions at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitrofullerenes]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ununoctium fluoride]].</ref>
 
==Footnotes==
Line 11 ⟶ 16:
 
==See also==
*[[WP:CRYSTAL|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball]]
*[[{{section link|Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Albums]]}}
*[[pt:Wikipedia:Lei doShirt58's MarteloLaw]]
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:TenPoundHammer's Law}}
[[pt:Wikipedia:Lei do Martelo]]
 
[[Category:Wikipedia essays]]
[[Category:Wikipedia essays about deletion]]