Content deleted Content added
we certainly need some sections here, but the one and only section shouldn't be a criticism section based on the criticism of one person. will revisit later, but perhaps something like "reception" after "explanation", for example |
Added links Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{short description|Technique in journalism}}
{{Tweet
| name = [[George Lakoff]]
Line 10 ⟶ 11:
| date = December 1, 2018
| ID = 1068891959882846208
| reference = <ref name="
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220130232150/https://twitter.com/georgelakoff/status/1068891959882846208?lang=en
|archive-date=January 30, 2022
}}
A '''truth sandwich''' is a technique in [[journalism]] to cover stories involving [[misinformation]] without unintentionally furthering the spread of false or misleading
The idea was developed by [[Linguistics|linguist]] [[George Lakoff]], and the name was coined in June 2018 by [[Brian Stelter]] of [[CNN]].<ref name="Sartwell-2018">{{Cite news|last=Sartwell|first=Crispin|date=2018-08-05|title=‘Truth Sandwich’? Baloney!|language=en-US|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/truth-sandwich-baloney-1533496472 |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-02-17|issn=0099-9660|archive-date=2022-02-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220215081810/https://www.wsj.com/articles/truth-sandwich-baloney-1533496472|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="cnn20180615">{{cite web |last1=Waldow |first1=Julia |title=George Lakoff says this is how Trump uses words to con the public |url=https://money.cnn.com/2018/06/15/media/reliable-sources-podcast-george-lakoff/index.html |website=CNNMoney |access-date=7 April 2024 |date=15 June 2018}}</ref> Lakoff observed media organizations spreading misinformation by quoting politicians or pundits who lie or mislead.
[[Linguistics|Linguist]] [[George Lakoff]] developed the idea, and the name was coined by [[Brian Stelter]] of [[CNN]].<ref name=":2">{{Cite news|last=Sartwell|first=Crispin|date=2018-08-05|title=‘Truth Sandwich’? Baloney!|language=en-US|work=Wall Street Journal|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/truth-sandwich-baloney-1533496472|access-date=2022-02-17|issn=0099-9660}}</ref> Lakoff observed media organizations spreading misinformation by quoting politicians or pundits who lie or mislead. He was specifically interested in the ways journalists were covering [[Donald Trump]], who made an [[Veracity of statements by Donald Trump|unprecedented number of false and misleading statements]] over the course of his term as [[President of the United States]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Analysis {{!}} Tracking all of President Trump’s false or misleading claims|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/|access-date=2022-02-16|website=Washington Post|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Baker|first=Peter|date=2018-03-17|title=Trump and the Truth: A President Tests His Own Credibility|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/trump-truth-lies.html|access-date=2022-02-16|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-09-25|title=Scope of Trump's falsehoods unprecedented for a modern presidential candidate|url=https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-false-statements-20160925-snap-story.html|access-date=2022-02-16|website=Los Angeles Times|language=en-US}}</ref> Lakoff has written about Trump's effective use of language and framing techniques, understanding the media will cover and repeat his most controversial statements, stereotypes, and pithy mischaracterization, thus turning even his critics into part of his marketing apparatus.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|last=Lakoff|first=George P.|date=2018-06-13|title=Trump has turned words into weapons. And he's winning the linguistic war {{!}} George P Lakoff and Gil Duran|url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/13/how-to-report-trump-media-manipulation-language|access-date=2022-02-17|website=the Guardian|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":2" /> Standard journalistic practice involves repeating claims made by public figures or quoting them directly, but when the public figure is spreading misinformation or disinformation, repetition of the claims can amplify them and increase their harm. Sometimes lies are too consequential to ignore, however, placing journalists in a difficult position.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|date=2020-08-18|title=How to serve up a tasty ‘truth sandwich?’|url=https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2020/how-to-serve-up-a-tasty-truth-sandwich/|access-date=2022-02-17|website=Poynter|language=en-US}}</ref>▼
==Background==
According to Lakoff, even if you cover a lie and say afterwards that what was just said was false, the message has still been spread, and "denying a frame, activates the frame".<ref>{{Citation|title=How to make a 'truth sandwich' - CNN Video|url=https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2018/06/17/how-to-make-a-truth-sandwich-rs.cnn|access-date=2022-02-16}}</ref> He argues that repetition strengthens "frame-circuits" in the brain that we use to understand the world.<ref name=":3" /> A truth sandwich ensures the bad information is not the first thing people read or hear, nor the final impression of a story at the end. Restating false claims can reinforce them through repetition, but adding repetition of their [[fact-checking]] and rebuttal can have a similar effect.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|title=Perspective {{!}} Instead of Trump’s propaganda, how about a nice ‘truth sandwich’?|language=en-US|work=Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/instead-of-trumps-propaganda-how-about-a-nice-truth-sandwich/2018/06/15/80df8c36-70af-11e8-bf86-a2351b5ece99_story.html|access-date=2022-02-17|issn=0190-8286}}</ref>▼
▲
▲According to Lakoff, even if you cover a lie and say afterwards that what was just said was false, the message has still been spread, and "denying a frame, activates the frame".<ref>{{Citation|title=How to make a 'truth sandwich'
[[PBS]] published a blog post which explained the principle behind a truth sandwich is already something its editorial standards address: "Accuracy includes more than simply verifying whether information is correct; facts must be placed in sufficient context based on the nature of the piece to ensure that the public is not misled".<ref>{{Cite web|title=What is a 'Truth Sandwich'?|url=https://www.pbs.org/standards/blogs/standards-articles/what-is-a-truth-sandwich/|access-date=2022-02-16|website=PBS Standards|language=en}}</ref> [[Roy Peter Clark]] wrote for ''[[Poynter Institute|Poynter]]'' that the idea of a truth sandwich is like the [[rhetoric]]al concept of "emphatic word order", where someone places "emphatic words" at the beginning and end of a sentence. In journalism, Clark wrote, "the position of least emphasis turns out to be the middle".<ref name=":1" />▼
Lakoff explained his tactic to Brian Stelter on CNN's ''[[Reliable Sources]]'' [[podcast]] on 17 June 2018:<ref name="cnn20180615"/>
Truth sandwiches have been used, advocated, or discussed in the context of a range of topics where misinformation is particularly widespread. A group of scientists writing about the challenge of [[COVID-19 misinformation|misinformation about coronavirus vaccines]] during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] advocated truth sandwiches as a communication strategy in their guide to dispelling common myths.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Jensen|first=Elizabeth|date=2019-03-08|title=Injecting NPR's Vaccine Coverage With Respect — And Facts|language=en|work=NPR|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2019/03/08/701591482/injecting-nprs-vaccine-coverage-with-respect-and-facts|access-date=2022-02-16}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-01-07|title=Scientists create guide to building truth ‘sandwich’ to combat Covid misinformation|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-vaccines-misinformation-scientists-truth-sandwich-b1783401.html|access-date=2022-02-17|website=The Independent|language=en}}</ref> In an article about truth sandwiches at ''[[Journalism.co.uk]],'' Joseph Cummins uses the term "backfire effect" for when "telling people that what they believe in is false [makes] them double down on their beliefs".<ref name=":4">{{Cite web|last=Cummins|first=Joseph|date=2022-02-02|title=The truth sandwich: how to cover falsehoods from official sources {{!}} Media news|url=https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/truth-sandwich-how-to-report-falsehoods-from-official-sources-journalism-misinformation/s2/a899610/|access-date=2022-02-17|website=www.journalism.co.uk}}</ref> He urged journalists to utilize the technique, or keep in mind its principles, in not just the main writing about a story involving falsehoods, but also the images, headlines, social media, and other elements of coverage.<ref name=":4" />▼
* Lakoff: Right now, people in the media ... allow Trump to manipulate them. So... start with the truth that he's trying to hide. You make clear to that, and then you point out that the president is trying to hide this by lying. You might in... a few words or in a few seconds say a little bit about what the lie is. And go back to the truth.
* Stelter: It's a truth sandwich.
* Lakoff: You've got it. A truth sandwich. Perfect way to image it.
==Use by news media==
[[Crispin Sartwell]] opined in the [[The Wall Street Journal|''Wall Street Journal'']] that using truth sandwiches is manipulative and condescending, and noted that the name is confusing because sandwiches are typically named for what is in the middle, not for the bread.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />▼
▲[[PBS]] published a blog post which explained the principle behind a truth sandwich is already something its editorial standards address: "Accuracy includes more than simply verifying whether information is correct; facts must be placed in sufficient context based on the nature of the piece to ensure that the public is not misled".<ref>{{Cite web|title=What is a 'Truth Sandwich'?|url=https://www.pbs.org/standards/blogs/standards-articles/what-is-a-truth-sandwich/ |first1= Marcia |last1=Apperson |date=April 22, 2020 |access-date=2022-02-16|website=PBS Standards|language=en|archive-date=2022-02-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220215120328/https://www.pbs.org/standards/blogs/standards-articles/what-is-a-truth-sandwich/|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Roy Peter Clark]] wrote for ''[[Poynter Institute|Poynter]]'' that the idea of a truth sandwich is like the [[rhetoric]]al concept of "emphatic word order", where someone places "emphatic words" at the beginning and end of a sentence. In journalism, Clark wrote, "the position of least emphasis turns out to be the middle".<ref name="
▲Truth sandwiches have been used, advocated, or discussed in the context of a range of topics where misinformation is particularly widespread. A group of scientists writing about the challenge of [[COVID-19 misinformation|misinformation about coronavirus vaccines]] during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] advocated truth sandwiches as a communication strategy in their guide to dispelling common myths.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Jensen|first=Elizabeth|date=2019-03-08|title=Injecting NPR's Vaccine Coverage With Respect — And Facts|language=en|work=[[NPR]]|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2019/03/08/701591482/injecting-nprs-vaccine-coverage-with-respect-and-facts|access-date=2022-02-16|archive-date=2022-02-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220215063030/https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2019/03/08/701591482/injecting-nprs-vaccine-coverage-with-respect-and-facts|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-01-07|title=Scientists create guide to building truth ‘sandwich’ to combat Covid misinformation|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-vaccines-misinformation-scientists-truth-sandwich-b1783401.html|access-date=2022-02-17|website=[[The Independent]]|language=en|archive-date=2022-02-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213112649/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-vaccines-misinformation-scientists-truth-sandwich-b1783401.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In an article about truth sandwiches at ''[[Journalism.co.uk]],'' Joseph Cummins uses the term "[[Belief perseverance|backfire effect]]" for when "telling people that what they believe in is false [makes] them double down on their beliefs".<ref name="
==Criticism==
▲[[Crispin Sartwell]] opined in the [[The Wall Street Journal|''Wall Street Journal'']] that using truth sandwiches is manipulative and condescending, and noted that the name is confusing because sandwiches are typically named for what is in the middle, not for the bread.<ref name="
==See also==
* [[Disinformation]] and [[Misinformation]]
* [[Factoid]]
* [[Illusory truth effect]]
* [[Post-truth politics]]
* [[Serial-position effect]]
* [[Truthiness]]
== References ==
Line 30 ⟶ 49:
[[Category:Misinformation]]
[[Category:Media bias]]
[[Category:Communication of falsehoods]]
[[Category:Mass media issues]]
[[Category:Journalism terminology]]
[[Category:Linguistics terminology]]
|