Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Added url. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Wikipedia introduction cleanup from April 2024 | #UCB_Category 152/214 |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 3:
{{Use American English|date=January 2024}}
{{Lead extra info|date=April 2024}}
[[File:Qbittorrent-Interface-4.2.1.png|thumb|upright=1.35|alt=An image of a qbittorrent interface; a popular torrenting program due to its free and open-sourced design.|[[qBittorrent]] is one of the most widely used torrenting programs due to its [[Free
'''Online piracy''' or '''software piracy''' is the practice of [[download]]ing and distributing [[copyrighted]] works digitally without permission, such as [[music]], [[movies]] or [[software]].<ref name=":03">{{Cite journal|last1=Choi|first1=David Y.|last2=Perez|first2=Arturo|date=April 2007|title=Online piracy, innovation, and legitimate business models|journal=Technovation|volume=27|issue=4|pages=168–178|doi=10.1016/j.technovation.2006.09.004|issn=0166-4972}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/63907/internet-piracy|title=Definition of: Internet piracy|website=[[PC Magazine]] Encyclopedia|access-date=26 October 2018}}</ref> The principle behind [[piracy]] has predated the creation of the [[Internet]]
==History==
Line 19:
==Scope==
The economic loss caused by digital piracy before the year 2000 is estimated to be worth $265B and in 2004 it was found that 4% of box office receipts were lost. Both piracy and economic losses due to piracy are trending upwards. Lost revenues due to digital piracy
A 2019 study sponsored by the [[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]] Global Innovation Policy Center (GIPC), in partnership with NERA Economic Consulting "estimates that global online piracy costs the U.S. economy at least $29.2 billion in lost revenue each year."<ref>{{cite web |title=Impacts of Digital Piracy on the U.S. Economy |url=https://www.theglobalipcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Digital-Video-Piracy.pdf |website=GlobalInnovationPolicyCenter.com |access-date=2 September 2021}}</ref> An August 2021 report by the [[Digital Citizens Alliance]] states that "online criminals who offer stolen movies, TV shows, games, and live events through websites and apps are reaping $1.34 billion in annual advertising revenues." The DCA claims that they consist of "risky advertising that exposes consumers to fraud and malware."<ref>{{cite web |title=Advertising Fuels $1.34 Billion Illegal Piracy Market, Report by Digital Citizens Alliance and White Bullet Finds |url=https://www.digitalcitizensalliance.org/news/press-releases-2021/advertising-fuels-1.34-billion-illegal-piracy-market-report-by-digital-citizens-alliance-and-white-bullet-finds/ |website=Digital Citizens Alliance |access-date=2 September 2021}}</ref>
The groups and individuals who operate piracy websites potentially earn millions of dollars from their efforts. This revenue can come from a number of sources, such as advertising, subscriptions, and the sale of content.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=McCOYD|first=Ed|date=January 2012|title=Online piracy of publishers' content: a primer|journal=Learned Publishing|volume=25|issue=1|pages=21–28|doi=10.1087/20120104|s2cid=2912597|issn=0953-1513|doi-access=}}</ref> Piracy behavior demonstrated that economic theory explains a notable part of the individual variation in a survey study. Individuals with a low net valuation of an original when a copy is available are more prone to engage in piracy than individuals with a higher valuation. Individuals with a low cost of obtaining and handling copies are also more engaged in piracy. The country-wise variation can also be explained by economic variables; GNI/capita and judicial efficiency explain a substantial part of this variation.<ref>Holm, H. J. (2003). Can economic theory explain piracy behavior?, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1082</ref>
While these sites are occasionally shut down, they are often quickly replaced, and may move through successive national legal jurisdictions to avoid law enforcement. These efforts at detection and enforcement are further complicated by the often prohibitive amount of time, resources and number of personnel required.<ref name="Scott20162">{{cite book|last=Scott|first=Gini Graham|url=https://archive.org/details/internetbookpira0000scot|url-access=registration|title=Internet Book Piracy: The Fight to Protect Authors, Publishers, and Our Culture|date=22 March 2016|publisher=Allworth Press|isbn=978-1-62153-495-2}}</ref>
Some jurisdictions, such as [[Thailand]] and [[Malaysia]], have no legislation in place to address online piracy, and others, such as the [[Philippines]] and [[Vietnam]], have oversight regimes in place that have proven largely ineffective.<ref name="Ballano20152">{{cite book|last=Ballano|first=Vivencio O.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0oxNCwAAQBAJ|title=Sociological Perspectives on Media Piracy in the Philippines and Vietnam|date=26 December 2015|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-981-287-922-6}}</ref>{{rp|62–5}}
==Implications==
Online piracy has led to improvements into file sharing technology that has bettered information distribution as a whole. Additionally, pirating communities tend to model market trends well, as members of those communities tend to be early adopters. Piracy can also lead to businesses developing new models that better account for the current market.<ref name=":03"/> It has been argued that online piracy may help in preventing businesses from investing in unnecessary marketing campaigns. In addition to helping screen businesses, research proposes that some organizations may be better off servicing only their most valued and legitimate customers, or those who buy legitimate copies of their products. Because pirated copies of software are expected to attract customers who are sensitive to price, it may not be to businesses' best interest to engage in extraneous price wars with their competitors or invest heavily in anti-piracy campaigns to win target customers.<ref>Ernan Haruvy,
Despite the discourse on the digital threat of piracy, it has been shown that innovation and the creation of new works is flourishing more than ever on the Internet.<ref name=":2">Frosio, G. F. (2016). Digital piracy debunked: a short note on digital threats and intermediary liability. Internet Policy Review, 5(1). [[doi:10.14763/2016.1.400]]</ref> Piracy has also
==Ethics==
In many countries the laws on copyright are clear and penalties are heavy. The prevalence of piracy in face of these potential penalties is due to the fact that individuals do not see piracy as inappropriate, let alone
Conversely, those same individuals{{who|date=January 2024}} cited that the prevalence of piracy is due to the industry's inability to cater to the consumer. Many{{who|date=January 2024}} cite unsatisfactory industry practices such as obtrusive [[Digital rights management|DRM]] in paid software, overpriced media, and split markets as their reason for pirating.<ref name=":2" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Al-Rafee|first1=Sulaiman|last2=Cronan|first2=Timothy Paul|date=February 2006|title=Digital Piracy: Factors that Influence Attitude Toward Behavior|journal=Journal of Business Ethics|language=en|volume=63|issue=3|pages=237–259|doi=10.1007/s10551-005-1902-9|s2cid=143769363|issn=0167-4544}}</ref> Digital piracy has posed a significant threat to the development of the software industry and the growth of the digital media industry, it has, for the last decade, held considerable interest for researchers and practitioners.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Yoon, C.|title=Theory of Planned Behavior and Ethics Theory in Digital Piracy: An Integrated Model|journal=Journal of Bus Ethics|volume=100|pages=405–417|date=2011-11-21|issue=3 |doi=10.1007/s10551-010-0687-7|s2cid=14395090 }}</ref> In the context of Indonesia, moral equity has affected digital piracy behavior negatively. Therefore, efforts to reduce piracy have been focused on highlighting the importance of fairness and justice.<ref>{{cite journal|author1=Arli, D.|author2=Tjiptono, F.|author3=Porto, R.|date=2015|title=The impact of moral equity, relativism and attitude on individuals' digital piracy behaviour in a developing country|journal=Marketing Intelligence & Planning|volume=33|issue=3|pages=348–365|doi=10.1108/MIP-09-2013-0149|hdl=10072/169704|hdl-access=free}}.</ref>
|