Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sro23: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Fix Linter errors.
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate rfa" style="background-color: #f5fff5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a '''successful''' [[wikipedia:requests for adminship|request for adminship]]. <strong style="color:red">Please do not modify it</strong>.''[[Category:Successful requests for adminship|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
 
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sro23|Sro23]]===
'''Final (277/4/0); Closed as successful''' by [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) at 02:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC) <!-- Template:finaltally (automatic) -->
<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sro23|action=edit&section=4}} <b style="color: #002BB8;">Voice your opinion on this candidate</b>]</span> ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Sro23|talk page]])
'''{{RfA tally|Sro23}}<!-- WHEN CLOSING THIS RFA, REPLACE THIS PART WITH {{subst:finaltally|[OPTIONALMESSAGE] OR [result=successful] OR [reason=SNOW] OR [reason=NOTNOW] OR (blank)}} SEE TEMPLATE FOR MORE DETAILS -->; Scheduled to end 02:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)'''
 
====Nomination====
Line 139 ⟶ 141:
#'''Support'''. I'm not seeing some of the things we usually ask candidates to have, but anyone who lasts a significant period clerking can be trusted with the tools. Take care when expanding into other areas, and you should be fine. [[User:TheDragonFire|TheDragonFire]] ([[User talk:TheDragonFire|talk]]) 06:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Absolutely, strong SPI work and experience in administrative areas. Would clearly be a [[WP:NETPOSITIVE|net positive]] to the project. [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 06:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is one of those "gee, I thought he/she already was... " candidates. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps; text-shadow:blue 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">--<fontspan colorstyle="color:blue;">Dr.</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">Margi</fontspan></span> [[User talk:Drmargi#top|<big>✉</big>]] 07:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Industrious and trustworthy. He would be a good admin. [[User:Scope creep|scope_creep]] ([[User talk:Scope creep|talk]]) 07:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full support. Informed user , will benefit from having the admin tools. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari|talk]]) 07:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Line 208 ⟶ 210:
#'''Support''' good record, no problems at all, [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 17:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Sure. [[User:Jon Kolbert|Jon Kolbert]] ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|talk]]) 17:43, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' with a piece of free advice (you get what you pay for!) that I hope Sro will carry on working the content project they've started. I don't usually care about trinkets, but perusing creations and entries where Sro is a major contributor, I think going through e.g. a GA review could be fruitful for getting a little farther into the finer points of content creation, which I think will be useful experience in adminning (e.g. to help avoid the ANI trap Ritchie mentions). But I think NETPOSITIVE given the trustworthiness and specific skills. Thanks for all your work! [[User:Innisfree987|Innisfree987]] ([[User talk:Innisfree987|talk]]) 18:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
# 20 Mule Team '''Support''' Sro's tireless work on SPI's is but one facet of his value to the project. The mop and bucket will only increase that. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]]&#124;[[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 18:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' good track record, mature approach to problematic editors, looks like he will make an excellent admin active in the SPI area. --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 18:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Line 223 ⟶ 224:
#'''Support'''. The user has been extremely productive and very fair at SPI. Sro23 can definitely be trusted with admin tools and I'm happy to see this user's RfA. [[User:Aoi|青い(Aoi)]] ([[User talk:Aoi|talk]]) 19:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I don't believe we've ever crossed paths, apart from fighting vandals at the same time. A quick poke around no worries at all. All the best, just don't get buried in the snow! [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]]) 19:43, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Definitely! Need more reliable admins working on behind the scenes jobs!<span style="white-space:nowrap; font-family: Harlow Solid Italic;">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<span style="font-size: small; color: teal;"> « Gonzo fan2007</span>]] ''[[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007#top|<span style="color: #191970;">(talk)</span>]]'' @ </span> 19:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
# '''Support''' it’s about time. :-) <span style="color: #9932CC">[[:User:KrakatoaKatie|Katie]]<sup>[[User talk:KrakatoaKatie|talk]]</sup></span> 19:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I have only seen sensible edits from Sro23. Along with his experience at [[WP:SPI]], I am pretty confident they will make a good admin. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 20:00, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No issues, plus wants to work in a specialized area. ~'''''[[User:Editorofthewiki|<span style="color: #F90000;">EDDY</span>]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Editorofthewiki|<span style="color: Green;">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|<span style="color: Green;">contribs</span>]])</sup>'''</span>~ 20:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' not familiar with editor but think it'll be net positive [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 20:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I think it'll be net positive and I am glad there is recent experience with article creation. --[[User:Frmorrison|Frmorrison]] ([[User talk:Frmorrison|talk]]) 20:47, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Line 257 ⟶ 258:
#'''Support''' – No concerns. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
# Absolutely, yes. — [[User talk:Fox|🦊]] 01:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Fantastic resume from what I gather. No issues that I can think of and the editor seems ready to step into the role as an admin.-[[user:White Shadows|<fontspan style="color:#003153">'''White Shadows'''</fontspan>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<fontspan style="color:#DC143C">'''New and improved!'''</fontspan>]]</sup> 02:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - seems well versed with SPI work, a much needed asset to the admin corps. [[User:HMSLavender|<span style="color: #C45AEC;">lavender</span>]]&#124;<sup>(formerly [[User:HMSSolent|<span style="color: #808080;">HMSSolent</span>]])</sup>&#124;[[User talk:HMSLavender|<span style="color: #50EBEC">lambast</span>]] 02:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. SPI needs more admin clerks, and Sro23 is an excellent clerk. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 02:11, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Line 335 ⟶ 336:
# '''Support''' with delight. - '''[[User:Julietdeltalima|<span style="color:#006600;font-family:Century Schoolbook">Julietdeltalima</span>]]''' ''[[User talk:Julietdeltalima|<span style="color:#806000">(talk)</span>]]'' 17:53, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
# Yep. I found the answer ''"I'm only human; I've been wrong before and will be wrong in the future"'' particularly perspicacious. So often, we (meaning the whole human race) fail to note this applies to ourselves at all times. I like the cut of this candidates jib for that in particular. But also they need the tools and would make good use of them, so there's that too. ◦ [[User talk:Trey Maturin|Trey Maturin]] 18:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Candidate meets all of my established standards and appears to be a net positive. Good luck! [[User:Strikerforce|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#3333cc;">'''Striker'''</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#330099;">'''force'''</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Strikerforce|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#3333cc;">Talk</fontspan>]] </sup> 18:53, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I knew pretty much nothing about this user before this RFA popped up on my watchlist. Since then I have skimmed through some of his answers to the questions here and messages on his talk page, and they have convinced me that he will be an excellent admin, due to his extensive knowledge of Wikipedia policy and how to apply it, his modesty, and his willingness to admit when he is not sure what to do. I am quite confident that he will do a great job if given the mop. [[User:Everymorning|Everymorning]] [[User talk:Everymorning|<small>talk to me</small>]] 20:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' with very high enthusiasm. A thoughtful self-nom, and a good reason for using the tools. I'm not concerned about content or other experience-related issues, because I think that dealing with SPI actually does expose an editor to issues of disputes and conduct, because the answers to questions seem very clueful to me, and because I'm seeing a good attitude of not over-reaching and of not just trying to tick the RfA boxes in order to hat-collect. I like everything I've seen here. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 20:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Line 363 ⟶ 364:
#'''Support'''. I find the Oppose !votes unconvincing, support per nom. --[[User:Joshualouie711|Joshualouie711]]<sup>[[User talk:Joshualouie711|talk]]</sup> 15:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Great answers, seems like he'll make a great admin! <span style="font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 34px black">[[User:QueerFilmNerd|<span style="color:#e52929">QueerFilmNerd</span>]]<small><sup>[[User talk:QueerFilmNerd|<span style="color:#2863e5;">talk</span>]]</sup></small></span> 18:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per nom. Welcome to the corps! &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 18:39, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as clearly clueful. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 19:25, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#Seems trustworthy and sane. --[[User:Dylan620|Dylan620]] ([[User talk:Dylan620|talk]]) 19:26, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' and good to see I have to scroll so far down to add this support, clearly qualified.--[[User:Loriendrew|<span style="color: #005000;">☾Loriendrew☽</span>]] [[User talk:Loriendrew|<span style="color: #000080;">☏''(ring-ring)''</span>]] 22:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Have seen him around, can be trusted with tools. —<span style="font-size: 104%; letter-spacing:1.5pt;"><span class="monospaced" style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran[[User talk:Usernamekiran|<span style="letter-spacing:1pt;">'''(talk)'''</span>]]</span></span> 00:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''', no problems here. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 01:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' no reason to think that this user would abuse the tools --[[User:Rogerd|rogerd]] ([[User talk:Rogerd|talk]]) 02:34, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Excellent candidate. [[User_talk:Bradv|<span style="color:#C60">Brad</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bradv|<span style="color:#C60">v</span>]] 04:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per above. Should have happened a while ago. Good luck. [[User:Nihlus|<span style="padding:2px 2px;font-variant:small-caps;color:#000;letter-spacing:-0.5px">'''Nihlus'''</span>]] 04:38, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Active sockpuppet investigation clerk. Potential use case applicable. Also endorsed as pert all above. Regards [[User:Sau226|Sau226]] ([[User talk:Sau226|talk]]) 09:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - three years' learning the ropes, no blocks, some work at [[WP:AFD]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 14:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - But Cryptic's question was just as wikipolitical as any other. This is an opportunity to examine if sysop candidates have extreme viewpoints on different topics.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 14:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Is definitely familiar with admin areas, has demonstrated a need for the tools, and seems like a very kind person. I fully trust Sro23 with the new tools that will become available when he becomes an admin. Also, we're at 269 support votes now - if we can get just 31 more within the next 11 hours, Sro23's RfA will be the second one to have over 300 supports!--<span style="font-family: AR BERKLEY; text-shadow: 2px 5px 5px gray;">[[User:SkyGazer 512|SkyGazer 512]]</span> <sup><span style="background: linear-gradient(aqua, #d580ff);">[[User talk:SkyGazer 512|Oh no, what did I do this time?]]</span></sup> 14:46, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Obviously, he can make mistakes, like that one with the rollback back in June, but he is aware of these mistakes and quickly learns from them too. Overall though, I think Wiki will be better with the mop given to him. [[User:Minimac|<span style="color: #0645AD;">Minima</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Minimac|<span style="color: #0645AD;">©</span>]] ([[User talk:Minimac|<span style="color: #0645AD;">talk</span>]]) 17:32, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.--'''[[User:Jetstreamer|Jetstreamer]]'''&nbsp;''{{sup|[[User talk:Jetstreamer#top|Talk]]}}'' 18:46, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. One of those cases where it's like, how did this person not already have the tools? —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 20:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Definitely [[User:JMHamo|JMHamo]] ([[User talk:JMHamo|talk]]) 21:06, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#Just reviewed the deleted edits, deletion tagging looks fine. ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers</span>'' 21:44, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I don't often !vote at AfD. But this is an obvious one. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 22:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#:Are you sure about? [https://tools.wmflabs.org/afdstats/afdstats.py?name=Black+Kite&max=&startdate=&altname= This page] says "Total number of unique AfD pages edited by Black Kite: 4619" :-D [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 22:45, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Can be trusted with the tools. [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 23:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
#'''Support''' piling on even more. I see lots of reasons to support and few reasons to oppose. Since everyone will make mistakes, admins who can admit their failings are better than the alternative. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 02:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 
=====Oppose=====
Line 394 ⟶ 417:
#:::<small>Restored ~ <span style="color:#F09">Amory</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Amorymeltzer|u]] • [[User talk:Amorymeltzer|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Amorymeltzer|c]])''</small> 10:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
#'''Moral Oppose''' per the (mostly, not all) inappropriate behavior at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Sro23#Saturnalia0's oppose]]. &ndash;[[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]]&nbsp;([[User Talk:Deacon Vorbis|carbon]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Deacon Vorbis|videos]]) 16:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#:Move to Talk page.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 23:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#:What's that got to do with {{u|Sro23}}? \\\Septrillion:- [[User:Septrillion|<span style="color: red;">~~&#8237;~~</span>]]'''''[[User talk:Septrillion|<span style="color: orange;">10</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Septrillion|<span style="color: black;">Eleventeen</span>]]</sup>''''' 16:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#::Absolutely nothing. &ndash;[[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]]&nbsp;([[User Talk:Deacon Vorbis|carbon]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Deacon Vorbis|videos]]) 16:28, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#:::Why are you opposing an RfA candidate for reasons having nothing to do with them? How is that fair? \\\Septrillion:- [[User:Septrillion|<span style="color: red;">~~&#8237;~~</span>]]'''''[[User talk:Septrillion|<span style="color: orange;">10</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Septrillion|<span style="color: black;">Eleventeen</span>]]</sup>''''' 16:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#::::It's just a moral oppose on a request that has no chance of failing anyway. Since my !vote will have no impact on the outcome (as intended), I don't think it's unfair to Sro at all. I simply added it to hopefully make others think twice about badgering those giving a dissenting voice, regardless of how useful or not it was (again, not everyone who commented there was at fault, but some were). &ndash;[[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]]&nbsp;([[User Talk:Deacon Vorbis|carbon]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Deacon Vorbis|videos]]) 16:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#:::::This !vote may need to be struck. \\\Septrillion:- [[User:Septrillion|<span style="color: red;">~~&#8237;~~</span>]]'''''[[User talk:Septrillion|<span style="color: orange;">10</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Septrillion|<span style="color: black;">Eleventeen</span>]]</sup>''''' 16:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#:::::(ec) Even as someone who doesn't really have any problem with unsubstantiated opposes, and thinks that striking them is uncalled for (the closing 'crat can afford said votes the weight they feel is due), this 'moral oppose' really smacks of [[WP:POINT|disrupting proceedings to prove a point]]. [[User:Firefly|<span style="color:#850808;">ƒirefly</span>]] <small>( [[User talk:Firefly|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Firefly|c]] · [[User:Firefly/who|who?]] )</small> 16:41, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#::::::I may have made it to prove a point, but I disagree that it was disruptive. &ndash;[[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]]&nbsp;([[User Talk:Deacon Vorbis|carbon]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Deacon Vorbis|videos]]) 16:45, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#:::::::People have a right to oppose even a popular candidate, which is the point this is trying to make. I obviously want this to succeed, but the point is valid (and it was a point made in my RfA as well.) Most candidates get why people might be frustrated with badgering opposers, and I don't think harping on Deacon Vorbis is useful. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 16:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#::::::::This should be moved to neutral or general comments, as the voter has stated plainly that this is not a comment on the candidate but on other users' behaviour in a subthread. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 16:59, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#:::::::::How about we just leave it here and stop this discussion, saving us all some time? We have a pool of people (crats) whose job is to moderate RFAs if needed and if they see no reason to move this comment, we should just accept it and move on as Tony correctly says. Regards [[User:SoWhy|<b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b>]] 17:05, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#::::::::::The point is ''not'' valid, though. We have a user saying "Sro23 should not be an administrator because of the way that some other people have behaved". If it were intended to be a constructive general comment on the process, it would be on one of the pages or in one of the sections intended for such a thing. But it's not, it's here in the oppose section, and in doing so Deacon Vorbis obviously meant for this to get a reaction and disrupt the process, rather than to comment on the issue in good faith; in other words this vote is nothing more than trolling. It should not remain here. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 17:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
#:::::::::::Be that as it may, the only thing that needs moving to the talk page is this discussion, not the oppose. [[User talk:Lourdes|<span style="color: black">Lourdes</span>]] 17:59, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 
=====Neutral=====
Line 437 ⟶ 449:
:::::{{u|Serial Number 54129}} I think you left your reply incomplete, it seems to be missing a word or something. [[User:Thinker78|Thinker78]] ([[User talk:Thinker78|talk]]) 17:57, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
::::: :D I'm foxed at what the word would be. [[User talk:Lourdes|<span style="color: black">Lourdes</span>]] 06:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
-------
It's going to be lame if this guy gets 299 supports. He is SO close to the 300 club right now! [[User:PCHS-NJROTC|<span style="color: red; font-family: Comic Sans MS;">PCHS-NJROTC</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:PCHS-NJROTC|<span style="color: black; font-family: Comic Sans MS;">(Messages)Have a blessed day.</span>]]</sup> 21:03, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
:''The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either [[{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this nomination]] or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>