Catharine Macaulay: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{shortShort description|English historian, philosopher, and feminist (1731-17911731–1791)}}
{{for|the Irish nun|Catherine McAuley}}
{{EngvarB|date=August 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2014}}
{{Infobox person
| image = Catharine Macaulay (née Sawbridge) by Robert Edge Pine.jpg
| caption = Portrait of Catharine Macaulay by [[Robert Edge Pine]], {{circa|1785}}.
| birth_name = Catharine Sawbridge
| birth_date = {{Birth date|df=yes|1731|03|23}}
| death_date = {{death date and age|df=yes|1791|6|22|1731|4|02}}
| birth_place = [[Olantigh]], [[Wye, Kent]], England
| death_place = [[Binfield]], Berkshire, England
| resting_place = All Saints' Church, Binfield
| resting_place_coordinates = {{Coord|51|26|32.65|N|0|47|6.53|W|type:landmark|display=inline}}
| occupation = Historian, political theorist, author
| nationality = English
| parents = {{unbulleted list| John Sawbridge (1699–1762) | Elizabeth Wanley (died 1733) }}
| spouse = {{Plainlist |
* Dr. George Macaulay (1760–1766, his death)
* William Graham (1778–1791, her death)
|religion =[[Church of England]]
}}
| known_for = Writing on the history of England, early feminism, political activism
| notable_works = ''The History of England from the Accession of James I to that of the Brunswick Line'' (1763–1783)
}}
 
'''Catharine Macaulay''' (née '''Sawbridge''', later '''Graham'''; 23 March 1731 – 22 June 1791), was ana famed English [[Whigs (British political party)|Whig]] republicanhistorian. She was the first Englishwoman to become an historian and during her lifetime the world's only published female historian. She was the first English radical to visit America after independence, staying there from 15 July 1784 to 17 July 1785 including time at [[Mount Vernon (plantation)|Mount Vernon]] with [[George Washington]] and his family.
 
==Early lifeLife==
Catharine Macaulay was a daughter of John Sawbridge (1699–1762) and his wife Elizabeth Wanley (died 1733) of [[Olantigh]]. Sawbridge was a landed proprietor from [[Wye, Kent|Wye]], Kent, whose ancestors were [[Warwickshire]] yeomanry.<ref>{{harvnbSfn |Hill|1992|p=4}}.</ref>
 
Macaulay was educated privately at home by a governess. In the first volume of her ''History of England'', Macaulay claimed that from an early age she was a prolific reader, in particular of "those histories which exhibit liberty in its most exalted state in the annals of the Roman and Greek Republics...Republics… [from childhood] liberty became the object of a secondary worship".<ref>{{harvnbSfn |Hill|1992|p=9}}</ref>
 
However this account is at odds with what she told her friend [[Benjamin Rush]], to whom she described herself as "a thoughtless girl till she was twenty, at which time she contracted a taste for books and knowledge by reading an odd volume of some history, which she picked up in a window of her father's house". She also told [[Caleb Fleming]] that she knew neither Latin nor Greek.<ref name="Hill10">{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=10}}</ref>
 
Little is known about her early life. In 1757, a Latin and Greek scholar, [[Elizabeth Carter]], visited a function at Canterbury where she met Macaulay, then 26 years old. In a letter to a friend, Carter described Macaulay as a "very sensible and agreeable woman, and much more deeply learned than beseems a fine lady; but between the [[Sparta]]n laws, the Roman politics, the philosophy of [[Epicurus]], and the wit of [[Charles de Saint-Évremond|St. Evremond]], she seems to have formed a most extraordinary system".<ref>{{harvnbSfn |Hill|1992|p=11}}</ref>
 
On 20 June 1760<ref>Marriage Register for St Gregory & Martin, Wye, Kent</ref> she married a Scottish physician, Dr. George Macaulay (1716–1766), and they lived at [[St James's Place]], London. They remained married for six years until his death in 1766. They had one child together, Catharine Sophia.<ref>"Born February 24th 1765", baptism register, St James Piccadilly</ref>{{Sfn |Hill|1992|pp=12–16}} Macaulay moved to [[Bath, Somerset|Bath]] in 1774. At age 47, she was married a second time on 14 November 1778<ref>Entry in marriage register All Saints Church, Leicester.</ref> to William Graham (then 21 years old). This caused some scandal.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|ppp=12–16109}}</ref>
 
The marriage coincided with the publication of the first volume of ''The History of England from the Revolution to the Present Time, in a Series of Letters to the Reverend Doctor Wilson'' (1778) in which she argued that the English Civil War had not gone far enough to eliminate the prerogatives of the crown. Her arguments against monarchy challenged moderate elements in the Whig party.
 
She later lived in [[Binfield|Binfield, Berkshire]].
 
According to [[Mary Hays]], Macaulay "had been furnished by general Washington with many materials" for a history of the American Revolution but that "she was, by the infirm state of her health" stopped from doing so. Macaulay wrote to the American writer [[Mercy Otis Warren]] in 1787: "Tho' the History of your late glorious revolution is what I should certainly undertake were I again young, yet as things are I must for many reasons decline such a task".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=128}}.</ref>
 
She died in [[Binfield]] in Berkshire on 22 June 1791<ref name="ODNB" /> and was buried in All Saints' [[parish church]] there.
 
==''The History of England''==
Line 45 ⟶ 52:
| align = right
}}
Between 1763 and 1783 Macaulay wrote, in eight volumes, ''The History of England from the Accession of James I to that of the Brunswick Line''. However, when completing the last three volumes she realised she would not reach 1714 and so changed the title to ''The History of England from the Accession of James I to the Revolution''.<ref name="Hill 1992 26">{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=26}}</ref> Being practically unknown before the publication of the first volume, overnight she became "the Celebrated Mrs. Macaulay".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=16}}.</ref> She was the first Englishwoman to become an historian and during her lifetime the world's only published female historian.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|pp=16, 25, 49}}</ref>
 
The ''History'' is a political history of the seventeenth century. The first and second volumes cover the years 1603–1641; volumes three and four cover 1642–1647; volume five covers 1648–1660; volumes six and seven cover 1660–1683 and the last volume spans 1683–1689. Macaulay chose this period because, as she wrote in the first volume, she wanted "to do justice...to the memory of our illustrious ancestors". She lamented that her contemporaries had forgotten that the privileges they enjoyed had been fought for by "men that, with the hazard and even the loss of their lives, attacked the formidable pretensions of the Stewart family, and set up the banners of liberty against a tyranny which had been established for a series of more than one hundred and fifty years".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|pp=26–27}}.</ref>
 
She believed that the [[Anglo-Saxons]] had possessed freedom and equality with representative institutions but that these were lost at the [[Norman conquest of England|Norman Conquest]]. The history of England, in Macaulay's view, was the story of the struggle of the English to win back their rights that were crushed by the "[[Norman yoke]]".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=31}}</ref> She viewed the [[Commonwealth of England]] as "the brightest age that ever adorned the page of history...Never did the annals of Humanity furnish the example of a government, so newly established, so formidable to foreign states as was at this period of the English Commonwealth".<ref name="Hill35">{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=35}}</ref> The [[Long Parliament]] was "the most patriotic government that ever blessed the hopes and military exertions of a brave people". The [[Roundhead|Parliamentarian]] army's fighting "was not a trade of blood, but an exertion of principle, and obedience to the call of conscience, and their conduct was not only void of insolence but benevolent and humane".<ref name="Hill35" />
Line 61 ⟶ 68:
Throughout her ''History'', Macaulay showed a concern for her subjects' moral character and conduct. Self-interest was in her eyes the worst fault a king or politician was capable of. She criticised "their apparent devotion to politics for personal gain rather than for the advancement of liberty". Her approach was a moralising one as she believed that only a virtuous people could create a republic.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=39}}</ref>
 
[[Whigs (British political party)|Whigs]] welcomed the first volumes of the ''History'' as a Whig answer to [[David Hume]]'s "Tory" ''History of England''.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=30}}</ref> However, in 1768, relations between her and the Whigs cooled. Volume four of the history was published; this dealt with the trial and execution of Charles I. Macaulay expressed the view that Charles's execution was justified,<ref>{{harvnb|Rabasa et al.|2012|p=524}}</ref> praised the [[Commonwealth of England]] and revealed [[Republicanism in the United Kingdom|republican]] sympathies. This caused her to be abandoned by the [[Rockingham Whigs]].<ref name="ODNB">{{harvnb|Hill|2012}}</ref>
 
[[Thomas Hollis (1720–1774)|Thomas Hollis]] recorded in his diary (30 November 1763) that "the history is honestly written, and with considerable ability and spirit; and is full of the freest, noblest, sentiments of Liberty".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|pp=39–40}}</ref> [[Horace Walpole]] wrote to [[William Mason (poet)|William Mason]], quoting with approval [[Thomas Gray]]'s opinion that it was the "most sensible, unaffected and best history of England that we have had yet".<ref name="Hill40">{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=40}}</ref>
 
Early in 1769, Horace Walpole recorded dining with "the famous Mrs. Macaulay": "She is one of the sights that all foreigners are carried to see".<ref name="Hill23">{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=23}}.</ref> However, Walpole later changed his opinion: "The female historian as partial to the cause of liberty as bigots to the Church and royalists to tyranny, exerted manly strength with the gravity of a philosopher. Too prejudiced to dive into causes, she imputes everything to tyrannic views, nothing to passions, weakness, error, prejudice, and still less to what operates oftenest and her ignorance of which qualified her less for a historian—to accident and little motives".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=45}}</ref>
Line 74 ⟶ 81:
 
==Politics==
Macaulay was associated with two political groups in the 1760s and 1770s: the Real Whigs and the Wilkites.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=52}}.</ref> She was also sympathetic with the cause of the American Colonists.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/biography/Catharine-Macaulay Catharine Macaulay profile], Britannica.com. Accessed 5 November 2022.</ref> However, she was more interested in polemic than everyday strategy.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=57}}.</ref> She was a supporter of [[John Wilkes]] during the Wilkesite controversy of the 1760s and closely associated with the radical Society for the Supporters of the Bill of Rights. Both of these groups wanted to reform Parliament.{{citation needed|date=November 2022}}
 
The Tory [[Samuel Johnson]] was a critic of her politics:
 
<blockquote>Sir, there is one Mrs. Macaulay in this town, a great republican. One day when I was at her house, I put on a very grave countenance, and said to her, "Madam, I am now become a convert to your way of thinking. I am convinced that all mankind are upon an equal footing; and to give you an unquestionable proof, Madam, that I am in earnest, here is a very sensible, civil, well-behaved fellow-citizen, your footman; I desire that he may be allowed to sit down and dine with us." I thus, Sir, shewed her the absurdity of the levelling doctrine. She has never liked me since. Sir, your levellers wish to level ''down'' as far as themselves; but they cannot bear levelling ''up'' to themselves. They would all have some people under them; why not then have some people above them?<ref>James Boswell, ''Life of Johnson'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 316–317.</ref></blockquote>
 
Line 84 ⟶ 90:
Macaulay opposed [[Catholic emancipation]], criticising in 1768 those "who pretend to be friends of Liberty and (from an affectation of a liberal way of thinking) would tolerate Papists".<ref name="Hill 1992 54"/> She regarded the people of [[Corsica]] as being "under Popish Superstition" and recommended the works of Milton to enlighten them.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=63}}.</ref>
 
She supported the exiled Corsican [[Pasquale Paoli]].<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|pp=62–63}}.</ref> In her ''Sketch of a Democratical Form of Government'', she advocated a two chamber state (Senate and People). She wrote that "The second order is necessary because&nbsp;... without the people have authority enough to be thus classed, there can be no liberty". The people should have the right to appeal a court's decision to the Senate and the People. Also, there should be a rotation of all public offices to prevent corruption. An agrarian law was needed to limit the amount of land an individual could inherit to prevent the formation of an aristocracy. She claimed that there needed to be "an unrestrained power lodged in some person, capable of the arduous task of settling such a government" and claimed that this should be Paoli.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|pp=63–64}}.</ref> However, Paoli distanced himself from Macaulay as his sole concern was sustaining English support for Corsica rather than intervening in domestic politics.<ref>Peter Adam Thrasher, ''Pasquale Paoli: An Enlightened Hero, 1725–1807'' (1970), p. 166.</ref>
 
Macaulay attacked [[Edmund Burke]]'s ''[[Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents]]''. She wrote that it contained "a poison sufficient to destroy all the little virtue and understanding of sound policy which is left in the nation", motivated by "the corrupt principle of self-interest" of "Aristocratic faction and party" whose over-riding aim was a return to power.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=74}}.</ref> Burke, in her estimation, had failed to see that the problem lay in the corruption which had its origins in the Glorious Revolution. Parliament was reduced to "a mere instrument of regal administration" rather than controlling the executive. Macaulay advocated a system of rotation for MPs and "a more extended and equal power of election".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=75}}.</ref>
 
None of Macaulay's historical or political works were concerned with women's rights. In her support for parliamentary reform, she did not envisage granting the vote to women.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=147}}.</ref> She was heavily influenced by the works of [[James Harrington (author)|James Harrington]], especially his belief that property was the foundation of political power.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=170}}.</ref>
 
During a visit to France in 1774, she dined with [[Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, Baron de Laune|Turgot]], who enquired whether she wanted to see the [[Palace of Versailles]]. She replied that "I have no desire to see the residence of the tyrants, I haven't yet seen that of the Georges".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=209}}.</ref>
 
Her last work was a pamphlet reply to Burke's ''[[Reflections on the Revolution in France]]'' (1790). She wrote that it was right that the French had not replaced [[Louis XVI]] as this would have complicated their task to ensure liberty.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=228}}.</ref> She replied to Burke's lament that the age of chivalry was gone by claiming that society should be freed from "''false'' notions of honour" which were nothing more than "methodized sentimental barbarism".<ref name="Hill229">{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=229}}.</ref> Whereas Burke supported the inherited rights of Englishmen rather than the abstract rights of man, Macaulay claimed that Burke's theory of rights as gifts of monarchs meant that monarchs could just as easily take away the rights they had granted. Only by claiming them as natural rights could they be secured. The "boasted birthright of an Englishman" she had always thought of as "an arrogant pretension" because it suggested "a kind of exclusion to the rest of mankind from the same privileges".<ref name="Hill229" />
 
Whereas Burke supported the inherited rights of Englishmen rather than the abstract rights of man, Macaulay claimed that Burke's theory of rights as gifts of monarchs meant that monarchs could just as easily take away the rights they had granted. Only by claiming them as natural rights could they be secured. The "boasted birthright of an Englishman" she had always thought of as "an arrogant pretension" because it suggested "a kind of exclusion to the rest of mankind from the same privileges".<ref name="Hill229" />
==Marriage to William Graham==
 
[[File:Bluestockings3.jpg|thumb|right|Macaulay (seated, far left), in the company of other "[[Bluestocking|Blue Stockings]]" (1778)]]
== Feminism ==
The increasingly radical nature of her work and her scandalous marriage on 14 November 1778<ref>Entry in marriage register All Saints church, Leicester</ref> to William Graham (she was 47, he was 21) damaged her reputation in Britain,<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=109}}.</ref> where she lived in [[Bath, Somerset|Bath]], Leicestershire and then [[Binfield]] in Berkshire. William was the younger brother of the sexologist [[James Graham (sexologist)|James Graham]], inventor of the Celestial Bed.
Macaulay is a central figure in the history of women's political thought.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Green |first=Karen |title=A History of Women's Political Thought in Europe, 1700–1800 |date=2014 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Skjönsberg (ed.) |first=M. |title=Catharine Macaulay: Political Writings |date=2023 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge}}</ref> Like English philosopher and feminist [[Mary Astell]] (1666-1731), Macaulay's work anticipated ideas that would later be associated with [[Feminist theory|feminist]] political theory such as concerns about women, consent, and the [[social contract]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Green |first=Karen |title=Catharine Macaulay's Republican Enlightenment |publisher=Routledge |year=2020 |location=New York |publication-date=2020}}</ref> In her ''Loose Remarks on Certain Positions to be found in Mr. Hobbes's 'Philosophical Rudiments of Government and Society''' (1767), Macaulay criticized [[Thomas Hobbes]]'s construction of [[patriarchy]] and paternal right.<ref name="Gunther-Canada 190–216">{{Citation |last=Gunther-Canada |first=Wendy |title=9 Catharine Macaulay's ''Loose Remarks'' on Hobbesian Politics |date=2015-06-29 |work=Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes |pages=190–216 |editor-last=Hirschmann |editor-first=Nancy J. |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780271061351-012/html |access-date=2024-09-25 |publisher=Penn State University Press |doi=10.1515/9780271061351-012 |isbn=978-0-271-06135-1 |editor2-last=Wright |editor2-first=Joanne H.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Green |first=Karen |title="When is a Contract Theorist not a Contract Theorist? Mary Astell and Catharine Macaulay as Critics of Thomas Hobbes," in Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, N.J. Hirschmann and J.H. Wright (eds.) |date=2012 |publisher=The Pennsylvania University Press |pages=169–189}}</ref> Although predominantly a historian, Macaulay developed her own theory of politics.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Green |first=Karen |date=2012 |title=Catharine Macaulay: Philosopher of the Enlightenment |journal=Intellectual History Review |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=411–426|doi=10.1080/17496977.2012.695192 }}</ref> She criticized absolute monarchs and despotic regimes—and the patriarchy that she believed made both possible. She outlined her elements of her own form of popular or republican government.<ref name="Gunther-Canada 190–216"/> Scholarly interest in her feminism has led to more attention to her critique of patriarchy and her political theory (beyond her works of history).<ref>{{Cite book |last=Titone |first=Connie |title=Gender Equality in the Philosophy of Education: Catherine Macaulay's Forgotten Contribution |date=2004 |publisher=Peter Lang |location=New York}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hicks |first=Philip |date=2002 |title="Catharine Macaulay's Civil War: Gender, history, and Republicanism in Georgian Britain" |journal=Journal of British Studies |volume=41 |issue=2 |pages=170–99|doi=10.1086/386259 }}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Green |first=Karen |title=Catharine Macaulay |date=2024 |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/catharine-macaulay/#Femi |access-date=2024-09-26 |edition=Summer 2024 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |editor2-last=Nodelman |editor2-first=Uri}}</ref> Scholars have also noted the relationship between her feminism and religious ideas.<ref>{{Citation |last=Hutton |first=Sarah |title=Liberty, Equality and God: The Religious Roots of Catherine Macaulay's Feminism |date=2005 |work=Women, Gender and Enlightenment |pages=538–550 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230554801_34 |access-date=2024-09-25 |place=London |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |doi=10.1057/9780230554801_34 |isbn=978-0-230-51781-3}}</ref>
 
In addition, scholars have noted Macaulay's impact on early feminist [[Mary Wollstonecraft]], author of ''[[A Vindication of the Rights of Woman]]'' (1792).<ref>{{Cite book |last=Green |first=Karen |title="Catharine Macaulay's Philosophy and Her Influence on Mary Wollstonecraft" in The Routledge Handbook of Women and Early Modern European Philosophy, Karen Detlefsen and Lisa Shapiro (eds.) |date=2023 |publisher=Routgedge |location=London |pages=546–57}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hill |first=Bridget |date=1995 |title="The Links between Mary Wollstonecraft and Catharine Macaulay: new evidence," |journal=Women's History Review |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=177–92|doi=10.1080/09612029500200078 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Gunther-Canada |first=Wendy |title="The Politics of Sense and Sensibility: Mary Wollstonecraft and Catherine Macaulay Graham on Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France," in Women Writers and the Early Modern Political Tradition, H. Smith (ed.) |date=1998 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |pages=126–147}}</ref> Macaulay and Wollstonecraft both wrote on themes such as education, freedom as independence, equality, virtue, reputation, injustice, history, and false ideas.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Coffee |first=Alan |title="Catharine Macaulay's Influence on Mary Wollstonecraft" in The Wollstonecraftian Mind Edited By Sandrine Bergès, Eileen Hunt Botting, Alan Coffee |date=2019 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9781138709973}}</ref> Wollstonecraft recognized the impact when she wrote to Macaulay: "You are the only female writer who I coincide in opinion with respecting the rank our sex ought to endeavour to attain in the world. I respect Mrs Macaulay Graham because she contends for laurels while most of her sex only seek for flowers."<ref name=":0" />
 
Macaulay's work challenged the political and legal world of her time. British law relied on [[coverture]]: a husband “covered” the legal identity of a married woman so that, by a “fiction of the law,” marriage joined husband and wife into one legal person represented solely by the husband. As the head of household, the husband controlled a married woman's wages and body as well as their children. Coverture began in England in the 12th century and continued to control legal thinking in common law countries (such as Great Britain and the United States) into the 20th century.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Liebell |first=Susan P. |date=2021-04-01 |title=Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in District of Columbia v. Heller |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/712393 |journal=Polity |volume=53 |issue=2 |pages=207–238 |doi=10.1086/712393 |issn=0032-3497}}</ref> Macaulay's political works interrogated the subordination of women in British society and law.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gunther-Canada |first=Wendy |date=1998 |title=Catharine Macaulay on the Paradox of Paternal Authority in Hobbesian Politics |journal=Hypatia |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=150–173|doi=10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01098.x }}</ref> [[File:Bluestockings3.jpg|thumb|right|Macaulay (seated, far left), in the company of other "[[Bluestocking|Blue Stockings]]" (1778)]]
 
==''Treatise on the Immutability of Moral Truth''==
Line 110 ⟶ 121:
 
==American visit==
SheMacaulay wrote pamphlets criticizing the policy of the British Government in the lead up to the Revolution and she was personally associated with many leading figures among the American Revolutionaries. She was the first English radical to visit America after independence, staying there from 15 July 1784 to 17 July 1785.<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=126}}.</ref> Macaulay visited siblings [[James Otis, Jr.|James Otis]] and his sister [[Mercy Otis Warren]]. Mercy wrote afterwards that Macaulay was "a lady whose Resources of knowledge seem to be almost inexhaustible" and wrote to John Adams that she was "a Lady of most Extraordinary talent, a Commanding Genius and Brilliance of thought".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|pp=126–127}}.</ref> According to Mercy's biographer, Macaulay had "a more profound influence on Mercy than had any other woman of her era".<ref>Katharine Anthony, ''First Lady of the Revolution: The Life of Mercy Otis Warren'' (1958), p. 123.</ref> She then visited New York and met [[Richard Henry Lee]], who afterwards thanked [[Samuel Adams]] for introducing him to "this excellent Lady".<ref name="Hill127">{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=127}}.</ref> Upon the recommendation of Lee and [[Henry Knox]], Macaulay stayed at [[Mount Vernon (plantation)|Mount Vernon]] with [[George Washington]] and his family. Afterwards, Washington wrote to Lee of his pleasure at meeting "a Lady ... whose principles are so much and so justly admired by the friends of liberty and mankind".<ref name="Hill127" />
 
Macaulay wrote to George Washington on October 30, 1789<ref>{{Cite web |title=Founders Online: To George Washington from Catherine Sawbridge Macaulay Graham … |url=https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05-04-02-0181 |access-date=2024-09-25 |website=founders.archives.gov }}</ref> in which she offered analysis of the American Revolution and Washington responded January 9, 1790.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Founders Online: From George Washington to Catharine Sawbridge Macaulay Graham … |url=https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05-04-02-0363 |access-date=2024-09-25 |website=founders.archives.gov }}</ref> During this period she corresponded with [[John Adams]] and [[Abigail Adams]], James Otis and Mercy Otis Warren,<ref>{{Citation |last=Davies |first=Kate |title=Introduction Catharine Macaulay and Mercy Otis Warren: Women, Writing, and the Anglo-American Public Sphere |date=2005-12-22 |work=Catharine Macaulay and Mercy Otis Warren |pages=1–33 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199281107.003.0001 |access-date=2024-09-25 |publisher=Oxford University PressOxford |doi=10.1093/oso/9780199281107.003.0001 |isbn=978-0-19-928110-7}}</ref> [[Benjamin Franklin]] and [[Sarah Prince Gill|Sarah Prince-Gill]],<ref>{{Cite journal |date=April 1918 |title=&lt;italic&gt;Warren-Adams Letters, being chiefly a Correspondence among John Adams, Samuel Adams, and James Warren&lt;/italic&gt;. Volume I., 1743– 1777. [Massachusetts Historical Society, Collections, vol. LXXIL] (Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society. 1917. Pp. xxxi, 382. $3.00.) |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ahr/23.3.666 |journal=The American Historical Review |doi=10.1086/ahr/23.3.666 |issn=1937-5239}}</ref> among numerous other colonists.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Green |first=Karen |title=The Correspondence of Catharine Macaulay |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2019 |isbn=9780190934460 |location=New York}}</ref>
==Last years==
 
According to [[Mary Hays]], Macaulay "had been furnished by general Washington with many materials" for a history of the American Revolution but that "she was, by the infirm state of her health" stopped from doing so. Macaulay wrote to Mercy in 1787: "Tho' the History of your late glorious revolution is what I should certainly undertake were I again young, yet as things are I must for many reasons decline such a task".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|1992|p=128}}.</ref>
 
She died in [[Binfield]] in Berkshire on 22 June 1791<ref name="ODNB" /> and was buried in All Saints' [[parish church]] there.
 
==Legacy==
Her status as a somewhat scandalous woman writer with a damaged reputation has allowed her to be forgotten or disregarded by later historians of eighteenth-century literature and politics.{{citation needed|date=September 2014}} However, her significance as a writer and political thinker is increasingly recognised.{{citation needed|date=September 2014}} Her work has been the focus of a growing number of recent studies, a trend which seems set to continue.{{citation needed|date=September 2014}}
 
==Works==
Line 151 ⟶ 155:
 
==Further reading==
*Karen Green, ''Catharine Macaulay’s Republican Enlightenment'', New York: Routledge, 2020.
*Catherine Macaulay'', Catharine Macaulay: Political Writings'', M. Skjönsberg (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
*L. M. Donnelly, 'The celebrated Mrs Macaulay', ''William and Mary Quarterly'', 6 (1949), pp.&nbsp;173–207.
*Bridget Hill and Christopher Hill, 'Catharine Macaulay's ''History'' and her "Catalogue of tracts"', ''Seventeenth Century'', 8 (1993), pp.&nbsp;269–85.
*T. P. Peardon, ''The Transition in Historical Writing'' (1933).
 
==External links==
{{Wikisource author}}
*[http://sheroesofhistory.wordpress.com/2014/04/10/catharine-macaulay-the-patroness-of-liberty/ Catherine Macaulay – Sheroes of History]
*{{cite SEP |url-id=catharine-macaulay |title=Catharine Macaulay |last=Green |first=Karen|date=5 July 2012}}
*{{cite DNB|wstitle=Macaulay, Catharine |volume=34 |short=x}}
*{{Worldcat id|lccn-n85-24865}}
 
{{Authority control}}
Line 172 ⟶ 174:
[[Category:English women philosophers]]
[[Category:English philosophers]]
[[Category:18th-century BritishEnglish philosophers]]
[[Category:18th-century English historians]]
[[Category:18th-century English women writers]]
[[Category:BritishEnglish women historians]]
[[Category:Whigs (British political party)]]