New Atheism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
"Four Horsemen": Broke up a paragraph so that the mini-biography for each of the "Four Horsemen" gets their own paragraph, for clarity. Also, put these in alphabetical order by last name, to match the introduction.
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Positions promoted by some atheists}}
 
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2018}}
 
{{Atheism sidebar|types}}
 
The term '''''New Atheism''''' describes the positions of some [[atheist]] academics, writers, scientists, and philosophers of the 20th and 21st centuries.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Lee |first1=Lois |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XguDDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT48 |title=A Dictionary of Atheism |last2=Bullivant |first2=Stephen |date=2016-11-17 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-252013-5 |language=en |access-date=12 March 2017 |archive-date=20 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120215619/https://books.google.com/books?id=XguDDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT48 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Wolf |first=Gary |date=November 1, 2006 |title=The Church of the Non-Believers |language=en-US |magazine=Wired |url=https://www.wired.com/2006/11/atheism/ |access-date=2023-01-19 |issn=1059-1028 |archive-date=21 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170721010426/https://www.wired.com/2006/11/atheism/ |url-status=live }}</ref> New Atheism advocates the view that [[superstition]], [[religion]], and [[irrationalism]] should not simply be tolerated. Instead, they advocate the [[antitheist]] view that the various forms of [[theism]] should be [[Criticism of religion|criticised]], [[Antireligion|countered]], examined, and challenged by [[rational]] argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics.<ref>{{cite web |last=Taylor |first=James E. |title=New Atheists |url=http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/ |access-date=14 April 2016 |website=The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |quote=The New Atheists are authors of early twenty-first century books promoting atheism. These authors include [[Sam Harris]], [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Daniel Dennett]], and [[Christopher Hitchens]]. The 'New Atheist' label for these critics of religion and religious belief emerged out of journalistic commentary on the contents and impacts of their books. |archive-date=26 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160826001224/http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Hooper |first=Simon |date=November 9, 2006 |title=The rise of the New Atheists |publisher=CNN |url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/08/atheism.feature/index.html |access-date=16 March 2010 |archive-date=8 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100408094135/http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/08/atheism.feature/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Critics have describedcharacterised New Atheism as "''[[Fundamentalism|secular [[fundamentalism]]''" or "''fundamentalist atheism''".<ref>{{cite book |last=Hedges |first=Chris |title=When Atheism Becomes Religion: America's New Fundamentalists |year=2008 |publisher=Free Press |isbn=978-1-4165-7078-3 |url=https://books.google.co.ukcom/books?hl=en&lr=&id=b-f_HU9MZuYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=new+atheism+fundamentalism&otspg=XfBFQe7x5O&sig=hRMvn4odSKaohpA58GQ9Ze5gV3Q#v=onepage&q=new%20atheism%20fundamentalism&f=falsePA1}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=McAnulla |first=Stuart |title=Secular fundamentalists? Characterising the new atheist approach to secularism, religion and politics |journal=British Politics |volume=9 |pages=124-145124–145 |year=2011 |issue=2 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |doi=10.1057/bp.2013.27 |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/bp.2013.27}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=LeDrew |first=Stephen |title=Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society |chapter=Scientism and Utopia: New Atheism as a Fundamentalist Reaction to Relativism |year=2018 |pages=143–155 |publisher=Springer |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-96559-8_9 |isbn=978-3-319-96558-1 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-96559-8_9}}</ref><ref>{{cite journalbook |last=Stahl |first=William |title=Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal |chapter=One-Dimensional Rage: The Social Epistemology Of The New Atheism And Fundamentalism |year=2010 |pages=95–108 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-19053-5 |chapter-url=https://brill.com/display/book/9789004190535/Bej.9789004185579.i-253_008.xml}}</ref> Major figures of New Atheism include [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Sam Harris]], [[Christopher Hitchens]], and [[Daniel Dennett]], collectively referred to as the "[[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse|Four Horsemen]]" of the movement, as well as [[Ayaan Hirsi Ali]],<ref name=":5">{{Citationcite |title=The New Atheismjournal |datelast=2017Nall |urlfirst=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/jihad-radicalism-and-the-new-atheism/new-atheism/5971EDDFB153952A0D0C593DE26E074AJeff |worktitle=Jihad,Fundamentalist Radicalism,Atheism and theits NewIntellectual AtheismFailures |pagesjournal=95–96Humanity & Society |editor-lastvolume=Khalil32 |editor-firstissue=Mohammad Hassan3 |access-datepages=2022-12-24263–280 |placepublisher=CambridgeSage |publisheryear=Cambridge University Press2008 |doi=10.10171177/9781108377263.009016059760803200304 |isbn=978-1-108-38512-1 |archive-date=3 October 2023 |archive-url=https://webjournals.archivesagepub.orgcom/webdoi/20231003172043abs/https://www10.cambridge.org1177/core/books/abs/jihad-radicalism-and-the-new-atheism/new-atheism/5971EDDFB153952A0D0C593DE26E074A |url-status=live 016059760803200304}}</ref> untilMajor herfigures of New Atheism include [[ConversionRichard to Christianity|conversionDawkins]] to, [[ChristianitySam Harris]], in[[Christopher 2023.<refHitchens]], name=":12">{{Citeand web[[Daniel |last=JonesDennett]], |first=Sarahcollectively |date=2023-11-29referred |title=Theto Infidelas Turnedthe Christian"[[Four |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/ayaan-hirsi-alis-political-conversion.htmlHorsemen |access-date=2023-12-05of |website=Intelligencerthe Apocalypse|language=enFour |archive-date=18Horsemen]]" Januaryof 2024the |archive-url=https://webmovement.archive.org/web/20240118195953/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/ayaan-hirsi-alis-political-conversion.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
==History==
The secular humanist [[Paul Kurtz]] (1925–2012), founder of the [[Center for Inquiry]], is often regarded as a forerunner to the New Atheism movement.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Evans |first=Robert |date=2012-10-22 |title=Paul Kurtz, "giant" of humanism, dead at 86 |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-religion-kurtz-idUSBRE89L19D20121022 |access-date=2022-12-25 |archive-date=28 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221228115310/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-religion-kurtz-idUSBRE89L19D20121022 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="A Bitter Rift Divides Atheists" /> The 2004 publication of ''[[The End of Faith|The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason]]'' by [[Sam Harris]], a bestseller in the United States, was joined over the next couple years by a series of popular best-sellers by atheist authors.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2007/09/hitchens200709|title=God Bless Me, It's a Best-Seller!|last=Hitchens|first=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Hitchens|magazine=Vanity Fair|date=15 August 2007|access-date=14 April 2016|quote=...in the last two years there have been five atheist best-sellers, one each from Professors Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett and two from the neuroscientist Sam Harris.|archive-date=2 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161002001157/http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2007/09/hitchens200709|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":6">{{Cite book |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=38thDwAAQBAJ |title=The Four Horsemen: The Conversation That Sparked an Atheist Revolution |publisher=Random House |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-525-51195-3 |location=New York |pages=1 |access-date=20 January 2023 |archive-date=21 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230421232245/https://books.google.com/books?id=38thDwAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> Harris was motivated by the events of [[11 September 2001]], for which he blamed Islam, while also directly criticizing [[Christianity]] and [[Judaism]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Harris |first=Sam |author-link=Sam Harris |date=11 August 2004 |title=The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason |publisher=[[W. W. Norton & Company]] |isbn=978-0-7432-6809-7|title-link=The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason }}</ref> Two years later, Harris followed up with ''[[Letter to a Christian Nation]]'', which was a severe criticism of Christianity.<ref>{{cite news |last=Steinfels |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Steinfels |title=Books on Atheism Are Raising Hackles in Unlikely Places |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=3 March 2007 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/03/books/03beliefs.html |access-date=17 July 2016 |archive-date=26 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170626135149/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/03/books/03beliefs.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Also in 2006, following his television documentary series ''[[The Root of All Evil?]]'', [[Richard Dawkins]] published ''[[The God Delusion]]'', which was on the ''New York Times'' best-seller list for 51 weeks.<ref>{{cite web |title=''The God Delusion'' One-Year Countdown |url=http://richarddawkins.net/article,1599,The-God-Delusion-One-Year-Countdown,RichardDawkinsnet|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080828171533/http://richarddawkins.net/article,1599,The-God-Delusion-One-Year-Countdown,RichardDawkinsnet|archive-date=28 August 2008|work=RichardDawkins.net |access-date=5 October 2007}}</ref>
 
In 2010, [[Tom Flynn (author)|Tom Flynn]] (1955–2021), then editor of ''[[Free Inquiry]]'', stated that the only thing new about "New Atheism" was the wider publication of atheist material by big-name publishers, books that appeared on bestseller lists and were read by millions.<ref name="Flynn2010">{{cite journal |last=Flynn |first=Tom |author-link=Thomas W. Flynn |year=2010 |title=Why I Don't Believe in the New Atheism |url=https://secularhumanism.org/volume/no-3-vol-30/ |journal=Free Inquiry |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=7–43 |access-date=28 July 2011 |archive-date=7 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200407201920/https://secularhumanism.org/volume/no-3-vol-30/ |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Mitchell Landsberg]], covering a gathering held by the [[Council for secular humanism|Council for Secular Humanism]] in 2010, said that religious [[Skepticism|skeptics]] in attendance were at odds between "new atheists" who preferred to "encourage open confrontation with the devout" and "accommodationists" who preferred "a subtler, more tactical approach."<ref name=":8">{{Cite web |last=Landsberg |first=Mitchell |date=2010-10-10 |title=Religious skeptics disagree on how aggressively to challenge the devout |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-oct-10-la-me-humanists-20101010-story.html |access-date=2023-01-21 |website=Los Angeles Times |language=en-US |archive-date=21 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230121003552/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-oct-10-la-me-humanists-20101010-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Paul Kurtz was ousted from the Center for Inquiry in the late 2000's.<ref name=":8" /><ref name="A Bitter Rift Divides Atheists" /> This was in part due to a perception that Kurtz was "on the mellower end of the spectrum" according to Flynn.<ref name=":8" />
 
In November 2015, ''[[The New Republic]]'' published an article entitled "Is the New Atheism dead?"<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://newrepublic.com/article/123349/new-atheism-dead|title=Is the New Atheism dead?|first=Elizabeth|last=Bruenig|magazine=The New Republic|date=6 November 2015|access-date=27 August 2022|archive-date=12 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180712054228/https://newrepublic.com/article/123349/new-atheism-dead|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2016, the atheist and evolutionary biologist [[David Sloan Wilson]] wrote: "The world appears to be tiring of the New Atheism movement."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sloan Wilson |first=David |date=2016-02-01 |title=The New Atheism as a Stealth Religion: Five Years Later |url=https://thisviewoflife.com/the-new-atheism-as-a-stealth-religion-five-years-later/ |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=This View Of Life |language=en-US |archive-date=16 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170816064310/https://evolution-institute.org/article/the-new-atheism-as-a-stealth-religion-five-years-later/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2017, [[PZ Myers]], who formerly considered himself a new atheist, publicly renounced the New Atheism movement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Myers |first=PZ |date=31 July 2017 |title=The New Atheism is dead. Long live atheism. |url=https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2017/07/31/the-new-atheism-is-dead-long-live-atheism/ |website=Pharyngula |access-date=12 July 2018 |archive-date=11 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180911020202/https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2017/07/31/the-new-atheism-is-dead-long-live-atheism/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The book ''The Four Horsemen: The Conversation That Sparked an Atheist Revolution'' was released in 2019.<ref>{{cite web |date=19 March 2019 |title=The Four Horsemen: The Conversation That Sparked an Atheist Revolution |url=https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-525-51195-3 |website=Publishers Weekly |access-date=21 August 2019 |archive-date=21 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190821214044/https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-525-51195-3 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":6" />
 
=== Legacy ===
In a January 2019 retrospective article, [[Steven Poole]] of ''[[The Guardian]]'' observed: "For some, New Atheism was never about God at all, but just a topical subgenre of the rightwing backlash against the supposedly suffocating atmosphere of '[[political correctness]]'."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Poole |first=Steven |date=2019-01-31 |title=The Four Horsemen review - whatever happened to 'New Atheism'? |url=http://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jan/31/four-horsemen-review-what-happened-to-new-atheism-dawkins-hitchens |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=[[The Guardian]] |archive-date=28 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220728160815/https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jan/31/four-horsemen-review-what-happened-to-new-atheism-dawkins-hitchens |url-status=live }}</ref> In November 2019, [[Slate Star Codex |Scott Alexander]] argued that New Atheism did not disappear as a political movement but instead turned to social justice as a new cause to fight for.<ref>{{Cite web |last=West |first=Ed |date=2019-11-04 |title=What really happened to the New Atheists |url=https://unherd.com/thepost/what-really-happened-to-the-new-atheists/ |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=[[UnHerd]] |archive-date=21 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220721013302/https://unherd.com/thepost/what-really-happened-to-the-new-atheists/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
In an April 2021 interview, Natalie Wynn, a [[left-wing]] YouTuber who runs the channel [[ContraPoints]], commented: "The [[alt-right]], the [[manosphere]], [[incel]]s, even the so-called [[SJW]] Internet and [[LeftTube]] all have a genetic ancestor in New Atheism."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Maughan |first=Philip |date=April 14, 2021 |title=The World According to ContraPoints |url=https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/contrapoints-natalie-wynn-interview/ |access-date=August 3, 2021 |website=Highsnobiety |archive-date=29 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220429125954/https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/contrapoints-natalie-wynn-interview/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In a June 2021 retrospective article, [[Émile P. Torres]] of ''[[Salon.com|Salon]]'' argued that prominent figures in the New Atheist movement had aligned themselves with the [[far-right]].<ref>{{cite web|date=5 June 2021|title=Godless grifters: How the New Atheists merged with the far right|url=https://www.salon.com/2021/06/05/how-the-new-atheists-merged-with-the-far-right-a-story-of-intellectual-grift-and-abject-surrender/|work=Salon|first=Émile P.|last=Torres|access-date=27 August 2022|archive-date=26 August 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220826203416/https://www.salon.com/2021/06/05/how-the-new-atheists-merged-with-the-far-right-a-story-of-intellectual-grift-and-abject-surrender/|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
In a June 2022 retrospective article, Sebastian Milbank of [[The Critic (modern magazine)|''The Critic'']] stated that, as a movement, "New Atheism has fractured and lost its original spirit", that "much of what New Atheism embodied has now migrated rightwards", and that "another portion has moved leftwards, embodied by the 'I Fucking Love Science' woke nerd of today."<ref name="milbank 2022"/> Following the conversion of writer [[Ayaan Hirsi Ali]] to Christianity in 2023, the columnist Sarah Jones wrote in [[New York (magazine)|''New York'']] magazine that the New Atheism movement was in "terminal decline".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Jones |first=Sarah |date=2023-11-29 |title=The Infidel Turned Christian |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/ayaan-hirsi-alis-political-conversion.html |access-date=2023-12-05 |website=Intelligencer |language=en |archive-date=18 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118195953/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/ayaan-hirsi-alis-political-conversion.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
==Prominent figures==
Several keyKey figures associated with the New Atheism movement include [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Sam Harris]], [[Christopher Hitchens]], [[Daniel Dennett]], and [[Ayaan Hirsi Ali]].<ref name=":552" /><ref name=":7">{{Cite web |last=Blumner |first=Robyn |author-link=Robyn Blumner |date=2020-12-04 |title=Give the Four Horsemen (and Ayaan) Their Due. They Changed America. |url=https://secularhumanism.org/2020/12/give-the-four-horsemen-and-ayaan-their-due-they-changed-america/ |access-date=2022-12-24 |website=Free Inquiry |language=en-US |archive-date=28 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221228145337/https://secularhumanism.org/2020/12/give-the-four-horsemen-and-ayaan-their-due-they-changed-america/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
==="Four Horsemen"===
Line 22 ⟶ 32:
| image3 = Sam Harris 2016 (cropped).jpg
| image4 = Daniel Dennett in Venice 2006.png
| footer = The "Four Horsemen of the New Atheism" (clockwise from top left): [[Richard Dawkins]] (b. 1941), [[Christopher Hitchens]] (1949–2011), [[Daniel Dennett]] (1942–2024), and [[Sam Harris]] (b. 1967).
| caption_align = left
}}
Line 28 ⟶ 38:
On 30 September 2007, Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens, and Dennett met at Hitchens' residence in Washington, D.C., for a private two-hour unmoderated [[round table (discussion)|round table]] discussion. The event was videotaped and titled "The Four Horsemen".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://richarddawkins.net/2013/10/the-four-horsemen-dvd-19-95/ |title=The Four Horsemen DVD |website=Richard Dawkins Foundation |access-date=13 April 2016 |quote=On the 30th of September 2007, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens sat down for a first-of-its-kind, unmoderated 2-hour discussion, convened by RDFRS and filmed by Josh Timonen. |archive-date=11 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170611214236/https://richarddawkins.net/2013/10/the-four-horsemen-dvd-19-95/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> During "The God Debate" in 2010 with Hitchens versus [[Dinesh D'Souza]], the group was collectively referred to as the "Four Horsemen of the Non-Apocalypse",<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/sam-harris-is-still-railing-against-religion/ |title=Sam Harris is Still Railing Against Religion |last=Hoffman |first=Claire |date=2 September 2014 |website=Los Angeles Magazine |access-date=13 April 2016 |quote=As Western society grappled with radical Islam, Harris distinguished himself with his argument that modern religious tolerance had placated us into allowing delusion rather than reason to prevail. Harris upended a discussion that had long been dominated by cultural relativism and a hands-off academic intellectualism; his seething contempt for the world's faiths helped launch the 'New Atheist' movement, and together with Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, and Daniel Dennett, he became known as one of the 'Four Horsemen of the Non-Apocalypse.' |archive-date=15 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170615152332/http://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/sam-harris-is-still-railing-against-religion/ |url-status=live }}</ref> an allusion to the biblical [[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]] from the [[Book of Revelation]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Zenk |first=Thomas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jbIVAgAAQBAJ |title=The Oxford Handbook of Atheism |publisher=OUP Oxford |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-19-964465-0 |editor-last=Bullivant |editor-first=Stephen |page=254 |language=en |chapter=16. New Atheism |editor-last2=Ruse |editor-first2=Michael |access-date=20 January 2023 |archive-date=3 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231003172045/https://books.google.com/books?id=jbIVAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> The four have been described by critics as "evangelical atheists".<ref name="Stedman">{{cite news|last1=Stedman|first1=Chris|title='Evangelical Atheists': Pushing For What?|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-stedman/evangelical-atheists-what_b_765379.html|work=The Huffington Post|access-date=2 March 2017|date=18 October 2010|quote=something peculiarly evangelistic about what has been termed the new atheist movement ... It is no exaggeration to describe the movement popularized by the likes of Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens as a new and particularly zealous form of fundamentalism — an atheist fundamentalism.|archive-date=4 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160804130829/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-stedman/evangelical-atheists-what_b_765379.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
Harris wrote several bestselling non-fiction books including ''[[The End of Faith]]'', ''[[Letter to a Christian Nation]]'', ''[[The Moral Landscape]]'', and ''[[Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion|Waking Up]]'', along with two shorter works (initially published as e-books) ''Free Will'' and ''Lying''.<ref name="Free Will">{{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|author-link=Sam Harris (author)|year=2012|title=Free Will|publisher=The Free Press|isbn=978-1451683400|page=[https://archive.org/details/freewill00harr_0/page/96 96]|id={{ASIN|1451683405|country=uk}}|url=https://archive.org/details/freewill00harr_0/page/96}}</ref> <ref name=Lying>{{cite book|last=Harris |first=Sam|title=Lying|year=2013|publisher=Four Elephants Press|isbn=978-1940051000|page=108|id= {{ASIN|1940051002|country=uk}}}}</ref> He is a co-founder of the Reason Project.{{Citation needed|date=December 2022}} Dawkins, the author of ''[[The God Delusion]]'',<ref>{{cite book|last=Dawkins |first=Richard |title=The God Delusion|year=2007|publisher=Black Swan|isbn=978-0-552-77429-1|title-link=The God Delusion }}</ref> and director of a [[Channel 4]] television documentary titled ''[[The Root of All Evil?]],'' is the founder of the [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science]]. He wrote: "I don't object to the horseman label, by the way. I'm less keen on 'new atheist': it isn't clear to me how we differ from old atheists."<ref>[[Richard Dawkins]], ''[[The God Delusion]]'', 10th anniversary edition, Black Swan, 2016, page I15 (new introduction for the 10th anniversary edition).</ref>
 
Harris wrote several bestselling non-fiction books including ''[[The End of Faith]]'', ''[[Letter to a Christian Nation]]'', ''[[The Moral Landscape]]'', and ''[[Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion|Waking Up]]'', along with two shorter works (initially published as e-books) ''Free Will'' and ''Lying''.<ref name="Free Will">{{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|author-link=Sam Harris (author)|year=2012|title=Free Will|publisher=The Free Press|isbn=978-1451683400|page=[https://archive.org/details/freewill00harr_0/page/96 96]|id={{ASIN|1451683405|country=uk}}|url=https://archive.org/details/freewill00harr_0/page/96}}</ref> <ref name=Lying>{{cite book|last=Harris |first=Sam|title=Lying|year=2013|publisher=Four Elephants Press|isbn=978-1940051000|page=108|id= {{ASIN|1940051002|country=uk}}}}</ref>
Hitchens, the author of ''[[God Is Not Great]],''<ref>{{cite book |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Hitchens |title=God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything |year=2007 |publisher=Atlantic Books |edition=First trade |isbn=978-1-843-54574-3 |page=320}}</ref> was named among the "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" by ''[[Foreign Policy]]'' and ''[[Prospect (magazine)|Prospect]]'' magazines. He served on the advisory board of the [[Secular Coalition for America]]. In 2010, Hitchens published his memoir ''[[Hitch-22]]'' (a nickname provided by close personal friend [[Salman Rushdie]], whom Hitchens always supported during and following [[The Satanic Verses controversy|''The Satanic Verses'' controversy]]).<ref>{{cite book |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |title=Hitch22 |year=2010 |publisher=Atlantic Books |isbn=978-1-843-54922-2 |page=448 |id= {{ASIN|1843549220|country=uk}} }}</ref> Shortly after its publication, he was diagnosed with esophageal cancer, which led to his death in December 2011.<ref>{{cite news|title=Christopher Hitchens dies at 62 after suffering cancer|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16212418|work=BBC News|date=16 December 2011|access-date=20 June 2018|archive-date=30 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330215716/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16212418|url-status=live}}</ref> Before his death, Hitchens published a collection of essays and articles in his book ''[[Arguably]]'';<ref>{{cite book|last=Hitchens|first=Christopher|title=Arguably|year=2011|publisher=Atlantic Books|isbn=978-0857892584|id= {{ASIN|0857892584|country=uk}}}}</ref> a short edition, ''[[Mortality (book)|Mortality]]'',<ref>{{cite book|last=Hitchens|first=Christopher |title=Mortality |year=2012 |publisher=Atlantic Books|isbn=978-1848879218|id= {{ASIN|1848879210|country=uk}} }}</ref> was published posthumously in 2012. These publications and numerous public appearances provided Hitchens with a platform to remain an astute atheist during his illness, even speaking specifically on the culture of [[deathbed conversion]]s and condemning [[There are no atheists in foxholes|attempts to convert]] the [[terminally ill]], which he opposed as "bad taste".<ref>{{cite web |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |title=Is there an afterlife? |website=[[YouTube]] |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbzd6ZbCowY}}{{cbignore}}{{Dead Youtube links|date=February 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |title=Hitchens and Paxman interview |website=[[YouTube]] |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-s9AyNQyCw |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211220/Y-s9AyNQyCw |archive-date=2021-12-20 |url-status=live}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
 
Hitchens, the author of ''[[God Is Not Great]],''<ref>{{cite book |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Hitchens |title=God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything |year=2007 |publisher=Atlantic Books |edition=First trade |isbn=978-1-843-54574-3 |page=320}}</ref> was named among the "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" by ''[[Foreign Policy]]'' and ''[[Prospect (magazine)|Prospect]]'' magazines. He served on the advisory board of the [[Secular Coalition for America]]. In 2010, Hitchens published his memoir ''[[Hitch-22]]'' (a nickname provided by close personal friend [[Salman Rushdie]], whom Hitchens always supported during and following [[The Satanic Verses controversy|''The Satanic Verses'' controversy]]).<ref>{{cite book |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |title=Hitch22 |year=2010 |publisher=Atlantic Books |isbn=978-1-843-54922-2 |page=448 |id= {{ASIN|1843549220|country=uk}} }}</ref> Shortly after its publication, he was diagnosed with esophageal cancer, which led to his death in December 2011.<ref>{{cite news|title=Christopher Hitchens dies at 62 after suffering cancer|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16212418|work=BBC News|date=16 December 2011|access-date=20 June 2018|archive-date=30 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330215716/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16212418|url-status=live}}</ref> Before his death, Hitchens published a collection of essays and articles in his book ''[[Arguably]]'';<ref>{{cite book|last=Hitchens|first=Christopher|title=Arguably|year=2011|publisher=Atlantic Books|isbn=978-0857892584|id= {{ASIN|0857892584|country=uk}}}}</ref> a short edition, ''[[Mortality (book)|Mortality]]'',<ref>{{cite book|last=Hitchens|first=Christopher |title=Mortality |year=2012 |publisher=Atlantic Books|isbn=978-1848879218|id= {{ASIN|1848879210|country=uk}} }}</ref> was published posthumously in 2012. These publications and numerous public appearances provided Hitchens with a platform to remain an astute atheist during his illness, even speaking specifically on the culture of [[deathbed conversion]]s and condemning [[There are no atheists in foxholes|attempts to convert]] the [[terminally ill]], which he opposed as "bad taste".<ref>{{cite web |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |title=Is there an afterlife? |website=[[YouTube]] |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbzd6ZbCowY}}{{cbignore}}{{Dead Youtube links|date=February 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |title=Hitchens and Paxman interview |website=[[YouTube]] |date=12 December 2010 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-s9AyNQyCw |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211220/Y-s9AyNQyCw |archive-date=2021-12-20 |url-status=live}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
Dennett is the author of ''[[Darwin's Dangerous Idea]]'' and ''[[Breaking the Spell (Dennett book)|Breaking the Spell]]''.<ref>{{cite book |last=Dennett|first=Daniel |author-link= Daniel Dennett | title=Darwin's Dangerous Idea |year=1996 |isbn=978-0140167344 |page=592|publisher=Penguin Adult |id= {{ASIN|014016734X|country=uk}} }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Dennett|first=Daniel |author-link= Daniel Dennett | title=Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon |year=2007 |publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-0141017778 |page=464}}</ref> He has been a vocal supporter of [[The Clergy Project]],<ref>{{cite web |last=Dennett |first=Daniel |author-link= Daniel Dennett |title=Clergy Project |url=http://clergyproject.org/news/2012/04/15/dan-dennett-speaks-about-the-clergy-project-at-2012-global-atheist-convention/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130122144720/http://www.clergyproject.org/news/2012/04/15/dan-dennett-speaks-about-the-clergy-project-at-2012-global-atheist-convention/ |archive-date=22 January 2013}}</ref> an organization that provides support for clergy in the US who no longer believe in God and cannot fully participate in their communities any longer.<ref>{{cite web|title=Clergy Project Home Page|url=http://clergyproject.org/|date=4 October 2014|access-date=3 November 2013|archive-date=9 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170609133526/http://clergyproject.org/|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
Dennett was the author of ''[[Darwin's Dangerous Idea]]'' and ''[[Breaking the Spell (Dennett book)|Breaking the Spell]]''.<ref>{{cite book |last=Dennett|first=Daniel |author-link= Daniel Dennett | title=Darwin's Dangerous Idea |year=1996 |isbn=978-0140167344 |page=592|publisher=Penguin Adult |id= {{ASIN|014016734X|country=uk}} }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Dennett|first=Daniel |author-link= Daniel Dennett | title=Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon |year=2007 |publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-0141017778 |page=464}}</ref> He had been a vocal supporter of [[The Clergy Project]],<ref>{{cite web |last=Dennett |first=Daniel |author-link= Daniel Dennett |title=Clergy Project |url=http://clergyproject.org/news/2012/04/15/dan-dennett-speaks-about-the-clergy-project-at-2012-global-atheist-convention/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130122144720/http://www.clergyproject.org/news/2012/04/15/dan-dennett-speaks-about-the-clergy-project-at-2012-global-atheist-convention/ |archive-date=22 January 2013}}</ref> an organization that provides support for clergy in the US who no longer believe in God and cannot fully participate in their communities any longer.<ref>{{cite web|title=Clergy Project Home Page|url=http://clergyproject.org/|date=4 October 2014|access-date=3 November 2013|archive-date=9 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170609133526/http://clergyproject.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> He was also a member of the [[Secular Coalition for America]] advisory board,<ref>{{cite web |title=Daniel Dennett |url=https://secular.org/profile/dr-daniel-dennett/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205150404/https://secular.org/profile/dr-daniel-dennett/ |archive-date=December 5, 2020 |access-date=January 4, 2021 |work=secular.org}}</ref> and a member of the [[Committee for Skeptical Inquiry]], as well as an outspoken supporter of the [[Brights movement]]. He did research into clerics who are secretly atheists and how they rationalize their works. He found what he called a "don't ask, don't tell" conspiracy because believers did not want to hear of loss of faith. This made unbelieving preachers feel isolated, but they did not want to lose their jobs and church-supplied lodgings. Generally, they consoled themselves with the belief that they were doing good in their pastoral roles by providing comfort and required ritual.<ref name="Dennett2010">[https://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/papers/Preachers_who_are_not_believers.pdf] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123131759/http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/papers/Preachers_who_are_not_believers.pdf|date=January 23, 2019}}, "Preachers Who Are Not Believers," ''Evolutionary Psychology'', Vol. 8, Issue 1, March 2010, pp. 122–50, {{ISSN|1474-7049}}.</ref> The research, with Linda LaScola, was further extended to include other denominations and non-Christian clerics.<ref>[http://traffic.libsyn.com/ffrf/FTradio_247_011511.mp3 Podcast: interview with Daniel Dennett. Further developments of the research: pastors, priests, and an Imam who are closet atheists]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200414080440/http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/8/6/b/86b9fb94735253f4/FTradio_247_011511.mp3?c_id=2966629&cs_id=2966629&expiration=1586854694&hwt=5f8f65a36e676aca287140cce601aef1|date=April 14, 2020}}.</ref> The research and stories Dennett and LaScola accumulated during this project were published in their 2013 co-authored book, ''Caught in the Pulpit: Leaving Belief Behind''.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://thehumanist.com/magazine/may-june-2014/arts_entertainment/caught-in-the-pulpit-leaving-belief-behind|title=Caught in the Pulpit: Leaving Belief Behind|date=2014-04-22|work=TheHumanist.com|access-date=2017-06-01|language=en-US|archive-date=April 1, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401015205/https://thehumanist.com/magazine/may-june-2014/arts_entertainment/caught-in-the-pulpit-leaving-belief-behind|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
==="Plus one horse-woman"===
{{main|Ayaan Hirsi Ali}}
[[File:Ayaan Hirsi Ali by Gage Skidmore.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Ayaan Hirsi Ali]] (born 1969) in 2016]]
Ayaan Hirsi Ali was a central figure of New Atheism<ref name=":52">{{Citation |title=The New Atheism |date=2017 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/jihad-radicalism-and-the-new-atheism/new-atheism/5971EDDFB153952A0D0C593DE26E074A |work=Jihad, Radicalism, and the New Atheism |pages=95–96 |editor-last=Khalil |editor-first=Mohammad Hassan |access-date=2022-12-24 |place=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |doi=10.1017/9781108377263.009 |isbn=978-1-108-38512-1 |archive-date=3 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231003172043/https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/jihad-radicalism-and-the-new-atheism/new-atheism/5971EDDFB153952A0D0C593DE26E074A |url-status=live }}</ref> until she announced her [[conversion to Christianity]] in November 2023.<ref>{{cite news |last=Ali |first=Ayaan Hirsi |date=11 November 2023 |title=Why I am now a Christian |work=UnHerd |url=https://unherd.com/2023/11/why-i-am-now-a-christian/ |access-date=13 November 2023 |archive-date=23 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240123043959/https://unherd.com/2023/11/why-i-am-now-a-christian/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Hirsi Ali, originally scheduled to attend the 2007 meeting,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ahuja |first=Anjana |date=2019-03-22 |title=The Four Horsemen — polemics from the high priests of New Atheism |work=Financial Times |url=https://www.ft.com/content/f3238d46-4418-11e9-b83b-0c525dad548f |access-date=2022-12-24 |archive-date=28 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221228115310/https://www.ft.com/content/f3238d46-4418-11e9-b83b-0c525dad548f |url-status=live }}</ref> later appeared with Dawkins, Dennett, and Harris at the 2012 [[Global Atheist Convention]], where she was referred to as the "plus one horse-woman" by Dawkins.<ref>{{YouTube|id=sOMjEJ3JO5Q|title=Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris & Ayaan Hirsi Ali}}</ref> [[Robyn Blumner]], CEO of the Center for Inquiry, described Hirsi Ali as the "Fifth" horseman.<ref name=":7" />
 
Line 42 ⟶ 54:
 
Hirsi Ali was later involved in the production of the film ''[[Submission (2004 film)|Submission]]'', for which her friend [[Theo van Gogh (film director)|Theo van Gogh]] was murdered with a death threat to Hirsi Ali pinned to his chest.<ref>{{cite news|title=Controversial film maker killed|date=November 2, 2004|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/controversial-filmmaker-shot-dead-531777.html | location=London | work=[[The Independent]]|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110624091729/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/controversial-filmmaker-shot-dead-531777.html|archive-date=June 24, 2011}}</ref> This event resulted in Hirsi Ali's hiding and later emigrating to the United States, where she resides and remains a prolific critic of Islam.<ref>{{cite web|last=Hirsi Ali|first=Ayaan|title=Christians in the Muslim world|url=http://mag.newsweek.com/2012/02/05/ayaan-hirsi-ali-the-global-war-on-christians-in-the-muslim-world.html|date=6 February 2012|work=Newsweek|access-date=3 November 2013|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304212737/http://mag.newsweek.com/2012/02/05/ayaan-hirsi-ali-the-global-war-on-christians-in-the-muslim-world.html|url-status=live}}</ref> She regularly speaks out against the treatment of women in Islamic doctrine and society<ref>{{cite web |last=Hirsi Ali |first=Ayaan|title=Ayaan Hirsi Ali on Protecting Women From Militant Islam |url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/people-places/Ayaan-Hirsi-Ali-on-Protecting-Women-From-Militant-Islam.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120625215745/http://www.smithsonianmag.com/people-places/Ayaan-Hirsi-Ali-on-Protecting-Women-From-Militant-Islam.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=June 25, 2012|date=May 15, 2012 |work=Smithsonian.com}}</ref> and is a proponent of free speech and the freedom to offend.<ref>{{cite web |last=Hirsi Ali |first=Ayaan |title=The Right to Offend |date=May 12, 2009 |website=Project Reason |url=http://www.project-reason.org/archive/item/the_right_to_offend_a_speech_by_ayaan_hirsi_ali/ |archive-date=December 6, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101206133048/http://www.project-reason.org/archive/item/the_right_to_offend_a_speech_by_ayaan_hirsi_ali/ }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |last=Hirsi Ali |first=Ayaan |title=Muslim Rage and the Last Gasp of Islamic Hate |magazine=Newsweek |date=17 September 2012 |url=http://mag.newsweek.com/2012/09/16/ayaan-hirsi-ali-on-the-islamists-final-stand.html |access-date=3 November 2013 |archive-date=23 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160423014351/http://mag.newsweek.com/2012/09/16/ayaan-hirsi-ali-on-the-islamists-final-stand.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
Writing in a column in November 2023, Ali announced her conversion to the Christian faith, saying the Judeo-Christian tradition is the only answer to the problems of the modern world.<ref name=":12">{{Cite web |last=Jones |first=Sarah |date=2023-11-29 |title=The Infidel Turned Christian |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/ayaan-hirsi-alis-political-conversion.html |access-date=2023-12-05 |website=Intelligencer |language=en |archive-date=18 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118195953/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/ayaan-hirsi-alis-political-conversion.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Ali |first=Ayaan Hirsi |date=11 November 2023 |title=Why I am now a Christian |work=UnHerd |url=https://unherd.com/2023/11/why-i-am-now-a-christian/}}</ref>
 
===Others===
Line 47 ⟶ 61:
Others have either self-identified as or been classified by some commentators as new atheists:
 
* [[Dan Barker]] (b. 1949), author of ''[[Godless (Barker book)|Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists]]''<ref>{{cite web |last=Wainwright |first=Jon |date=2010 |title=The Not So New Atheists? |url=https://philosophynow.org/issues/78/The_Not_So_New_Atheists |access-date=27 August 2022 |work=Philosophy Now |archive-date=30 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220630005810/https://philosophynow.org/issues/78/The_Not_So_New_Atheists |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Peter Boghossian]] (b. 1966), philosopher and author of ''[[A Manual for Creating Atheists]]''<ref name="daily-beast">{{cite news|last=Schulson|first=Michael|title=Atheist Philosopher Peter Boghossian's Guide to Converting Believers|url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/atheist-philosopher-peter-boghossians-guide-to-converting-believers|work=[[The Daily Beast]]|date=2 November 2013|access-date=19 November 2020|archive-date=16 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201216105714/https://www.thedailybeast.com/atheist-philosopher-peter-boghossians-guide-to-converting-believers|url-status=live}}</ref>
* [[Greta Christina]] (b. 1961), author of ''Why Are You Atheists So Angry?: 99 Things that Piss Off the Godless''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/defending_new_atheism_from_misdirected_leftists/|title=In Defense of New Atheism|work=Center for Inquiry|first=Ned|last=Borninski|date=30 June 2015|access-date=26 August 2022|archive-date=19 May 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230519055401/https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/defending_new_atheism_from_misdirected_leftists/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* [[Jerry Coyne]] (b. 1949), author of ''[[Faith Versus Fact|Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible]]''<ref>{{Cite web |last=Berezow |first=Alex |date=October 21, 2013 |title=Jerry Coyne's Twisted History of Science and Religion |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexberezow/2013/10/21/jerry-coynes-twisted-history-of-science-religion/ |access-date=2022-11-25 |website=Forbes |archive-date=25 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221125220028/https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexberezow/2013/10/21/jerry-coynes-twisted-history-of-science-religion/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="midwest" />
* [[Rebecca Goldstein]] (b. 1950), philosopher and author of ''36 Arguments for the Existence of God''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/amphtml/Books/2011/0210/Interview-with-Rebecca-Newberger-Goldstein-author-of-36-Arguments-for-the-Existence-of-God|title=Interview with Rebecca Newberger Goldstein, author of "36 Arguments for the Existence of God|first=Marjorie|last=Kehe|work=The Christian Science Monitor|date=10 February 2011|access-date=27 August 2022|archive-date=7 December 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221207144956/https://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/amphtml/Books/2011/0210/Interview-with-Rebecca-Newberger-Goldstein-author-of-36-Arguments-for-the-Existence-of-God|url-status=live}}</ref>
* [[Michel Onfray]] (b. 1959), author of ''[[Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam]]''<ref>{{cite web |last=Dalrymple |first=Theodore |date=2007 |title=What the New Atheists Don't See |url=https://www.city-journal.org/html/what-new-atheists-don%e2%80%99t-see-13058.html?wallit_nosession=1 |access-date=27 August 2022 |work=City Journal |archive-date=10 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710183440/https://www.city-journal.org/html/what-new-atheists-don%E2%80%99t-see-13058.html?wallit_nosession=1 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* [[Michael Schmidt-Salomon]] (b. 1967) author of ''[[Manifesto of Evolutionary Humanism]]'' and identified as [[Germany|Germany's]] "Chief Atheist"<ref>"...sagte Michael Schmidt-Salomon, Vorstand der Giordano-Bruno-Stiftung und damit so etwas wie Deutschlands Chef-Atheist." ("...said Michael Schmidt-Salomon, [who is] chairman of the Giordano Bruno Foundation, and therefore something of a 'chief atheist' for Germany.") [http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/0,1518,485459,00.html Chef-Atheist im Chat: "Gynäkologen, die an die Jungfrauengeburt glauben"], ''Spiegel Online'', 29 May 2007 (Accessed 6 April 2008)</ref>
* [[Victor J. Stenger]], author of ''[[God: The Failed Hypothesis]]''<ref>{{Cite web |title=New Atheists |url=https://iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/ |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |language=en-US |archive-date=21 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221102742/https://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Stenger |first=Victor J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GQSJ5l24cQMC |title=The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason |date=2009-12-04 |publisher=Prometheus Books |isbn=978-1-61592-344-1 |language=en |access-date=20 January 2023 |archive-date=21 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230421214640/https://books.google.com/books?id=GQSJ5l24cQMC |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[TJ Kirk]] (b. 1985), [[YouTube]] personality and podcast host known for his YouTube Channel ''Amazing Atheist''<ref>{{cite web|title=Joe Rogan and T.J. Kirk on Milo Yiannopoulos|work=[[The Joe Rogan Experience]]|via=YouTube|first=Joe|last=Rogan|date=March 15, 2017|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcLh4Hwb0FU|accessdate=17 March 2017}}</ref>
* [[Victor J. Stenger]] (1935–2014), author of ''[[God: The Failed Hypothesis]]''<ref>{{Cite web |title=New Atheists |url=https://iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/ |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |language=en-US |archive-date=21 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221102742/https://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Stenger |first=Victor J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GQSJ5l24cQMC |title=The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason |date=2009-12-04 |publisher=Prometheus Books |isbn=978-1-61592-344-1 |language=en |access-date=20 January 2023 |archive-date=21 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230421214640/https://books.google.com/books?id=GQSJ5l24cQMC |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Rebecca Watson]], author of the blog ''Skepchick''<ref name="Johnstone-Louis 2013">{{cite book |last1=Johnstone-Louis |first1=Mary |editor1-last=Rinallo |editor1-first=Diego |editor2-last=Scott |editor2-first=Linda M. |editor3-last=Maclaran |editor3-first=Pauline |title=Consumption and Spirituality |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |isbn=978-0-415-88911-7 |page=57 |chapter=No Gods. No Masters?: The 'New Atheist' Movement and the Commercialization of Unbelief}}</ref>
 
Some writers sometimes classified as new atheists by others have explicitly distanced themselves from the label:
 
* [[A. C. Grayling]] (b. 1949), philosopher and author of ''[[The God Argument]]''<ref name=Catto>{{cite web|last1=Catto|first1=Rebecca|last2=Eccles|first2=Jane|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/apr/14/atheism-socialnetworking|title=Beyond Grayling, Dawkins and Hitchens, a new kind of British atheism|work=The Guardian|date=14 April 2011|access-date=27 August 2022|archive-date=31 December 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111231034107/http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2011/apr/14/atheism-socialnetworking|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="midwest" />
* [[John W. Loftus]] (b. 1954), author of ''The Outsider Test For Faith''<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://twitter.com/loftusjohnw/status/1497969878795309056 |title=@loftusjohnw on Twitter: Why Did Randal Rauser Recommend "God and Horrendous Suffering"? Despite his high recommendation of my book Rauser is on a mission to discredit it, pejoratively calling me a "New Atheist" and a "Fundamentalist". Inquiring Minds Want to Know Why! |access-date=8 April 2022 |archive-date=8 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220408072534/https://twitter.com/loftusjohnw/status/1497969878795309056 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[P. Z. Myers]] (b. 1957), critic of [[intelligent design]], the [[creationist]] movement, and other [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] concepts<ref name="midwest">Pigliucci, Massimo (2013). [https://philpapers.org/archive/PIGNAA.pdf New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200820050154/https://philpapers.org/archive/PIGNAA.pdf |date=20 August 2020 }} ''Midwest Studies In Philosophy,'' Vol. 37 (1): pp. 142-153.</ref>
 
==Perspective==
Line 70 ⟶ 87:
 
===Logical arguments===
In his book ''[[God: The Failed Hypothesis]]'', [[Victor J. Stenger]] argues that a God having [[omniscient]], [[omnibenevolent]], and [[omnipotent]] attributes, which he termed a ''3O God'', cannot [[logic]]ally exist.<ref>{{cite book |last=Stenger |first=Victor J. |title=God: The Failed Hypothesis. How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist |publisher=Prometheus Books |year=2007 |isbn=978-1591026525 |edition=with new foreword by Christopher Hitchens |location=Amherst (New York) |chapter=}}</ref> A similar series of alleged logical disproofs of the existence of a God with various attributes can be found in [[Michael Martin (philosopher)|Michael Martin]] and Ricki Monnier's ''The Impossibility of God'',<ref>{{cite book |author-link1=Michael Martin (philosopher) |first1=Michael |last1=Martin |first2=Ricki |last2=Monnier |title=The Impossibility of God |publisher=Prometheus Books |date= 2003 }}</ref> or [[Theodore M. Drange]]'s article, "Incompatible-Properties Arguments: A Survey".<ref>{{cite journal|author1=Theodore M. Drange |title=Incompatible-Properties Arguments: A Survey |url=http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theodore_drange/incompatible.html |journal=[[Philo (journal)|Philo]] |date=1998 |issue=2 |pages=49–60 |archive-date=6 December 2022 |via=The Secular Web |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221206205407/https://infidels.org/library/modern/theodore-drange-incompatible/}}</ref>
 
===Views on non-overlapping magisteria===
Line 79 ⟶ 96:
===Science and morality===
{{main|Science of morality}}
 
Popularized by Sam Harris is the view that science and thereby currently unknown objective facts may instruct human morality in a globally comparable way. Harris' book ''The Moral Landscape'',<ref>{{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=The Moral Landscape|year=2012|publisher=Black Swan|isbn=978-0552776387|id= {{ASIN|0552776386|country=uk}}}}</ref> and accompanying TED Talk ''How Science can Determine Moral Values'',<ref>{{cite web|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=How Science can Determine Moral Values|url=http://www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_science_can_show_what_s_right.html|access-date=2 November 2013|archive-date=27 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140227021657/http://www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_science_can_show_what_s_right.html|url-status=live}}</ref> propose that human well-being and conversely suffering may be thought of as a landscape with peaks and valleys representing numerous ways to achieve extremes in human experience, and that there are objective states of well-being.
Harris considers that the [[well-being]] of conscious creatures forms the basis of morality. In ''[[The Moral Landscape]]'', he argues that science can in principle answer moral questions and help maximize well-being.<ref>{{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=The Moral Landscape|year=2012|publisher=Black Swan|isbn=978-0552776387|id= {{ASIN|0552776386|country=uk}}}}</ref> Harris also criticizes [[Cultural relativism|cultural]] and [[moral relativism]], arguing that it prevents people from making objective moral judgments about practices that clearly harm human well-being, such as [[female genital mutilation]]. Harris contends that we can make scientifically-based claims about the negative impacts of such practices on human welfare, and that withholding judgment in these cases is tantamount to claiming complete ignorance about what contributes to human well-being.<ref>{{cite web|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=How Science can Determine Moral Values|url=http://www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_science_can_show_what_s_right.html|access-date=2 November 2013|archive-date=27 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140227021657/http://www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_science_can_show_what_s_right.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
===Politics===
In the context of international politics, the principles of New Atheism establish no particular stance in and of themselves.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal |last1=Kettell |first1=Steven |title=Faithless: The politics of new atheism |journal=Secularism and Nonreligion |date=21 November 2013 |volume=2 |page=61 |doi=10.5334/snr.al |doi-access=free }}</ref> [[PZP. Z. Myers]] stated that New Atheism's key proponents are "a madly disorganized mob, united only by [their] dislike of the god-thing".<ref>{{cite web |author-link=PZ Myers |last1=Meyers [sic] |first1=Paul Z. [Pharyngula] |title=Atheism ≠ fascism |website=ScienceBlogs |language=en |date=June 11, 2011 |url=https://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/06/12/atheism-fascism |access-date=1 April 2023 |archive-date=1 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230401130701/https://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/06/12/atheism-fascism |url-status=live }}</ref> That said, the demographic that supports New Atheism is a markedly homogeneous one; in America and the Anglo-sphere more generally, this cohort is "more likely to be younger, male and single, to have higher than average levels of income and education, to be less [[authoritarian]], less [[dogmatic]], less prejudiced, less [[conformist]] and more tolerant and open-minded on religious issues."<ref name=":0" /> Because of this homogeneity among the group, there exists not a formal dynamic but a loose consensus on broad political "efforts, objectives, and strategies".<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|date=2014-06-18|title=New Atheism: The Politics of Unbelief|url=https://www.e-ir.info/2014/06/18/new-atheism-the-politics-of-unbelief/|access-date=2020-06-21|website=E-International Relations|archive-date=23 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200623122404/https://www.e-ir.info/2014/06/18/new-atheism-the-politics-of-unbelief/|url-status=live}}</ref>

For example, one of the primary aims is to further reduce the entanglement of church and state, which derives from the "belief that religion is antithetical to liberal values, such as freedom of expression and the separation of public from private life".<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":3" /> Additionally, new atheists have engaged in the campaign "to ensure legal and civic equality for atheists", in a world considerably unwelcoming to and distrustful of non-religious believers.<ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Schulzke |first1=Marcus |title=The Politics of New Atheism |journal=Politics and Religion |date=December 2013 |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=778–799 |id={{ProQuest|2210982282}} |doi=10.1017/S1755048313000217 |s2cid=197670821 }}</ref><ref name=":3">{{cite journal |last1=Kettell |first1=Steven |title=What's really new about New Atheism? |journal=Palgrave Communications |date=December 2016 |volume=2 |issue=1 |page=16099 |doi=10.1057/palcomms.2016.99 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Edgell |first1=Penny |last2=Gerteis |first2=Joseph |last3=Hartmann |first3=Douglas |title=Atheists As 'Other': Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society |journal=American Sociological Review |date=April 2006 |volume=71 |issue=2 |pages=211–234 |doi=10.1177/000312240607100203 |s2cid=143818177 }}</ref> Christopher Hitchens may be the new atheist concerned most with religion's incompatibility with contemporary liberal principles, and particularly its imposed limitation on both freedom of speech and freedom of expression.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite web|last=Hitchens|first=Christopher|date=December 2011|title=Why Even Hate Speech Needs to Be Protected|url=https://www.rd.com/culture/freedom-speech-most-important-first-amendment-right/|website=Reader's Digest|access-date=21 June 2020|archive-date=23 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200623003725/https://www.rd.com/culture/freedom-speech-most-important-first-amendment-right/|url-status=live}}</ref> Because New Atheism's proliferation is accredited partly to the 11 September attacks and the ubiquitous, visceral response, [[Richard Dawkins]], among many in his cohort, believes that [[theism]] (in this case, [[Islam]]) jeopardizes political institutions and [[national security]], and he warns of religion's potency in motivating "people to do terrible things" against international [[Polity|polities]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Richard Dawkins On Terrorism And Religion|url=https://www.npr.org/2017/05/27/530337283/richard-dawkins-on-terrorism-and-religion|access-date=2020-06-20|website=NPR.org|date=27 May 2017|archive-date=22 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200622093627/https://www.npr.org/2017/05/27/530337283/richard-dawkins-on-terrorism-and-religion|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
==Criticisms==
Line 99 ⟶ 119:
 
===Criticisms of responses to theistic arguments===
[[Edward Feser]] has critiqued the new atheists' responses to arguments for the existence of God, especially Dawkins' and Dennett's.:<ref>{{cite news |last1=Feser |first1=Edward |last2=Bowman |first2=Karlyn |title=The New Philistinism |url=https://www.aei.org/articles/the-new-philistinism/ |work=American Enterprise Institute - AEI |date=26 March 2010 |access-date=1 April 2023 |archive-date=1 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230401132215/https://www.aei.org/articles/the-new-philistinism/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
{{Blockquote |text=It can safely be said that if you haven't both understood [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]] and answered him – not to mention [[Anselm of Canterbury|Anselm]], [[Duns Scotus]], [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz|Leibniz]], [[Samuel Clarke]], and so on, but let that pass – then you have hardly "made your case" against religion. Yet Dawkins is the only "New Atheist" to offer anything even remotely like an attempt to answer him, feeble as it is. |author=Edward Feser |source=''The Last Superstition'' (2008) }}
Line 111 ⟶ 131:
 
Some commentators have accused the New Atheist movement of [[Islamophobia]].<ref>{{cite web|first=Jerome|last=Taylor|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/atheists-richard-dawkins-christopher-hitchens-and-sam-harris-face-islamophobia-backlash-8570580.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220618/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/atheists-richard-dawkins-christopher-hitchens-and-sam-harris-face-islamophobia-backlash-8570580.html |archive-date=18 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Atheists Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris face Islamophobia backlash|work=The Independent|date=13 April 2013|access-date=30 January 2022}}</ref><ref>FP Staff [http://www.firstpost.com/politics/unholy-war-atheists-and-the-politics-of-muslim-baiting-684377.html "Unholy war: Atheists and the politics of Muslim-baiting] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170608144450/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/unholy-war-atheists-and-the-politics-of-muslim-baiting-684377.html |date=8 June 2017 }}". ''First Post''. Retrieved April 16, 2013.</ref><ref name="Jacoby Yavuz">{{cite journal |last1=Jacoby |first1=Wade |last2=Yavuz |first2=Hakan |title=Modernization, Identity and Integration: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Islam in Europe |journal=Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs |volume=28 |issue=1 |page=1 | date=April 2008 |doi=10.1080/13602000802080486 |s2cid=144021468}}</ref><ref name="emilsen 2012">{{cite journal |last = Emilsen | first = William |title =The New Atheism and Islam |journal=The Expository Times |volume=123 |issue=11 |pages=521–528 |date=August 2012 |doi=10.1177/0014524612448737 |s2cid=171036043}}</ref> Wade Jacoby and Hakan Yavuz assert that "a group of 'new atheists' such as Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens" have "invoked Samuel Huntington's 'clash of civilizations' theory to explain the current political contestation" and that this forms part of a trend toward "Islamophobia{{nbsp}}... in the study of Muslim societies".<ref name="Jacoby Yavuz" /> William W. Emilson argues that "the 'new' in the new atheists' writings is not their aggressiveness, nor their extraordinary popularity, nor even their scientific approach to religion, rather it is their attack not only on militant Islamism but also on Islam itself under the cloak of its general critique of religion."<ref name="emilsen 2012" />
 
=== Legacy ===
In a January 2019 retrospective article, [[Steven Poole]] of ''[[The Guardian]]'' observed: "For some, New Atheism was never about God at all, but just a topical subgenre of the rightwing backlash against the supposedly suffocating atmosphere of '[[political correctness]]'."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Poole |first=Steven |date=2019-01-31 |title=The Four Horsemen review - whatever happened to 'New Atheism'? |url=http://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jan/31/four-horsemen-review-what-happened-to-new-atheism-dawkins-hitchens |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=[[The Guardian]] |archive-date=28 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220728160815/https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jan/31/four-horsemen-review-what-happened-to-new-atheism-dawkins-hitchens |url-status=live }}</ref> In November 2019, [[Slate Star Codex |Scott Alexander]] argued that New Atheism did not disappear as a political movement but instead turned to social justice as a new cause to fight for.<ref>{{Cite web |last=West |first=Ed |date=2019-11-04 |title=What really happened to the New Atheists |url=https://unherd.com/thepost/what-really-happened-to-the-new-atheists/ |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=[[UnHerd]] |archive-date=21 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220721013302/https://unherd.com/thepost/what-really-happened-to-the-new-atheists/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
In an April 2021 interview, Natalie Wynn, a [[left-wing]] YouTuber who runs the channel [[ContraPoints]], commented: "The [[alt-right]], the [[manosphere]], [[incel]]s, even the so-called [[SJW]] Internet and [[LeftTube]] all have a genetic ancestor in New Atheism."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Maughan |first=Philip |date=April 14, 2021 |title=The World According to ContraPoints |url=https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/contrapoints-natalie-wynn-interview/ |access-date=August 3, 2021 |website=Highsnobiety |archive-date=29 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220429125954/https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/contrapoints-natalie-wynn-interview/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In a June 2021 retrospective article, [[Émile P. Torres]] of ''[[Salon.com|Salon]]'' argued that prominent figures in the New Atheist movement had aligned themselves with the [[far-right]].<ref>{{cite web|date=5 June 2021|title=Godless grifters: How the New Atheists merged with the far right|url=https://www.salon.com/2021/06/05/how-the-new-atheists-merged-with-the-far-right-a-story-of-intellectual-grift-and-abject-surrender/|work=Salon|first=Émile P.|last=Torres|access-date=27 August 2022|archive-date=26 August 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220826203416/https://www.salon.com/2021/06/05/how-the-new-atheists-merged-with-the-far-right-a-story-of-intellectual-grift-and-abject-surrender/|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
In a June 2022 retrospective article, Sebastian Milbank of [[The Critic (modern magazine)|''The Critic'']] stated that, as a movement, "New Atheism has fractured and lost its original spirit", that "much of what New Atheism embodied has now migrated rightwards", and that "another portion has moved leftwards, embodied by the 'I Fucking Love Science' woke nerd of today."<ref name="milbank 2022"/> Following the conversion of writer [[Ayaan Hirsi Ali]] to Christianity in 2023, the columnist Sarah Jones wrote in [[New York (magazine)|''New York'']] magazine that the New Atheism movement was in "terminal decline".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Jones |first=Sarah |date=2023-11-29 |title=The Infidel Turned Christian |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/ayaan-hirsi-alis-political-conversion.html |access-date=2023-12-05 |website=Intelligencer |language=en |archive-date=18 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118195953/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/ayaan-hirsi-alis-political-conversion.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
== See also ==
{{colCol-begin}}
{{colCol-break}}
* [[Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief|''A Brief History of Disbelief'']] &ndash; 3-part [[PBS|PBS series]] (2007)
* [[Antireligion]]
Line 131 ⟶ 145:
* [[Freethought]]
* [[History of atheism]]
{{colCol-break}}
* [[Metaphysical naturalism]]
* [[Misotheism]]
Line 140 ⟶ 154:
* [[Secular movement]]
* [[Social movement]]
{{colCol-end}}
 
== References ==
'''Informational notes'''
{{notelistNotelist}}
 
'''Citations'''
{{reflistReflist}}
 
== External links ==
Line 153 ⟶ 167:
 
{{New Atheism}}
 
{{Irreligion}}
 
{{Theism}}
 
{{Criticism of religion}}
 
{{Portal bar|Religion|Philosophy|Science|Society}}
 
[[Category:New Atheism| ]]
[[Category:2000s fads and trends]]
[[Category:2010s fads and trends]]
[[Category:2006 neologisms]]
[[Category:Antitheism]]
[[Category:Freethought]]