Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Reverted 1 edit by Diamond6112 (talk): Not needed |
||
(28 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
Line 4:
{{multiple issues|{{more citations needed|date=August 2018}}
{{POV|date=March 2021}}}}
[[File:Fra Angelico - Last Judgement (detail) - WGA00472.jpg|thumb|''Last Judgement (detail)'' by [[Fra Angelico]], circa 1431]]
'''Damnation''' (from Latin ''[[:wikt:damnatio|damnatio]]'') is the [[concept]] of [[Divine judgment|divine punishment]] and torment in an [[afterlife]] for
In [[Ancient Egyptian religion|Ancient Egyptian religious]] tradition, it was believed that [[citizens]] would recite the 42 negative confessions of [[Maat]] as their heart was weighed against the feather of truth. If the citizen's heart was heavier than
[[Zoroastrianism]] developed an eschatological concept of a Last Judgment called Frashokereti where the dead will be raised and the righteous wade through a river of milk while the wicked will be burned in a river of molten metal.
[[Abrahamic religions]] such as [[Christianity]] have similar concepts of
Following the religious meaning, the words '''''damn''''' and '''''goddamn''''' are a common form of religious [[profanity]], in modern times often [[Semantic change|semantically weakened]] to the status of
==Etymology==
[[Classical Latin]]
The word entered [[Middle English]] usage from Old French in the early 14th century.
Line 26:
==Christianity==
{{Further|Hell|Sin|Last Judgement|Christian eschatology|Universal reconciliation}}
In most forms of [[Western Christianity|Western Christian]] belief, damnation to [[Christian views on hell|hell]] is what humanity deserves for its sins. [[Catholic]] and many [[Protestant]] denominations hold that human sin is the product of the [[fall of man]] of Adam and Eve in the [[
Christian denominations have differing views on [[soteriology]], but a mainstream view is that believers can only escape damnation by salvation
Opinions in the [[Eastern Orthodoxy|Eastern Orthodox]] church differ on this subject matter. Question 383 of the [[Philaret Drozdov]] catechism asks: "What will be the lot of unbelievers and transgressors? Answer: They will be given over to everlasting death{{snd}}that is, to everlasting fire, to everlasting torment, with the devils. Proof: Whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. Rev. xx. 15. And, That is the second death. Rev. xx. 14. Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels. Matt. xxv. 41. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal. Matt. xxv 46. It is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire: where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. Mark ix. 47, 48."<ref>[http://www.pravoslavieto.com/docs/eng/Orthodox_Catechism_of_Philaret.htm#ii.xv.iii.ii.p751 The Longer Catechism of The Orthodox, Catholic, Eastern Church: On the Twelfth Article.]</ref>
However some view sin in less legalistic sense, but more as a spiritual illness that needs to be cured and purged.<ref>Thus it is the Church's spiritual teaching that God does not punish man by some material fire or physical torment. God simply reveals Himself in the risen Lord Jesus in such a glorious way that no man can fail to behold His glory. It is the presence of God's splendid glory and love that is the scourge of those who reject its radiant power and light.<br /> ... those who find themselves in hell will be chastised by the scourge of love. How cruel and bitter this torment of love will be! For those who understand that they have sinned against love, undergo no greater suffering than those produced by the most fearful tortures. The sorrow which takes hold of the heart, which has sinned against love, is more piercing than any other pain. It is not right to say that the sinners in hell are deprived of the love of God ... But love acts in two ways, as suffering of the reproved, and as joy in the blessed! (St. Isaac of Syria, Mystic Treatises) ''The Orthodox Church of America website'' [http://www.oca.org/OCchapter.asp?SID=2&ID=208] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070704063634/http://www.oca.org/OCchapter.asp?SID=2&ID=208
==Hinduism==
Line 37 ⟶ 38:
==As profanity==
:"'[[Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn|Frankly, my dear, I don't give a]] small copper coin weighing one [[tolah]], eight [[Masha_(unit)|masha]]s and seven surkhs, being the fortieth part of a [[rupee]].' Or, to put it more concisely, a [[Dam (Indian coin)|dam]]."<ref>[[Salman Rushdie]]'s [https://books.google.com/books?id=5fApCKZT91kC&pg=PA100&dq=frankly+my+dear+don't+give+small+copper+coin+weighing+tolah+eight+mashas+seven+surkhs+being+fortieth+part+rupee+put+more+concisely+dam Hobson-Jobson] essay, in the book ''Travelers' Tales India'' by James O'Reilly and Larry Habegger</ref>▼
▲In [[Indian English]], there is an incorrect etymology connecting "I don't give a damn" with the [[Dam (Indian coin)|dam]], a 16th-century copper coin. [[Salman Rushdie]], in a 1985 essay on the dictionary of Anglo-Indian terms ''[[Hobson-Jobson]]'', ends with this: {{"'}}[[Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn|Frankly, my dear, I don't give a]] small copper coin weighing one [[tolah]], eight [[Masha_(unit)|masha]]s and seven surkhs, being the fortieth part of a [[rupee]].' Or, to put it more concisely, a [[Dam (Indian coin)|dam]]."<ref>[[Salman Rushdie]]'s [https://books.google.com/books?id=5fApCKZT91kC&pg=PA100&dq=frankly+my+dear+don't+give+small+copper+coin+weighing+tolah+eight+mashas+seven+surkhs+being+fortieth+part+rupee+put+more+concisely+dam Hobson-Jobson] essay, in the book ''Travelers' Tales India'' by James O'Reilly and Larry Habegger</ref>
==See also==
{{Wiktionary|damn}}
Line 65 ⟶ 64:
[[Category:Curses]]
[[Category:Interjections]]
[[Category:Profanity]]
[[Category:Punishments]]
[[Category:Religious law]]
|