Content deleted Content added
Escape Orbit (talk | contribs) Reverted 1 edit by 212.154.4.24 (talk): Rvv |
|||
| (37 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 583:
::Unknown purpose? I am not Robot to read thousands of blog at a time and then add them on WIki. So you thought its Spam? Did you even check that article on that site? I can understand if there's any problem in content, but i don't think that's problem here. So how do you think its Spam without reading article? If there's no problem with TechRadar, Verge, TechCrunch press releases citation on WIki, almost same, then why you are against 'particular' site with rich, unique content? Just trying to understanding Wiki culture. [[User:AkiraAnastasia12345|AkiraAnastasia12345]] ([[User talk:AkiraAnastasia12345|talk]]) 11:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
:::I knew it was a spam because of where You put it. Links are meant to reference a particular sentence or paragraph or a section. In Your history of contributions I found that You were mostly interested in inserting this particular link. That was a red flag. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 11:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
::::Please guide me more about "Where To Put It". How to give references to unique, rich articles? Wikipedia is for worldwide people right? About "particular site", if someone puts multiple links to their own Media sites, Like Forbes and their affiliates, then you won't find any problem because they are adding Multiple sites there (All are own by same media company)? And I am not Robot or huge media team and browse unique blogs so adding one single site makes me Red Flag? [[User:AkiraAnastasia12345|AkiraAnastasia12345]] ([[User talk:AkiraAnastasia12345|talk]]) 11:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
:::Examples {{diff|Droidcon|1215907720|1208743861}} (Added Droidcon NYC official Media sponsor- Global Tech Gadgets™ to reference section) {{diff|Bugatti Chiron|1215873925|1215872322}} (Added reference for rich content, users can see multiple images, interiors of Bugatti Chiron "Edition Noire Sportive" on source) and this sounds very promotional of the link {{diff|List of computer system manufacturers|1214020526|1208738557}} (Added reference of latest big laptop brands in 2024). You were clearly promoting this website. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 11:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
::::It seems to me You are not interested to add content and reference it but to add a promotional link and get away with it, to camouflage it as a regular reference. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 11:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::Can you give example of what references can we add in such paragraphs? Where I am wrong? Would like to know. For example; If I added Bugatti Chiron Noire Sportive related reference, what was wrong in that content? What reference can be added?
:::::About blog, Why you are assuming I am promoting? I am adding value. You don't talk about value or if there's any problem in content, you are ASSUMING just because I added ONE blog. As said before, i am NOT A Robot to read 1000 blogs. Neither Forbes or big media affiliate to add multiple links at a time! So can you confirm your problem is you are ASSUMING I'm promoting site, but not problem with content of site right?? [[User:AkiraAnastasia12345|AkiraAnastasia12345]] ([[User talk:AkiraAnastasia12345|talk]]) 12:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
::::::You don't have to add it. It does not have to be here. There is no compulsion to edit. Just let it go. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 12:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::::{{redacted|link removed}} coincidence? [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 12:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
::::::::Why not?? Wikipedia is not for Big media houses only? Or you are affiliated with them so don't want to add any rich content which can result in loss of your affiliated sites?
::::::::About Coincidence? So someone can't use Pinterest blog? And you are Doxxing users? Great culture of Wikipedia! I am not Robot or a media team to add like Forbes or big media affiliate to add multiple links at a time! Please share more doxxing proofs so we can share it on Reddit and other blogs. [[User:AkiraAnastasia12345|AkiraAnastasia12345]] ([[User talk:AkiraAnastasia12345|talk]]) 12:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
::::::::What is Your affiliation with Global Tech Gadgets? [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 13:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::I read that blog, world should ask you first to read or Pin anything?
:::::::::what's your affiliation with Forbes? or big media sites? That you are so desperate to doxx because you can't argue with article quality? have problem with me adding a blog, not problem with content of the source.
:::::::::If someone puts multiple links to their own Media sites, Like Forbes and their affiliates, then you won't find any problem because they are adding Multiple sites there (All are own by same media company)? And I am not Robot or huge media team and browse unique blogs so adding one single site makes me Red Flag? So if I add multiple sites you won't have any problem? [[User:AkiraAnastasia12345|AkiraAnastasia12345]] ([[User talk:AkiraAnastasia12345|talk]]) 13:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
:Just noting that a thread has been started (not in the right place, but such is life) at {{slink|Wikipedia_talk:Administrators'_noticeboard#DOXXING_USERS,_Social_Media}} regarding this issue. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
::Saw it, thank You. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 14:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
== May 2024 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to [[:Left Together]]: you may already know about them, but you might find [[Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace]] useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the [[Wikipedia:sandbox|sandbox]]. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandal]] when they've been previously warned. Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-warn --> [[User:Rahio1234|'''<span style="color:#FF0000;">Rah</span>''']][[User_talk:Rahio1234|'''<span style="color:#0026FF;">io</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Rahio1234|'''<span style="color:#007F0E;">1234</span>''']] 07:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
== Introduction to contentious topics ==
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''Eastern Europe or the Balkans''', a topic designated as '''[[WP:AC/CT|contentious]]'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
*adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
*comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
*follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
*comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
*refrain from gaming the system.
<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks' noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> [[User:Mellk|Mellk]] ([[User talk:Mellk|talk]]) 23:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
== July 2024 ==
Regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&diff=prev&oldid=1237547921 this] edit, you have not edited this article before and made the revert after responding to a dispute with JDiala. Please bear in mind the policy on [[WP:FOLLOWING]]. Thanks. [[User:Mellk|Mellk]] ([[User talk:Mellk|talk]]) 21:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
:Yes, I have issues with this user's POV edits. This user is in my opinion clearly pushing pro-Russian, anti-Ukrainian, anti-NATO and anti-US propaganda. I'm curious what new fallacies will be used each day. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 21:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
::If you believe that the edits are violating the policies and that this is a persistent issue despite telling the editor, please submit a report on [[WP:AE]] or [[WP:ANI]] with diffs to support such statements. [[User:Mellk|Mellk]] ([[User talk:Mellk|talk]]) 21:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
:::My unrequested 2¢: from what I see, Mellk is off base here. YBSOne's use of this editor's contrib history is entirely consistent with P&G. It is not necessary (or advisable) to pursue sanctions on a noticeboard simply because one notices a pattern of tendentious editing. [[User:Generalrelative|Generalrelative]] ([[User talk:Generalrelative|talk]]) 13:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
::::They should not be using the article talk pages to repeatedly make accusations of violating policies and being [[WP:NOTHERE]].[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:War_crimes_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine&diff=prev&oldid=1237010724][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:War_crimes_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine&diff=prev&oldid=1237011574] If said editor is indeed violating policies every day and clearly should not be allowed to edit, as they so often claim, they should go to the relevant noticeboard instead of repeatedly making accusations about conduct, as they have been doing for weeks. This kind of environment is what pushes editors away from taking part, especially in a CT area. [[User:Mellk|Mellk]] ([[User talk:Mellk|talk]]) 15:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
== Thanks and FYI ==
I very much appreciate your thoughtful comments at [[Talk:Kevin MacDonald (evolutionary psychologist)]]. Just FYI I use they/them pronouns. No stress at all, I understand that most generals are dudes :) [[User:Generalrelative|Generalrelative]] ([[User talk:Generalrelative|talk]]) 13:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
:Will do. Thank You. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 14:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
== ANI discussion on your stalking-esque conduct ==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:JDiala|JDiala]] ([[User talk:JDiala|talk]]) 10:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
==Lancia IP vandal==
Just reverted a bunch more edits by the IP vandal; sorry if any of your edits got swept up (feel free to restore as you see fit). I don't even disagree with this person on all points, but they need to be civil and collaborate. <span style="background:#ff0000;font-family:Times New Roman;">[[User:Mr.choppers|<span style="color:#FDEE00;">''' Mr.choppers | '''</span>]][[User talk:Mr.choppers|<span style="color:#FDEE00;">✎ </span>]]</span> 14:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
:Thank you. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 14:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
== ANI discussion ==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[Special:Contributions/223.29.234.202|223.29.234.202]] ([[User talk:223.29.234.202|talk]]) 06:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
== County Durham ==
You have stated in the Ridley Scott article South Shields is within County Durham. Please note neither the County Durham or the South Shield articles suggest this to be acurate. The Countyh Durham map comtained is clearly further South than South Shields.
South Shields is served by the South Tyneside council and is within the South Tyneside boarders, South Tyneside is a Metropolitan borough within Tyne and Wear. [[Special:Contributions/87.114.71.165|87.114.71.165]] ([[User talk:87.114.71.165|talk]]) 18:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
==Tipo/type==
I reckon since "Tipo Tre" is a proper name, it is correct to write Tipo Tre first. Not gonna argue about it, but sleep on it. Best, <span style="background:#ff0000;font-family:Times New Roman;">[[User:Mr.choppers|<span style="color:#FDEE00;">''' Mr.choppers | '''</span>]][[User talk:Mr.choppers|<span style="color:#FDEE00;">✎ </span>]]</span> 00:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
:I alse preffer ''tipos'' but still English should be used. [[User:Ybsone|YBSOne]] ([[User talk:Ybsone#top|talk]]) 11:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1258243549 -->
| |||