Content deleted Content added
Pedigree Query: new section
m Full citation request: Made a minor correction.
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{not around|||15 November 2011}}
[[/Archive 1]]
 
== Ajax Picture ==
Hi. I think you added a picture of the racehorse Ajax to Wikimedia Commons some time ago. The file name is "Ajax in 1838", but the picture is actually from <u>19</u>38. Can you fix that please. Thanks. VirtualDave 14:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 
==DYK for Kennaquhair (horse)==
Line 52 ⟶ 55:
== [[Draft horse showing]] and Australian Draught ==
 
Hi Cg, peek at the above article, someone was removing [[Australian Draught Horse]], claiming it is a fictional breed. This is more in your balliwick than mine, I reverted, but you may wish to watchlist and comment if needed. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 18:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 
== You are now a Reviewer ==
 
[[File:Redaktor Wikipedia 600px.png|right|130px]]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "<tt>{{mono|reviewer<tt>}}" userright, allowing you to to [[WP:Reviewing|review other users' edits]] on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a [[WP:Pending changes|a two-month trial]] at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
 
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not [[wp:autoconfirmed|autoconfirmed]] to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
Line 84 ⟶ 87:
== If you want to... ==
 
I just created a new article to clean up some red links: [[Pickup rider]]. Feel free to go in and tweak for any Australian variants or correct any errors! Also, if you use different terms, please add them and, if you like, create relevant redirects. Thanks! [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 18:20, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 
== HORSE RACING IN AUSTRALIA ==
Line 117 ⟶ 120:
== Question ==
 
Would you be interested in helping out as an admin? You've been around quite a long time, and you're clearly experienced enough to take up sysop activities. The growth in admins lately has been pretty dismal, and though it's not something I usually do, I'd be happy to nominate you at RFA. [[User:Steven Walling|<fontspan style="font-family: Georgia;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</fontspan>]] 18:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
:Awesome! Well I will get going on a nomination and let you know when to jump in. [[User:Steven Walling|<fontspan style="font-family: Georgia;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</fontspan>]] 21:53, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 
<div class="boilerplate metadata plainlinks" id="rfa" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #FFFAEF; border: 1px solid #999999; text-align: left; font-size:95%;">
'''[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]] would like to nominate you to become an administrator.''' Please visit [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship]] to see what this process entails, and then [{{fullurl:User talk:Steven Walling|action=edit&section=new}} contact Steven Walling] to accept or decline the nomination. A page {{#ifexist:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cgoodwin|has been created|will then be created}} for your nomination at '''[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cgoodwin{{#if:|}}]]'''. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.</div><!--- Template:RfA-nom. --->
 
Also, I'd suggest and opt in to the various options for getting a closer look at your edit count per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Nominate#Reminders|the reminders here]]. Cheers, [[User:Steven Walling|<fontspan style="font-family: Georgia;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</fontspan>]] 22:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
:I urge you to answer the new questions on the RfA as soon as possible, as that often makes the difference in how people will vote. '''[[User:Soap|<fontspan colorstyle="color: green;">—</fontspan>]][[User talk:Soap|<fontspan colorstyle="color: #057602;">''Soap''</fontspan>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<fontspan colorstyle="color: green;">—</fontspan>]]''' 18:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 
== RfA toolbox ==
Line 134 ⟶ 137:
{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|Rollbackgiven}}
[[File:Wikipedia Rollback.svg|right|80px]]
I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A{{PAGENAMEU}} granted] rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of ''reverting [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]'', and that you will not abuse it by reverting [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good-faith]] edits or to [[Wikipedia:Edit war|revert-war]]. For information on rollback, see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]] and [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]]. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. '''[[User:NuclearWarfare|<fontb colorstyle="color:navy;">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</fontb>''']] ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk]]</fontspan>]])'' 22:24, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 
== Your RfA ==
 
I'm sorry it's starting to turn this way. I think it's clear enough that you would be willing to learn all these things and take the tools very slowly, but adminship is not a provisional thing, so I guess I can see their argument there. Hope that you will speak with your nominator after the RfA is over to see where you want to go from here. Best, '''[[User:Ceranthor|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#2F4F4F"; face="font-family:Optima;">ceran</fontspan>]]'''[[User_talk:Ceranthor|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#2F4F4F"; face="font-family:Optima;">''thor''</fontspan>]] 19:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
:I have read your RfA and it is clear there are some editors who are trying to yank your chain. Glad to see you are not letting them provoke you. We do need Admins like you. Thanks for making yourself available! - [[User:Ret.Prof|Ret.Prof]] ([[User talk:Ret.Prof|talk]]) 20:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
::Yikes! What a pileon! Hope this isn't getting you down. I'd be spitting tacks about now, which is probably why I don't think I'll ever want to be an admin. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 04:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 
Hello, Cgoodwin. I saw that you left messages at the talk pages of Ceranthor, Ret.Prof and Montanabw, where you seem to be talking about the RfA as being over already. Officially, your RfA is still open and is schedule to run until 08:10, 8 August 2010. If you wish to withdraw the RfA (which, IMO, would be a good idea at this point), the technical way to do that is to post a note at the RfA page itself, directly below your original acceptance note. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 08:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
: {{Edit conflict}} Comment to Nsk92: An RfA can't technically be withdrawn. The users make their decision, whether to support, oppose or be neutral. Then if the user gets a support percentage of all amount of users voting in the RfA after it is closed that is high enough, a [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] will assign the nominated user the administrator privileges. /[[User:Heymid|<span style="color:green;">Hey</span>]][[User_talk:Heymid|<span style="color:red;">'''''Mid'''''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contributions]]) 13:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
::An RfA ''can'' technically be withdrawn by the candidate indicating he wishes for it to end. Then someone uninvolved can close it at that time. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<fontspan colorstyle="color: darkgreen;">日本穣</fontspan>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<fontspan colorstyle="color: blue;">投稿</fontspan>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<fontspan colorstyle="color: maroon;">Join WikiProject Japan</fontspan>]]!</small> 15:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
::: OK. I think I misunderstood him. How does it work when a bureaucrat closes an RfA? /[[User:Heymid|<span style="color:green;">Hey</span>]][[User_talk:Heymid|<span style="color:red;">'''''Mid'''''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contributions]]) 17:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
::::See reply at your talk page, [[User talk:Heymid]]. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 18:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
*Hang in there and keep your chin up. [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/J04n|If at first]] you don't succeed [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/J04n 2|try again]]. Take your time and answer the questions, you will only learn from the experience. <fontspan facestyle="font-family:Century Gothic;">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</fontspan> 13:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 
:* Exactly - [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Excirial My first RFA] was kind of a train wreck as well, but eventually the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Excirial_2 second RFA] went a lot better. I know that a failed RFA can be quite dishearting, especially because the intention the RFA and your edits is certainly positive. Don't let this get you down though! I said it before and i said i'll say it again - you are a fantastic contributer and this RFA is in no way a reflection of your value to Wikipedia.
 
:: Just work a bit as an editor in the administrative related area's such as vandalism and newpage patrol, and get some working experience and affinity with the policies related to them (I can guarantee you that they vary quite a bit from FA related rules, and that there are a lot of details). Once people see that you are knowledgeable in those area's you will breeze trough the next RFA. Or alternatively you might conclude that you don't like the maintenance work, and that you prefer writing article's. Either way, keep in mind that an admin is simply a Wikipedian-style cleaner with a bucket on his head, a mop in his hand and some sponge's under his soles. I know it sounds comical, but it is really quite accurate (In a figurative way). An admin is in no way more important or valuable then any other Wikipedian. [[User:Excirial|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#191970;">'''Excirial''']]</fontspan>]]<sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF8C00;">Contact me</fontspan>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF8C00;">Contribs</fontspan>]])</sup> 20:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
* Sorry to see your RFA fail. I was hoping that you could explain yourself better; you could have gotten my Neutral to turn into Support easily. [[User:Bwrs|Bwrs]] ([[User talk:Bwrs|talk]]) 00:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
:::same here, I voted neutral but that could have easily been a support. There were alot of queries thrown your way. I guess the trick to those is quality in answers over quantity. I hope you decide to run again in the near future. a little bit of tweaking, only a little and you should be fine, just take some time to read what people were looking for and you nail it next time. If you want to join the fight against the vandals there are many editors(myself included) who can teach you a few quick pointers to be up on on your way to build up a bit of experince. Any queries fire away, But do give RFA another shot down the road, youd be a fine admin one day :) [[User:Ottawa4ever|Ottawa4ever]] ([[User talk:Ottawa4ever|talk]]) 08:12, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Line 159 ⟶ 162:
== Your RfA has been closed ==
 
I regret to inform you that [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cgoodwin|your RfA]] has been closed with an indication that [[WP:NOTNOW|now is not the time]]. Please do not let this discourage you, however. Use this as a learning experience and apply the feedback given by those who participated (especially those who opposed or who were neutral). I strongly encourage and recommend that you read and become very familiar with [[Wikipedia:Administrators]], all of the pages listed on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list|the admin reading list]], the [[Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship|guide to requesting adminship]], and the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide|how-to guide]]. After several months, once you have more experience and knowledge under your belt, you may consider running again. Please let me know if you have any questions. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<fontspan colorstyle="color: darkgreen;">日本穣</fontspan>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<fontspan colorstyle="color: blue;">投稿</fontspan>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<fontspan colorstyle="color: maroon;">Join WikiProject Japan</fontspan>]]!</small> 15:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
:Don't give up. Some our best admins (& bureaucrats) have taken 2 or three tries. The good guys must not let them selves be bullied or intimidated. Take Nihonjoe for example. After 4 tries and some nasty [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_bureaucratship/Nihonjoe_4&diff=prev&oldid=327490104nasty false accusations] he prevailed. My only question is how thick is your skin? A fan. - [[User:Ret.Prof|Ret.Prof]] ([[User talk:Ret.Prof|talk]]) 00:47, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
::Though that was running for bureaucratship, not adminship. Just to be clear. :) ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<fontspan colorstyle="color: darkgreen;">日本穣</fontspan>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<fontspan colorstyle="color: blue;">投稿</fontspan>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<fontspan colorstyle="color: maroon;">Join WikiProject Japan</fontspan>]]!</small> 04:47, 4 August 2010 (UTC)***Corrected - [[User:Ret.Prof|Ret.Prof]] ([[User talk:Ret.Prof|talk]]) 03:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
:::I gotta say that after watching this one, I will probably never bother to even try become an admin. If Cg got slammed this hard for having a clean record of NOT engaging in dramas and getting over-involved, someone like myself with a track record is doomed. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 22:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
::::The problem with RfA is that it is the one area where people are basically encouraged to attack other users personally. It's a big issue and a major reason why adminship growth has basically gone the way of the Dodo. [[User:Steven Walling|<fontspan style="font-family: Georgia;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</fontspan>]] 00:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 
== Reflecting on your RfA ==
 
I'm sorry it didn't go well. On one hand, I know it's a little draining and a waste of time you could spend on other things. On the other hand, it's an interesting learning experience and as others have pointed out, it's not uncommon to fail your first RfA (I did!). I would like to say that many of the opposes were of a particularly tiresome strain that has cursed the process lately (I'm talking here about the "doesn't need the tools" junk especially). All in all, it's good not to take it personally, even if RfA is one of the few places were users are encouraged to sound off about your editing with few checks on their behavior or requirements to be courteous. Thank you again for accepting my nomination, [[User:Steven Walling|<fontspan style="font-family: Georgia;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</fontspan>]] 00:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
:I agree with the "doesn't need the tools" junk especially! We have too many 'needy' admins. The truth is that we need people like him. - [[User:Ret.Prof|Ret.Prof]] ([[User talk:Ret.Prof|talk]]) 03:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
::I will simply say this: for Steven to have been so dismissive of comments that this RfA did not offer a clear indication of what you would need admin tools for, going so far as to cite AGF and admonish one user to change his !vote, was a ''huge'' nail in the coffin, right off the bat, as far as I was concerned. For me, it came across as arrogant and certainly hardened my own opposition. He may think it "junk," but this is a widely held view that would have to be properly addressed in any future nomination, I should think. Please feel free to remove this comment if you wish: it's your page. Sorry it didn't work out, [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 18:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
:::I think that the RfA process is very flawed. Basically, regardless of Cg's individual merits, which are substantial, the whole thing feels like what would happen if people let all the grad students piling on a professor seeking tenure! =:-O There's got to be a better way of doing this. I mean, slamblasting someone for AVOIDING AIV and WQAs and ANI? That's a problem! [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 21:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 
== Ring bits ==
 
Cg, can you find a photo of a Tattersall? I've been ripping my hair out (well, once in a while) trying to find a copyright free image of the old ring spades (or, for that matter, a modern spade) with little success. (There is a tack store 60 miles from here that MIGHT have some spades on the rack, but then I have to remember to take the turn off, drive 10 miles off the interstate, sigh, the things I do for wiki...LOL!) Anyway, I appreciate the work you are doing on that article, and thanks! [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 17:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 
== RANDWICK RACECOURSE ==
Line 189 ⟶ 192:
== With ya! ==
 
Just a FYI on the various article renamings and such, my basic position is that I'm with you on Stockman, and I also see your view on having articles (at least, non-stub articles) on Au agriculture named what they are in Au when unique enough, though we may ''also'' need articles about the generic overall worldwide concept (like whatever we wind up naming the Livestock/Animal Unit piece). The trick for me will be figuring out when there is actually something unique (Australian Stock Horse versus generic Stock horses) or if we are just using different words for very similar things (cattle crush/cattle squeeze chute). On that note, I'm not sure if I did the right thing to toss the US roundup stuff into the mustering article; seems the basic outline is pretty similar, but wondering if there is a need to explain the differences more...dunno. Anyway, my point (I have a point, somewhere) is that I think I see where you are coming from and have general supportive feelings even if I spat and argue a bit! ;-) [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 06:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 
:Hm. Both of you might want to review what [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry]] says about meat puppets. [[Special:Contributions/69.3.72.9|69.3.72.9]] ([[User talk:69.3.72.9|talk]]) 17:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 
::69.3.72.9, that is inappropriate. A meatpuppet is when someone goes and recruits a bunch of people, particularly non-previous editors, to dogpile on an article. Here, Cg and I happen to be wiki-acquaintences of long standing, and we don't necessarily agree on every single article, so I wanted to tell Cg that I FULLY SUPPORT Cg's position here. By the way, why don't you log in under you wikipedia ID, because you are clearly an experienced user with a clear interest in disambiguation issues, given your similar behavior at [[ranch]]. [[cowman]], [[ranch foreman]], [[cattle rancher]], [[cattle barron]] (sic), [[stockgrower]], and so on. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 02:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 
:::This was public discussion between users (mostly about ''past'' actions) on topics in which they both already have an interest. Very hard indeed to see how that could reasonably be called meat puppetry: this is a wholly unjustified accusation of two very experienced editors. [[User:Richard New Forest|Richard New Forest]] ([[User talk:Richard New Forest|talk]]) 09:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Line 207 ⟶ 210:
As an aside, I'm very impressed with how the article looks at the moment. I believe you've been the primary contributor there. Nice job! [[User:MarkGallagher|fuddlemark]] ([[User talk:MarkGallagher|befuddle me!]]) 11:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 
::Well, anon 69 got an innocent closer to move the article. I see you did some editing on it. I'm raising a stink that the article was moved without consensus, but if you don't care and think I should back off, I'll take that into consideration. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 00:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 
::: I will leave it all up to to make the calls. It appears that we will lose anyway.[[User:Cgoodwin|Cgoodwin]] ([[User talk:Cgoodwin#top|talk]]) 03:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 
::::I suppose it's a question of choosing one's battles. Sigh. (I suspect this anon user is someone who has previously been blocked for moving articles without consensus.) [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 20:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 
== Not vandalism ==
Line 221 ⟶ 224:
::Okay, for "obvious good faith edit" you may substitute "edit that is not obvious vandalism". Either way, labeling it "vandalism" is, in my opinion, unkind. [[Special:Contributions/69.3.72.249|69.3.72.249]] ([[User talk:69.3.72.249|talk]]) 17:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 
:::It was the second time these changes had been reverted, for one thing. I had to fix their mess the first time. Cg is an experienced editor and the changes were appropriate. And 69.3.72.249, how about you log in under the User name that you clearly must have? It's patently obvious you aren't a newbie, whoever you are. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 20:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 
== Aussie racehorse article ==
Line 229 ⟶ 232:
 
==FYI==
Just an FYI that user 69.3.72.249 just filed an ANI on me. Pretty sure I know who this user actually is, but for now am just looking at their behavior as an anon. Some of this came about from the move discussion at Stockman. You don't have to do anything if you don't care to, but I'm letting you know what's up. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 02:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
:And now they are blocked. Ahhhh... [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 02:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 
==DYK for Encosta De Lago==
Line 250 ⟶ 253:
== Oh great one, cite check request ==
 
That darn bot tagged two Aussie citation with a deadlink tag in the [[Thoroughbred]] article . Sometimes the bot is wrong. Can you check the links and see if they really are dead? If they are, can you find new sources for the same info? If they aren't, can you toss the tags and tell the bot owner to note them as exceptions? (The same bot tagged other non-dead stuff as dead earlier, so I tend to verify their tags before tossing...). Figured you'd be the best person to fix them if they are dead. Hope all else is well with you! [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 02:25, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 
== Glenmorgan, Queensland ==
Line 260 ⟶ 263:
== Interesting reuse of one of your Commons photos ==
 
[http://earth911.com/news/2010/12/09/agritourism-gets-interactive-with-rent-a-cow-programs/ ] See the image credit. That's free licenses at work! :-) [[User:Steven Walling|<fontspan style="font-family: Georgia;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</fontspan>]] 16:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
:I GOTTA figure out a way to make a gig like that work ... people pay you to do manual labor, particularly hauling manure? Oh YESSSS! [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 
== Looking for new request ==
Line 271 ⟶ 274:
== Bulls... ==
 
CG, seems [[bull riding]] is under attack as having an insufficiently global focus. Can you add anything there about Australian variants? [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 10:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 
:Please edit as required.[[User:Cgoodwin|Cgoodwin]] ([[User talk:Cgoodwin#top|talk]]) 02:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 
::Thanks for what you added! Much appreciated! [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 00:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 
==Lamb fry/fries==
Line 282 ⟶ 285:
::There are other editors involved here. I suggest that this is taken to the relative talk pages. I think that we have some type of oysters along these lines, too. Can't remember the name though. Have seen too many testicles lying in the dirt, not my type of food! [[User:Cgoodwin|Cgoodwin]] ([[User talk:Cgoodwin#top|talk]]) 02:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 
:I was just lurking, but don't forget [[calf fries]] aka [[Rocky Mountain Oysters]]! LOL! [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 00:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 
== Question ==
Line 295 ⟶ 298:
== Saddle motherlode ==
 
FYI, we have a new WPEQ person who rebuilds saddles and uploaded a bunch of saddle photos, some showing innards and some showing Aussie saddles. Could have fun with these! [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 17:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 
== More separation by a common language ;-) ==
 
Cg, my handy horsey dictionary (published in the USA) claims that the term "hack" is used in Australia to mean "to present, exhibit or compete, as in a horse show." Aside from the really awkward wording, it is true? I'm going to be putting a little bit of sourceing into [[hack (horse)]] and if you could check that and fix my errors in Au uses of the term, I'd be grateful! Thanks. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 
== Bits ==
 
Just a thanks for the cleanup of the bit stuff. A lot of the tack articles were originally created around 2006 or so by User:Eventer, who was a nice person but not around much any more. She was helpful to me when I came on, but also in those days it was more OK to just write stuff without sources and there was a lot more tolerance of "how to" content. So there's a lot of that in the equipment articles. Usually, any article with a lot of "shoulds" in it is one of Eventer's old ones. I cleaned up a lot of them with general wordsmithing and such but most I haven't looked at most of them real closely in years. (That one now-banned editor who used to drive me so nuts sort of targeted the tack articles and I just got tired of going down that road, I guess) [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 04:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 
On a different note, we are going to have to sort out the stuff on nickel bit mouthpieces. Over here, they are considered cheap throwaway bits and less desirable than steel, but I note that my Henderson book (I don't have the Edwards book) states that the metal is softer which on one hand is probably why it's less desired here, but the book notes the same properties also may make them more palatable to the horse. Interesting. Curious your thoughts on the matter. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 04:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 
:The only solid nickel bits that I have had anything to with are the old, now rare solid nickel bits, as in the Kimblewick, maybe a driving bit plus some stirrups. Many years ago SN was used in the production of irons and bits. In irons it was prone to bending and could prove dangerous in a fall. Many bits and irons were also made of steel and had a shiny chrome or nickel coat that peeled and the metal underneath rusted. Stainless steel was very expensive when it first came here, but is now much cheaper. Modern SS bits sometimes have about 8% nickel content that is claimed to add strength and durability. I recently read though that nickel is now more expensive in bits than SS, but I suspect that this would not be referring to SN as it is not now available here in new bits. It is all a bit confusing. [[User:Cgoodwin|Cgoodwin]] ([[User talk:Cgoodwin#top|talk]]) 05:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 
::But your explanation makes sense to me. I'll probably have to see if there are any manufacturers of nickel equipment here. It is spoken of, but I know that people keep old stuff around forever too. I've heard the bit about stirrups, I've heard some rumbles that the issue is over stuff manufactured n east Asia. We also, for some reason, have a tack-making industry operated out of some prisons too, must be a holdover from old times. Both are viewed as sources of cheap, shoddy tack. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 05:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 
==Warning for false labelling as vandalism==
Line 330 ⟶ 333:
== New article ==
 
Hi Cg, I finally created [[stock contractor]]. Feel free to trot over and expand, add in needed stuff, etc., particularly from the Au viewpoint. I swiped one of your sources, by the way. ;-) [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 19:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 
== Dogwood Crossing WikiAcademy ==
Line 370 ⟶ 373:
== FYI ==
 
A RfC has been filed by JLAN on this issue. Your input would be helpful as you have an Australian perspective: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Equine#RFC:_what_units_should_be_used_for_horse_and_pony_heights.3F]]. [[User:Montanabw|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">Montanabw</fontspan>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 18:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 
==Take a look, please before reverting==
Line 382 ⟶ 385:
== Version of this in Australia? ==
 
Please feel free to make [[Cow-calf operation]] less US-centric. Thanks, <fontspan style="font-family:Palatino, Georgia, serif;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[User talk:Steven Walling|<span style="color: #8080b0">talk</span>]]</fontspan> 05:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 
== CycadGorge.jpg ==
Line 395 ⟶ 398:
 
Thanks for pointing out the problems with Pedigree Query in your edit of [[New Approach]]. I see now that you already flagged this up on the project discussion page. I think the database is probably 99.9% accurate (<200 errors in 1.2 million entries), but if users can just tinker around with it (a bit like wikipedia?), I see that we can't use it for reference. I am working through the articles I have created (list on my user page), replacing the PQ references. [[User:Tigerboy1966|Tigerboy1966]] ([[User talk:Tigerboy1966|talk]]) 23:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 
== Thanks for Assessment- help needed! ==
 
Thank you for assessing the [[New Approach]] article, your comments were very encouraging. Unfortunately, all the other articles I have been working on have been asssessed at START class so now I'm thoroughly puzzled. As the user who assessed them went through them at a rate of about one article a minute (I've checked the times) I assume that I must be doing something obviously wrong. Sorry to bother you about this, but could you take a look and see what the problem is? [[User:Tigerboy1966|Tigerboy1966]] ([[User talk:Tigerboy1966|talk]]) 02:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
:it's OK, I've done major rewrites now. btw on the PQ issue, you were so right. According to the site, [[Mumtaz Mahal (horse)]] wasn't a proper Tb- try it![[User:Tigerboy1966|Tigerboy1966]] ([[User talk:Tigerboy1966|talk]]) 12:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 
== Alamshar and the Manual of Style ==
 
Thanks for improvements to [[Alamshar]]. I have been having a look at the MoS and I can see that I tend to be a bit heavy on the Capital Letters (or capital letters), and that I need to write the dates in WP style. At the moment I'm working on expanding stubs, for example [[Daylami]], [[Dubai Millennium]], [[Falbrav]] etc[[User:Tigerboy1966|Tigerboy1966]] ([[User talk:Tigerboy1966|talk]]) 08:58, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 
== Daylami ==
 
Thanks for correcting date format on the [[Daylami]] article. I am hoping to put this article forward for GA assessment soon, although I am going to test the water first with [[Fantastic Light]]. The rationale for this is that I'm more likely to hit the right tone when I'm writing about a horse that I have no strong feelings about- I am a bit of a Daylami fanboy.[[User:Tigerboy1966|Tigerboy1966]] ([[User talk:Tigerboy1966|talk]]) 11:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 
== Bathurst Meetup ==
 
Hi again Cgoodwin. We have a meetup at Bathurst this Sunday and it would be great if you could attend. We have attendees from across the state. [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Bathurst]]. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 11:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 
== Cheers! ==
 
[[File:Glass of Jamesons.jpg|thumb|left|50px]]Thanks for adding the detail on [[Fantastic Light]]'s Australian stud career.
 
You'll be pleased to know that it's passed GA.[[User:Tigerboy1966|Tigerboy1966]] ([[User talk:Tigerboy1966|talk]]) 18:05, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 
==Village Kid==
 
I see that there is a link to Village Kid on the Miracle Mile article. It links to the pop group. I can't find any article relating to the harness horse Village Kid. I guess the best way forward is to start a new one under Village Kid(horse). :) [[User:Wallie|Wallie]] ([[User talk:Wallie|talk]]) 07:14, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 
==[[A D Hollindale Stakes]]==
Concerning the chronilogical ordering of past winners, I would refer you to the following message which I posted on your talk page on 14 April 2011. I would appreciate a reply.
 
With reference to your recent edits on Chronological ordering, whilst accepting that there is a ''guideline'' for earliest to latest chronological ordering, the default ordering for all Australian, American and Canadian past race winners is the reverse order. In my opinion this has developed because the most recent results are the more likely to be the subject of a query from the general public. This is illustrated by the method used in British races, which takes the most recent 30 - 40 years results and puts them at the top of the list but in earliest to latest order. The overall result is complete mishmash, and also does not follow the ''guideline''.
To get another perspective on this please take a look at [[Wikipedia:What_%22Ignore_all_rules%22_means|What "Ignore all rules" means]] and in particular the following points: ''Don't follow written instructions mindlessly; Rules derive their power to compel not from being written down on a page labeled "guideline" or "policy", but from being a reflection of the shared opinions and practices of many editors; and To apply a rule to the letter, rigidly, unquestioningly, in cases where it fits and in cases where it does not fit, is pedantry...'' Could I appeal to you to not change the order for Australian races. I do not see how it improves the articles and could develop into a controversial issue on the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Thoroughbred_racing|Thorougbred Project]].[[User:Cuddy Wifter|Cuddy Wifter]] ([[User talk:Cuddy Wifter|talk]]) 03:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
[[User:Cuddy Wifter|Cuddy Wifter]] ([[User talk:Cuddy Wifter|talk]]) 04:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 
::The MOS very clearly states that, and I quote "Chronological lists, including all timelines and lists of works, should be in earliest-to-latest chronological order. Special cases which specifically require frequent daily additions, such as Deaths in 2010, may use reverse chronological order for temporary convenience, although these articles should revert to non-reverse order when the article has stabilized, such as Deaths in 2003." It is quite ridiculous that the chronological order is changed twice in consecutive parts of the A D Hollindale Stakes, as it was. [[User:Cgoodwin|Cgoodwin]] ([[User talk:Cgoodwin#top|talk]]) 02:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 
==New Page Patrol survey==
{| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
| [[Image:NPPbarnstar.jpg|right|70px]]
<big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big>
----
Hello {{PAGENAME}}! The [[WP:WMF|WMF]] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
*If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
*If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
'''Please click [https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9RSKYC9 HERE] to take part.'''<br>
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
----
<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Survey|NPP Survey]]</small>
|}
 
== Progeny Lists ==
 
I would like your opinion on using bulleted lists for the progeny of Tb racehorses- see [[Darshaan]], [[Nureyev (horse)|Nureyev]], [[Bois Roussel]] etc. Would these be better as prose with just 3 or 4 examples? Do we need to have "grandsire" sections?
 
Also thanks for contributing the image to Bois Roussel. The article looks tons better than it did three days ago. Do check out the 1938 Derby newsreel link I added if you get the chance, it's a pretty spectacular performance. [[User:Tigerboy1966|Tigerboy1966]] ([[User talk:Tigerboy1966|talk]]) 14:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 
:WP MOS accepts the use of bulleted lists for children, and the progeny of horses. Longer lists are easier to follow in this manner. Where the important daughters of stallions have produced winners that have contributed to these horses being leading BM sires I think that it is important to name them. I have deleted "b." as this is the standard abbreviation for bay and in these cases it is unlikely that this is so. I hope to be able to add more images of the earlier horses if possble.[[User:Cgoodwin|Cgoodwin]] ([[User talk:Cgoodwin#top|talk]]) 01:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 
== Poseidon ( Horse ) Edit ==
 
Hi,Cgoodwin
Have uploaded to Commons under Horse racing in Australia an original 1906 photo of Poseidon
As a major contributor to this article thought I would leave the edit decision to you
Many Thanks
[[User:LESHAIGH|LESHAIGH]] ([[User talk:LESHAIGH|talk]]) 04:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 
== Au and UK and US English and horse stuff ==
 
Trying to clean up several articles with possible merges into a catchall now called [[equestrian facility]] until we cook up something better. Definitely need an Aussie on board here! [[User:Montanabw|<span style="color:#006600;">Montanabw</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 
== Hydronymy ==
 
I am interested in hydronymy as it looks the language of prehistoric Europe is reflected therein. I left a message on the wikiproject rivers talkpage, just looking for editors with similar interests to exchange information. I have discovered the so called old european hydronymy is not limited to Europe but has many correspondences in Iran, India and furhter away so I think this disproves the current scholarly etymological interpretations. Presently I am trying to research Bengal and Burma.[[User:Aldrasto11|Aldrasto11]] ([[User talk:Aldrasto11|talk]]) 10:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 
==Wikipedia trainers requested in New South Wales==
[[File:Wikimedia Australia.svg|right|100px]]
[[wmau:Wikimedia Australia|Wikimedia Australia]] is looking for experienced Wikipedians to help out at training sessions across New South Wales, in particular in Newcastle, Wollongong, Port Macquarie and in Parkes. If you're interested, the details are at the following link:
 
*http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaau-l/2013-July/003677.html
 
We'd love to see you there! [[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]])</sup> 13:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 
== Image use in academic journal ==
 
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Merino ewe judging.JPG|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Image use in academic journal'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I would like to use your image in a print journal. Can you get back to me about signing a copyright agreement? Thanks [[User:Lsharkey|Lsharkey]] ([[User talk:Lsharkey|talk]]) 15:11, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
|}
 
== Pound or Lira? ==
 
Hi, in April 2009 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nearco&diff=290453172&oldid=285306773 you added] the following line to [[Nearco]]: ''“In England Nearco sired the winners of 657½ races worth ₤501,665.”'' That fact that you used the [[Lira]] sign ₤ instead of the [[pound sign]] £ confused me a bit. Is it really Lira, or is this a typo? --[[User:Bender235|bender235]] ([[User talk:Bender235|talk]]) 16:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 
:CG hasn't edited in a long time, but as I know this user is an Aussie, I'm pretty comfortable saying that pounds was intended. ;-) [[User:Montanabw|<span style="color:#006600;">Montanabw</span>]][[User talk:Montanabw|<sup style="color:purple;">(talk)</sup>]] 02:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 
== New Challenge for Oceania and Australia ==
 
Hi, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge]] are up and running based on [[Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge]] which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon|The Africa Destubathon]], which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ser_Amantio_di_Nicolao/sandbox&oldid=751209197 -->
 
== Fair Use in Australia discussion ==
 
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of ''Fair Use'' into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place [[Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board#Fair_Use_campaign_-_Next_steps|at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board]], please read the proposal and comment there. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 
<small>This message has been automatically sent to all users in [[:Category:Australian Wikipedians]]. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to [[:Category:Opted-out of message delivery]]</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Lankiveil@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Australian_Wikipedians -->
 
== Brumby page ==
 
Hello, can you please come to the Brumby page and have a look and give some suggestions. I was called to the page myself due and asked to mediate a better term than ferial, as we have a Federal judge that in a ruling has eluded to the fact that this label is a little misleading and I tend to agree as it can give a narrative that a could lead to its mistreatment. His term that he has chosen is Brumby [[User:Shenqijing|Shenqijing]] ([[User talk:Shenqijing|talk]]) 09:17, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 
== Full citation request ==
 
Greetings and felicitations. I realize that you have not made any edits to Wikipedia in thirteen years, but just in case you are still there: You [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Poll_Dorset&action=history created] the article [[Poll Dorset]], with the referenced book ''The Land Stock Types'', which is also used in three other articles (copy and paste: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aen.wikipedia.org+"The+Land+Stock+Types"). I've added as much bibliographic information to it as I've been able to find, but I'm hoping you can fill in the author, publication date, and ISBN (if there is one). The publisher was apparently bought out about two decades ago, so there seems to be little point in contacting the successor company, and no copies are to be found in WorldCat, the Internet Archive, Google Books, or via BookFinder.com. I hope you can help. —[[User:DocWatson42|DocWatson42]] ([[User talk:DocWatson42|talk]]) 04:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)