Direct Selling Association: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
cut repeat info
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|U.S.-based national trade association}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2024}}
{{Infobox organization
| name = Direct Selling Association
Line 78 ⟶ 80:
| footnotes =
}}
The '''Direct Selling Association''' ('''DSA''') is a [[trade association]] in the United States that represents [[direct selling]] companies, primarily those that use [[multi-level marketing]] compensation plans. On behalf of its members' companies, the DSA engages in [[public relations]] and [[lobbying]] efforts against regulation of the multi-level marketing industry, and it funds political candidates through a [[political action committee]].<ref name=NCAHF>{{cite web|last=Barrett|first=Stephen|title=Consumer Health Digest #11-39|url=http://www.ncahf.org/digest11/11-39.html|publisher=National Council Against Health Fraud|accessdate=June 16, 2012}}</ref><ref name=klein>{{cite news|last=Klein|first=Karen E.|title=The Multibillion-Dollar Direct-Selling Industry Dodges the FTC|url=http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-16/the-multibillion-dollar-direct-selling-industry-dodges-the-ftc#p1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120419122915/http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-16/the-multibillion-dollar-direct-selling-industry-dodges-the-ftc#p1|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 19, 2012|accessdate=June 16, 2012|newspaper=[[Bloomberg News]]|date=April 16, 2012}}</ref><ref name=CAI>{{cite web| last=Taylor| first=Jon M.| title=Direct Selling Association (DSA) vs. Consumers| url=http://mlm-thetruth.com/legal/legal/dsa-vs-cons/| publisher=Consumers Awareness Institute| accessdate=2012-06-17| url-status=dead| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120613215210/http://mlm-thetruth.com/legal/legal/dsa-vs-cons| archivedate=2012-06-13}}</ref>
 
==History in the US==
The American DSA, headquartered in Washington, D.C., is the national [[trade association]] of a group of firms that manufacture and distribute goods and services sold directly to consumers typically through social selling that includes a compensation model called multi -level marketing.
 
Founded in [[Binghamton, New York]] in 1910 as a trade group for [[door-to-door]] salesmen, the association was originally called the Agents Credit Association. It was renamed the National Association of Agency Companies (NAAC) in 1914, and briefly renamed the National Association of Agency and Mail Order Companies in 1917, before returning to the NAAC in 1920. It became the Direct Selling Association in 1968.<ref>{{cite web|title=History - Direct Selling Association (US)|url=http://www.dsa.org/about-dsa/history-of-dsa |publisher=Direct Selling Association (US)|accessdate=21 December 2014}}</ref> As of 1970, less than 5% of the DSA's members were multi-level marketing companies. By 2018, the DSA's membership had grown to include nearly 130 companies, more than 90% of which were multi-level marketing companies.<ref name=number/>
Line 94 ⟶ 96:
 
==Political lobbying==
The DSA serves as a [[public relations]] and [[lobbying group]] acting on behalf of its member companies.<ref name=NCAHF>{{cite web|last=Barrett|first=Stephen|title=Consumer Health Digest #11-39|url=http://www.ncahf.org/digest11/11-39.html|publisher=National Council Against Health Fraud|accessdate=June 16, 2012}}</ref><ref name=CAI>{{cite web| last=Taylor| first=Jon M.| title=Direct Selling Association (DSA) vs. Consumers| url=http://mlm-thetruth.com/legal/legal/dsa-vs-cons/| publisher=Consumers Awareness Institute| accessdate=2012-06-17| url-status=dead| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120613215210/http://mlm-thetruth.com/legal/legal/dsa-vs-cons| archivedate=2012-06-13}}</ref> The DSA played a role in petitioning the [[Federal Trade Commission|Federal Trade Commission (FTC)]] to exempt multi-level marketing companies from [[consumer protection]] regulations outlined in the FTC's 2006 proposed Business Opportunity Rule, encouraging people to write 17,000 form letters complaining about the rule from 2006 to 2008.<ref name=klein>{{cite news|last=Klein|first=Karen E.|title=The Multibillion-Dollar Direct-Selling Industry Dodges the FTC|url=http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-16/the-multibillion-dollar-direct-selling-industry-dodges-the-ftc#p1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120419122915/http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-16/the-multibillion-dollar-direct-selling-industry-dodges-the-ftc#p1|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 19, 2012|accessdate=June 16, 2012|newspaper=[[Bloomberg News]]|date=April 16, 2012}}</ref><ref name=stroud/><ref>{{cite news|last1=Greenberg|first1=Herb|authorlink1=Herb Greenberg|title=How Multi-Level Marketers Dodged a Bullet|url=https://www.cnbc.com/id2013/10036045601/09/how-multilevel-marketers-dodged-a-bullet.html|accessdateaccess-date=31 July 2015|work=CNBC|date=9 January 2013}}</ref> The law was passed in 2012, with most multi-level marketing companies considered exempt.<ref name=stroud>{{cite news|last1=Stroud|first1=Matt|title=How lobbying dollars prop up pyramid schemes|url=https://www.theverge.com/2014/4/8/5590550/alleged-pyramid-schemes-lobbying-ftc|accessdate=31 July 2015|work=The Verge|date=8 April 2014}}</ref>
 
The DSA supported and allegedly drafted much of the language of the "Anti-Pyramid Promotional Scheme Act" introduced by US Representative [[Marsha Blackburn]], and an amendment to the US House of Representatives' omnibus Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill for fiscal year 2018 by US Representative [[John Moolenaar]] that would have limited the ability of the FTC and other agencies to classify companies as pyramid schemes and to investigate whether MLMs are pyramid schemes.<ref name="Kosman2017">{{cite news|last1=Kosman|first1=John|title=DeVos' family seeks deregulation of Amway so it can beat Herbalife|url=https://nypost.com/2017/09/18/devos-family-seeks-deregulation-of-amway-so-it-can-beat-herbalife/|accessdate=6 May 2018|work=[[New York Post]]|date=18 September 2017}}</ref><ref name="Gingerich2017">{{cite news|last1=Gingerich|first1=Jon|title=Pyramid Scheme Protection Law Pits Legal Group Against Multilevel Marketers|url=http://www.odwyerpr.com/story/public/9601/2017-10-20/pyramid-scheme-protection-law-pits-legal-group-against-multilevel-marketers.html|accessdate=6 May 2018|work=O'Dwyer's: The Inside News of PR & Marketing Communications|date=20 October 2017}}</ref> The amendment would have disbarred the Treasury Department, the Judiciary Department, the Small Business Administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FTC, or any other agencies from using any monies to take enforcement actions against pyramid operations for the fiscal year.<ref name="Gingerich2017"/> The Act would blur the lines between legitimate MLM activity and pyramid schemes established under the original 1979 FTC case by deeming sales made to people inside the company as sales to an “ultimate user,” thus erasing the key distinction made in the ruling between sales to actual consumers of a product and sales made to members of the MLM network that are used for recruitment of additional members or to qualify for commissions.<ref name="NCL2018">{{cite news|last1=NCL Communications|title=Public interest groups' letter to Congress in opposition of Moolenaar pyramid scheme rider|url=http://www.nclnet.org/congress_moolenaar_letter|accessdate=6 May 2018|publisher=[[National Consumers League]]|date=March 2018}}</ref><ref name="Gingerich2017"/><ref name="VanderNatTINA">{{cite web|last1=Vander Nat|first1=Peter|title=Why This Anti-Pyramid Scheme Bill is Outrageously Wrong for Consumers|date=23 May 2016|url=https://www.truthinadvertising.org/why-hr-5230-is-wrong/|publisher=[[Truth in Advertising (organization)|Truth in Advertising (TINA.org)]]|accessdate=6 May 2018}}</ref> The amendment was opposed by a coalition of consumer interest groups including [[Consumer Action]], the [[Consumer Federation of America]], [[Consumers Union]] (the publisher of ''[[Consumer Reports]]'' magazine), [[Consumer Watchdog]], the [[National Consumers League]], and the [[Public Interest Research Group|United States Public Interest Research Group]] (US PIRG),<ref name="NCL2018"/> as well as [[Truth in Advertising (organization)|Truth in Advertising (TINA.org)]] in its original incarnation.<ref name="VanderNatTINA"/>
 
The DSA also funds political candidates through its [[political action committee]].<ref name=Blaze>{{cite news|title=Direct Selling Association Political Action Committee PAC - Qualified 2012 Committee |url=http://fec-committee-contributions.theblaze.com/l/11665/Direct-Selling-Association-Political-Action-Committee |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130203191116/http://fec-committee-contributions.theblaze.com/l/11665/Direct-Selling-Association-Political-Action-Committee |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 3, 2013 |accessdate=June 16, 2012 |newspaper=The Blaze }}</ref>
 
==Pyramid schemes==
The DSA has said that [[pyramid scheme]]s which disguise themselves as direct selling companies have caused confusion in the industry.<ref name=spotting>{{cite news|last1=Greenberg|first1=Herb|last2=Frayter|first2=Karina|title=Why Spotting a Pyramid Scheme Isn't So Easy|url=https://www.cnbc.com/id2013/10036448401/09/why-spotting-a-pyramid-scheme-isnt-so-easy.html|accessdateaccess-date=31 July 2015|work=CNBC|date=9 January 2013}}</ref> In 2013, [[Tupperware]] left the DSA citing industry changes and concerns over pyramid schemes.<ref name=splits>{{cite news|last1=Ehrenfreund|first1=Max|title=Avon splits with trade group, citing risk of pyramid schemes|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/09/16/avon-splits-with-trade-group-citing-risk-of-pyramid-schemes/|accessdate=31 July 2015|worknewspaper=Washington Post|date=16 September 2014}}</ref> In 2014, [[Avon Products|Avon]] (a founding member) left the DSA citing that its bylaws were inadequate in protecting consumers from fraud. News reports have connected Avon's quitting to pyramid scheme allegations against DSA member [[Herbalife]], which was under investigation by the [[Federal Trade Commission|FTC]] at the time,<ref name=splits/><ref name=cbsavon/><ref>{{cite news|last1=Smith|first1=Ernie|title=It's Not Me, It's You: Why Avon Left an Association it Helped Found|url=http://associationsnow.com/2014/09/avon-left-association-helped-found/|accessdate=31 July 2015|work=Associations Now|date=19 September 2014}}</ref> and has now been ordered agreed to pay two hundred million dollars in a settlement.<ref name="reuters.com">{{cite web |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-herbalife-probe-ftc-idUSKCN0ZV1F7|title=Herbalife settles pyramid scheme case with regulator, in blow to Pershing's Ackman|date=15 July 2016|publisher=[[Reuters]]|accessdate=15 July 2016}}</ref> The DSA made a statement that they would look at Avon's concerns.<ref name=cbsavon>{{cite news|last1=Berr|first1=Jonathan|title=Why Avon quit direct-sales group|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-behind-avons-surprising-decision-to-quit-trade-group/|accessdate=31 July 2015|agency=CBS News}}</ref>
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
<references/>
 
==External links==
* [http://www.dsa.org/ Direct Selling Association] US
** [http://www.directselling411.com/ DSA Consumer Website]
 
[[Category:Direct selling]]
[[Category:Multi-level marketing companies]]
[[Category:Trade associations based in the United States]]