Revision as of 17:04, 1 March 2021 view source Mathglot (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 84,121 edits →‎Wikipedia:Citing sources: Have at it. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:11, 1 March 2021 view source Adam9007 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 65,750 edits →‎Wikipedia:Citing sources: Replying to Mathglot (using reply-link) Next edit →
Line 104: I won't revert again at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], so you have free rein at the guideline afaic if you want to declare a dispute that doesn't exist. If you want to discuss at Talk, discuss. You don't need an Rfc to show that there is no dispute about this point, but suit yourself. Happy editing! [[User:Mathglot\|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot\|talk]]) 17:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC) :{{u\|Mathglot}}, Well, it contradicts [[WP:BLPPROD]] (which is policy). They can't both be right, surely? [[User:Adam9007\|Adam9007]] ([[User talk:Adam9007#top\|talk]]) 17:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Adam9007