Content deleted Content added
→Fringe Theory: You have uncovered my Evil Plan. BWAAHAHAHAHAHA! |
|||
Line 720:
::It is in response to your repeated advocacy of a fringe theory in general, and your removal of "Other sources have concluded that [carbon nanotubes] will never be strong enough"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=998245187] from the article in particular. Which was, I might add, a change to the article -- and not a good one. Feel free to stop pushing your fringe theory and other editors will stop disagreeing with you. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 19:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
:::So you are saying this section is not intended to improve the article in any way? That's exactly what WP:NOTFORUM is about. You are the one who keeps restarting this discussion for no reason. From my side this was done in January. --[[User:Mfb|mfb]] ([[User talk:Mfb|talk]]) 23:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
::::<nowiki><</nowiki>sarcasm<nowiki>></nowiki> That's right. Responding to someone who has, with both talk page comments and edits, been trying to get their fringe theory into the article against consensus is a clear violation of Wikipedia's rules. The person ''pushing'' the fringe POV isn't doing anything wrong of course. Only those who ''disagree'' are violating FORUM. I admit it. You have uncovered my [https://zapatopi.net/blackhelicopters/ Evil Plan]. BWAAHAHAHAHAHA! You clearly should report me to [[WP:ANI]]. At the very least I should be blocked for daring to disagree with you.<nowiki></</nowiki>sarcasm<nowiki>></nowiki>
::::'''This will be my last response to you.''' Free clue: in general, the best way to stop discussing something involves not discussing it. Discussing it at length while claiming you were done discussing it last January, not so much. I'm just saying. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 01:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
| |||