Content deleted Content added
SMcCandlish (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 270:
:::::::{{re|SMcCandlish}} This thread ''is'' meant to be an RFC about a specific draft. For any such draft RFC to work, indeed we need some feedback and "editorial suggestions". (That would also apply to any future draft.) ''So feedback is what is needed now.'' So far, this draft has had more positive feedback than the drafts of Krakkos in the previous RFC. The only criticism about my draft so far is from Krakkos who suggests my draft should have more footnotes. (Berig disagrees with the whole aim of shortening the origins discussions. That is not a criticism specific to any draft.)--[[User:Andrew Lancaster|Andrew Lancaster]] ([[User talk:Andrew Lancaster|talk]]) 12:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
::::::::This is far too much meta-discussion about my own input/viewpoint. I'm not in control of this discussion or any processes. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 16:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
:::::::::{{re|SMcCandlish}}, I can't really follow these occasional remarks, but the fact is that this RFC is now at a point where simple feedback (positive and/or negative) about the proposed draft is what would be most helpful. --[[User:Andrew Lancaster|Andrew Lancaster]] ([[User talk:Andrew Lancaster|talk]]) 20:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
:Well, maybe one step towards simplification would be to do the change to the lead if there is a consensus or no objections. <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
| |||