Content deleted Content added
Ozzie10aaaa (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Cn}} Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 49:
===Workings===
There are also differences in the way codes work. For example, the ''ICN'' (the code for algae, fungi and plants) forbids [[tautonym]]s, while the ''ICZN'', (the animal code) allows them.{{cn|date=June 2024}}
===Terminology===
These codes differ in terminology, and there is a long-term project to "harmonize" this. For instance, the ''ICN'' uses "valid" in "valid publication of a name" (=the act of publishing a formal name), with "establishing a name" as the ''ICZN'' equivalent. The ''ICZN'' uses "valid" in "valid name" (="correct name"), with "correct name" as the ''ICN'' equivalent. Harmonization is making very limited progress.{{cn|date=June 2024}}
===Types===
Line 71:
Some [[protist]]s, sometimes called '''ambiregnal protists''', have been considered to be both [[protozoa]] and [[algae]], or [[protozoa]] and [[fungi]], and names for these have been published under either or both of the ''ICZN'' and the ''ICN''.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Corliss |first=J. O. |date=1995 |title=The ambiregnal protists and the codes of nomenclature: A brief review of the problem and of proposed solutions |journal=Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature |volume=52 |pages=11–17 |url= http://biostor.org/reference/2636 |doi=10.5962/bhl.part.6717 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{harv|McNeill et al. 2012|loc=Preamble: 8|ref=McNeill}}</ref> The resulting double language throughout protist classification schemes resulted in confusion.<ref>Adl, S. M. et al. Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists. ''Systematic Biology'', p. 684-689, 2007, [https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20110331223739/http://myweb.dal.ca/jmarchib/2007.Adl.Syst.biol.pdf].</ref><ref>Elbrächter, M. et al. Establishing an Agenda for Calcareous Dinoflagellates Research (Thoracosphaeraceae, Dinophyceae) including a nomenclatural synopsis of generic names. ''Taxon'' 57, p. 1289–1303, 2008, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/27756780?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents]</ref><ref name="auto">{{harv|Lahr et al. 2012|ref=Lahr}}</ref>
Groups claimed by both [[protozoologist]]s and [[phycologist]]s include [[euglenid]]s, [[dinoflagellate]]s, [[cryptomonad]]s, [[haptophyte]]s, [[glaucophyte]]s, many [[heterokont]]s (e.g., [[chrysophyte]]s, [[raphidophyte]]s, [[silicoflagellate]]s, some [[xanthophyte]]s, [[proteromonad]]s), some monadoid [[green algae]] ([[Volvocales|volvocaleans]] and [[prasinophyte]]s), [[choanoflagellate]]s, [[bicosoecid]]s, [[ebriid]]s and [[chlorarachniophyte]]s.{{cn|date=June 2024}}
[[Slime mold]]s, [[plasmodial]] forms and other "[[Fungus#Fungus-like organisms|fungus-like]]" organisms claimed by both protozoologists and [[mycologist]]s include [[mycetozoan]]s, [[plasmodiophorid]]s, [[acrasid]]s, and [[labyrinthulomycetes]]s. [[fungus|Fungi]] claimed by both protozoologists and [[mycologist]]s include [[chytrid]]s, [[Blastocladiomycota|blastoclads]], and the [[Neocallimastigomycota|gut fungi]].{{cn|date=June 2024}}
Other problematic groups are the [[Cyanobacteria]] (ICNP/ICN) and [[Microsporidia]] (ICZN/ICN).{{cn|date=June 2024}}
==Unregulated taxa==
| |||