Revision as of 15:53, 28 September 2024 edit Horse Eye's Back (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 48,161 edits →‎Should the entire British press be deprecated? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:03, 28 September 2024 edit undo Jayen466 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 56,336 edits →‎RFC Jewish Chronicle: Moving !vote by User:Genabab to the appropriate section Next edit →
Line 119: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_452#The_Jewish_Chronicle RFCbefore], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_337#Jewish_Chronicle Previous RFC] [[User:Selfstudier\|Selfstudier]] ([[User talk:Selfstudier\|talk]]) 09:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC) :'''Option 2 in General. Option 3 for issues relating to Palestine and the war in Gaza''' Its bias is very clear and overt. But as other editors have pointed out, this does not necessarily mean it deserves depreciation. However, depreciation and considering a source unreliable on a single topic are two very different things. For the same reason why editors are rightfully sceptical of Pro-Russian sources reporting on the war in Ukraine, it is best to be consistent and also treat with some scepticism the reliability of the Jewish Chronicle when dealing with Gaza and issues related to Palestine. [[User:Genabab\|Genabab]] ([[User talk:Genabab\|talk]]) 15:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)▼ ===Note (Jewish Chronicle)=== Line 275 ⟶ 273: ::::The concerns about ownership etc. are voiced in the British and Israeli mainstream press, across the political spectrum. ::::Using the Jewish Chronicle for WP:A/I/PIA coverage after this episode is not my idea of due diligence. "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." If they sort their operation out, we can always revisit. Regards, [[User:Jayen466\|Andreas]] <small>[[User_Talk:Jayen466\|<span style="color: #FFBF00;">JN</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Jayen466\|466]]</small> 16:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC) ▲:*'''Option 2 in General. Option 3 for issues relating to Palestine and the war in Gaza''' Its bias is very clear and overt. But as other editors have pointed out, this does not necessarily mean it deserves depreciation. However, depreciation and considering a source unreliable on a single topic are two very different things. For the same reason why editors are rightfully sceptical of Pro-Russian sources reporting on the war in Ukraine, it is best to be consistent and also treat with some scepticism the reliability of the Jewish Chronicle when dealing with Gaza and issues related to Palestine. [[User:Genabab\|Genabab]] ([[User talk:Genabab\|talk]]) 15:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC) ===Discussion (Jewish Chronicle)===

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions