Traumnovelle

::Thanks for clarifying. To comply with [[WP:V]], it is not necessary immediately the matter is identified, to remove all unsourced statements in a section contributed to by multiple historic editors and that covered subjects other than the commercial activity that irritated you. That you removed the citation needed tags on others contributions I added as per the policy, and again sections not relating to potential self serving issues in a non selective manner, before any other editor could reasonably take action is disruptive. It was not clear to me by your initial brief edit note why such a large removal of text occurred and this is why I did not do a more selective initial restore. Now you have clarified the specific and implied that you do not wish to contribute to the improvement of a recreational section in the article, I am in a better position to improve the article if others do not, which has a greater probability, as by your last action, you made the issues at hand invisible to all who do not have the page on their watchlist. The essays [[H:RV]] and [[WP:CON]] can be helpful as editors gain more experience in applying policy in ways that time has shown is most productive for the wikipedia community and its audience. [[User:ChaseKiwi|ChaseKiwi]] ([[User talk:ChaseKiwi|talk]]) 08:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

:::Content is required to be sourced to being with, the policies are quite clear on this. If you want to re-add with sourced content then go ahead but there is no policy based reason to restore unsourced content. [[User:Traumnovelle|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle#top|talk]]) 08:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)