Content deleted Content added
Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) →see also: followup |
|||
Line 552:
:::::If you can put the parallels in the '''text''' of the article, with reliable sources, then the wikilink would belong. As a {{tl|seealso}}, it's misleading. As it stands, I believe [http://books.google.com/books?id=VEO0rtx9VIMC&pg=PA272&dq=%22Operation+Northwoods%22+911+OR+%22september+11%22#v=onepage&q=%22Operation%20Northwoods%22%20911%20OR%20%22september%2011%22&f=false] is an acceptable reference for the text. (But please use a reference to the actual book, rather than to google books.) It's still not related to any actual [[9/11]] '''theeories''', but it might then belong in the article. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 15:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
:::::::can you then word it in a way you think it's appropriate and relevant for the article? thanks. [[Special:Contributions/93.86.164.168|93.86.164.168]] ([[User talk:93.86.164.168|talk]]) 15:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
| |||