Content deleted Content added
Glenfarclas (talk | contribs) AfD nomination of Traité didactique de la Plume. (TW) |
→Oragenitalism: reply |
||
Line 383:
::Several articles have been blanked as copyright problems because their contents are almost entirely quotation. These are problematic for the same reason above. They are [[Flying Fuck (sexual technique)]], [[Diligence de Lyon (sexual technique)]], [[32 Positions]], and [[Bowling-Hold (sexual technique)]]. If these are not rewritten, they may be revised or deleted after seven days. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 22:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
:::I've responded to your note at [[Talk:Trip around the world (sexual technique)]]. However, since your question has broader implications, I wanted to reply here as well. For material to be presumed public domain in the United States, the laws of which govern Wikipedia, it must have been published before 1923. Otherwise, you must prove that copyright has lapsed, which can be a difficult procedure. See [[Wikipedia:Public domain]]. I'm afraid that a 1969 publication can by no means be presumed to be public domain. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Bagh-i-Muattar]]==
| |||