Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 92.229.234.19 - "" |
|||
Line 15:
[[User:Aflazmn|Aflazmn]] ([[User talk:Aflazmn|talk]]) 04:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
: this is just confusion about how people think of it. If you have TV in only the pitch direction, then you can vector the thrust up or down, so that the potential areas where the exhaust goes describes a 2-D plane. Even though there's only one actual dimension the nozzle can move through. The thrust direction becomes a "vector" in that 2-d plane. 3D thrust vectoring is when the nozzle can move in both pitch and yaw, so that the exhaust can go anywhere in a 3D cone behind it. Someone was really confused about this and listed su30mki and su-35 as 2D thrust-vectored. They're 3D. I'm pretty sure the MiG29OVT is also. I'm fixing this for the sukhois right now.[[Special:Contributions/75.170.64.63|75.170.64.63]] ([[User talk:75.170.64.63|talk]]) 20:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
I read the part about the SU-30, quoting "dynamic aerobatics in negative speeds up to 200 km/h". What is the meaning of 'negative speeds' up to 200 km/h?
| |||