Talk:Frank Gambale: Difference between revisions

Actually out of all of this, I would reccommend that we leave the instrumental rock out. The music that he plays is not rock. I mean it is absolutely not rock! It's called jazz fusion. I'm still on with leaving the instrumental rock in (just because you'll put it back in nomatter what), but I know the best choice would be to just leave it out. Frank Gambale is Jazz Fusion! He is not instrumental rock, not even close! I've listened to progressive rock and jazz fusion. Yes there may be some similarities, but that's because it's fusion! Fusion is jazz+ rock. IT IS REDUNDANT TO PUT INSTRUMENTAL ROCK WITH JAZZ FUSION UNLESS YOU ARE SPECIFYING THAT IT REPRESENTS THE ROCKIER SPECTRUM OF FUSION (JEFF BECK); IN GAMBALE'S CASE HE IS IN THE JAZZIER AND MIDDLE PART OF FUSION. All we really need to put down is fusion. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.68.229.73|99.68.229.73]] ([[User talk:99.68.229.73|talk]]) 05:55, 7 July 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->