Content deleted Content added
m →Untitled: reply |
Riverstones (talk | contribs) →Deletion of Autogynephilia (paraphilia): new section |
||
Line 120:
why was my musician article deleted that band is relevant and has a cause <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Yhon4|Yhon4]] ([[User talk:Yhon4|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yhon4|contribs]]) 04:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Hi there Yhon4. Please see [[User:Nancy/Why?]]. Best, [[User:Nancy|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#FF6600;font-size:14px">Nancy</span>]][[User talk:Nancy|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;font-size:14px"><sup> talk</sup></span>]] 07:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
== Deletion of [[Autogynephilia (paraphilia)]] ==
No, this topic is ''not'' covered at [[Blanchard, Bailey and Lawrence theory]]. The creation of the article is meant to address the very paraphilia that is ''not'' described by BBL taxonomy. BBL taxonomy is a (highly controversial) way of differentiating transsexual women by sexual orientation. The mere presence of autogynephilia (a man's tendency toward sexual arousal at the thought or image of himself as a woman) does not imply that the person's behavior must be viewed in this way. The paraphilia exists separately from this trio's controversial views about it, just as [[Autoandrophilia]] does. The term exists in the DSM, not in BBL's Big Book O' Ideas. Please reverse. [[User:Riverstones|Riverstones]] ([[User talk:Riverstones|talk]]) 11:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
| |||