Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: new section |
|||
Line 502:
::: Hi David. You accused me of: "improperly using sources to support my views on the use of Kendrick units." You still did not back up this accusation by showing me exactly what you mean. I have no idea where I should have done this. I asked for an explanation of your accusation, but only got vague answers. I did not get any answer to my last question above. How do we continue? [[User:Kehrli|Kehrli]] ([[User talk:Kehrli|talk]]) 10:42, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
:::: Hi David. Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately you now open a whole new can of worms. I do not very well understand the arbitration process, but as far as I can see in my arbitration case [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kehrli_2#Kehrli|there is only one accusation]]. It goes like this:
::::: "Kehrli has improperly used sources to support his views on the use of Kendrick units."
:::: I have to assume this is the reason for which you banned me. However, instead of indicating to me where in the article I did "improperly use sources" you now come up with a list of new accusations which are actually old accusations that I countered before. I will be glad to show you again why these additional accusations are not true, but I hope you will understand that first I would like investigate the main accusation for which I was banned and which was written by you. Please also note that this accusation was not even mentioned in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kehrli_2/Workshop#Proposals_by_User:David_Fuchs|Workshop]] and that therefore I did not even have the chance to give my opinion about it. So let's stick to the issue of improperly using sources and please show me where in the article I did this. Once this accusation is off the table we can address the next one. You will see that none of it will stick and that in fact Murray was disruptive by renaming an article that I started without discussion to a new name that is 1) nowhere defined, 2) is a jargon term of a minority, and 3) does not make sense in the framework of metrology. [[User:Kehrli|Kehrli]] ([[User talk:Kehrli|talk]]) 09:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
== ''The Signpost'': 16 May 2011 ==
| |||