Talk:Thrust vectoring: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Nozzles section: added suggestion
Line 60:
 
::Whether it stays here or is moved it can be improved. I don't think it needs sources from a verifiability POV because it is not going to be challenged as it is standard propulsion engineering. I think it needs some sources to give the inquisitive reader places to go to learn in a more interesting context. As a first step in translating/enhancing this section I have selected one definition, which, as it stands, doesn't match the painful precision typical in this section. I have reworded it and added a good cite to test the water.[[User:Pieter1963|Pieter1963]] ([[User talk:Pieter1963|talk]]) 02:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:::It is nothing to do with thrust vectoring, it is a quite different aspect of nozzle technology. It must surely already be treated better in the relevant article/s. IMHO it should just be deleted. — Cheers, [[User:Steelpillow|Steelpillow]] ([[User Talk:Steelpillow|Talk]]) 09:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)