Revision as of 15:17, 5 October 2018 edit Rameezraja001 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,810 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:22, 5 October 2018 edit undo Rameezraja001 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,810 edits →Bullshit article hijacked by european nationalists Next edit →
Line 86: 6) needs to mention the kali yuga and that prominent indian mathematician aryabhatta calculated kali yuga date as 3102 BC which predates the 1500 BC aryan migration notion 7) scholars who have established indus seals with the event of kali yuga. 8) mention that max muller who proposed aryan dating of 1500 BC was a christian evangelist who believed earth was created in 4000 BC so far i see so many aryanists contribution and editing and this article seem oto be exhibiting very aryanist and european nationalist views, it needs to accomodate the second view as well. This article seem to be deliberately destorting and presenting twited one sided european nationalist view of the indian history. The entire article seems to be propagating aryanist author views, without any evidence of archaeological proofs, where are the views of Mark kenoyer etc on cemetry H culture and the swat grave culture etc? seems like any contrary views are not being accomodated in this article.

Talk:Historical Vedic religion: Difference between revisions