Content deleted Content added
→Life Sciences / Biology. Stop edit war!: stop it yourself |
health ecologist is the correct and appropriate summary of his fields. Plant scientist is not appropriate. He has 2 qualifications in life sciences and many international publications in health ecology |
||
Line 50:
Btw. Neither does he critizise vaccines nor is he against vaccination. He only critizises the shortening, in his words: "telescoping", of safety procedures.)--[[Special:Contributions/217.149.168.16|217.149.168.16]] ([[User talk:217.149.168.16|talk]]) 07:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
:Why don't you stick on the facts? Stop biasing the article with your POV asap. thx. BTW: Arvay has never studied biology. --[[User:Julius Senegal|Julius Senegal]] ([[User talk:Julius Senegal|talk]]) 10:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
:: The '''facts''' are:
:: Arvay qualified in two subjects of ''life sciences'' (landscape ecology and plant science)
:: his work is centered on ecology&health (see his books and research gate profile)
:: "Plant scientist" is an inadmissibly simplified identification to summarize his fields. "Health ecologist" is the adequate and correct identification in summary. (The details are anyway listed in the curriculum vitae below.)
:: This is not my "POV". As linked above, several experts even confirmed that he should be identified as a biologist, including an English confirmation. But you don´t even want to accept the health ecologist.
Please stop the attempts of inappropriate labelling in the intro.--[[Special:Contributions/213.225.35.57|213.225.35.57]] ([[User talk:213.225.35.57|talk]]) 12:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
| |||