Talk:Anti-aging product
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Efficacy
A Consumer Reports study has shown anti-wrinkle creams don't offer much improvement to the skin. After 12 weeks, the best products were only able to reduce the average depth of wrinkles by 10% - a barely visible change to the naked eye. Source - [1]The Australian Newspaper
I have no idea what Boslowox is and havent been able to find any reference to it apart from in articles that seem to have copied this wikipedia entry. If anyone has a good reference, they can put it back in. Halon8 (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Open Source Anti-Aging Cream
I have developed, tested and published an open source anti-aging cream. (this link doesn't work, and the company doesn't seem to have anything to do with creams) http://ronja.twibright.com:8080/retune/ I would like to discuss if it's appropriate to put a link to this creme into the Anti-aging creme article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clocktwibright (talk • contribs) 16:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Do not. What you propose would be considered original research, which is not allowed at Wikipedia. David notMD (talk) 23:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Merge proposal
I propose to merge Anti-aging supplements into Anti-aging cream. I think that the content in the shorter and less referenced Anti-aging supplements article can easily be explained in the context of Anti-aging cream. My reasoning is that Anti-aging supplements is mistitled, as supplements are orally consumed products, whereas the article deals only with topically applied products, i.e., creams. Four of the seven refs in the supplements article are already in the cream article. Lastly, there are in theory anti-aging supplements which are proposed to slow or reverse all aspects of aging (for example, antioxidants), not just skin, but that is not the content of the supplements article.
Per Wikipedia:Merging, unless contested, this merger will proceed in one week's time. David notMD (talk) 22:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support – appears to be a WP:CONTENTFORK, as I can't see any daylight between this and Anti-aging supplements. Mathglot (talk) 00:19, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support. "Supplements" is a misnomer anyway as it suggests oral products as opposed to topical ones. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 06:07, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Listed at: WT:WikiProject Fashion, WT:WikiProject Health and fitness, WT:WikiProject Pharmacology. Mathglot (talk) 00:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support and comment. The current content of Anti-aging supplements belongs in Anti-aging cream. There could be a new article on anti-aging supplements that expands on Life extension#Diets and supplements. WP:SPINOFF --Isabela31 (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies, this fell off my 'to-do' list. David notMD (talk) 03:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support I would also recommend merging both pages to a new title Anti-aging product. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- This is a great idea! I fully support the merger as well LashyLady (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC)