UzbukUdash

Joined 7 January 2015

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vinegarymass911 (talk | contribs) at 13:35, 5 September 2023 (Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH 0.9.1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
UzbukUdash (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UzbukUdash (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

dont understand the reason, im not using any kind of VPN service, Please reconsider me and allow me to contribute to Wikipedia. im here for more than five years and continuously giving my time to update data unconditionaly Parbon (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Please only have one open unblock request at a time. Z1720 (talk) 16:54, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

Hello, Parbon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply


Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Profile.jpeg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Profile.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar Pramanik (March 8)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by StraussInTheHouse were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SITH (talk) 12:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Parbon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 12:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of CHAYACHABI Film Festival

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CHAYACHABI Film Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Manoj Pramanik

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manoj Pramanik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 12:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Film Poster Iti Tomari Dhaka.jpg

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Zonayed Saki for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zonayed Saki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zonayed Saki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 21:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Manoj Kumar Pramanik

 

Hello, Parbon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Manoj Kumar Pramanik.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Film Poster Iti Tomari Dhaka.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Film Poster Iti Tomari Dhaka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

About [[1]]

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Manoj_Kumar_Pramanik a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Manoj Kumar Pramanik. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. NagalimNE (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of OTTA Orchestra

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on OTTA Orchestra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://losslessclub.com/artist/OTTA-Orchestra. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 18:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar Pramanik (January 20)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar Pramanik (May 29)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 00:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar Pramanik (June 23)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vinegarymass911 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

unblocking IP

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UzbukUdash (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

dont understand the reason, im not using any kind of VPN service, Please reconsider me and allow me to contribute to Wikipedia. im here for more than five years and continuously giving my time to update data unconditionaly Parbon (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You have not given your IP address, so I cannot assess whether the VPN block is valid. In your next request, please give your IP address, or if you are uncomfortable with doing so, please contact the CheckUser team.

More generally, if you are using an Apple device, check to see if Apple Private Relay is enabled; this is a VPN but many people do not realize it. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zakir Hossain Raju (August 10)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Zakir Hossain Raju has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zakir Hossain Raju. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Is this person the same as Jakir Hossain Raju, or are they two Bangladeshi filmmakers with the same name? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
They are two different filmmakers with the same name but slightly different spelling. This confusion makes it necessary for this article to be on Wikipedia's main space, so that people can get accurate information about these two directors. Here, Im dropping my talk page comment of Draft_talk:Zakir_Hossain_Raju. Please Review @Robert McClenon to solve this confusion/matter.
Two Bangladeshi Directors - Zakir Hossain Raju and Jakir Hossain Raju are indivisual person[edit] ==
Bangladeshi two film directors with remarkably similar names, Zakir Hossain Raju (i was trying to develop the draft and clear the confusion, but one of the reviewers not getting the facts.) He is renowned globally as an Art House Documentary director, Cinema Scholar, festival Jury member, University professor, accomplished author, and esteemed researcher, earning him an esteemed international reputation. In contrast, Jakir Hossain Raju (already has a article about him on Wikipedia) operates on the local front as a prolific commercial filmmaker, contributing to the vibrant world of mainstream cinema in Bangladesh.
please review if possible and make this article live, that will help people get concreate information about these two directors. Parbon (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zakir Hossain Raju (September 5)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply