Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 August 26

After removing redirects this template only has 2 entries, with 1 of them up for deletion. There is not much point having a navbox for 2 entries, which might end up being 1. LibStar (talk) 23:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Restore the Broken

Template:Restore the Broken (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The subject, the band Restore the Broken, is apparently not notable, failed WP:BAND, and its article was deleted. The only blue links in this navbox are Christian standard covers and the related link to Christian music. DB1729^talk 22:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The template makes no sense if it doesn't have an article to go in. None of the linked songs are known because this band covered them; they're not mentioned under any of the links, nor do any of them lead to singers the template indicates are/were in the band. P Aculeius (talk) 13:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scottish musicians

Template:Scottish musicians (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not based on anything. Sahaib (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no idea what the inclusion criteria actually is, and a huge percentage of the contents are groups/bands not musicians against what is implied by the title. Not to mention they're categorised by decade, but there are people who were active prior to those decades included in different ones (for instance Twin Atlantic is in the 2010s to present, but started in 2007. And Susan Boyle also in 2010s, but her moment of fame was in 2008/9.) Canterbury Tail talk 20:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. The inclusion criteria is musicians of Scotland. Titus Gold (talk) 21:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Inclusion criteria is too broad. See Category:Scottish musicians. --DB1729^talk 22:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too broad of a list. Gonnym (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Veertien Mie

Template:Veertien Mie (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a useful navbox. Mostly red links while the few blue links merely point back to the subject article or in one case, the eponymous category, itself not particularly useful. DB1729^talk 14:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Template:WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:WikiProject Pakistan has switches for provincial wiki project banners. This template is not needed, no other Pakistani provincial WP has a separate banner template, if we take an example of WP India, same is true there as well. This is a prematurely created template and should be deleted. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 12:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a standlone project it's valid for it to have a project banner. I'd personally send Wikipedia:WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to MfD as a dead project with zero activity instead of merging anything. If it really needs to exist, then it should still be sent to MfD to convert it to a task force (but with no activity, there is really no point). Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stratovolcanoes

Template:Stratovolcanoes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navbox does not have clear inclusion criteria. According to a petscan search that goes just two levels deep from Category:Stratovolcanoes, more than 1,000 articles could justifiably be listed here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Acceleration teams

Template:Acceleration teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Navbox with no links in the body after all of the linked articles in it were deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen symbol

Template:All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen symbol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Image with no transclusions or documentation. Created in 2023. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is basically just an icon. The image is still available for whatever usages. Gonnym (talk) 07:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox acceleration team

Template:Infobox acceleration team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2014. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MLB Team Maps (1964)

Template:MLB Team Maps (1964) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, template documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in early 2024. There are about thirty of these unused maps. They should either be used or deleted. If this discussion is closed as delete, I'll be happy to nominate the others, but I'd rather not bother Spesh531 with thirty nominations yet. See this discussion on the creator's talk page for some background. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So when these were made, I initially added them to all the MLB season pages. Due to how the standings tables were formatted at the time, there were large empty gaps in the page due to the maps. Given the updated standings table format, adding maps does not involve adding large empty gaps... so I've re-added the maps via WP:BOLD. I get the feeling some (or all) the map templates will be removed, but in the meantime, all thirty or so unused maps are now being used (again). Spesh531^{(talk, contrib., ext.)} 04:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it is now used, again. However, if this or others from this set are removed once again, I'd be extremely opposed to it being re-added again to any article to save it from deletion. If the community does not want it, then it does not want it. Gonnym (talk) 07:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]