HubertSchuf
Hello, HubertSchuf, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Infineon Technologies. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the hint, I expected a check of the article later on, so that when the Draft is being accepted the change will be accepted as well.
- But we can surely remove that link. HubertSchuf (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Chief Digital Transformation Officer (May 3)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chief Digital Transformation Officer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, HubertSchuf!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Your draft article, Draft:Chief Digital Transformation Officer
Hello, HubertSchuf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chief Digital Transformation Officer".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Rudeness and personal attacks
You need to stop posting rudeness on other users' talkpages, as here and here. Also, your input on article talkpages frequently lacks civility, as here (one of many rude posts). Please have a read of the policy Wikipedia:No personal attacks and improve the way you speak to people or you're likely to be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 19:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC).
- First of all, the users haven't read my argumentation at all and tried to deviate from the topic, including off-topic comments.
- After checking the linked posts, nothing in there is rude. It's a matter of fact and discussion on subject. What exactly is "rude"?
- There is no personal attack by describing what happened. As shown below, I muted MrOllie for that. HubertSchuf (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Pointing out that others should read is not "lacking civility", it's quite the opposite, pointing others to re-read instead of staying at a superficial level and going into off-topic or saying "nah it does not matter" without considering what someone says.
- If that's promoted by the English Wikipedia the world is doomed. HubertSchuf (talk) 19:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Muted @MrOllie
User ignores or does not read core argumentation, then gets told that, and confuses it with harassment. Later user resorted to spam the discussions tab with off-topic personal matters. Due to toxicity and non-sense user is being muted. HubertSchuf (talk) 19:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's interesting. How do you mute somebody on Wikipedia? Also, did you fail to notice my warning just above before you posted those attacks? You are on extremely thin ice now. Bishonen | tålk 19:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC).
- @Bishonen
- I replied to your "warning" afterwards (you haven't declared it as warning).
- You can mute someone on the right side of the profile
- For example for me: Special:Mute/HubertSchuf HubertSchuf (talk) 19:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Bishonen
Blocked
Oh, you can mute e-mails and notifications, sure. Has Mr Ollie been inundating you with such? Per your comment above, you stand by the nasty aspersions in this section ("spam", "toxicity and non-sense") despite seeing my warning. You have been blocked for 48 hours for egregious personal attacks. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 19:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC).
- Exactly. Muted E-Mails and Notif. I wish I could just hide that person's profile entirely. Would be easier.
- The person clearly said and refused themselves that they won't read because my saying would be "irrelevant". See here: "I decline to fill this page with a paraphrase of your irrelevancies" by that person Talk:Big Pharma conspiracy theories#c-MrOllie-20240920184800-HubertSchuf-20240920184500 To just later scream about the tiny comment (that was kept very superficial and non-insulting) on the profile page, after deleting it from their profile page.
- Person kept saying "I read it" but obviously did not read it as the person not once went into the discussion, unlike the other person.
- Only after that I drew the conclusion that the person is indeed spamming, trolling, toxic and I do not think that nonsense was related to it but fine then that too.
- In my opinion that is not a reason to block me for making that informed assessment, especially when your warning (which I had not seen until that point, and that was not declared as "warning") was related to rudeness, which you haven't explained yet.
- Thank you. HubertSchuf (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I like also to add, that the user tries to paint it in a certain way, as they have threatened here: Talk:Big Pharma conspiracy theories#c-MrOllie-20240920185200-MrOllie-20240920185100 HubertSchuf (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Bishonen but thanks for your administrative work anyways :) requested the unblock like recommended HubertSchuf (talk) 19:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Unblock request
HubertSchuf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=There is no repeated personal attack, as there was none in the first place. On the other hand you ask me how to mute someone, and then continued to straight forward block me. I do not understand why you warn me, if the others do not read what someone writes or fail to stay on topic, and I am muting them for that, yet alone the comments page in the profile is precisely for acknowledging that. Furthermore I would like to know what you perceive as rude, for me there is nothing rude in it. [[User:HubertSchuf|HubertSchuf]] ([[User talk:HubertSchuf#top|talk]]) 19:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=There is no repeated personal attack, as there was none in the first place. On the other hand you ask me how to mute someone, and then continued to straight forward block me. I do not understand why you warn me, if the others do not read what someone writes or fail to stay on topic, and I am muting them for that, yet alone the comments page in the profile is precisely for acknowledging that. Furthermore I would like to know what you perceive as rude, for me there is nothing rude in it. [[User:HubertSchuf|HubertSchuf]] ([[User talk:HubertSchuf#top|talk]]) 19:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=There is no repeated personal attack, as there was none in the first place. On the other hand you ask me how to mute someone, and then continued to straight forward block me. I do not understand why you warn me, if the others do not read what someone writes or fail to stay on topic, and I am muting them for that, yet alone the comments page in the profile is precisely for acknowledging that. Furthermore I would like to know what you perceive as rude, for me there is nothing rude in it. [[User:HubertSchuf|HubertSchuf]] ([[User talk:HubertSchuf#top|talk]]) 19:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
HubertSchuf (talk) 19:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I suspect the problem is that you think, for example, that claiming someone "doesn't read" is a statement of a fact, when instead it is an unfounded accusation, one which you have been repeating all over the place. If someone disagrees with you, you seem to think that's proof that they are wrong and incapable of understanding your rightness. I'm not here to get into a discussion with you, I'm just here to let you know that if you refuse to change that attitude, then another admin is going to come along and block you forever. The way you are acting now, you are not welcome here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
"Furthermore I would like to know what you perceive as rude, for me there is nothing rude in it."
I actually quote some of it in the block notice itself: "spam", "toxicity and non-sense". Previously, in the warning, I provided three diffs. They'll probably be helpful to the reviewing admin; I'm sorry they're not helpful to you. Bishonen | tålk 19:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC).- also "troll" (somewhere inside that part of the talk page I just hatted). Floquenbeam (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)