Talk:Private (rank)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Additional information:
/
	This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

Australia Unassessed

	Australia portal Private (rank) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Moved discussion

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The discussion here, which should be about the rank of private, was discussion about private (disambig page), incorrectly redirected here. I did a cut-and-paste to Talk:Private. --SigPig 03:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Removed statement about pay for US Army Privates. Current salary pay is available from http://www.dod.mil/militarypay/pay/bp/paytables/jan2007_basicpay.html . The removed figure was close to the actual current pay for an E-1, but not an exact match. Privates also recieve allowances for living expenses, which was not mentioned in the statement I removed. Erall 08:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Netherlands Section

I have expanded the Netherlands section based on the Dutch equivalent page. Should anyone wish to edit this, feel free, and should someone believe that the notice should now be removed, it is up to them.

PV1 and PV2

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Is there actually any (current) source for the use of PV1? This question has led to a bit of an edit war here. --rimshots^talk 14:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here's a 2000 document that uses PV1

Jecowa 15:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, good reply. --rimshots^talk 21:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply