TerminalPreppie

Joined 14 December 2004

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ewnnrj (talk | contribs) at 02:51, 8 May 2009 (Re.: deleted article: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ewnnrj in topic Re.: deleted article

Orphaned non-free media (File:Utah grizzlies ahl 200x200.png)

  Thanks for uploading File:Utah grizzlies ahl 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

P. K. Subban

Hello Ccwaters. To answer your question, on the history page, the page creation diffs begin with "Created page with" in the edit summary. -- Samir 07:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sayre Metro Area

Hi Ccwaters!

I see you put a deletion tag on the page I created Sayre Metro Area I obtained the information on the page from the following link, I would love to have the page stay on. Also just so you know the actual name of the Valley IS the Penn-York Valley, It has a 'nickname' of "The Valley".

Sayre Metro Area Info Link

Thanks --Johshandlesmand332ffs (talk) 01:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC) (Mike K)Reply

CBJ/OTT trade draft pick

Looks like I just ass/u/med that one. I should know better. Skudrafan1 (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

TSN reported it as a 2009 pick about a minute after I removed the date from the transactions page. :) Skudrafan1 (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Pimpjuices

For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. In the case of a category like this one, parent categories are provided automatically when you include a {{Sockpuppet category}} template.

Note that I am a human being, not a bot. You may contact me if you have questions. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 23:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your recent post at Talk:University of Maine violates WP:Civility

Brevity does not make it otherwise. It has been noted for future reference. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I think he was being politer than necessary. And _now_ who's making threats?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

CC, perhaps you and some colleagues could take at Mervyn Emrys' recent postings on the University of Maine talk page. I'm seriously concerned for some of my fellow Wikipedians, as this guy clearly is bring a knife to something that could easily be ajudicated fairly following Wikipedia rules. He's like trying to erase the word "flagship" from existence.--76.179.60.206 (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not so. By all means use the "flagship" metaphor, silly as it may be, but use it correctly following WP:NPOV. Is that really so much to ask? Mervyn Emrys (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Faked warning templates

Actually, that one was directed at me, as far as I can tell, responding to my "politer than necessary" comment.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC):Reply

Ah... ccwaters (talk) 16:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Actually, if you are referring to the warning above this section, it refers to User:CCwaters use of WP:Lame on the University of Maine article page, which is not a Wikipedia policy as I understand it, and placing it where he/she did seemed a poor attempt at humor (that is the generous interpretation). You might also notice I have edited constructively on all the University of Maine System pages, not just the Orono page, which really was of little interest to me at the time. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ah, my mistake. Sorry about that; the timing of the messages confused me.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Laing

You said: "Hi. I too find the Laing situation puzzling. I actually bumped into your off-wiki inquiries about it. I think your most recent solution of taking him off the template completely is definitely not the way to go. He's on the roster in some capacity, as i don't see any transactions indicating movement (IR or reassignment) [1] [2] . I also wouldn't use the Caps site roster page as the authoritative source in the matter: I routinely update the league roster templates and the Caps is routinely lacking on updates and injuries."

Yeah, I wasn't using the roster on the Caps' site, which tends to be terrible. When I said he's not on the one given to the media I meant the one in Friday's Game Notes e-mail. That one tends to be a lot more reliable in my experience than either their site or the NHL's page. Hopefully it will clear up this week. We certainly know he's not going to be playing until next season, that's for sure. 1995hoo (talk) 23:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reverting my userpage last week

Appreciate the attention. :-)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Toronto marlies 200x200.png)

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Toronto marlies 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Manchester monarchs 200x200.png)

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Manchester monarchs 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Portland pirates 200x200.png)

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Portland pirates 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Providence bruins 200x200.png)

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Providence bruins 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Springfield falcons 200x200.png)

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Springfield falcons 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Worcester sharks 200x200.png)

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Worcester sharks 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I copy that!

Good thing you let me know that, because some others was ready to go ;) Kalel2007 (talk) 14:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wilkes-barre scranton penguins 200x200.png)

  Thanks for uploading File:Wilkes-barre scranton penguins 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Syracuse crunch 200x200.png)

  Thanks for uploading File:Syracuse crunch 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Peoria rivermen 200x200.png)

  Thanks for uploading File:Peoria rivermen 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Craig MacTavish

My edit to Craig MacTavish's page is NOT vandalism. MacTavish pled guilty to vehicular homicide. This fact is fully documented and sourced, even on his wikipedia page. Categorizing him with Canadian murderers is accurate and not inappropriate. [[Wfredmason (talk) 20:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)]]Reply

Hey

i was just wondering why you removed my edit and reported it as vandalim, this incedent actually happened i invite you to verify my story by searching it on Google™ or some other search engine that yo uprefer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oktumblechamp (talkcontribs) 18:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I guess you are referring to [1] back in January? The burden of proof is on you and if you do find reliable sources its still not in anyway notable or encyclopedic. ccwaters (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Texas Stars

No, just a hockey fan here in Central Texas.--Txhockey (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Philadelphia phantoms 200x200.png)

  Thanks for uploading File:Philadelphia phantoms 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re.: deleted article

An article listed under the name of a regional writer ("E.J.W.") has been deleted. That's OK by me. Judging from what is left of the discussion concerning it, I take it the assumption was that it was autobiography. It was not. The author was someone I know who misguidedly thought to be paying a compliment. The person named in the title of that article happens to be a very private person these days and wholly disapproves of public exposure related to article, title, or, now, author of deleted article. (I also completely reject his editing "contributions" to the article on Rochester NY.) This is posted to you, because I tried to delete the title of that article from the tag discussion and was directed to you. I am also posting to LtPowers who made the autobiography charge explicit, and will post it to MBisanz when he returns from vacation. Thank you. Ewnnrj (talk) 02:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply