Dan Brouthers has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 24, 2008. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 03:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
pronunciation
BROO-therz, not BRUDH-erz? And with the th of tooth? kwami 01:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dan Brouthers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- Looks good and well-written. A couple of the references (hickoksports, tripod.com, geocities.com - I'm not familiar with thebaseballpage.com) look like less-than-reliable personal web pages but none of the info from them seems controversial. A more exhaustive search through Google Book Search could probably glean the same information. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you reviewing the article, I will check out the information I pulled from these websites and see if it essential article information. At least with Hickok, I've used quite a bit for other articles.Neonblak (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I've removed the information and references for Hickok and Tripod, but I have not been able to find the same information used from that geocities website. It appears to be well done with good research, and I hesitate to remove the information, as it gives good context of his career in relations to the other sluggers of his era.Neonblak (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've also removed thebaseballpage.com info for the reasons you stated, but I am unable to find the same information that geocities.com page illustrates. Your call on that, but seems pretty reliable, but also scarce.Neonblak (talk) 23:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I've removed the information and references for Hickok and Tripod, but I have not been able to find the same information used from that geocities website. It appears to be well done with good research, and I hesitate to remove the information, as it gives good context of his career in relations to the other sluggers of his era.Neonblak (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)